Quotes! 09-JUN-2007
CSMA_Moderator
Fact: Snit has put up more posts in a 2-3 year period than the top 2 or 3
*ALL TIME* posters in csma... "the VAST MAJORITY of Snit's posts" during
this time period have NOTHING to do with Mac advocacy.
Snit: "It is easy: you are claiming that your view of group consensus equals
reality when it comes to a view you believe (but cannot support), but you
run from group consensus when that consensus is extremely powerful."
Fact is most csma posters have noticed that Snit is different. Many cola
posters have noticed too. Here is what nearly 100 different posters have to
say about him.
--------- (DIS)HONORABLE MENTIONS ---------
New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense of
humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of time,
and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool. Then you
revel in wallowing in your own filth."
Muahman/Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the
USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative attention. We
will read about him in the news some day soon going on a shooting rampage.
Somebody should get the pychopath some help before he VT's a bunch of
people. "
Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst troll
this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've almost
destroyed this group single-handedly.
For you to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries
about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest
stunts you've pulled.
It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at
all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you."
Elizabot: "Well, he's a floater and sometimes you have to flush a couple of
times to get him down. "
George Graves "Of course, we also have Snit on "our side" and that's a big
minus on any list. But then Snit would be an extreme disadvantage anywhere
on earth. It just so happens that he's here, and the rest of us apologize
profusely for that :->"
John Slade: "Snit is not a virus, he/she is a loon."
Mike Dee: "The only known virus for the Mac OS is the Snit virus. Thankfully
I have learnt to keep my Mac Snit free and clean."
PC Guy: "You're inability to hold a good discussion is evidenced by the fac
that Mac and PC users find you annoying. "
Tim Adams: "watch snit continue to re-write what was written. It's so much
fun."
----------- CSMA_MODERATOR'S ALL TIME FAVORITES! -----------
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you, and
a bot will send an e-mail.
*That* is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's that
fucked in the head and starved for attention that he'd claim it to be an
e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get sucked into his little circus.
The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably originate from
Sandman.net."
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour and
not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave too.
Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have never
made the same wish of him."
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you are
flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the newsgroup."
4- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not just
let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are? You
could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the low
level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...."
5- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe.
Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but it's fixed now."
6- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be if
you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do the
same.."
7- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but since
Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent discussion
about anything.
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people just
can't stop feeding him."
8- °b° unny: "snit makes me sad."
9- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
10- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him "shit", and rightly so, for they way
he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and simply
refused to die, despite repeated flushes.
It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..."
11- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility.
Maybe it's time for you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming,
of course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter."
12- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win" an
argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep this
up? What results are you expecting?"
13- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread what I
had previously written. What makes you think that you're correctly
understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of reading into
things what you wanted people to have said instead of what they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of them
are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse people
who share a common perception where do you think the problem lies? With
Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an advanced degree
to figure out."
14- Dave Fritzinger: "Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do
something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!! "
15- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you knew
what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented to you.
I guess I had too much confidence in you."
16- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and loser
you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i stop
responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up responding
as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the magnitude of
your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop
responding to you. you almost always start responding back in a semi normal
way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for having to put
up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser
as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double
condolences to her). "
17- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly.
For you to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries
about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest
stunts you've pulled.
It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at
all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you."
18- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor."
19- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in my
post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How childishly
typical of you, Snit. "
20- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to CSMA
I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides the typical
Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like being in a room of
really young children trying there best to best the other person. The one
common thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but
facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great percentage of
arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more about "look everybody,
I think he lied". Is there no end then all this picking at each other on
such a personal level. CSMA has always been al little adversarial but you
have personally crank it up to the point that this place is no longer fun.
Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own personal
circus."
21- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit (AKA
Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy with his
twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will
move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his
endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger you and feed
him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"
22- gimme_this...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
23- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else notices
that you are not honest and you have no honor."
24- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a while, I
make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make sense in
your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post stuff like
this and it destroys any respect that I have for you."
25- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
26- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer support
for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no straw
men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state as facts
can be true.
I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude, the topic is an
interesting one and I thought you might have some insights.
I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid answering any
of the questions I asked by saying everything was just repeated. "
27- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on usenet
that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh your screen
endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either you're a super
troll, or you're a super mess."
28- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
29- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
30- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve a
greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and those
kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
31- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing besides
being annoying? Is that your goal?"
32- Jim Lee Jr.: "Troll."
33- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT things
and garbage?"
34- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims.
Par for the course I suppose."
35- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall - in a
few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at passersby
'sucky sucky, $2...'"
36- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
37- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
38- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings since
I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I just
consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
39- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that he
has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer repairman
and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him deal with his
disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get attention from
people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction. You say you like to
beat him over the head. Well that's what he's counting on, he says stuff he
knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise out of people like you. Ignore him,
you won't regret it."
40- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
Because I certainly cannot find it."
41- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even though
the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is mostly
being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that keep
replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this place could
be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his
trolling to more fertile ground."
42- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading the
posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid excrescence.
Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position, instead of
sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll all go away."
43- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks.You make
silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a liar
and a hypocrite and you always have been."
44- Lars Träger: "Yes, you are stupid."
45- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but the
few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it anymore.
*plonk*"
46- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been an
annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of trying
to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk about
Linux and you acting every bit the troll."
47- Linønut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
48- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous, I
would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
49- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the same
as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would be
impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual dishonesty
ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen on proverbs,
and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story.
Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has."
50- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this post
since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him today. A
friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and videotaped her
kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her.
While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv the center of
attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to block our view of it.
That's how Snit lives his whole life."
51- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
"facts", you run away and ignore them. Refuting your "facts" is easily done
in this case. I did it, and you ignored it. "
52- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see
you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone.
You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!"
53- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can only
say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to inhabit CSMA
for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged you actually behave
further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional help."
54- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all rubbernecking.
We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat him the same way,
look but just keep moving on."
55- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly show
that you are crying out for attention."
56- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet you
piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his website's
validation status more often than most people check their e-mail. These are
not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
57- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two about
social behavior."
58- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are trolls,
if anyone here has issues it's not me."
59- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am now.
Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?"
60- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."
61- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?"
62- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:
Select offending Author, example Snit...
Go to the Filters Menu, Choose "Kill this Author"
Click "OK"
Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice.
Then to see your work...
Choose the Filter Menu again,
Then "Refilter Articles"...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!"
63- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit, for
whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?"
64- Pawel Wójciak: "Jesus Christ, snit...
<plonk> "
65- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who talks
about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to be the
least honest and honorable of anyone here."
66- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher but I
thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten seconds later
and he's gone! Amazing."
67- Peter Bjørn Perlsø: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room."
68- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say."
69- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has told
me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
70- Peter Köhlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as dishonest
as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters even more
stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly other csma
posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent on trolling in
whatever way possible as Snot"
71- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."
72- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long standing
war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you single out
persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously berate them
with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious responses,
which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum.
Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature
aside, this is what convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting
this and other groups is to troll."
73- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
74- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous situation.
And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going on."
75- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll. I
am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
...somewhat clumsy."
76- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell of a
tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of looking
ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's your goal,
you're on the right track, and more power to you."
77- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category. Starting
crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to generate a flame
war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and how it can help you and
your supposed users why aren't you requesting help from a more technical
Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group?
As the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO."
78- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY- of
csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news group
before.
He has the ability to turn just about any person against him in just a few
posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is
that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn
what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong.
Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour."
79- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even the
nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than this.
You been doing drugs or something?"
80- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're probably
dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to remove smut from
your harddrive."
81- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing anger, i
guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he thinks he's
making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's pretty smart.
indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and the iq tests and
he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted."
82- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll (or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
83- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant dung,
and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus", but then
the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung."
84- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me for
your rediculous argument regarding this."
85- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost all
self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses' when
referring to others.
Oh, how could the morally superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a
moment out of your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the appropriate plastic
bags)."
86- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then. A
snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."
87- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm right,
nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to demonstrate
their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they provide no evidence,
or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on
straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in your
favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is
more prone to fits of reason than you are. "
88-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see, you
never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just the
other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in this NG
anyway) calling somebody else a liar."
89- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more compassion.
Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor sick fool can
get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out with and supporting
racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that no-one likes him and
those that pretend they do are just using him or don't know him - but come
on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All these
idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so
alike. I pity each and every one of them"
90- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here."
91- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
92- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of your
Circus acts?"
93- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You give
Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded! That also
goes for all that bullshit on your website"
94- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'.
Just what would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must
be some kind of severe mental illness."
95- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are nothing
more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to define the rules,
but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend the rules when
inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this reason I doubt anyone
would be foolish enough to play your game."
96- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK!
Feel proud about that. You're the first person to be plonked from my new
computer! :-) "
97- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
98- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to prove
what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people without lives,
like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit to do a search -
you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry little life."
99- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic
is fairly trollish."
John
"CSMA_Moderator" <x...@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:5cvtjlF...@mid.individual.net...
Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
problem.
Snit
Rrednbdxr_27XPfb...@netlojix.com on 6/9/07 8:03 AM:
> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
> problem.
I noticed a paranoid new-comer yesterday and wondered if it was Steve...
likely it was. He is back... he left after he got spanked on his BS where
he whined, first, that I *had* made it clear I did not have absolute proof
about Bush, and then flip-flopped and whined that I had *not* made it clear.
I suppose he has had time to lick his wounds and is back for round one
million and four.
--
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The path "~/users/username/library/widget" is not common on any OS
€ The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
Tim Adams
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Snit
teadams$2$0$0$3-A183F6.11...@news.west.earthlink.net on 6/9/07 8:48
AM:
>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
>> problem.
>
> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
Of course, Tim, you and I both know you will merely panic and run at that
request... keep in mind how rarely right you are *and* how you share
Carroll's obsessive need to troll me in your *every* post. Have you figured
out how to change your trolling .sig *yet* or do you still claim you need
something from me to do so?
Oh, and since I talked about you rarely being right... here is a *partial*
list of the things you have gotten wrong:
* You were wrong about the tilde meaning "the hard drive only"
* You were wrong when you denied different OS X version numbers relate to
different OS X versions
* You were wrong to say anyone other than you brought the following
bizarre path to CSMA: "~/users/username/library/widget"
* You were wrong (and perverted) when you claimed sex and incest
were identical
* You were wrong when you claimed the word "ouch" is a sure sign of
agreement.
* You were wrong to deny that a "rudimentary operating system" is an OS
* You were wrong to say original IBM PCs were relevant to a conversation
about the current Apple store and other modern computers
* You were wrong when you claimed a non-powered USB hub will only support
non-powered devices.
As I have noted, I am happy to provide support for any of those claims...
all easy to do... the Google record is a handy tool!
--
€ Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
€ Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
€ Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
Tim Adams
Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
> > problem.
>
> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
>
> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something explained
to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it again.
>
> Of course
then snit runs away and posts all sorts of distortions and lies, as the google
record clearly proves as he tries to change the subject. Please note also how
snit proves himself both a liar and a hypocrite with this one post. I mean, he
has *claimed* to have signed an agreement that includes not bringing up past
arguments BUT continues doing so with most every posts.
so snit, keep posting as CSMA_Moderator and blaming Steve for it.
Snit
5:59 AM:
>>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
>>>> problem.
>>>
>>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
>>
>> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
>
> Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
> explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it
> again.
Gee, Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been explained
"over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again. No big deal
- he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else from him.
>> Of course, Tim, you and I both know you will merely panic and run at that
>> request... keep in mind how rarely right you are *and* how you share
>> Carroll's obsessive need to troll me in your *every* post. Have you figured
>> out how to change your trolling .sig *yet* or do you still claim you need
>> something from me to do so?
No comment? I bet you *still* cannot change your .sig without help.
>> Oh, and since I talked about you rarely being right... here is a *partial*
>> list of the things you have gotten wrong:
>>
>> * You were wrong about the tilde meaning "the hard drive only"
>> * You were wrong when you denied different OS X version numbers relate to
>> different OS X versions
>> * You were wrong to say anyone other than you brought the following
>> bizarre path to CSMA: "~/users/username/library/widget"
>> * You were wrong (and perverted) when you claimed sex and incest
>> were identical
>> * You were wrong when you claimed the word "ouch" is a sure sign of
>> agreement.
>> * You were wrong to deny that a "rudimentary operating system" is an OS
>> * You were wrong to say original IBM PCs were relevant to a conversation
>> about the current Apple store and other modern computers
>> * You were wrong when you claimed a non-powered USB hub will only support
>> non-powered devices.
>>
>> As I have noted, I am happy to provide support for any of those claims... all
>> easy to do... the Google record is a handy tool!
>
> then snit runs away and posts all sorts of distortions and lies, as the google
> record clearly proves
Oh, this should be fun! Which of the above do you think cannot be fully
supported? Let's let the Google record show who is right and who is wrong.
Pick what you think is my weakest claim and then we can see if the Google
record supports me or you.
I bet I am right and you are wrong. That easy. :)
> as he tries to change the subject.
Oh, Tim, the topic is how wrong and stupid you are - and how you cannot stop
yourself from trolling me in your every post.
> Please note also how snit proves himself both a liar and a hypocrite with this
> one post. I mean, he has *claimed* to have signed an agreement that includes
> not bringing up past arguments BUT continues doing so with most every posts.
The topic is how wrong you are - your past is relevant to that.
> so snit, keep posting as CSMA_Moderator and blaming Steve for it.
LOL! Gee, maybe *someone* believes you... maybe?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Bueller?
LOL!
--
€ Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
€ Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
Snit
5:59 AM:
> In article <teadams$2$0$0$3-A183F6.11...@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Responding to yourself again, eh?
LOL!
--
€ Deleting from a *Save* dialog is not a sign of well done design
€ A personal computer without an OS is crippled by that lacking
€ Web image alt-text shouldn't generally be "space", "left" or "right"
Jolly Roger
> 99- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
> people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic
> is fairly trollish."
Man... Bad enough you have no life and spend every waking moment
scouring childish arguments for quotes you seem to think mean
something, but illustrating that you have no life so perfectly to the
rest of us really shows you also have no brains to boot. LOL... how
sad!
--
JR
Tim Adams
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> > > > a
> >>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
> >>>> problem.
> >>>
> >>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
> >>
> >> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
> >
> > Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
> > explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it
> > again.
>
> Gee,
snit still fails to offer any support for his lie that Steve is the person that
posts as CSMA Moderator. The fact being, he has no proof as none exist because
it is snit himself that is posting as CSMA Moderator, just to start up some more
trolling .
> Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been explained
> "over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again. No big deal
> - he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else from him.
>
> >> Of course
then snit runs away and posts all sorts of distortions and lies, as the google
record clearly proves
~babbling from the idiot that still thinks a person needs a tilde in the path
name when directing people to Apple's installed widgets snipped.
Snit
2:54 AM:
>>>>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
>>>>
>>>> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
>>>
>>> Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
>>> explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it
>>> again.
>>
>> Gee, Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been explained
>> "over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again. No big deal
>> - he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else from him.
I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
Come on... can't you find a single example of what you claim has been
explained "over a dozen times"?
No, you cannot.
You are a liar. It is that simple.
Tim Adams
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-21C19F.05...@news.west.earthlink.net on 6/11/07
> 2:54 AM:
>
> >>>>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
> >>>>>> problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
> >>>>
> >>>> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
> >>>
> >>> Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
> >>> explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it
> >>> again.
> >>
> >> Gee, Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been explained
> >> "over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again. No big deal
> >> - he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else from him.
>
> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
No - you snipped the topic of the message as you try to change it to your off
topic trolling.
And once again, i see you still fail to offer any support for Joun's and your
claim that Steve is the person posting as CSMA_Moderator. Why is that snit?
You've been asked more than a dozen times now but continue to run away from
offering any. Of course, some of us know the reason - you can't as there is
none. michael glasser, aka snit is the person posting as CSMA_Moderator, just to
give himself a start up more trolling threads without it looking like he
started them.
That is why in one of your earlier posts in this thread you dragged up all sorts
of your trolling issues, still unable to come t o terms that you had been proved
a liar with all of them, as anybody that can do a google search can plainly see.
So keep running michael. keep begging for me to point out a single example of
where I've explained to you that you have no proof/support for your lies about
Steve. All it does is verify what a real idiot you are.
~repeated babbling b y the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped
Snit
3:14 AM:
> In article <C292B188.8310C%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> "Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-21C19F.05...@news.west.earthlink.net on 6/11/07
>> 2:54 AM:
>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old obsessive-compulsive
>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
>>>>> explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain it
>>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> Gee, Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been explained
>>>> "over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again. No big deal
>>>> - he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else from him.
>>
>> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
>
> No
Yes, Tim, I did.
And you *still* have not been able to show a single example of what you
claim has been explained "over a dozen times".
You are blowing smoke. It really is that easy.
--
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
€ Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
Sandman
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
> >
> > No
>
> Yes, Tim, I did.
>
> And you *still* have not been able to show a single example of what you
> claim has been explained "over a dozen times".
And you still have not been able to show a single substantiation for
your claim that Steve posts as CSMA Moderator.
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
mr-CA4157.17...@News.Individual.NET on 6/12/07 8:32 AM:
Look at the thread, Sandman... I am not the one who noted that. I leave
open the chance that it is you - being that it comes from an account that is
accessed from both where you are and where Steve is. Great, you both have
"plausible denial". Who cares - you are both absurd trolls who use sock
puppets - your word against individual.net - you lose.
--
€ It is OK to email yourself files and store them there for a few weeks
€ No legislation supercedes the Constitution (unless it amends it)
€ Apple's video format is not far from NTSC DVD and good enough for most
Tim Adams
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
There goes snit, still posting his lies.
You snipped the topic of the message as you try to change it to your off
topic trolling.
And once again, i see you still fail to offer any support for John's and your
Tim Adams
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
Which is what has been explained to him over a dozen time now and he's still too
much of an idiot to understand that one simple fact.
Snit
3:02 AM:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old
>>>>>>>>>> obsessive-compulsive problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once again shit proves how really stupid he is, having had something
>>>>>>> explained to him over a dozen times and he still begs people to explain
>>>>>>> it again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gee, Tim cannot find a single example of what he claims has been
>>>>>> explained "over a dozen times". OK. Tim is just blowing smoke. Again.
>>>>>> No big deal - he does that so often I doubt anyone expected anything else
>>>>>> from him.
>>>>>>
>>>> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
>>>>
>>> No
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, I did.
>>
>
> There goes snit, still posting his lies.
John noted:
Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old
obsessive-compulsive problem.
Tim Adams claimed:
and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
Snit asked:
OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
And the rest has been you running, Tim. You, at first, claimed you had done
as asked "over a dozen times", but you have failed to find a single example.
That, Tim, is what this is about... nothing else. Anything else you post
about is an obfuscation - it is that simple.
So, Tim, are you going to drop the ball *again* or are you actually going to
back up your claims?
PS: we *both* know you are going to drop the ball. You *always* do.
<snip />
Snit
3:03 AM:
> In article <mr-CA4157.17...@News.Individual.NET>,
> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <C293F464.831F7%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
>> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
>>>>
>>>> No
>>>
>>> Yes, Tim, I did.
>>>
>>> And you *still* have not been able to show a single example of what you
>>> claim has been explained "over a dozen times".
>>
>> And you still have not been able to show a single substantiation for
>> your claim that Steve posts as CSMA Moderator.
>
> Which is what has been explained to him over a dozen time now and he's still
> too
> much of an idiot to understand that one simple fact.
John noted:
Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old
obsessive-compulsive problem.
Tim Adams claimed:
and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
Snit asked:
OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
And the rest has been you running, Tim. You, at first, claimed you had done
as asked "over a dozen times", but you have failed to find a single example.
That, Tim, is what this is about... nothing else. Anything else you post
about is an obfuscation - it is that simple.
So, Tim, are you going to drop the ball *again* or are you actually going to
back up your claims?
PS: we *both* know you are going to drop the ball. You *always* do.
--
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
Steve Carroll
Fantasy is reality to Snit.
--
"None of you can be honest... you are all pathetic." - Snit
"I do not KF people" - Snit
"Not only do I lie about what others are claiming,
I show evidence from the records".-Snit
"You should take one of my IT classes some day." - Snit
Snit
noone-3DC3D3....@newsgroups.comcast.net on 6/13/07 8:11 AM:
> In article <mr-CA4157.17...@News.Individual.NET>,
> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <C293F464.831F7%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
>> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
>>>>
>>>> No
>>>
>>> Yes, Tim, I did.
>>>
>>> And you *still* have not been able to show a single example of what you
>>> claim has been explained "over a dozen times".
>>
>> And you still have not been able to show a single substantiation for
>> your claim that Steve posts as CSMA Moderator.
>
> Fantasy is reality to Snit.
John noted:
Hi Steve! I notice you still have the same old
obsessive-compulsive problem.
Tim Adams claimed:
and hear we have John, once again proving he hasn't a clue.
Snit asked:
OK, Tim, where do you disagree with John and *why*. Be specific.
Tim runs.
Steve Carroll jumps in to support Tim.
Gee... who coulda guessed *that* would happen?
Steve Carroll
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-3DC3D3....@newsgroups.comcast.net on 6/13/07 8:11 AM:
>
> > In article <mr-CA4157.17...@News.Individual.NET>,
> > Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <C293F464.831F7%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> >> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> I snipped your obfuscations, Tim.
> >>>>
> >>>> No
> >>>
> >>> Yes, Tim, I did.
> >>>
> >>> And you *still* have not been able to show a single example of what you
> >>> claim has been explained "over a dozen times".
> >>
> >> And you still have not been able to show a single substantiation for
> >> your claim that Steve posts as CSMA Moderator.
> >
> > Fantasy is reality to Snit.
>
> John noted
... your old delusion? Yes, he did.
Tim Adams
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
So why did you leave out the statement from snit "I noticed a paranoid new-comer
yesterday and wondered if it was Steve...likely it was." were you afraid it
would prove you a liar...again?
The fact that you are supporting John in his bogus claim, and the fact that you
have also made the same bogus claim, all with no support show you to be the
person running away.
And once again, i see you still fail to offer any support for John's and your
claim that Steve is the person posting as CSMA_Moderator. Why is that snit?
You've been asked more than a dozen times now but continue to run away from
offering any. Of course, some of us know the reason - you can't as there is
none. michael glasser, aka snit is the person posting as CSMA_Moderator, just to
give himself a start up more trolling threads without it looking like he
started them.
That is why in one of your earlier posts in this thread you dragged up all sorts
of your trolling issues, still unable to come t o terms that you had been proved
a liar with all of them, as anybody that can do a google search can plainly see.
So keep running michael. keep begging for me to point out a single example of
where I've explained to you that you have no proof/support for your lies about
Steve. All it does is verify what a real idiot you are.
run snit run...
~more babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped