Is csma better now?
snit
been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
--
"If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law."
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://smallurl.com/?i=15235)
Rick G
<b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
> been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
Obviously, I appreciate all efforts to police yourselves...
--
Rick...
snit
Rick-B96233.1...@news.telus.net on 8/29/04 2:47 PM:
As such we should just give it arrest. :)
Mayor of R'lyeh
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
>been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
It was, but then you started posting again.
>Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
with one hand.
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
snit
52m4j0pc8lr0oaqd7...@4ax.com on 8/29/04 3:27 PM:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
> It was, but then you started posting again.
LOL. Thanks.
Do you think I am Steve's only motivation in life? :)
>
>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
> with one hand.
And the humor never stops... :)
Mike Dee
> is csma a better place?
It is now.
*plonk*
--
D.
snit
emteedee-FFB708...@news.individual.net on 8/29/04 4:38 PM:
> In article
> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>> is csma a better place?
>
> It is now.
Then my work was not for naught... thanks.
Steve Carroll
> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
> been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to change
the bag:)
--
"I may just be the primary topic of this group"
"You really need to learn the whole concept of context"
- Michael Glasser (AKA Snit)
--
Steve C
Steve Carroll
Mayor of R'lyeh <ev5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
> >been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
> It was, but then you started posting again.
>
> >Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
> with one hand.
LOL!
Jim Lee Jr.
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
> >been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
> It was, but then you started posting again.
>
> >Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
> with one hand.
Mayor, how do you know so much about typing in porn sites with one
hand? You must keep Rosie Palm pretty busy...
Mayor of R'lyeh
<peejs...@insightbb.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
>In article <52m4j0pc8lr0oaqd7...@4ax.com>, Mayor of
>R'lyeh <ev5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>
>> >With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
>> >been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>
>> It was, but then you started posting again.
>>
>> >Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>
>> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
>> with one hand.
>
>Mayor, how do you know so much about typing in porn sites with one
>hand?
Your Mayor has done much and learne much in his life.
> You must keep Rosie Palm pretty busy...
Does projecting me into your fantasies make them more satisfying for
you?
snit
fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13 PM:
> In article
> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>
>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
> change the bag:)
Oh. I see you wanted to flame me. Anything else you want to add...
maybe some more flaming and trolling. The affect may be amusing.
Elizabot v2.0.1
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>
>>With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
>>been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>
>
> It was, but then you started posting again.
Snit is *still* trolling for Steve's attention. How pathetic.
>>Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
>
> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
> with one hand.
Well, if anyone's ISP is watching I'd guess they're probably wondering
why they bothered wasting away their Sunday watching Snit troll and his
CONTINUING to egg on Steve Carroll.
--
By responding to Elizabot v2.0.1 you implicitly agree to the TOS at:
http://elizabot.spymac.net/
Elizabot v2.0.1
> In article
> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>
>>With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
>>been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>
>>Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
And they see that you continue to troll and bait Steve Carroll.
>
> They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to change
> the bag:)
Too bad they weren't watching when Snitty was impersonating you, Steve.
snit
41328f8c$0$99770$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 7:23 PM:
> Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit"
>> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> chose to bless us with the following
>> wisdom:
>>
>>
>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>>> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>
>>
>> It was, but then you started posting again.
>
> Snit is *still* trolling for Steve's attention. How pathetic.
>
>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>
>>
>> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
>> with one hand.
>
> Well, if anyone's ISP is watching I'd guess they're probably
> wondering why they bothered wasting away their Sunday watching Snit
> troll and his CONTINUING to egg on Steve Carroll.
LOL. Yeah, Steve can't help his trolling. He is a mere victim of my
evil egging on.
Mike Dee
R'lyeh <ev5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:51:02 GMT, "Jim Lee Jr." wrote:
> >Mayor, how do you know so much about typing in porn sites with one
> >hand?
>
> Your Mayor has done much and learne much in his life.
Jim will most likely correct your typo's for you Mayor.
>
> > You must keep Rosie Palm pretty busy...
>
> Does projecting me into your fantasies make them more satisfying for
> you?
Mayor has this stock phrase ready for any given time *anybody* questions
his [ahem] masculinity. He stole it from Edwin.
snit
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
>> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>>> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>>
>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> And they see that you continue to troll and bait Steve Carroll.
>
>>
>> They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
>> change the bag:)
>
> Too bad they weren't watching when Snitty was impersonating you,
> Steve.
You imply that they were not able to see the whole record.
Is this yet another of your trolling accusations that you will not
support?
From earlier:
"Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
41320eab$0$99772$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 10:13 AM:
> Indeed.
>
> Looks like Snit's the one willing to present false charges and false
> accusations against other people. Somehow this does not surprise me.
In what way do you think the Google Usenet archive is false, being that
is the *only* evidence that was needed?
You have just made an accusation against me that I presented false
charges. Can you back that up?
Elizabot v2.0.1
> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
> 41328f90$0$99770$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 7:23 PM:
>
>
>>Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article
>>><b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
>>>"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>>>>it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>>>
>>>>Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>
>>And they see that you continue to troll and bait Steve Carroll.
>>
>>
>>>They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
>>>change the bag:)
>>
>>Too bad they weren't watching when Snitty was impersonating you,
>>Steve.
>
>
> You imply that they were not able to see the whole record.
Nope. You said that they were here watching, as if they couldn't Google
it later.
> Is this yet another of your trolling accusations that you will not
> support?
You can't read very well.
> From earlier:
>
> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
> 41320eab$0$99772$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 10:13 AM:
>
>
>>Indeed.
>>
>>Looks like Snit's the one willing to present false charges and false
>>accusations against other people. Somehow this does not surprise me.
>
>
> In what way do you think the Google Usenet archive is false, being that
> is the *only* evidence that was needed?
I never said it was, but since you can't read very well, I'm not
surprised you'd think that.
> You have just made an accusation against me that I presented false
> charges. Can you back that up?
My response was based on Steve Mackay's response which you conveniently
snipped out. You should ask him about what he said. lol
Oh, and
*PLONK*
snit
> snit wrote:
>
>> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
>> 41328f90$0$99770$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 7:23 PM:
>>
>>
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
>>>> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced,
>>>>> as it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better
>>>>> place?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>>
>>> And they see that you continue to troll and bait Steve Carroll.
>>>
>>>
>>>> They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
>>>> change the bag:)
>>>
>>> Too bad they weren't watching when Snitty was impersonating you,
>>> Steve.
>>
>>
>> You imply that they were not able to see the whole record.
>
> Nope. You said that they were here watching, as if they couldn't
> Google it later.
Google is available to anyone. In any case, I have been completely
honest about my using of the troll name "Steve Carroll" when responding
to trolling posts that use the name "Steve Carroll". Someone else set
the standard that "Steve Carroll" posts are trolls... not I.
>
>> Is this yet another of your trolling accusations that you will not
>> support?
>
> You can't read very well.
What part of csma do you think any ISP does not have access to? What
part can they not see as well now as they could have, say, a week or
two ago?
I assure you that any ISP in question has the resources to get the
whole record.
>
>> From earlier:
>>
>> "Elizabot v2.0.1" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in article
>> 41320eab$0$99772$7586...@news.frii.net on 8/29/04 10:13 AM:
>>
>>
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>> Looks like Snit's the one willing to present false charges and
>>> false accusations against other people. Somehow this does not
>>> surprise me.
>>
>>
>> In what way do you think the Google Usenet archive is false, being
>> that is the *only* evidence that was needed?
>
> I never said it was, but since you can't read very well, I'm not
> surprised you'd think that.
You claim I am presenting "false charges", or that it looks that way to
you. Since the only evidence I offered to anyone was Usenet articles
from csma, the only way I could present anything false about these
records is if I could falsify the Google archives.
Can you support that accusation? Can you offer *any* evidence to
support your claim? Or will you simply back peddle again?
>
>> You have just made an accusation against me that I presented false
>> charges. Can you back that up?
>
> My response was based on Steve Mackay's response which you
> conveniently snipped out. You should ask him about what he said. lol
>
> Oh, and
>
> *PLONK*
Does this imply your obsession is waning? If so, I am glad to see it.
In any case, it is not surprising to see that you will not be
supporting your accusations. There was *never* any doubt you were
making them up. You will not be able to back them up, nor will
anyone else.
snit
fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13 PM:
> In article
> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
>> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
>>
>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>
> They are watching... they wrote me
Before you were denying this. Now you admit it. Yet you will never
admit you were lying.
<snip>
Jim Lee Jr.
R'lyeh <ev5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:51:02 GMT, "Jim Lee Jr."
> <peejs...@insightbb.com> chose to bless us with the following
> wisdom:
>
> >In article <52m4j0pc8lr0oaqd7...@4ax.com>, Mayor of
> >R'lyeh <ev5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:34:36 -0400, "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET>
> >> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >>
> >> >With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as it has
> >> >been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
> >>
> >> It was, but then you started posting again.
> >>
> >> >Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
> >>
> >> I doubt it. They're probably too busy typing in porn site addresses
> >> with one hand.
> >
> >Mayor, how do you know so much about typing in porn sites with one
> >hand?
>
> Your Mayor has done much and learne much in his life.
You misspelled "learned." You forgot the final d.
> > You must keep Rosie Palm pretty busy...
>
> Does projecting me into your fantasies make them more satisfying for
> you?
Sorry, you're the farthest from my mind in my fantasies. Hope you're
not jealous.
Jim Lee Jr.
Dee <emte...@optushome.com.au> wrote:
I just did, Mike, and yours too. The correct spelling is "typos."
Mike Dee
<peejs...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> I just did, Mike, and yours too. The correct spelling is "typos."
Hmmm... My spelling checkers seem to pass both as being correct
[AppleWorks and MS word]
--
D.
Steve Carroll
<cbef6c222284f660...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
> fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13 PM:
>
> > In article
> > <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> > <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> >
> >> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
> >> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
> >>
> >> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
> >
> > They are watching... they wrote me
>
> Before you were denying this. Now you admit it. Yet you will never
> admit you were lying.
>
> <snip>
Why should you be the only person allowed to play make believe, Mikey:)
If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how many
threads you create with other's names in the title or posts where you
simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the troll is. But
hey... no point letting reality get in your way now, huh?
Steve Carroll
<b0b2204d92f0d71d...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
Yeah... think about that, genius:)
> You have just made an accusation against me that I presented false
> charges. Can you back that up?
Question:
How are you so sure that the instances of you stealing my (or anyone's)
identity were not pointed out already?
Answer:
Testers
No matter how much you wish it were so, people simply aren't as stupid
as you need them to be to get away with your horse-crap.
Steve Carroll
<88f66490a6293037...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
> fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13 PM:
>
> > In article
> > <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> > <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> >
> >> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced, as
> >> it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better place?
> >>
> >> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
> >
> > They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
> > change the bag:)
>
> Oh. I see you wanted to flame me. Anything else you want to add...
> maybe some more flaming and trolling. The affect may be amusing.
No flames or trolls by me... but I'm curious, do you think it's as
amusing as all the times you have stolen my identity (or the identity of
others) and made your trolling/flaming posts? As amusing as the websites
you have specifically created to troll... or the filthy sex webpage
which was proven you created about Elizabot? That amusing? Seek help
soon. You're right about one thing... you can't hide with google:)
snit
> In article
> <cbef6c222284f660...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
>> fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
>>> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced,
>>>> as it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better
>>>> place?
>>>>
>>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>>
>>> They are watching... they wrote me
>>
>> Before you were denying this. Now you admit it. Yet you will never
>> admit you were lying.
>>
>> <snip>
>
> Why should you be the only person allowed to play make believe,
> Mikey:)
While dishonestly including others in your games, it is good to see you
admit to your playing of "make believe".
> If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how many
> threads you create with other's names in the title or posts where you
> simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the troll is.
> But hey... no point letting reality get in your way now, huh?
So, care to share with us all what they said when they wrote you?
snit
I see you felt the need to do some more trolling and flaming against
me. Anything else you want to add?
snit
> In article
> <88f66490a6293037...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
>> fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13
>> PM:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
>>> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced,
>>>> as it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better
>>>> place?
>>>>
>>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
>>>
>>> They are watching... they wrote me and told me to remind you to
>>> change the bag:)
>>
>> Oh. I see you wanted to flame me. Anything else you want to add...
>> maybe some more flaming and trolling. The affect may be amusing.
>
> No flames or trolls by me... but I'm curious, do you think it's as
> amusing as all the times you have stolen my identity (or the identity
> of others) and made your trolling/flaming posts? As amusing as the
> websites you have specifically created to troll... or the filthy sex
> webpage which was proven you created about Elizabot? That amusing?
> Seek help soon. You're right about one thing... you can't hide with
> google:)
Yup. The affect of your trolling may be amusing. Do you want to add
some more trolling and flaming against me, or are you almost done?
Steve Carroll
<e3b849d3b33fde8e...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> >> Oh. I see you wanted to flame me. Anything else you want to add...
> >> maybe some more flaming and trolling. The affect may be amusing.
> >
> > No flames or trolls by me... but I'm curious, do you think it's as
> > amusing as all the times you have stolen my identity (or the identity
> > of others) and made your trolling/flaming posts? As amusing as the
> > websites you have specifically created to troll... or the filthy sex
> > webpage which was proven you created about Elizabot? That amusing?
> > Seek help soon. You're right about one thing... you can't hide with
> > google:)
>
> Yup.
Glad to see you finally admit to what you've been doing. This is a good
first step... now seek that counseling you need.
Steve Carroll
<20b5eb1aae35c70c...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
I haven't done any. You didn't answer the question. Any particular
reason you wish to avoid the fact that you have disingenuously posted
under the names of others? Oh that's right... it proves who the troll is
here:)
Steve Carroll
<91deee4aa5564351...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
> fretwizz-B43F08...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/30/04 6:31 AM:
>
> > In article
> > <cbef6c222284f660...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> > <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> >
> >> "Steve Carroll" <fret...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote in article
> >> fretwizz-8D4396...@netnews.comcast.net on 8/29/04 6:13
> >> PM:
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> <b90d84bea481fab1...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
> >>> "snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> With the trolling Steve and I direct at each so heavily reduced,
> >>>> as it has been for the last 48 hours or so, is csma a better
> >>>> place?
> >>>>
> >>>> Please be aware: people from poster's ISP's may be watching.
> >>>
> >>> They are watching... they wrote me
> >>
> >> Before you were denying this. Now you admit it. Yet you will never
> >> admit you were lying.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> > Why should you be the only person allowed to play make believe,
> > Mikey:)
>
> While dishonestly including others in your games, it is good to see you
> admit to your playing of "make believe".
The dishonest game was yours... I merely joined it.
> > If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how many
> > threads you create with other's names in the title or posts where you
> > simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the troll is.
> > But hey... no point letting reality get in your way now, huh?
>
> So, care to share with us all what they said when they wrote you?
Only you know what they said:)
snit
> In article
> <e3b849d3b33fde8e...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>, "snit"
> <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
>
>>>> Oh. I see you wanted to flame me. Anything else you want to
>>>> add... maybe some more flaming and trolling. The affect may be
>>>> amusing.
>>>
>>> No flames or trolls by me... but I'm curious, do you think it's as
>>> amusing as all the times you have stolen my identity (or the
>>> identity of others) and made your trolling/flaming posts? As
>>> amusing as the websites you have specifically created to troll...
>>> or the filthy sex webpage which was proven you created about
>>> Elizabot? That amusing? Seek help soon. You're right about one
>>> thing... you can't hide with google:)
>>
>> Yup.
>
> Glad to see you finally admit to what you've been doing. This is a
> good first step... now seek that counseling you need.
I see you are still being dishonest as you snipped my comment, which
was
Yup. The affect of your trolling may be amusing. Do you want to
add some more trolling and flaming against me, or are you almost
done?
What other trolling do you wish to add?
snit
We have talked about your above claims many times. There is no point,
other than attacking each other and csma in general to go over it
again.
I have no desire to do that.
Will you please join me in reducing our trolling and flaming against
each other? Will you at least take responsibility for your actions, or
do you still hold to the idea that I am the one who *makes* you do your
trolling... or whatever you want to call your posts where you do little
but flame against me?
snit
Well, you are at least now admitting you are being dishonest. Seems
you still want to blame others for making you be so.
Will you take responsibility for the dishonesty of yours you just
admitted to?
>
>>> If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how
>>> many threads you create with other's names in the title or posts
>>> where you simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the
>>> troll is. But hey... no point letting reality get in your way now,
>>> huh?
>>
>> So, care to share with us all what they said when they wrote you?
>
> Only you know what they said:)
I have no access to your private e-mails.
Steve Mackay
Notice Snit has to now resort to using a gateway from talkaboutmac.com? He
claims to have complained, yet he's not using supernews directly anymore.
How odd...
:)
What's wrong Snit, did Supernews finally tire of your bullshit?
Steve Carroll
<df183d5139cdf506...@localhost.talkaboutmac.com>,
"snit" <snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET> wrote:
You started a pre-school game of pretend... I tried to teach you why it
doesn't work with adults. I failed... the same way everyone in here has
failed whenever they have attempted to educate you about anything.
Apparently, you even have no interest in learning from your errors.
> >>> If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how
> >>> many threads you create with other's names in the title or posts
> >>> where you simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the
> >>> troll is. But hey... no point letting reality get in your way now,
> >>> huh?
> >>
> >> So, care to share with us all what they said when they wrote you?
> >
> > Only you know what they said:)
>
> I have no access to your private e-mails.
I did get an e-mail from my ISP... they told me they were bumping my
mailboxes up in size considerably. I'm pretty happy with them at this
point.
Elizabot v2.0.1
> I did get an e-mail from my ISP... they told me they were bumping my
> mailboxes up in size considerably. I'm pretty happy with them at this
> point.
LOL!
Hey, ask him what it's like to be called a pea brain by supernews!
snit
I am not responsible for your lies, no matter how you try to spin things.
Will you take responsibility for your actions, or will you continue say I
force you to troll?
>
>>>>> If you contacted my ISP (or anyone else's) once they look at how
>>>>> many threads you create with other's names in the title or posts
>>>>> where you simply steal the identity of others they'll spot who the
>>>>> troll is. But hey... no point letting reality get in your way now,
>>>>> huh?
>>>>
>>>> So, care to share with us all what they said when they wrote you?
>>>
>>> Only you know what they said:)
>>
>> I have no access to your private e-mails.
>
> I did get an e-mail from my ISP... they told me they were bumping my
> mailboxes up in size considerably. I'm pretty happy with them at this
> point.
LOL. Your story seems to be changing a lot on this issue. Why is that?