Apple provided the first updated to the iPhone yesterday in the
form of iPhone Update v1.0.1. It address a bunch of security
concerns that were TROLLING around the net this past week.
1) You can read the Secunia report about about the iPhone
vulnerabilities at:
<http://secunia.com/advisories/26287/>
They mention these general problems with the original v1.0 iPhone:
Cross Site Scripting
Spoofing
Denial of Service
System Access
2) You can read Apple's technical note about the security fixes
in iPhone Update v1.0.1 at:
<http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306173>
Apple describe 5 patches involving:
Safari
WebCore
WebKit
For those keeping score you will notice that these vulnerability
patches are similar to those in Mac OS X Security Update 2007-007.
3) And for information overkill you can read even MORE about
iPhone Update v1.0.1 at:
<http://www.iphoneatlas.com/2007/07/31/iphone-update-101-released/
>
AND
<http://www.iphoneatlas.com/2007/08/01/iphone-update-101-undocumen
ted-fixes-improvements-galore-volume-stability-vpn-battery-more/>
They mention some undocumented fixes that were included with the
update.
4) And for those of you adventurous iPhone users who have HACKED
your little beauty, naughty naughty. You need to read this:
iPhone Update 1.0.1 troubleshooting: Problems installing
(especially with hacks)
<http://www.iphoneatlas.com/2007/08/01/iphone-update-101-troublesh
ooting-problems-installing-especially-with-hacks-more/>
The article describes the NECESSITY and METHOD of restoring your
iPhone to original condition before installing the v1.0.1
firmware update.
Share and Enjoy,
:-Derek
--
Fortune Magazine 11-29-05: What's your computer setup today?
Frederick Brooks: I happily use a Macintosh. It's not been
equalled for ease of use, and I want my computer to be a tool,
not a challenge.
<http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/12/12/8363107/>
[Frederick Brooks is the author of 'The Mythical Man Month'.
He spearheaded the movement to modernize computer software
engineering in 1975.]
> In article
> <derekcurrie-BA17...@johnf2.biosci.ohio-state.edu>,
> Derek Currie <derek...@mac.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Apple provided the first updated to the iPhone yesterday in the form
>> of iPhone Update v1.0.1. It address a bunch of security concerns that
>> were TROLLING around the net this past week.
>
> Essentially, they were the same bug fixes that were in the Safari update
> released the same day.
Did it break the 3rd party ringtone solutions? It is shameful that you
cant easily import decent ringtones into this phone.
Oh, yes, shameful. I would be crushed if I had not
had the opportunity to listen to the same six measures
of the William Tell Overture for two minutes several
times a day on the phone of someone who's never at her desk.
--
Wes Groleau
You always have time for what you do first.
> Art Vandelay wrote:
>> Did it break the 3rd party ringtone solutions? It is shameful that you
>> cant easily import decent ringtones into this phone.
>
> Oh, yes, shameful. I would be crushed if I had not
> had the opportunity to listen to the same six measures
> of the William Tell Overture for two minutes several
> times a day on the phone of someone who's never at her desk.
It is shameful. The charge 600 fucking dollars for the thing but you
can only use the Steve Jobs approved ringtones. People say Microsoft is
totalitarian? Mmmmm, that Apple Kool Aid tastes good!
> It is shameful. The charge 600 fucking dollars for the thing but you
> can only use the Steve Jobs approved ringtones. People say Microsoft is
> totalitarian? Mmmmm, that Apple Kool Aid tastes good!
You really are a fucking moron. Ringtones are coming to a theatre near
you. There's a pecking order of importance you stupid ass.
> On 2007-08-04 06:11:33 -0700, Wes Groleau <grolea...@freeshell.org> said:
I guess you can't follow directions. http://www.modmyiphone.com/cmps_index.php
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
> In article <2007080409113216807-null@unixsite>, Art Vandelay <nu...@unix.site>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2007-08-04 06:11:33 -0700, Wes Groleau <grolea...@freeshell.org> said:
>>
>>> Art Vandelay wrote:
>>>> Did it break the 3rd party ringtone solutions? It is shameful that you
>>>> cant easily import decent ringtones into this phone.
>>>
>>> Oh, yes, shameful. I would be crushed if I had not
>>> had the opportunity to listen to the same six measures
>>> of the William Tell Overture for two minutes several
>>> times a day on the phone of someone who's never at her desk.
>>
>> It is shameful. The charge 600 fucking dollars for the thing but you
>> can only use the Steve Jobs approved ringtones. People say Microsoft is
>> totalitarian? Mmmmm, that Apple Kool Aid tastes good!
>
> I guess you can't follow directions. http://www.modmyiphone.com/cmps_index.php
Why should I have to rely on some third party hack to add a ringtone to
my $600 phone? Especially because who knows if Apple will create an
update that will screw it up.
Any you know that how? Steve Jobs himself told you? Or you have a
cousin whose friend knows someone who works for Apple? Talk about a
fucking moron. Keep sippin' the Kool Aid!
I can understand your concern - seems Apple should allow different ring
tones. Those hardly could be seen as a security risk.
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
> In article <2007080412270916807-null@unixsite>,
> Adding customized ringtones is so important to the function of a phone
> that it just won't work if you can't do that.
People do like to personalize their phones with ring tones. Would be nice
if the iPhone 2 had more flexibility in this area.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
> In article <C2DA2E59.8A261%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>>> Adding customized ringtones is so important to the function of a
>>> phone that it just won't work if you can't do that.
>>
>> People do like to personalize their phones with ring tones. Would be
>> nice if the iPhone 2 had more flexibility in this area.
>
> Yes, it would be nice. And I'm fairly sure that Apple will include that
> functionality.
>
> Personally, the major missing feature so far as I am concerned is
> voice-recognition calling. I think that is the highest priority missing
> feature they should address.
A more easily replaced battery should be pretty high on the list, too.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
> Any you know that how? Steve Jobs himself told you? Or you have a
> cousin whose friend knows someone who works for Apple? Talk about a
> fucking moron. Keep sippin' the Kool Aid!
Fucking common sense you complete stupid fucking asshole. God you are a
pathetic piece of shit. Go crawl back into your hole you cunt!
> In article <C2DA458C.8A266%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>>> Personally, the major missing feature so far as I am concerned is
>>> voice-recognition calling. I think that is the highest priority
>>> missing feature they should address.
>>
>> A more easily replaced battery should be pretty high on the list,
>> too.
>
> In the nine years I've owned cell phones, I've never had the need to
> replace a battery.
>
> I doubt that Apple could have kept the form factor for the iPhone that
> it has if it had a user replaceable battery.
Hmmm, I have known a few people who have had to - I wonder how common it is.
If it is something that is pretty rare than I may stand corrected on this.
--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers
Are you 14 years old? Does Mommy know you're using her computer, little fella?
Your "common sense" statement is so stupid, I dont even know where to
start. The iPhone is totally closed and locked down. You're at Apple's
mercy, so nothing is "common sense." Its whatever whim Jobs decides to
indulge.
> In article <2007080412270916807-null@unixsite>,
> Adding customized ringtones is so important to the function of a phone
> that it just won't work if you can't do that.
Not the point. Users should have the ability to do something as basic
as add ringtones. Every other phone on the market allows it, but not
Apple.
> In article <2007080418374816807-null@unixsite>,
> Art Vandelay <nu...@unix.site> wrote:
>
>> Your "common sense" statement is so stupid, I dont even know where to
>> start. The iPhone is totally closed and locked down. You're at
>> Apple's mercy, so nothing is "common sense." Its whatever whim Jobs
>> decides to indulge.
>
> I have a great idea: don't get an iPhone, and shut the fuck up.
Nice argument. You really put me in my place. What a staggering intellect.
> Your "common sense" statement is so stupid, I dont even know where to
> start. The iPhone is totally closed and locked down. You're at Apple's
> mercy, so nothing is "common sense." Its whatever whim Jobs decides to
> indulge.
And common sense dictates that something so obvious will be addressed.
What the fuck aren't you getting here, dumbfuck?
Speaking of stupid - what are we supposed to thing about the little worm
that sits around trolling in Macintosh groups to get his jollies. You're