Samsung To LaunchA New S-IV That's Twice As Fast...

[Flint]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I20130617

Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!
--
MFB

[Sandman]

In article <kpoqq3$hrj$1...@dont-email.me>,
Flint <agen...@section-31.net> wrote:

> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I2013061

> 7
>
> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!

Yes, because faster networking is purely the innovation of *Samsung*.

Haha, you fanboys are too funny. Everything is invented by Samsung!! :-D


--
Sandman[.net]

[Alan Baker]

In article <kpoqq3$hrj$1...@dont-email.me>,
Flint <agen...@section-31.net> wrote:

> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I2013061
> 7
>

> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!

Are you sure they NEED to catch up, "Flint"?

"Sales of Samsung's flagship Galaxy S4 are falling short of initial
estimates as much as 30 percent, causing an implosion of $20 billion of
the firm's market value as analysts reconsider their formerly rosy
expectations. "

<http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/06/17/after-crowning-samsung-as-appl
es-heir-analysts-now-rethinking-their-math>

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

[Nashton]

On 6/18/2013 2:27 AM, Flint wrote:
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I20130617
>
>
> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!

In the meantime, Apple is revamping it ancient iOS with pretty colors
and flat app icons.
Not to mention creating an abomination of a Mac Pro after they
deliberatly abandoned Pros and Power users for years.

[Justin]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:27:12 -0400, Flint wrote:

> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-

idUSBRE95G05I20130617
>
> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!

It runs spyware twice as fast.

[Flint]

On 6/18/2013 3:27 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <kpoqq3$hrj$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Flint <agen...@section-31.net> wrote:
>
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I2013061
>> 7
>>
>> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!
>
> Are you sure they NEED to catch up, "Flint"?
>
> "Sales of Samsung's flagship Galaxy S4 are falling short of initial
> estimates as much as 30 percent, causing an implosion of $20 billion of
> the firm's market value as analysts reconsider their formerly rosy
> expectations. "
>
> <http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/06/17/after-crowning-samsung-as-appl
> es-heir-analysts-now-rethinking-their-math>
>

You're a tad slow on the draw there, partner - from my linked
*Reuters* article:

"Samsung's shares have lost almost $20 billion since June 7 after
analysts cut forecasts for Galaxy S4 sales by as much as 30 percent on
industry data that showed the high-end smartphone market was getting
saturated."

But here's the part you (and your biased source) conveniently failed
to mention:

"The same problem is hitting sales of the iPhone 5, made by Samsung
rival Apple Inc."

Try something a tad more objective/complete than AppleInsider next
time, fanboy...

--
MFB

[Justin]

LOL... watching non-MBA aspies try to analyze equities!
Here's your homework assignment, watch Mad Money on CNBC tonight.

[Nashton]

You got to feel sorry for them, though.
It always seems that their little world come crumbling down every time
something negative about Apple emerges.

It's pitiful. They're more or less like those poor lost souls that line
up to get the latest iteration of Apple new iGadget. It's pathetic, really.

[Nashton]

So one needs an MBA to follow and invest in the market?
Are you retarded?

[Flint]

Why would anyone seriously consider anything that crackpot Cramer
cackles on about?

--
MFB

[Nashton]

Why would anyone advocate for a for profit organization that hardly pays
any taxes and makes the entirety of its mediocre products in China?

The same crackpots that wave their pom poms for Apple and read Cramer.

[Alan Baker]

In article <kpq7ja$hg5$3...@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton <na...@na.com>
wrote:

Nokia?

>
> The same crackpots that wave their pom poms for Apple and read Cramer.

[Alan Baker]

In article <kpq7ja$hg5$3...@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton <na...@na.com>
wrote:

> >> LOL... watching non-MBA aspies try to analyze equities!
> >> Here's your homework assignment, watch Mad Money on CNBC tonight.
> >>
> >
> > Why would anyone seriously consider anything that crackpot Cramer
> > cackles on about?
> >
>
> Why would anyone advocate for a for profit organization that hardly pays
> any taxes and makes the entirety of its mediocre products in China?

"by Eric Mack March 7, 2012

...

It's a bit telling that your best chance at buying a Nokia phone
actually made in Finland is the N9, which runs the discontinued MeeGo
OS. Most of the N9s were made in Scandinavia, and the company also has
manufacturing facilities in Hungary and Mexico, but not for long. Last
month, Nokia announced it was moving all its device assembly operations
to Asia (read China), a transition that's already been in the works for
a while."

<http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57389858-1/are-any-smartphones-not-m
ade-in-china/>

[Justin]

Yes, actually.
A CPA or CFA could do it too, of course one needs the required credit
hours.
But I'm sure you knew that.

[Justin]

Nobody mentioned Microsoft or Dell.

[Nashton]

Yes, of course you are.

Retarded, that is.

[Nashton]

Are you lost? This is not a Windows advocacy group, it's an ipad
advocacy group.

[Flint]

"haha".... Sandy thinks "invented"="innovated"! :-D


Yes folks, he really is that stupid.

--
MFB

[KDT]

It at least requires someone who knows what an asset is......

[Nashton]

You still haven't answered the question of the hour. You are an
accomplished fart app developer, correct?
How's the fart app coming along?

[KDT]

A company has *announced* a faster product some day in the future.

News at 11

[KDT]

You mean like Nokia?

[Flint]

KDT, always lacks forsight of things coming down the pipe. By his
logic, iO7 is only going to be "some day in the future" too, I'll
wager. No news there, huh? Move along...

--
MFB

[Sandman]

In article <kq6tt1$5n4$1...@dont-email.me>,

Flint <agen...@section-31.net> wrote:

> >> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I2013
> >> 0617
> >>

> >> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!
> >

> > A company has *announced* a faster product some day in the future.
> >
> > News at 11
>
> KDT, always lacks forsight of things coming down the pipe. By his
> logic, iO7 is only going to be "some day in the future" too, I'll
> wager.

Of course.

> No news there, huh?

Exactly.

> Move along...

I bet you won't, though...


--
Sandman[.net]

[KDT]

I have a beta of iOS 7 installed on my iPhone right now. Have you used the announced faster Samsung?

[Nashton]

You would want your fart app to be compatible with Apple new iOS.
>

[KDT]

What's sad is, even if I did write a fart app, that far exceeds your stated ability....

[gaztro...@googlemail.com]

What's your verdict on the new OS KDT?
I realise it's still in beta but whats your opinion?

[Snit]

On 6/18/13 11:06 AM, in article kpq7ja$hg5$3...@speranza.aioe.org, "Nashton"

<na...@na.com> wrote:

>> Why would anyone seriously consider anything that crackpot Cramer
>> cackles on about?
>>
>
> Why would anyone advocate for a for profit organization that hardly pays
> any taxes and makes the entirety of its mediocre products in China?
>
> The same crackpots that wave their pom poms for Apple and read Cramer.

Apple reportedly paid about 2.5% of the US corporate income taxes last year.

Your claim about them hardly paying taxes is complete rubbish.


--
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/LinuxTrendMar2012Snit-vs-cc.png>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/LinearTrendLineCreation.mov>

"I am not claiming Excel and Pages are incorrect."
- Brad Wiggins AKA cc AKA Bill Bateman

[KDT]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:16:23 PM UTC-4, gaztro...@googlemail.com wrote:

>
> What's your verdict on the new OS KDT?
>
> I realise it's still in beta but whats your opinion?

1. There are a few animation glitches on my 4S but hopefully this will be cleared up by the time its released

2. The interface shows better but as far as usability, the biggest thing is the expanded control center.

3. I haven't played with the new API's at all. These days, all of my work is with HTML 5 apps.

[Nashton]

On 6/27/2013 9:59 PM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <361ab854-edc5-441b...@googlegroups.com>

> KDT <scarf...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:16:23 PM UTC-4, gaztro...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What's your verdict on the new OS KDT?
>>>
>>> I realise it's still in beta but whats your opinion?
>
>> 1. There are a few animation glitches on my 4S but hopefully this will be cleared up by the time its released
>

> I'm not willing to install it on my iphone. I have it on my iPad and
> it's not something I would recommend anyone do at this point. If you
> want to test iPad apps, do it in the simulator.

>
>> 2. The interface shows better but as far as usability, the biggest
>> thing is the expanded control center.
>

> The task switching is very nice, and I like that it is faster if you
> swipe the icons as opposed to slower if you swipe the cards.

iOS gets task switching?

Whoa! Welcome to 2008!

[Sandman]

In article <kqjmdl$ar5$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton <na...@na.com>
wrote:

> > The task switching is very nice, and I like that it is faster if you
> > swipe the icons as opposed to slower if you swipe the cards.
>
> iOS gets task switching?
>
> Whoa! Welcome to 2008!

Yes, this is how clueless Nashton is! Hilarious!


--
Sandman[.net]

[Gary]

On 2013-06-18 05:27:12 +0000, Flint said:

> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I20130617
>
> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!

You have actually brought up an interesting question here Flint without
even realising it.

First the headline, SAMSUNG TO LAUNCH A NEW S-IV THATS TWICE AS FAST

Notice the word TO is not HAS. (believe it when you see it)

Only to be sold in Korea? Not groundbreaking enough to be sold
worldwide from day one?


Now the question you posed without knowing it.

Does Apple to need to hurry up and duplicate that technology because
Samsung has?


Short answer: NO

Apple look at what can be done with a phone, what is being done with a
phone and then work out what to put in it.

They are still using dual core chips while Samsung are messing with 8 core.

Did the 8 core chips change the phone landscape? NO

Here is an example of effective use of dual core chips.


http://www.cultofmac.com/191118/iphone-5-may-not-have-a-quad-core-cpu-but-its-one-of-the-fastest-smartphones-money-can-buy/

When

Apple have a reason to move up the core count they will do it but my
guess is only when they have exhausted the dual core capabilities.

[Flint]

On 6/29/2013 9:32 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 05:27:12 +0000, Flint said:
>
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/17/us-samsung-shin-idUSBRE95G05I20130617
>>
>>
>> Hurry up Apple! Better 'innovate' again and catch up!
>
> You have actually brought up an interesting question here Flint
> without even realising it.
>
> First the headline, SAMSUNG TO LAUNCH A NEW S-IV THATS TWICE AS FAST
>
> Notice the word TO is not HAS. (believe it when you see it)

Don't suffer from the same myopia as KDT, Gary. :) LTE capability is
increasing as more networks supporting it come online. There's
nothing wrong with trying to get a leg up on newer technology. Apple
has a history of doing it themselves since killing floppy drives and
legacy ports to embrace USB and later on, Thunderbolt, no? seems to
me, Apple is making a concerted effort to kill optical drives too, no?

> Only to be sold in Korea? Not groundbreaking enough to be sold
> worldwide from day one?


> Now the question you posed without knowing it.

> Does Apple to need to hurry up and duplicate that technology because
> Samsung has?

How does one 'pose' a question without knowing it? What seems to be
a question (to your mind) is an already settled one (to my mind),
hence iu is pointless to raise.

>
>
> Short answer: NO
>
> Apple look at what can be done with a phone, what is being done with a
> phone and then work out what to put in it.
>
> They are still using dual core chips while Samsung are messing with 8
> core.

I really don't care to get into the "dual corse vs octo-core" thing.
Both approaches have their respective merits and disadvantages.
Besides, Apple's core approach is more of an optimization of the
memory bus interface over core counts. Samsung's approach is mixing
cores optimized for certain tasks. 6 of one, half dozen of the other.
Eventually, both will likely end up using a hybrid of both techniques.

>
> Did the 8 core chips change the phone landscape? NO

> Here is an example of effective use of dual core chips.
>
>
> http://www.cultofmac.com/191118/iphone-5-may-not-have-a-quad-core-cpu-but-its-one-of-the-fastest-smartphones-money-can-buy/



> When
> Apple have a reason to move up the core count they will do it but my
> guess is only when they have exhausted the dual core capabilities.

It's not just about core counts, Gary.


--
MFB