W7 share peaks at 9% on Jan 3
Tommy the Troll
less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
versions.
It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
Mike
However, windows overall is declining slightly as has been it's trend.
(If this was your big announcement tommie, it's pretty weak.)
--
Mike
Fa-groon
(in article <jdt4k5dqqv70s3kll...@4ax.com>):
> custom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
As P.T. Barnum once said: "There's a sucker born every minute". I guess this
proves him right. Microsoft continues to sucker-in people by selling them yet
another warmed-over version of NT. YAWN! Come back to us when you have
something interesting to report, Tommy.
Elijah Baley
Tommy the Troll <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142978/Windows_market_share_slide
_resumes
Except for this little tidbit, Tommy. It will take time, of course, but
Microsoft is on its way out. Empires, especially evil ones, don't last
forever. All they've got left is Windows and Office. That's it. They are
getting their asses handed to them on a platter in just about every
other endeavor they attempted. Ballmer needs to go but the board won't
act until it's too late. The stock is in the tank. The reputation is non
existent. Face it, you're beating a dead horse. All YOU have left is the
market share straw man and it's shrinking every quarter.
--
"Momma always said, "Stupid is as stupid does."" -Forest Gump
"You can't fix stupid." -Jim White, local radio personality
Maurice
"Elijah Baley" <li...@foundation.org> wrote in message
news:lije-23A2DB.1...@news.giganews.com...
And you are the living proof.
"You can't fix stupid." -Jim White, local radio personality
So I guess there's no hope for you.
Tommy the Troll
And Snow Leopard is not a warmed over version of OS X?
Tommy the Troll
wrote:
>In article <jdt4k5dqqv70s3kll...@4ax.com>,
> Tommy the Troll <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote:
>
>> That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
>> less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
>> versions.
>>
>> It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>>
>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct=4&qp
>> custom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>
>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142978/Windows_market_share_slide
>_resumes
>
>Except for this little tidbit, Tommy. It will take time, of course, but
>Microsoft is on its way out. Empires, especially evil ones, don't last
>forever. All they've got left is Windows and Office. That's it. They are
>getting their asses handed to them on a platter in just about every
>other endeavor they attempted. Ballmer needs to go but the board won't
>act until it's too late. The stock is in the tank. The reputation is non
>existent. Face it, you're beating a dead horse. All YOU have left is the
>market share straw man and it's shrinking every quarter.
Last time I checked Xbox was selling pretty well, as is their mouse
and keyboard business. For sure the Windows share losses are due
mainly to the spread of mobile phone and the Mac, but sales of Windows
and Office will grow in 2010.
As for evil, if evil dooms you Apple is not long for the world either.
Apple's incredible need to control the buyer is leading to
confrontation as Apple's share grows.
Lloyd Parsons
What is your point?
Snow Leopard is an upgrade to Leopard which was and upgrade...
It has been OSX all this time, just upgraded, no bullshit about a NEW
operating system.
Fa-groon
(in article <6hd6k5hurgrb8dci3...@4ax.com>):
That's not the argument. The argument is that some of you Wintrolls insist
that Win 7 is a brand NEW OS and that Snow Leopard is just another iteration
of OSX and when will Apple give it's users an ALL NEW OS the way Microsoft
has given it's users Win 7? By that same argument, if Snow Leopard is just
warmed over OSX, then Win 7 is merely warmed over NT.
MuahMan
> In article <jdt4k5dqqv70s3kllrmohcogp0bn0lf...@4ax.com>,
> Tommy the Troll <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote:
>
> > That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
> > less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
> > versions.
>
> > It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>
> > custom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142978/Windows_market_share_s...
> _resumes
>
> Except for this little tidbit, Tommy. It will take time, of course, but
> Microsoft is on its way out. Empires, especially evil ones, don't last
> forever. All they've got left is Windows and Office. That's it. They are
> getting their asses handed to them on a platter in just about every
> other endeavor they attempted. Ballmer needs to go but the board won't
> act until it's too late. The stock is in the tank. The reputation is non
> existent. Face it, you're beating a dead horse. All YOU have left is the
> market share straw man and it's shrinking every quarter.
>
> --
> "Momma always said, "Stupid is as stupid does."" -Forest Gump
>
> "You can't fix stupid." -Jim White, local radio personality
Yeah, in another 30 or 40 years Apple will be up to around 10% market
share. Of course most of you will be dead by then. LOL
Chance Furlong
<38bc859d-4161-4144...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
MuahMan <mua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> LOL
Laughing at yourself again?
Edwin
> Tommy the Troll <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote:
>
>> That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
>> less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
>> versions.
>>
>> It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>>
>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct=4&qp
>> custom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142978/Windows_market_share_slide
> _resumes
>
> Except for this little tidbit, Tommy. It will take time, of course, but
> Microsoft is on its way out. Empires, especially evil ones, don't last
> forever. All they've got left is Windows and Office. That's it. They are
> getting their asses handed to them on a platter in just about every
> other endeavor they attempted. Ballmer needs to go but the board won't
> act until it's too late. The stock is in the tank. The reputation is non
> existent. Face it, you're beating a dead horse. All YOU have left is the
> market share straw man and it's shrinking every quarter.
Another year starts with Maccies spewing the same old BS, Microsoft still
having over 90% of the computer market, and Apple still stuck below 4%, in
spite of a decade of claims of run-away Apple growth.
Edwin
"Tommy the Troll" <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote in message
news:jdt4k5dqqv70s3kll...@4ax.com...
I see not only does most of the market reject Snow Leopard, a great many Mac
owners do as well!
LOL
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
Sorry, Edwin, but you claim that when one quotes a source it isn't you
that is saying anything, so you should be replying to Computerworld, who
said:
'Microsoft's Windows resumed its usual losing form last month as the
operating system's usage share dropped by about a third of a point even
as the new Windows 7 posted a second straight month of impressive gains,
Web metrics firm Net Applications said Friday.'
What's good for the goose...
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
So those figures only mean something when they show a decline for Mac OS
X, then, is that right?
Edwin
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-59DBA...@news.shawcable.com...
> In article <nnu1n.17029$Wl3....@newsfe11.iad>,
> "Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> "Tommy the Troll" <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote in message
>> news:jdt4k5dqqv70s3kll...@4ax.com...
>> > That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
>> > less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
>> > versions.
>> >
>> > It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>> >
>> > http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct=4&
>> > qpcustom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>>
>>
>> I see not only does most of the market reject Snow Leopard, a great many
>> Mac
>> owners do as well!
>>
>> LOL
>
> So those figures only mean something when they show a decline for Mac OS
> X, then, is that right?
They also mean something when they show the great number of Mac owners who
reject Snow Leopard.
Want to mention Pixar again?
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
But somehow you can ignore the growth in overall Mac OS X use that they
show...
>
> Want to mention Pixar again?
What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
Edwin
Windows 7 gains, other Windows versions decline, Apple goes nowhere, as even
a great many Mac owners reject Snow Leopard.
> What's good for the goose...
... will not cure your schizophrenia.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
Windows overall declines.
>
> > What's good for the goose...
>
> ... will not cure your schizophrenia.
>
> Want to mention Pixar again?
What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
--
Edwin
No such thing is shown, unless it's an error. The Mac would have reached
4% market share if it had the growth you Maccies keep claiming for it. As
it stands even a great many Mac owners reject Apple's current offerings!
>>
>> Want to mention Pixar again?
>
> What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
Want to lie about workstations again?
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
LOL
You are *priceless*, Edwin!
You point to minor month to month fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac
declines", and you cannot see that if those numbers are significant,
then they are *all* significant.
>
> >>
> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
> >
> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>
> It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
LOL
>
> Want to lie about workstations again?
I'd have to have lied before to lie about it again, and I haven't.
Chance Furlong
Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net> wrote:
Eddie is jealous of those he is jealous of.
Chance Furlong
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> ... will not cure my schizophrenia.
>
> Want to mention Pixar again?
Edwin is not only jealous of Pixar, but is schizo as well.
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista? No windows
user here have been able to give me a good answer for that?
Thank you in advance...
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
I know I look great in comparison to yourself.
> You point to minor month to month fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac
> declines",
I do? Even if true how would that be worse than you guys who point at the
same minor fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac increases!" ?
> and you cannot see that if those numbers are significant,
> then they are *all* significant.
I'm not the one who can't see that. Want to get back to the issue of all
those Mac owners who have rejected Snow Leopard, and who aren't any mere
monthly fluctuation?
>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
>> >
>> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>>
>> It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
>
> LOL
Want to mention Unix licensing again?
>>
>> Want to lie about workstations again?
>
> I'd have to have lied before to lie about it again, and I haven't.
Yes you have, and you're covering those lies with even more lies.
Edwin
"Chance Furlong" <T-B...@megakatcity.com> wrote in message
news:T-Bone-5AFCDB....@news.giganews.com...
You misspelled "Jimmy Lee, Jr." again.
Edwin
"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-80A150.08...@News.Individual.NET...
> In article <nnu1n.17029$Wl3....@newsfe11.iad>,
> "Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> "Tommy the Troll" <tom_elamatearthlinkdotnet> wrote in message
>> news:jdt4k5dqqv70s3kll...@4ax.com...
>> > That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
>> > less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
>> > versions.
>> >
>> > It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>> >
>> > http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct=4&
>> > qpcustom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>>
>>
>> I see not only does most of the market reject Snow Leopard, a great many
>> Mac
>> owners do as well!
>
> So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
> No windows user here have been able to give me a good answer for that?
Why ask me if you got an answer to your question? You ought to know. A
"windows user" is the wrong person to ask anyway. Pose your question to a
Windows user instead of somebody you find looking out of windows.
> Thank you in advance...
Your welcome.
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
alan
> "Alan Baker" <alangba...@telus.net> wrote in message
> >> No such thing is shown, unless it's an error. The Mac would have
> >> reached
> >> 4% market share if it had the growth you Maccies keep claiming for it.
> >> As
> >> it stands even a great many Mac owners reject Apple's current offerings!
>
> > LOL
>
> > You are *priceless*, Edwin!
>
> I know I look great in comparison to yourself.
LOL
>
> > You point to minor month to month fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac
> > declines",
>
> I do? Even if true how would that be worse than you guys who point at the
> same minor fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac increases!" ?
That's not what anyone who has been pointing out Mac gains has been
doing.
>
> > and you cannot see that if those numbers are significant,
> > then they are *all* significant.
>
> I'm not the one who can't see that. Want to get back to the issue of all
> those Mac owners who have rejected Snow Leopard, and who aren't any mere
> monthly fluctuation?
You've yet to prove that there are any such group.
>
>
>
> >> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
>
> >> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>
> >> It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
>
> > LOL
>
> Want to mention Unix licensing again?
Why? Do you need to be embarrassed again?
>
>
>
> >> Want to lie about workstations again?
>
> > I'd have to have lied before to lie about it again, and I haven't.
>
> Yes you have, and you're covering those lies with even more lies.
Nope. Sorry.
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> > That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
> >> > less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
> >> > versions.
> >> >
> >> > It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
> >> >
> >> > http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct
> >> > =4&
> >> > qpcustom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
> >>
> >>
> >> I see not only does most of the market reject Snow Leopard, a great many
> >> Mac
> >> owners do as well!
> >
> > So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
>
> It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
So you have no idea what the advantage is of Windows 7 over Vista? Ahy
are you a windows advocate now again?
> > No windows user here have been able to give me a good answer for that?
>
> Why ask me if you got an answer to your question?
I don't have the answer. I'm looking for an answer
> > Thank you in advance...
>
> Your welcome.
To what?
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
No it doesn't. The Mac wouldn't still be stuck at less that 4% of the
market if Windows had declined. Any meager declines of Windows are due to
Linux, not the Mac.
>>
>> > What's good for the goose...
>>
>> ... will not cure your schizophrenia.
>>
>> Want to mention Pixar again?
>
> What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
It's not my obsession, it's yours, Alan. Go ahead and mention it. You
know you want to.
Edwin
Somebody should clean your cage.
Edwin
"alan" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:37e77a60-4a39-408d...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 8, 7:18 am, "Edwin" <thorn...@juno.com> wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangba...@telus.net> wrote in message
> >> No such thing is shown, unless it's an error. The Mac would have
> >> reached
> >> 4% market share if it had the growth you Maccies keep claiming for it.
> >> As
> >> it stands even a great many Mac owners reject Apple's current
> >> offerings!
>
> > LOL
>
> > You are *priceless*, Edwin!
>
> I know I look great in comparison to yourself.
"LOL"
Tacit agreement.
>
> > You point to minor month to month fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac
> > declines",
>
> I do? Even if true how would that be worse than you guys who point at the
> same minor fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac increases!" ?
"That's not what anyone who has been pointing out Mac gains has been
doing."
You're lying again, Alan.
>
> > and you cannot see that if those numbers are significant,
> > then they are *all* significant.
>
> I'm not the one who can't see that. Want to get back to the issue of all
> those Mac owners who have rejected Snow Leopard, and who aren't any mere
> monthly fluctuation?
"You've yet to prove that there are any such group."
You're lying again, Alan.
>
> >> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
>
> >> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>
> >> It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
>
> > LOL
>
> Want to mention Unix licensing again?
"Why? Do you need to be embarrassed again?"
You have me confused with Alan Baker, who tried to prove something about the
origins of BSD Unix by applying qoutes from AT&T's failed efforts to claim
ownership of PC Unix in the 1990's.
>
> >> Want to lie about workstations again?
>
> > I'd have to have lied before to lie about it again, and I haven't.
>
> Yes you have, and you're covering those lies with even more lies.
"Nope. Sorry."
Yet more of your lies, Alan.
Edwin
> In article <X7I1n.3286$rL7....@newsfe23.iad>,
> "Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> >> > That's right, still increasing about 1 percentage point a week. In
>> >> > less than 2 months W7 share will be more than double Mac OS of all
>> >> > versions.
>> >> >
>> >> > It's a hit! A Home Run in fact.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=4&qprid=86&qpdt=1&qpct
>> >> > =4&
>> >> > qpcustom=Windows%207&qptimeframe=H&qpsp=96365&qpnp=168
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I see not only does most of the market reject Snow Leopard, a great
>> >> many
>> >> Mac
>> >> owners do as well!
>> >
>> > So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
>>
>> It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
>
> So you have no idea what the advantage is of Windows 7 over Vista?
You mistakenly assume I share your limitations.
>Ahy are you a windows advocate now again?
Who's "Ahy?"
Do you suppose the Mac will ever have a working spelling checker?
>> > No windows user here have been able to give me a good answer for that?
>>
>> Why ask me if you got an answer to your question?
>
> I don't have the answer. I'm looking for an answer
Hold your breath until you find out if St. Peter can give you your answer.
:-D
>> > Thank you in advance...
>>
>> Your welcome.
>
> To what?
Don't smash the pea.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but the figures you rely on show that Linux increases have
been minimal.
Since November 2007, Linux's share has risen from .65% to 1.02%, while
Mac OS X's has risen from 3.43% to 5.11%
>
> >>
> >> > What's good for the goose...
> >>
> >> ... will not cure your schizophrenia.
> >>
> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
> >
> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>
> It's not my obsession, it's yours, Alan. Go ahead and mention it. You
> know you want to.
Sorry, but the evidence is that it's yours.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> "alan" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:37e77a60-4a39-408d...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 8, 7:18 am, "Edwin" <thorn...@juno.com> wrote:
> > "Alan Baker" <alangba...@telus.net> wrote in message
> > >> No such thing is shown, unless it's an error. The Mac would have
> > >> reached
> > >> 4% market share if it had the growth you Maccies keep claiming for it.
> > >> As
> > >> it stands even a great many Mac owners reject Apple's current
> > >> offerings!
> >
> > > LOL
> >
> > > You are *priceless*, Edwin!
> >
> > I know I look great in comparison to yourself.
>
> "LOL"
>
> Tacit agreement.
LOL
>
> >
> > > You point to minor month to month fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac
> > > declines",
> >
> > I do? Even if true how would that be worse than you guys who point at the
> > same minor fluctuations and say "Ha, ha! Mac increases!" ?
>
> "That's not what anyone who has been pointing out Mac gains has been
> doing."
>
> You're lying again, Alan.
LOL
>
> >
> > > and you cannot see that if those numbers are significant,
> > > then they are *all* significant.
> >
> > I'm not the one who can't see that. Want to get back to the issue of all
> > those Mac owners who have rejected Snow Leopard, and who aren't any mere
> > monthly fluctuation?
>
> "You've yet to prove that there are any such group."
>
> You're lying again, Alan.
LOL
>
> >
> > >> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
> >
> > >> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
> >
> > >> It's your obsession, not mine. You've been mentioning it for years.
> >
> > > LOL
> >
> > Want to mention Unix licensing again?
>
> "Why? Do you need to be embarrassed again?"
>
> You have me confused with Alan Baker, who tried to prove something about the
> origins of BSD Unix by applying qoutes from AT&T's failed efforts to claim
> ownership of PC Unix in the 1990's.
LOL
>
> >
> > >> Want to lie about workstations again?
> >
> > > I'd have to have lied before to lie about it again, and I haven't.
> >
> > Yes you have, and you're covering those lies with even more lies.
>
> "Nope. Sorry."
>
> Yet more of your lies, Alan.
LOL
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> > So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
> >>
> >> It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
> >
> > So you have no idea what the advantage is of Windows 7 over Vista?
>
> You mistakenly assume I share your limitations.
Apparently not, since you were unable to list any such advantages. So,
prove me wrong. what are the advantages with Windows 7 over Windows
Vista. For someone using Vista - such as me - why should I upgrade to
Windows 7?
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
> In article <WCI2n.12246$Ef7....@newsfe07.iad>,
> "Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> >> > So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
>> >>
>> >> It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
>> >
>> > So you have no idea what the advantage is of Windows 7 over Vista?
>>
>> You mistakenly assume I share your limitations.
>
> Apparently not, since you were unable to list any such advantages.
You need to learn the difference between "unwilling" and "unable."
> So, prove me wrong.
Why should I bother when you do that so well yourself already?
> what are the advantages with Windows 7 over Windows
> Vista. For someone using Vista - such as me - why should I upgrade to
> Windows 7?
You're welcome.
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> > So, again, what are the benefits of Windows 7 over Vista?
> >> >>
> >> >> It exposes people of low I.Q. by making them ask questions like that.
> >> >
> >> > So you have no idea what the advantage is of Windows 7 over Vista?
> >>
> >> You mistakenly assume I share your limitations.
> >
> > Apparently not, since you were unable to list any such advantages.
>
> You need to learn the difference between "unwilling" and "unable."
I know the difference, and you are unable. You admitted as much.
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
You must have a daily quota of lies to tell.
Edwin
Have your remedial reading tutor explain to you what that means.
> Since November 2007, Linux's share has risen from .65% to 1.02%, while
> Mac OS X's has risen from 3.43% to 5.11%
You're tracking changes over longer than two years? And you need somebody
to explain, yet again, that these are Net usage figures, not market share
figures?
>>
>> >>
>> >> > What's good for the goose...
>> >>
>> >> ... will not cure your schizophrenia.
>> >>
>> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
>> >
>> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
>>
>> It's not my obsession, it's yours, Alan. Go ahead and mention it.
>> You
>> know you want to.
>
> Sorry, but the evidence is that it's yours.
You're confused again. You must have been thinking of Pixar while you
answered.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
NetApplications figures were what was being discussed in this thread.
They are what Tom first wrote about. They are the subject of this thread
and they show Windows declining and the Mac growing
>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > What's good for the goose...
> >> >>
> >> >> ... will not cure your schizophrenia.
> >> >>
> >> >> Want to mention Pixar again?
> >> >
> >> > What is this obsession you have with Pixar, Edwin?
> >>
> >> It's not my obsession, it's yours, Alan. Go ahead and mention it.
> >> You
> >> know you want to.
> >
> > Sorry, but the evidence is that it's yours.
>
> You're confused again. You must have been thinking of Pixar while you
> answered.
LOL