Apple cancels Christmas... if you want a 27 inch iMac
Edwin
Maurice
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:679%m.57$ay...@newsfe02.iad...
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
per the article:
But, Allthingsdigital added, the firm did not address the alleged problems
or their relation to the stretched out shipping times.
Does Apple exchange those dogs, or patch them up?
Sandman
wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :)
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-387BF8.09...@News.Individual.NET...
Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock therapy
treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every week to
every other day?
> --
> Sandman[.net]
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly deserves.
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
> >> >
> >> > Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :)
> >>
> >> Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock therapy
> >> treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every week to
> >> every other day?
> >
> > Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
>
> Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly deserves.
Thanks for demonstrating the unprovoked insults yet again.
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
Above.
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
None there. You must be following Snit's playbook again.
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
> >> >> >> therapy
> >> >> >> treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every
> >> >> >> week
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> every other day?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly deserves.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for demonstrating the unprovoked insults yet again.
> >>
> >> Where?
> >
> > Above.
>
> None there.
Incorrect.
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
You're just a lamer version of Dave Tholen.
Dave Fritzinger
> "Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <5UN2n.2174$Mv3.1...@newsfe05.iad>,
> > "Edwin" <thorn...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
> >>news:mr-04865C.18...@News.Individual.NET...
> >> > "Edwin" <thorn...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
>
> >> >> >> > Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :)
>
> >> >> >> Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
> >> >> >> therapy
> >> >> >> treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every
> >> >> >> week
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> every other day?
>
> >> >> > Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
>
> >> >> Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly deserves.
>
> >> > Thanks for demonstrating the unprovoked insults yet again.
>
> >> Where?
>
> > Above.
>
> None there. You must be following Snit's playbook again.
Edwin, I believe the following quote from you is what Sandman was
referring to. Sure looks like unprovoked insults to me.
Tim Murray
>>>>>>>> Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
>>>>>>>> therapy treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from
>>>>>>>> every week to every other day?
>>
>>>>>>> Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
>>
>>>>>> Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly deserves.
>>
>>>>> Thanks for demonstrating the unprovoked insults yet again.
>>
>>>> Where?
>>
>>> Above.
>>
>> None there. You must be following Snit's playbook again.
>
> Edwin, I believe the following quote from you is what Sandman was
> referring to. Sure looks like unprovoked insults to me.
>
> "Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock therapy
> treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every week to
> every other day?"
C'mon. He knew it. Just not man enough to admit it.
Sandman
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/14/imac_delay/
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
> >> >> >> >> therapy
> >> >> >> >> treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every
> >> >> >> >> week
> >> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >> every other day?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Same old Edwin, same old unprovoked insults :)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Same old loopy Jonas, whining about receiving what he richly
> >> >> >> deserves.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for demonstrating the unprovoked insults yet again.
> >> >>
> >> >> Where?
> >> >
> >> > Above.
> >>
> >> None there.
> >
> > Incorrect.
>
> You're just a lamer version of Dave Tholen.
On what basis do you make that claim?
--
Sandman[.net]
Edwin
"Dave Fritzinger" <dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0539204d-c22d-43a7...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Only because you conveniently ignore what I was responding to.
"Hi Loopy! Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
therapy
treatments? Or did they just increase the sessions from every week
to
every other day?"
No unprovoked insult there.
Edwin
"Tim Murray" <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote in message
news:hij4lu$45s$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I made Tim have penis envy again.
Dave Fritzinger
> "Dave Fritzinger" <dfrit...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Edwin, Sandman's original reply to you, to which you responded as I
wrote above, was:
"Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :) "
Now, would you mind explaining what about that was so insulting that
you believe your reply was justified and provoked?
Snit
eac2a8bf-8050-4937...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com on 1/13/10
9:58 AM:
>>> None there. You must be following Snit's playbook again.
>>
>> "Edwin, I believe the following quote from you is what Sandman was
>> referring to. Sure looks like unprovoked insults to me."
>>
>> Only because you conveniently ignore what I was responding to.
>>
>> "Hi Loopy! � �Did they try increasing the voltage of your shock
>> therapy
>> treatments? � �Or did they just increase the sessions from every week
>> to
>> every other day?"
>>
>> No unprovoked insult there.
>
> Edwin, Sandman's original reply to you, to which you responded as I
> wrote above, was:
> "Oh, Edwin is back, under his own name. Welcome back :) "
>
> Now, would you mind explaining what about that was so insulting that
> you believe your reply was justified and provoked?
Both Sandman and Edwin are trolling each other... and they are not pleased
with the attention they are getting. Both are now begging for my attention,
mentioning me in just about every post of theirs. It is weird. And a
little wacked on their part.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Edwin
Ponder it, Dave.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
How is mentioning the fact that you have posted under pseudonyms so
insulting to you, Edwin? It happens to be true.
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
Edwin
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-96034...@news.shawcable.com...
How long ago was that true, Alan?
Want to mention Pixar again?
Dave Fritzinger
I did. You overreacted.
Edwin
"I did. You overreacted."
I see you've backpedaled from "unprovoked" to "overreacted."
Amazing progress for you, Dave. Now ponder it some more.
Dave Fritzinger
No backpedaling intended. Perhaps you are the one who should do some
pondering...
Edwin
"No backpedaling intended."
You backpedaled nontheless.
"Perhaps you are the one who should do some
pondering..."
I'm not the one who's posting unintentional messages.
David Fritzinger
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
As I said, no backpedaling was intended. If you insist on living in a
dreamworld where your interpretation of what I said is more important
than my interpretation of what I said, that is your problem.
>
> "Perhaps you are the one who should do some
> pondering..."
>
> I'm not the one who's posting unintentional messages.
I notice you don't want to ponder the unprovoked insult you directed at
Sandman. Why is that?
Edwin
"David Fritzinger" <dfri...@nospamtome.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzin-FEC2D9...@nothing.attdns.com...
But was done nontheless.
> If you insist on living in a
> dreamworld where your interpretation of what I said is more important
> than my interpretation of what I said, that is your problem.
I'll have to start doing that before it can become a problem for me.
Regardless your words are public record, and no amount of interpretation by
you will expunge the record.
>> "Perhaps you are the one who should do some
>> pondering..."
>>
>> I'm not the one who's posting unintentional messages.
>
> I notice you don't want to ponder the unprovoked insult you directed at
> Sandman. Why is that?
Because there is no unprovoked insult for me to ponder. Now you can
explain how I could overreact if there was nothing to react to.
Dave Fritzinger
> "David Fritzinger" <dfrit...@nospamtome.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dfritzin-FEC2D9...@nothing.attdns.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <Tfq3n.17901$Wl3.8...@newsfe11.iad>,
But, of course, you did insult Sandman, for no reason that I could
see. So, you are being somewhat dishonest here.
Alan Baker
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
Just a few weeks. Sermo Malifer and RottenApple.
>
> Want to mention Pixar again?
--