Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Vostro 220 Mini Tower $429.00

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dark

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 5:58:46 PM1/4/10
to


Vostro 220 Mini Tower

. Intel� CoreT2 Duo Processor
. Genuine Windows� 7 Home Premium
. 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
. Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
. Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
Subscription*

Only $429 After Instant Savings


pix.gif

Chance Furlong

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 6:55:16 PM1/4/10
to
In article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>, "Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>
> Intel� CoreT2 Duo Processor


> Genuine Windows� 7 Home Premium

> 2GB Memory and 250GB hard drive
> Dell 18.5" widescreen flat panel monitor
> Norton Internet Security 2009 15 month subscription


> Only $429 After Instant Savings

What is your point, zara?

Fa-groon

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 6:58:01 PM1/4/10
to
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:58:46 -0800, Dark wrote
(in article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>):

>
>
>
> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>
> . Intelᅵ CoreT2 Duo Processor
> . Genuine Windowsᅵ 7 Home Premium


> . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
> . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
> . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
> Subscription*
>
> Only $429 After Instant Savings
>
>
>

Does it come with OSX? No? Then it's worthless. Don't need a computer running
warmed-over and ancient NT at any price.

Dark

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:17:33 PM1/4/10
to

"Fa-groon" <fa-g...@mad.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C767C089...@news.giganews.com...

> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:58:46 -0800, Dark wrote
> (in article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>):
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>>
>> . Intel� CoreT2 Duo Processor
>> . Genuine Windows� 7 Home Premium

>> . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
>> . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
>> . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
>> Subscription*
>>
>> Only $429 After Instant Savings
>>
>>
>>
>
> Does it come with OSX? No? Then it's worthless. Don't need a computer
> running
> warmed-over and ancient NT at any price.
>

It's running Genuine Windows� 7, that's better then OSX


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:20:28 PM1/4/10
to
In article <4b428563$0$4998$607e...@cv.net>, "Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

What a pity most technology pundits don't agree with you...

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)

Fa-groon

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:46:42 PM1/4/10
to
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:17:33 -0800, Dark wrote
(in article <4b428563$0$4998$607e...@cv.net>):

>
> "Fa-groon" <fa-g...@mad.com> wrote in message
> news:0001HW.C767C089...@news.giganews.com...
>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:58:46 -0800, Dark wrote
>> (in article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>):
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>>>

>>> . Intelᅵ CoreT2 Duo Processor
>>> . Genuine Windowsᅵ 7 Home Premium


>>> . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
>>> . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
>>> . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
>>> Subscription*
>>>
>>> Only $429 After Instant Savings
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Does it come with OSX? No? Then it's worthless. Don't need a computer
>> running
>> warmed-over and ancient NT at any price.
>>
>

> It's running Genuine Windowsᅵ 7, that's better then OSX
>
>

Only to someone who's a complete dud, Mr. "Dark". Windows 7 is LAUGHABLE
junk! And to think, the management at Microsoft is setting up there on
mahogany row at MS headquarters in Redmond smiling as they think "Fooled them
again!"

Fa-groon

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:49:36 PM1/4/10
to
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:20:28 -0800, Alan Baker wrote
(in article <alangbaker-1CE7A...@news.shawcable.com>):

> In article <4b428563$0$4998$607e...@cv.net>, "Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Fa-groon" <fa-g...@mad.com> wrote in message
>> news:0001HW.C767C089...@news.giganews.com...
>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:58:46 -0800, Dark wrote
>>> (in article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>):
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>>>>

>>>> . Intelᅵ CoreT2 Duo Processor
>>>> . Genuine Windowsᅵ 7 Home Premium


>>>> . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
>>>> . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
>>>> . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
>>>> Subscription*
>>>>
>>>> Only $429 After Instant Savings
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does it come with OSX? No? Then it's worthless. Don't need a computer
>>> running
>>> warmed-over and ancient NT at any price.
>>>
>>

>> It's running Genuine Windowsᅵ 7, that's better then OSX

>
> What a pity most technology pundits don't agree with you...

And remember, "Genuine Windows 7" is better than just plain old "Windows 7"
(whatever the hell Microsoft might imagine THAT would be). LOL!

Maurice

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 8:32:22 AM1/5/10
to

"Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net...

Twice the performance - half the price of a Mac mini - plus a monitor,
keyboard and mouse.

And it runs WIN 7 which shits all over Snow Leopard.


Chance Furlong

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:57:11 AM1/5/10
to
In article <EbH0n.626$Ef7...@newsfe07.iad>,
"Maurice" <Mauric...@aol.com> wrote:

> "Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net...
> >
> >
> >
> > Vostro 220 Mini Tower
> >
> > . Intel� CoreT2 Duo Processor
> > . Genuine Windows� 7 Home Premium
> > . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
> > . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
> > . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
> > Subscription*
> >
> > Only $429 After Instant Savings
>

> Twice the performance, half the price of a Mac mini, plus a monitor,

> keyboard and mouse.
>
> And it runs WIN 7 which shits all over Snow Leopard.

Whatever, coprophile.

Edwin

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 6:47:38 PM1/7/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-1CE7A...@news.shawcable.com...

> In article <4b428563$0$4998$607e...@cv.net>, "Dark" <Da...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Fa-groon" <fa-g...@mad.com> wrote in message
>> news:0001HW.C767C089...@news.giganews.com...
>> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:58:46 -0800, Dark wrote
>> > (in article <4b4272ad$0$5019$607e...@cv.net>):
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Vostro 220 Mini Tower
>> >>
>> >> . Intel� CoreT2 Duo Processor
>> >> . Genuine Windows� 7 Home Premium
>> >> . 2GB Memory* & 250GB* Hard Drive
>> >> . Dell 18.5" Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
>> >> . Norton Internet SecurityT 2009 - 15-Month
>> >> Subscription*
>> >>
>> >> Only $429 After Instant Savings
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Does it come with OSX? No? Then it's worthless. Don't need a computer
>> > running
>> > warmed-over and ancient NT at any price.
>> >
>>
>> It's running Genuine Windows� 7, that's better then OSX
>
> What a pity most technology pundits don't agree with you...

... if we only consider "technology pundits" who exist outside of the real
world.


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 6:49:35 PM1/7/10
to
In article <uou1n.18178$0U1...@newsfe16.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

By all means, show some pundits who think that Windows 7 is a better OS
than Snow Leopard...

I look forward to replying to your forthcoming non-reply with <crickets>

Edwin

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 7:05:14 PM1/7/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-44466...@news.shawcable.com...

Again?

> I look forward to replying to your forthcoming non-reply with <crickets>

Are you going to mention Pixar to the crickets?


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 7:06:21 PM1/7/10
to
In article <_Eu1n.13787$w21....@newsfe17.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

By all means, show you ever doing so before...

>
> > I look forward to replying to your forthcoming non-reply with <crickets>
>
> Are you going to mention Pixar to the crickets?

LOL

Maurice

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:46:32 PM1/7/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-3C46F...@news.shawcable.com...

Definition of LOL:

1) no ready answer is available.
2) a form of agreement.


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:56:31 PM1/7/10
to
In article <40x1n.1244$Mv3...@newsfe05.iad>,
"Maurice" <Mauric...@aol.com> wrote:

I'll be sure to remember that you define it that way when you and Edwin
(who agrees with you) uses it...

Maurice

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 8:38:25 AM1/8/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-1E8C9...@news.shawcable.com...

I'll be sure to remember not to.


Edwin

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 10:29:20 AM1/8/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-3C46F...@news.shawcable.com...

What for? I'm not the guy who goes around accusing people for years of
saying that 850,000,000 workstations are every six months, then produces a
quote that proves he lied, and finally admits it's a lie but never
apologizes. That would be YOU.

>>
>> > I look forward to replying to your forthcoming non-reply with
>> > <crickets>
>>
>> Are you going to mention Pixar to the crickets?
>
> LOL

I take that as a YES. How did your imaginary crickets respond? Did they
try to devour your flesh again?

Isn't it time you got treatment for your schizophrenia?


Edwin

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 10:31:47 AM1/8/10
to

"Maurice" <Mauric...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:dzG1n.7355$V_3....@newsfe09.iad...

Remember that Alan Baker has overused "LOL" for YEARS, and constantly uses
it to dodge questions and issues he's too gutless to face like a man (if he
could even pretend to be one).

Neither you nor I have that meaning applied to us when we use "LOL" the
right way.


Maurice

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 12:52:31 PM1/8/10
to

"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:EdI1n.7365$V_3....@newsfe09.iad...

It's the tired, old maccie defense #11, "role reversal".


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 11:06:47 PM1/8/10
to
In article <EdI1n.7365$V_3....@newsfe09.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

LOL

Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 11:07:12 PM1/8/10
to
In article <lbI1n.15739$DY5....@newsfe08.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

LOL

>
> >>
> >> > I look forward to replying to your forthcoming non-reply with
> >> > <crickets>
> >>
> >> Are you going to mention Pixar to the crickets?
> >
> > LOL
>
> I take that as a YES. How did your imaginary crickets respond? Did they
> try to devour your flesh again?
>
> Isn't it time you got treatment for your schizophrenia?

LOL

Sandman

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 4:53:39 AM1/9/10
to
In article <lbI1n.15739$DY5....@newsfe08.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

> >> > By all means, show some pundits who think that Windows 7 is a better OS
> >> > than Snow Leopard...
> >>
> >> Again?
> >
> > By all means, show you ever doing so before...
>
> What for?

Credibility, supposedly.


--
Sandman[.net]

fibercut

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 8:34:31 AM1/9/10
to

Well i guess you got out the mental hospital since you started posting
here again after your public declaration to leave this forum for good a
year or so back.

Edwin

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 11:15:17 AM1/13/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-6A9D3...@news.shawcable.com...

See what I mean?


Edwin

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 11:21:20 AM1/13/10
to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-38B65A.10...@News.Individual.NET...

Using that word must make your body burn like a vampire dragged into the
sunlight.


Edwin

unread,
Jan 13, 2010, 11:22:45 AM1/13/10
to

"fibercut" <fibe...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:2010010908343116807-fibercut@nospamcom...

I guess you must be posting from a mental hospital since you think I
shouldn't be able to change my mind about posting here.


Sandman

unread,
Jan 14, 2010, 1:08:18 AM1/14/10
to
In article <4qm3n.21694$XU....@newsfe03.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

> >> >> > By all means, show some pundits who think that Windows 7 is a better
> >> >> > OS
> >> >> > than Snow Leopard...
> >> >>
> >> >> Again?
> >> >
> >> > By all means, show you ever doing so before...
> >>
> >> What for?
> >
> > Credibility, supposedly.
>
> Using that word must make your body burn like a vampire dragged into the
> sunlight.

And I'm assuming the burning you're experiencing now is just a
demonstration of this?

http://sandman.net/files/burning.jpg


--
Sandman[.net]

Edwin

unread,
Jan 18, 2010, 11:15:17 AM1/18/10
to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-8E8AB7.07...@News.Individual.NET...

You incorrectly assume I share your circumstances.

> http://sandman.net/files/burning.jpg

How is that phishing site working out for you, Jonas?

> --
> Sandman[.net]


0 new messages