Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion What's the difference between Intel Triton II VX and HX chipsets? Which one to buy?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark Hahn  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips, comp.sys.intel
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips, comp.sys.intel
From: h...@neurocog.lrdc.pitt.edu (Mark Hahn)
Date: 1996/09/11
Subject: Re: What's the difference between Intel Triton II VX and HX chipsets? Which one to buy?

> > I'd like to know what's the difference between the Triton II VX and HX
> > chipsets from Intel, also which one is faster and with which one should
> > I buy a motherboard?
...
> Or is that and FX instead of HX, I'm not sure? Anyways I'd really
> appreciate any info and clarification.

here's a brief summary of the main P5 chipsets:

neptune: ~3 years old and pretty slow.  until the 430hx, it was
the only way to build a multi-P5 system, though.

triton (430fx): ~2 years old, and pretty fast.  it introduced support
for PB cache and EDO, and had much improved memory and PCI interfaces.
it also frequently comes with the PIIX eide controller, which is quite
fast and capable of busmastering.  it's uniprocessor-only, and doesn't
support parity, though.

triton II (430hx): inside a year old, and a little faster than the 430fx.
it mainly just tweaked, with a little better buffering and memory timings.
it also supports error detection and correction and multiprocessors.

triton II (430vx): same age as the 430hx, but mostly inferior.  it doesn't
provide quite as agressive buffering, and has slower EDO timings.  its
only possible advantage is that it supports SDRAM.  but in the presence of
cache, SDRAM provides little benefit to most programs, so...

just for completeness:

Orion: older P6 chipset, which was pathologically buggy for a long time.
reports are that it's fixed now, but...  it offers 4-way multiprocessor
support as well as interleaved FPM.

Natoma: newer P6 chipset, which seems to work quite well, and does EDO.
it's limited to 2x multi, though, and does no interleaving.

there are a couple non-Intel P5 and P6 chipsets, but they never seemed
to ship in much quantity...

regards, mark hahn.
--
operator may differ from spokesperson.  h...@neurocog.lrdc.pitt.edu
                                        http://neurocog.lrdc.pitt.edu/~hahn/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google