Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Why is the E7 so hard to find?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Quadibloc  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2012, 4:42 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
From: Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 20 2012 4:42 pm
Subject: Why is the E7 so hard to find?
I was excited when I heard the news that the Xeon E7 chip would bring
to the x86 platfom the kind of RAS features that had previously only
been available for the Itanium (and, of course, other architectures
like SPARC and IBM mainframes).

However, currently, in looking for servers, I find that the E7 is only
available in blade or rack servers, not in the humbler tower servers.
Is the E7 so expensive, or are the RAS features of such limited use
except in very large-scale systems, so that this makes sense?

John Savard


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark F  
View profile  
 More options Jan 21 2012, 3:21 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
From: Mark F <mark53...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:21:14 -0500
Local: Sat, Jan 21 2012 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Why is the E7 so hard to find?
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:42:59 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc

<jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
> I was excited when I heard the news that the Xeon E7 chip would bring
> to the x86 platfom the kind of RAS features that had previously only
> been available for the Itanium (and, of course, other architectures
> like SPARC and IBM mainframes).

> However, currently, in looking for servers, I find that the E7 is only
> available in blade or rack servers, not in the humbler tower servers.
> Is the E7 so expensive, or are the RAS features of such limited use
> except in very large-scale systems, so that this makes sense?

> John Savard

 Intel Xeon Processor E7 Family:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-processor...

Click on: "See detailed product specifications"
on the right under: "Product Specifications"

and get to:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-processor...
  "Intel Xeon Processor E7 Family Specifications",
which shows a list of processors with some of the features.  I don't
know if the list is complete.

I think the E7-28nn is for up to 2 sockets, which I think is what you
want.

I think E7-48nn are for up to 4 sockets, E7-88nn for up to 8
sockets.

Using www.froogle.com seems to indicate that the price depends mainly
on the L3 cache size.

I think about US$1500 to US$4500 depending on cache.
(I've left out the 6 core stuff in the prices and features)

Add about US$200 to US$400 for going from  -2nnn to -8nnn

I'm not sure what differences there are beyond:
 . number of cores (6, 8, 10)
 . threads per core (1,2=HyperThreading)
 . cache size (18MB, 24MB, 30MB)
 . speed (2GH to 2.67GHz)
 . low power optimization
       ( No =  105W or 130W , yes 95W)

 . maximum sockets (2,4,8)

I don't know if any or all have RAS.

This has a nice table of functionality and some prices for
1000 units from about 2011 June:
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/19/xeon_e7_analysis/page2.html
  "Xeon E7 servers run with the big dogs
   Gives chase to RISC and Itanium foxes"
   By Timothy Prickett Morgan
   Posted in Enterprise Tech, 19th June 2011 11:00 GMT


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Orson Cart  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2012, 7:58 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
From: "Orson Cart" <ex-pri...@parts.org>
Date: 26 Jan 2012 01:58:27 +0100
Local: Wed, Jan 25 2012 7:58 pm
Subject: Re: Why is the E7 so hard to find?

Obviously Intel's market research stuffed up.
They underestimated how many people were willing to fork out
over $4000 to boast
"My cache is bigger than your cache"

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »