Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Best, but cost effective, sound card for a music server

26 views
Skip to first unread message

jtpryan

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 12:25:48 PM2/15/07
to
I'm putting all of my CD's (~800) on a PC that currently has onboard
sound. I want to come out of this to my receiver and use the PC as a
music server. However, it seems to me that the quality would be
better with a dedicated sound card. Now, all I'm gonna do is listen
to music on this, no fancy mixing or anything. Would something like
the Audigy SE do it? Or should I find a solution with optical out?
Is it worth it?

-Jim

Arny Krueger

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 1:23:21 PM2/15/07
to
"jtpryan" <jtp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171560347....@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com

Low cost? Better than your typical onboard audio interface?

SB Live! 24 bit PCI - about $30

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz):+0.07 dB, -0.18 dB
Noise level, dB (A):-97.1 dB
Dynamic range, dB (A):93.5 dB
THD, %:0.0066
IMD, %:0.014
Stereo crosstalk, dB:-95.
IMD at 10 kHz, %:0.013

In comparison:

Current Realtek AC97 on a motherboard:

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz): +0.08 dB, -0.56 dB
Noise level, dB (A):-85.0 dB
Dynamic range, dB (A):84.8 dB
THD, %:0.018
IMD + Noise, %: 2.703
Stereo crosstalk, dB: -67.
IMD at 10 kHz, %:0.088


jtpryan

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 3:14:04 PM2/15/07
to
On Feb 15, 1:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" <a...@hotpop.com> wrote:
> "jtpryan" <jtpr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Thank you for the response. However, I'm really not too good with
specs. Is this good or bad?

-Jim

Laurence Payne

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 5:02:03 PM2/15/07
to
On 15 Feb 2007 12:14:04 -0800, "jtpryan" <jtp...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Thank you for the response. However, I'm really not too good with
>specs. Is this good or bad?

Unless you listen to acoustic recordings, on good/very good speakers,
you won't notice any improvement over the onboard sound card. If you
listen to MP3s you DEFINITELY won't notice the difference :)

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 5:30:22 PM2/15/07
to

I can tell you that any X-Fi sounds better than the Audigy.
However, that's playing uncompressed (or lossless compressed) CDs on
speakers costing several thousand.

If you're talking MP3 then forget it.

--
Dirk

http://www.onetribe.me.uk - The UK's only occult talk show
Presented by Dirk Bruere and Marc Power on ResonanceFM 104.4
http://www.resonancefm.com

justin david

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 4:07:15 PM2/22/07
to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:22 +0000, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
<dirk....@gmail.com> wrote:

>jtpryan wrote:
>> I'm putting all of my CD's (~800) on a PC that currently has onboard
>> sound. I want to come out of this to my receiver and use the PC as a
>> music server. However, it seems to me that the quality would be
>> better with a dedicated sound card. Now, all I'm gonna do is listen
>> to music on this, no fancy mixing or anything. Would something like
>> the Audigy SE do it? Or should I find a solution with optical out?
>> Is it worth it?
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>
>I can tell you that any X-Fi sounds better than the Audigy.
>However, that's playing uncompressed (or lossless compressed) CDs on
>speakers costing several thousand.
>
>If you're talking MP3 then forget it.

How would one of the Turtle Beach cards do, specifically the Santa
Cruz? I've seen it on ebay for about $20.

Geoff

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 9:00:32 PM2/22/07
to


Your music server pc presumably only needs a soundcard for 'rough checking'
purposes. Only the client computer/s would need a high quality card. But
not if you are MP3ing the music at anything less that 256kbps - just use any
old junk for either soundcard.


geoff


Mr.T

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 10:52:28 PM2/22/07
to

"justin david" <ustin...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:781st2hugsgbsg18g...@4ax.com...

> How would one of the Turtle Beach cards do, specifically the Santa
> Cruz? I've seen it on ebay for about $20.

Perfectly adequate for the purpose IME.

MrT.


Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 9:46:29 PM2/23/07
to

On an obviously related topic, which is the best soundcard for playback?
Esp wrt s/n figures?

Mr.T

unread,
Feb 23, 2007, 10:53:30 PM2/23/07
to

"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:549n80F...@mid.individual.net...

> On an obviously related topic, which is the best soundcard for playback?
> Esp wrt s/n figures?

Pretty hard to beat the Lynx or DAL cards if that's what you are after.
The M-Audio Audiophile 192 is hard to beat for value though.

MrT.


curds&whey

unread,
Feb 10, 2008, 12:29:27 AM2/10/08
to
Laurence Payne <lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote:

Anyone with a sensitive and musically trained ear can tell the different
between standard quality onboard sound and the higher quality available
from some soundcards and external boxes. Generally this applies to
those who are old enough or interested enough to know what really good
live and analog sound is.

0 new messages