Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Soundscape Elite Specs. from Fax sheet
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Eugene Kang  
View profile  
 More options Apr 29 1995, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.advocacy
From: wi...@genes.pl.my (Eugene Kang)
Date: 1995/04/29
Subject: Re: Soundscape Elite Specs. from Fax sheet

>>It's incredible.  They just *don't* get it!  How hard can it be to
>>understand how important it is to have RAM on your sound card?  Such a
>>simple concept.

>Geez Louize Dogman... go buy a $900+ full fledged synth!  Of course, I can see
>the need for RAM in something, say, like the AWE32 since most of it's stock
>patches sound like crap(IMHO).  Great patches (from a *real* synth company)
>preclude the need for RAM to a large degree.  And with the price of RAM these

But even one of the best wavetable cards have several cheesy sounding
patches! e.g. Bagpipes on the Roland SCD-15.

>Keep this in perspective.  PC sound cards are MULTI-MEDIA oriented.  NOT
>dedicated synthesizers!  Choose your weapon and make the most of it.

Well, that's a point...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.