The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
From: "Bob Myers" <nospample...@address.invalid>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:59:47 -0700
Local: Thurs, Mar 3 2005 1:59 pm
Subject: Re: 1680x1050 name?
news:1109835206.740814.125030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> "Unfortunately we have not specifically tested our products with the DVI (and similar digital interfaces, or even analog types, for that > Apple Cinema brand of monitors. As for the max resolution when making > DVI connections, 1600x1200 is the conservative number for the > advertised max resolution. However like every computer hardware device, > the optimal performance will depend on the compatible of each computer > devices working together as a whole." matter) really doesn't have a "max. resolution" (pixel format) per se. The limiting factor is pretty much always the pixel rate, and as long as you can put together a valid timing for a given format which does not exceed the rate limit of the interface in question, the interface will be happen. For instance, a format of, say, 200 pixels horizontally by 10,000 vertically at 60 Hz refresh may be a silly thing to do, but since the pixel rate would probably come in well under 150 MHz it wouldn't pose much of a problem for most interfaces. With respect to DVI specifically, the maximum pixel rate Bob M. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||