--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, I no longer see any articles originating from |
| Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers |
| you will need to find a different place to post on Usenet. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |
Per what you are calling "overscanning," not usually. (The term
"overscanning" is generally one used in the context of CRT monitors
or televisions, where the beam actually scanned beyond the usable
limits of the screen and so put some fraction of the image offscreen.)
LCD panels as used in monitors do, however, tend to operate over
a fairly narrow range of update rates (re the panel itself), most over
centered around 60 frames per second. If the incoming video is at
a signficantly different rate (say, 75 FPS), then a frame-rate conversion
will be performed by the monitor's "front-end" electronics (the
scaler/controller IC, etc.). There's really nothing to be gained by
operating the monitor at any such "non-native" rate (and the process
can introduce some motion artifacts), so it is best to always drive
the monitor at its preferred timing if this is possible.
And in most panels, there IS a lower limit on the update rate of
the panel. Once written, the LCD pixels/subpixels will not hold their
assigned value forever, and neither will certain other parts of the
drive electronics. You need to refresh them at a regular rate to
maintain acceptable image quality. This is NOT the same mechanisms
that caused CRT flicker, etc., but there is still a minimum guaranteed
rate below which the performance specifications may not be met.
Think of the panel as a big, slow dynamic RAM, and you're not all
that far off.
Bob M.