Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Here's a Dell story you don't see too often
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Yousuf Khan  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2004, 3:56 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
From: "Yousuf Khan" <bbb...@ezrs.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:56:38 GMT
Local: Thurs, Aug 19 2004 3:56 pm
Subject: Re: Here's a Dell story you don't see too often

alexi wrote:
> Thanks Adam, yes, there is a concept of processor affinity, and
> apparently some means to control the task. With this regard, Yousuf
> is right. However, this mechanism is related to allocating logical
> processors, not physical processors.

The examples in the Intel website certainly made no distinction between
physical or logical processors. In fact, as far as Intel is concerned, all
of the processors are just logical processors. It's just that there would be
two logical processors per physical processor. Intel's Hyperthreading
mechanism makes allows for upto 256 logical processors in a physical
processor (there's an 8-bit counter for logical processors).

> As far as I remember,
> enumeration of physical processors (in x86 world) is
> a random process. Different physical processors may have some
> asymmetry in the way
> they are hooked up in the system

Nope, not random at all, it's all governed by the APIC specifications how
processors are enumerated. It may have been random prior to the advent of
APIC, but now there's a specific enumeration order. Part of the spec is that
the secondary logical processors are counted well after all of the primary
logical processors have been counted.

> (different configuration of
> Hypertransport links for example),
> therefore they may have different advantages and disadvantages with
> regard to
> different I/O-loaded tasks, while Win OS treats processors
> symmetrically.

Almost all operating systems have the ability to allocated certain tasks to
certain processors or processor groups. Windows and most other OSes will
simply allocate them round-robin by default, but there are administrative
commands available to set the processor affinity. Therefore if there are
administrative commands that can do it, then other programs should be able
to access the same facilities.

    Yousuf Khan


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.