http://www.crispygamer.com/_GeneratedPages/GameReviews/Review423.aspx
The money quote :
"XIII Century is a war game. It gives you the battles and you fight
them. No recruitment, no campaign, no grand strategy; just 30 tactical
challenges that kings and counts faced in the 1200s. Yes, it moves in
real time, and yes, it is in 3-D, but this is as conservative a war
game design as anything that you'll find with hexagonal maps and NATO
symbology."
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
"This review is based on a retail copy of the game purchased by the
reviewer. "
This is a further quotation. I wonder if the ratio "purchased vs. free
review copies" has been investigated, at least in case of specific game
genres.
Greetings, PY
- The reviewer got his copy for free, so he’ll feel gratitude towards
the publisher and hopes to receive further games, so he’s going to
give his review a positive slant
- The reviewer paid for his copy, so he’ll be more inclined to search
for the positive aspects in his purchase so as to not mentally feel
bad for throwing away a $50
- The reviewer got his copy for free, one of a half dozen this month,
so hasn’t got anything invested in this game, so he’ll only throw a
cursory glance at it before submitting his review
- The reviewer paid for his copy, so a minor irritation in the game
becomes a major hassle which isn’t doing the game justice.
You’ve probably noticed that there are reasons for “suspecting” a
positively or negatively slanted review no matter what the buy/free
parameter was, so I tend not to take that into account in evaluating a
review. The review should speak for itself, irrespective of some
external condition which is hard to determine if it influenced the
final score in one direction or another.
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
> Hi,
> http://www.crispygamer.com/_GeneratedPages/GameReviews/Review423.aspx
> The money quote :
but also :
"What's Hot: Well-made and well-chosen scenarios; Very challenging".
Not for people who like to win easy.
--
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito
http://www.newsland.it/news segnala gli abusi ad ab...@newsland.it
We certainly agree that it makes no sense to over-estimate the role of the
buy/free parameter; with a good (printed or online) magazine, the property
status of a game has no effect on the quality of the related review.
Back to the review of "XIII Century":
http://www.crispygamer.com/_GeneratedPages/GameReviews/Review423.aspx
Even not having the game, I think that this is a remarkable, good review.
Troy S. Goodfellow discusses both the good and bad sides of the game, and
this in a creative manner. A discussion of the game playability, the way
serious military gamers would enjoy it, is not so frequent, as far as I see,
but this review does it.
Greetings, PY
> Even not having the game, I think that this is a remarkable, good review.
> Troy S. Goodfellow discusses both the good and bad sides of the game, and
> this in a creative manner.
I agree - I've read reviews of real wargames of him before and they
were also good - I'm more or less waiting for one of the more
established names in wargame reviewing to pick-up this title and tell
me why a wargamer should/would buy it.
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
death or glory is a term that conjures up 17th-19th century warfare more
than 13th
Hell I'll but :)
I followed the link and bought two downloaded games. Acescension to the
Throne which I don't mind. Rather challenging. and Desert Law. RTS
holocauset. Why do I buy RTS thinking it will be different. They all suck.
The only game that RTS works is CC.
I will not buy another RTS till I hear from others first;-) roight.