Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hussar Games - what's up ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

eddys...@hotmail.com

unread,
May 14, 2008, 3:47:45 AM5/14/08
to
Hi,

The creators of 1848, For Liberty and more recently Napoleon in Italy
have been AWOL for a couple of weeks.

Anyone with some info / rumour ?

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

Bloodstar

unread,
May 14, 2008, 4:09:47 AM5/14/08
to

joke

After selling 340 copies at Matrix Games they decided to come back to
Battlefront.com
:o))))

They had good games but anyway I am not joking I am certain that they didn't
find happiness at Matrix Games obviously and any developer who thinks that
Matrix Games is best choice is simply wrong. Because it is a simple math -
too many games and you will sell less. So just flock to Matrix Games - you
will be dissapointed very soon.

von Schmidt

unread,
May 14, 2008, 5:20:53 AM5/14/08
to
On May 14, 9:09 am, "Bloodstar" <george.washing...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

... any developer who thinks that


> Matrix Games is best choice is simply wrong. Because it is a simple math -
> too many games and you will sell less.

How do you figure that? I don't know anyone who limits his purchases
by publisher.

I could see a flood of titles leading to less sales per title, but
that would affect every publisher.

-von Schmidt

eddys...@hotmail.com

unread,
May 14, 2008, 5:40:40 AM5/14/08
to
On 14 mei, 11:20, von Schmidt <von_schm...@mail.com> wrote:
> On May 14, 9:09 am, "Bloodstar" <george.washing...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> ... any developer who thinks that
>
> > Matrix Games is best choice is simply wrong. Because it is a simple math -
> > too many games and you will sell less.
>
> How do you figure that? I don't know anyone who limits his purchases
> by publisher.

You typed the above in a response to Mario ??? :)

> I could see a flood of titles leading to less sales per title, but
> that would affect every publisher.

Right.

The basic problem of the Hussar games is not that they are bad games,
but that they look and play like they were designed 10 years ago.

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

Bloodstar

unread,
May 14, 2008, 5:43:05 AM5/14/08
to
>... any developer who thinks that
> Matrix Games is best choice is simply wrong. Because it is a simple math -
> too many games and you will sell less.

How do you figure that? I don't know anyone who limits his purchases
by publisher.

I could see a flood of titles leading to less sales per title, but
that would affect every publisher.

//

LOL Now Eddy will see my post haha.
Well, what you said, I didn't tell that Matrix is limitator - it is simple
that there could be less sale per title and this silence maybe proves that.

Bloodstar

unread,
May 14, 2008, 5:48:29 AM5/14/08
to
You typed the above in a response to Mario ??? :)


LOL At least you can get free demos from Battlefront.com and SES, and
ridicule them and I can't get even that from Matrix :)


von Schmidt

unread,
May 14, 2008, 5:55:13 AM5/14/08
to
On May 14, 10:43 am, "Bloodstar" <george.washing...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

Well, yes you actually did say that: "Because it is a simple math -


too many games and you will sell less. So just flock to Matrix Games -
you
will be dissapointed very soon. "

It could be that low sales have laid them low - but more likely is
that Hussar are having a break. Or are maybe too busy finishing off a
new title to post on the web.

Regards,
-von Schmidt

Bloodstar

unread,
May 14, 2008, 9:25:14 AM5/14/08
to

Well, yes you actually did say that: "Because it is a simple math -
too many games and you will sell less. So just flock to Matrix Games -
you
will be dissapointed very soon. "

It could be that low sales have laid them low - but more likely is
that Hussar are having a break. Or are maybe too busy finishing off a
new title to post on the web.

Regards,
-von Schmidt


LOL You are stalker! :)


0 new messages