Are these systems (which make ALL the difference in a close-in dogfight
against the MiG-29 or Su-27/35 with their AA-11 Archer and Schlemm HMS)
modelled in Jane's? If not, why not?!?!
C.J.? Anyone?
(another C.J.)
Chris Johnson
I'd be careful about using Clancy as a serious reference. "Carrier" is
better than most of his books in that series, but still suffers from some
errors and wishful thinking.
JHMCS is on the fast track, and probably will be available in time for the
F/A-18E IOC cruise, but it is a seperate program otherwise unrelated to the
F/A-18E. We didn't model it in the game for several reasons: it wasn't part
of the original design spec, I didn't have good data on it (still don't),
and frankly I had too many other higher priority things to worry about. That
said, you may still see some sort of "JHMCS" in the game at some future
point.
AIM-9X is in the game.
-CJ
Hi CJ,
Looking forward to getting my copy of F/A-18. Just curious, what is the
difference in the AIM-9X vs. M or P?
Thanks,
Mike
Elf
> Looking forward to getting my copy of F/A-18. Just curious, what is the
> difference in the AIM-9X vs. M or P?
In a nutshell, the 9X has a much higher off-boresight lockon area, greater
flare rejection, and is smart enough not to lock on to the sun.
-CJ
Fair enough.
>JHMCS is on the fast track, and probably will be available in time for the
>F/A-18E IOC cruise, but it is a seperate program otherwise unrelated to the
>F/A-18E. We didn't model it in the game for several reasons: it wasn't part
>of the original design spec, I didn't have good data on it (still don't),
>and frankly I had too many other higher priority things to worry about.
That
>said, you may still see some sort of "JHMCS" in the game at some future
>point.
>
>AIM-9X is in the game.
>
>-CJ
Great. Thanks for the reply! I am curious however, when you say that JHMCS
may appear in the game at some later point, would that be an add-on mission
disk? It sounds rather ambitious for a patch.
Take care
Chris Johnson
In article <3876108F...@origin.ea.com>, Scott Elson
<sel...@origin.ea.com> wrote:
>An addition to this about the 9X. If you are padlocked on a plane I
>slave the seeker to follow the plane you are looking at (assuming it
>can) with the appropriate growls/tones. The exception to this is if the
>seeker is caged and you have a radar lock on a target.
>
>Elf
>
>CJ Martin wrote:
>>
>
> Great. Thanks for the reply! I am curious however, when you say that
JHMCS
> may appear in the game at some later point, would that be an add-on
mission
> disk? It sounds rather ambitious for a patch.
We'll see...
-CJ
> In a nutshell, the 9X has a much higher off-boresight lockon area, greater
> flare rejection, and is smart enough not to lock on to the sun.
I thought sun lockup wal already fixed in earlier models, like L, M and P?
Never seen it happen in other sims so far (if it was still possible, I
would think Falcon 4 would model it, it models everything else :-)
--
Jan-Albert "Anvil" van Ree | http://www.nl.3dgamers.com
3D Sims Archive maintainer | http://www.3dgamers.com
Thrustmaster Resource Center | http://www.3dgamers.com/tmresourcecenter/