Received: by 10.66.86.194 with SMTP id r2mr5359774paz.42.1352585947479;
        Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:19:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 6ni73659pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe07.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: A question for the experts. ^_^
From: Warewolf <warewolfmypa...@shaw.ca>
References: <XnsA100CCBBF64E0warewolfshawca@69.16.185.247> <euvd98l6g1feepcijsug69k43drqg98nha@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <XnsA10791A36673Awarewolfshawca@69.16.185.250>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.69.47.100
X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca
X-Trace: 1352585946 24.69.47.100 (Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:19:06 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:19:06 UTC
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:19:06 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1376

Rin Stowleigh <rstowle...@gmail.com> wrote in 
news:euvd98l6g1feepcijsug69k43drqg98nha@4ax.com:

> 
>>So my question is: Are these the best parts available or are there other 
>>parts that could be used instead?
> 
> Not best available.  You could literally double the effective gaming
> speed of the PC where it counts most by dropping a GTX 690 in there.
> For Approx $700-800 more, which seems like a lot for a GPU but when
> you consider what it does to your total performance and longevity
> before next upgrade, I personally would not build a new system today
> without one.

I'll look into this graphics card as well, then.

Thank you for your help.

Signed,
Warewolf