On 8/1/2012 9:31 PM, Andrew MacPherson wrote:
>
> As part of my ongoing mid-life crisis I just picked up one of the "kosher"
> equivalent of these Korean 27" panels which are being talked about. It's a 320ukp
> DGM IPS 2560x1440 and it is absolutely stunning. I've never been disappointed by
> monitor upgrades, whether that's my first 17" CRT (for more than twice as much
> money!) or three cheap screens for my sim racing machine.
>
Aaha, the Korean 27" LCD monitors. I almost bought one a few months
back. The only thing stopping me was the hope of seeing a 120Hz display
in the future. For those who don't know, Ebay has quite a few of these
monitors on sale directly from Korean resellers. The monitors use the
same LG panel that the 27" Apple Cinema display and Dell U2711 also
have, only that these panels are A- quality. There could be some defects
(stuck or dead pixels, but not more than five overall, and not more than
one in the center portion of the screen)
Search for Catleap, Shimian and Crossover at Ebay if you want more
information. The prices range from $280 - 450 or so. The lower priced
panels come with almost nothing on the controller board, so you won't
find usb ports or options to resize the image, adjust color temperature
or the gradient and will have to rely on the graphic driver control
panel (this is actually desirable for some, as the lack of features in
the controller mean less processing and less input lag). The cheaper
ones also have flimsy stands, but some of them have VESA mounting
mechanism, where you can buy a $50-60 VESA stand from any online store
as replacement. Some of the sellers charge extra to confirm that you
won't be getting stuck/dead pixels. They all do basic level of checks
before shipping these out of Korea.
In my search, Crossover seemed the best option, as it comes with a
better stand and some basic picture adjustment controls. Catleap however
is the only monitor that can do 100Hz+, but then you need special
controller boards that are overclocked (version 2b if I remember
correctly) and those particular models are more expensive.
Whichever one you get, the picture quality is supposedly awesome. If you
get lucky and get a monitor with no (or almost non-existent) defects, it
can be a great deal.
> Then I realised the brightness control doesn't work on this screen, and it sucks
> 116W at full brightness (which it seems to be stuck on) which will more than double
> my monitor power bill for the year. And on a machine which is on all day when I'm
> at home that will add up. So for the sake of my wallet and my eyes I need to turn
> the brightness down. Which means an RMA and the lottery of another panel with no
> other obvious defects.
I hope you get another panel with no noticeable defects. Good luck.
--
Noman