On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:23:40 -0800 (PST), "Mr. Stabby"
<
dbat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:12:27 PM UTC-5, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
>>
>> Advertisers and upgraders. Free to play and free of charge are not
>>
>> the same thing.
>
>I've been playing for 5 days without paying a dime.
I understand, I'm just saying the whole point of free to play is not
that the game is totally free of charge.
At a minimum, you will be solicited by ads at some point, or you have
given up some aspect of your privacy, etc.
That is the entire point of the free to play model. You give
something in return for the game (even if it's just your time sifting
through annoying spam).
In economics, "cost" does not always translate to currency.
Sometimes in free to play games the cost does not manifest until many
months after the games release.
To be clear I wasn't recommending against playing the game, I was
addressing how these games are funded.