Ars Technica saying, "Stay away from MW2 PC version"
Jonah Falcon
Brambles
<jonah...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99871
Ars Technica is a website by fucktards for fucktards.
Anton Kolakov
> Ars Technica is a website by fucktards for fucktards.
So says the suspected Activision employee.
Brambles
wrote:
>So says the suspected Activision employee.
They're fucktards too.
Vince
> Anton Kolakov wrote:
>>So says the suspected Activision employee.
> They're fucktards too.
I admire people who don't discriminate.
John Lewis
wrote:
... or maybe a website of thoughtful articles for thoughtful people
written by thoughtful people??
Specifically, the Ars opinion on MW2 is by a PC player and for PC
gamers.
Pretty accurate statements on both the crass short-changing of the PC
version of the game and Activision's $$-driven motives, imho.
This is a PC games newsgroup. So, if you are a genuinely dedicated PC
game-player, then maybe you should consider PREFERENTIALLY supporting
the few companies (by buying, NOT PIRATING, their products) that still
do not short-change the PC player. such as Bohemia (ARMA1,2), Bethesda
(FO3 etc), GSC ( Stalker, etc ), CDProjekt (the Witcher..), Relic
(Company of Heroes, Warhammer etc...) )and, of course, Blizzard....
and dare I say it Valve... but only for their own PC games. Plus very
interesting PC game indies like Runic (Torchlight), Introversion
(Darwinia, Defcon, Mutliwinia etc..)
John Lewis
Brambles
wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:16:57 -0500, Brambles <bram...@bp102.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:51:39 -0500, "Jonah Falcon"
>><jonah...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99871
>>
>>Ars Technica is a website by fucktards for fucktards.
>
>... or maybe a website of thoughtful articles for thoughtful people
>written by thoughtful people??
So you bought into the whole fucktard thing huh?
John Lewis
wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:14 GMT, john...@verizon.net (John Lewis)
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:16:57 -0500, Brambles <bram...@bp102.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:51:39 -0500, "Jonah Falcon"
>>><jonah...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99871
>>>
>>>Ars Technica is a website by fucktards for fucktards.
>>
>>... or maybe a website of thoughtful articles for thoughtful people
>>written by thoughtful people??
>
>So you bought into the whole fucktard thing huh?
I actually started reading Ars T a couple of years ago for its
insightful technical articles and excellent URL references for further
reading. Their gaming section is usually equally insightful with
regard to their views on games. The reviewer's concern about the
short-changing of PC game-players with MW2 is well-placed. A price of
$60 for the PC version is an insult. $19.99 is about what it is worth
in the context of gaming value to the PC gamer.
You have bought MW2, no doubt??
John Lewis
Brambles
wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:52:34 -0500, Brambles <bram...@bp102.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:42:14 GMT, john...@verizon.net (John Lewis)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:16:57 -0500, Brambles <bram...@bp102.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:51:39 -0500, "Jonah Falcon"
>>>><jonah...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99871
>>>>
>>>>Ars Technica is a website by fucktards for fucktards.
>>>
>>>... or maybe a website of thoughtful articles for thoughtful people
>>>written by thoughtful people??
>>
>>So you bought into the whole fucktard thing huh?
>
>I actually started reading Ars T a couple of years ago for its
>insightful technical articles and excellent URL references for further
>reading. Their gaming section is usually equally insightful with
>regard to their views on games. The reviewer's concern about the
>short-changing of PC game-players with MW2 is well-placed. A price of
>$60 for the PC version is an insult. $19.99 is about what it is worth
>in the context of gaming value to the PC gamer.
>
>You have bought MW2, no doubt??
Yes, the fucktard article from the fucktard magazine apparently didn't
influence the landscape much, this game is selling like hot cakes.
I don't really like paying $60 for games but I will get way more than
$60 out of the multiplayer action on this one.