Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
IFTE Command HP 50g
80 views
Skip to first unread message
PremiumBlend
Dec 26, 2011, 9:34:16 PM12/26/11
to
Hello,
Which of the following programs is more correctly written?
Is it just a matter of style?
\<< 1. FS?
\<< 1. "TRUE"
\>>
\<< 0. "FALSE"
\>> IFTE
\>>
or
\<< 1. FS? { 1. "TRUE"
} { 0. "FALSE" } IFTE
\>>
Regards,
Mark
Which of the following programs is more correctly written?
Is it just a matter of style?
\<< 1. FS?
\<< 1. "TRUE"
\>>
\<< 0. "FALSE"
\>> IFTE
\>>
or
\<< 1. FS? { 1. "TRUE"
} { 0. "FALSE" } IFTE
\>>
Regards,
Mark
Uergil
Dec 27, 2011, 12:33:15 AM12/27/11
to
In article
<db4c37c6-b356-4514...@x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Some lists of commands can be executed as if they were programs.
For example
\<< 1. "TRUE" >> EVAL
and
{ 1. "TRUE" } EVAL
will produce the same results, though the second uses considerably less
memory.
Where this is the case, it is a matter of style which one to use.
But for the above program, why not merely
\<< 1. FS? DUP "TRUE" "FALSE" IFTE />>
which will produce the same results?
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
<db4c37c6-b356-4514...@x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
For example
\<< 1. "TRUE" >> EVAL
and
{ 1. "TRUE" } EVAL
will produce the same results, though the second uses considerably less
memory.
Where this is the case, it is a matter of style which one to use.
But for the above program, why not merely
\<< 1. FS? DUP "TRUE" "FALSE" IFTE />>
which will produce the same results?
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
miCchelange
Dec 27, 2011, 8:17:29 PM12/27/11
to
Nemo
Dec 28, 2011, 5:47:22 AM12/28/11
to
Very interresting !
> "empty tag" method provides a nice workaround: simply use:
> { ::X RCL } {::Y STO } IFTE
What is the 'logic' of this synt
On Dec 28, 2:17 am, miCchelange <micchelange.8.bald...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "empty tag" method provides a nice workaround: simply use:
> { ::X RCL } {::Y STO } IFTE
What is the 'logic' of this synt
On Dec 28, 2:17 am, miCchelange <micchelange.8.bald...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Message has been deleted
PremiumBlend
Jan 5, 2012, 9:45:55 AM1/5/12
to
On Dec 27 2011, 8:17 pm, miCchelange <micchelange.8.bald...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This article may answer your question!http://www.hpcalc.org/hp48/docs/programming/nulltags.zip- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks!
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks!
PremiumBlend
Jan 5, 2012, 9:45:37 AM1/5/12
to
On Dec 27 2011, 12:33 am, Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote:
> In article
> <db4c37c6-b356-4514-b334-f77acdcee...@x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> Thomas Jefferson- Hide quoted text -
> In article
> <db4c37c6-b356-4514-b334-f77acdcee...@x19g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
0 new messages