<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm</id>
  <title type="text">comp.sys.cbm Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Discussion about Commodore micros.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.sys.cbm/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.sys.cbm feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-12T22:54:30Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ramswell</name>
  <email>shifty_bu...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-12T22:54:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c2a71c0ee962c621/e6b14cdb7bafcccf?show_docid=e6b14cdb7bafcccf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c2a71c0ee962c621/e6b14cdb7bafcccf?show_docid=e6b14cdb7bafcccf"/>
  <title type="text">MICE!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I bumped into a couple of more mice in the closet today in my &lt;br&gt; excursions throughout the house seeking Holiday Ornaments! One is an &lt;br&gt; Amiga and the other is a 1351. &lt;br&gt; The 1351 I believe needs a chip, but other than that is in MINT &lt;br&gt; PHYSICAL SHAPE. the Amiga I have no way to test so I&#39;m &amp;quot;assuming&amp;quot; that &lt;br&gt; it works ok, but (NO GUARANTEES).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>bluebirdpod</name>
  <email>bluebird...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-12T22:19:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/dc14d0166a235f54?show_docid=dc14d0166a235f54</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/dc14d0166a235f54?show_docid=dc14d0166a235f54"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Breadbox vs C64c - reliability?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well Commodore put almost everything into every style case, and &lt;br&gt; keyboard color, Just because it is the new style &lt;br&gt; case does not mean it is the 64C h-mos style, there are sightings of &lt;br&gt; old boards in new style cases, and what not, &lt;br&gt; when the serial numbers hit 130000X? then the new style small board &lt;br&gt; appeared, and there are two different layouts of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rudolf Harras</name>
  <email>rudi...@temporaryforwarding.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-12T21:33:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/dfedf7a93965a8ce?show_docid=dfedf7a93965a8ce</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/dfedf7a93965a8ce?show_docid=dfedf7a93965a8ce"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Breadbox vs C64c - reliability?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hg schrieb: &lt;br&gt; I just remember one case of a SID editor in the C128 where you could &lt;br&gt; select the SID. &lt;br&gt; Is there any way detecting it automatically at all?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>bluebirdpod</name>
  <email>bluebird...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-12T15:58:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/cae8a1f5b4ba6376?show_docid=cae8a1f5b4ba6376</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/cae8a1f5b4ba6376?show_docid=cae8a1f5b4ba6376"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JiffyDOS Forensics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I think my IndusGT has JD official roms, lemme look, its burried &lt;br&gt; though! &lt;br&gt; and I do have a old 4 slot dos programmer that I can read them from, &lt;br&gt; seems it didnt have a switch, and there are three eproms if I remember &lt;br&gt; correctly. It was an older version too, I dont think 6.01 was avail &lt;br&gt; for the GT &lt;br&gt; drive, I think it was 5.01 I will let you know.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>MagerValp</name>
  <email>magerv...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T14:41:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/ef01487ea848d161?show_docid=ef01487ea848d161</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/ef01487ea848d161?show_docid=ef01487ea848d161"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JiffyDOS Forensics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m going to have to correct myself here. There was an official &lt;br&gt; Swedish JiffyDOS ROM. However, IIRC, the editor ROM ($c000-$cfff) was &lt;br&gt; unmodified from the C= ROM. &lt;br&gt; Sure, if I can find them...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>dott.Piergiorgio</name>
  <email>dott.piergiorgioni...@kaigun.fastwebnet.it</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T14:24:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/b01bff020a6f132b/a4accac69a2f7c60?show_docid=a4accac69a2f7c60</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/b01bff020a6f132b/a4accac69a2f7c60?show_docid=a4accac69a2f7c60"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Jack Tramiel&#39;s organization of manufacturing</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  PK ha scritto: &lt;br&gt; Hisorical (both C= and USA) question: &lt;br&gt; IIRC one of the factors of the C= bankrupt was the loss of an &lt;br&gt; environmental lawsuit around a MOS factory (in the Reagan era !) so I &lt;br&gt; was puzzled by this, but if these environmental lawsuit(s) was in THAT &lt;br&gt; Valley Forge, a.k.a. &amp;quot;the birthplace of US Army&amp;quot;, the environmental
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Hg</name>
  <email>h...@hg2.hg</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T14:07:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/513a713e8580013a?show_docid=513a713e8580013a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/513a713e8580013a?show_docid=513a713e8580013a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Breadbox vs C64c - reliability?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Not a case of detecting the sound chip, though Beach Head II had a courteous &lt;br&gt; option of allowing filter adjustment. Not sure how it worked in practice. &lt;br&gt; At the time, I wondered why more games didn&#39;t have a similar option to &lt;br&gt; minimise the variable filter levels.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jim Brain</name>
  <email>br...@jbrain.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T13:52:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/91a5980f52c25813?show_docid=91a5980f52c25813</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/91a5980f52c25813?show_docid=91a5980f52c25813"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JiffyDOS Forensics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Can I get the patches to verify? &lt;br&gt; If so, anyone interested in testing?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rudolf Harras</name>
  <email>rudi...@temporaryforwarding.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T11:18:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/4c8c8cec6bedee98?show_docid=4c8c8cec6bedee98</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/4c8c8cec6bedee98?show_docid=4c8c8cec6bedee98"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Breadbox vs C64c - reliability?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  David Murray schrieb: &lt;br&gt; Well you still hear the digisound but it&#39;s far too quiet compared to the &lt;br&gt; rest of the sound. Just compare IM1 and Ghostbasters on both computers. &lt;br&gt; Newer Demos maybe were able to detect the correct sound chip but I don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; know of any game that asks you which SID to use.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Clocky</name>
  <email>notg...@happen.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T10:40:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c63d80cd5e054b08/3376a299b72a70ce?show_docid=3376a299b72a70ce</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c63d80cd5e054b08/3376a299b72a70ce?show_docid=3376a299b72a70ce"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Think my C64 is on the way out</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Not trying to take business away from Ramswell, but arcadecomponents.com &lt;br&gt; also has RAM chips as well as other IC&#39;s for many different computer systems &lt;br&gt; at a very reasonable price. If you get stuck, try them,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>MagerValp</name>
  <email>magerv...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T07:59:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/fc90ffcfb9f17c83?show_docid=fc90ffcfb9f17c83</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/fc90ffcfb9f17c83?show_docid=fc90ffcfb9f17c83"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JiffyDOS Forensics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  No, they were made by me, and sent as patches to Maurice. At one point &lt;br&gt; I had a bug in the keyboard map, so if you plan on offering them they &lt;br&gt; need to be verified. PETSCII $A4, $FA, and a few other are impossible &lt;br&gt; to type with the official Swedish kernal, but I mucked something up &lt;br&gt; when I tried to fix this.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ian McCall</name>
  <email>i...@eruvia.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T07:05:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c63d80cd5e054b08/06e60763cacf5843?show_docid=06e60763cacf5843</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c63d80cd5e054b08/06e60763cacf5843?show_docid=06e60763cacf5843"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Think my C64 is on the way out</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Definitely am, I&#39;ll pay postage to the UK obviously. Will unscrew the &lt;br&gt; machine and take a look. &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; Ian
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jim Brain</name>
  <email>br...@jbrain.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T06:28:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/3e15c17748c0782d?show_docid=3e15c17748c0782d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/c400fce6b105441f/3e15c17748c0782d?show_docid=3e15c17748c0782d"/>
  <title type="text">JiffyDOS Forensics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  As many of you are probably aware, I acquired a license to sell JiffyDOS &lt;br&gt; earlier this year and am now ramping up sales. &lt;br&gt; To that end, I am trying to reconstruct the exact product offerings that &lt;br&gt; CMD offered. This means verifying images, and determining what original &lt;br&gt; ROM images CMD supplied with each overlay.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>PK</name>
  <email>f.ke...@levamilibero.it</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-11T01:26:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/b01bff020a6f132b/8f639317bd8f08a6?show_docid=8f639317bd8f08a6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/b01bff020a6f132b/8f639317bd8f08a6?show_docid=8f639317bd8f08a6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Jack Tramiel&#39;s organization of manufacturing</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  x01001x ha scritto: &lt;br&gt; MOS was the producer of almost all chip created by Commodore. &lt;br&gt; It was sited in Walley Forge (Pennsylvania). &lt;br&gt; In California there was the main Commodore research center and the main &lt;br&gt; factory (in Santa Clara) but other factories was in Japan (were they &lt;br&gt; often used to re-design and fix the layouy of motherboards) , U.K and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Murray</name>
  <email>adri...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-10T22:36:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/0872796026f537f3?show_docid=0872796026f537f3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/browse_thread/thread/ee75f875d718e3fc/0872796026f537f3?show_docid=0872796026f537f3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Breadbox vs C64c - reliability?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I admit I&#39;ve never actually played any of those games. However, I &lt;br&gt; played Impossible Mission I and Ghostbusters all the time and they &lt;br&gt; were fine. I also remember a handful of other games, programs, and &lt;br&gt; demos that used digitized sounds and had no problems with any of those &lt;br&gt; either.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
