Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What do you make of this?
91 views
Skip to first unread message
Sean Fahey
Feb 2, 2013, 9:41:20 PM2/2/13
to
Jesse Rehmer
Feb 2, 2013, 10:19:38 PM2/2/13
to
Sean Fahey wrote:
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-IIe-Software-NEW-FOR-2013-Account-System-/271149196381
I'm not sure either... I am not too familiar with the accounting
packages from the day, but the video makes it look legit.
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-IIe-Software-NEW-FOR-2013-Account-System-/271149196381
I'm not sure either... I am not too familiar with the accounting
packages from the day, but the video makes it look legit.
osgeld
Feb 2, 2013, 11:18:27 PM2/2/13
to
no clue
seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
the screenshot is almost too perfect as far as flatness and gloss, but does have appropriate pixel fuzz
guess one of us needs to buy it and see whats up, though I have no interest in doing accounting on an apple2, can hardly stand it in excel 2010
seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
the screenshot is almost too perfect as far as flatness and gloss, but does have appropriate pixel fuzz
guess one of us needs to buy it and see whats up, though I have no interest in doing accounting on an apple2, can hardly stand it in excel 2010
gid...@sasktel.net
Feb 2, 2013, 11:23:38 PM2/2/13
to
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:41:20 PM UTC-6, Sean Fahey wrote:
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-IIe-Software-NEW-FOR-2013-Account-System-/271149196381
He calls it an accounting system, but it is really no more than a cheque balancing (I would not even call it a spreadsheet) program. With the menu options at the bottom, all can easily be done in applesoft. Little pricy for what it can do. Does not require a lot of programming experience.
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-IIe-Software-NEW-FOR-2013-Account-System-/271149196381
Rob
Your Name
Feb 2, 2013, 11:31:44 PM2/2/13
to
In article <45d4fd4e-1d03-4a99...@googlegroups.com>, osgeld
<ke...@hackaday.com> wrote:
>
> ... I have no interest in doing accounting on an apple2, can hardly
<ke...@hackaday.com> wrote:
>
> ... I have no interest in doing accounting on an apple2, can hardly
> stand it in excel 2010
Try in Office 2013, it's even worse! :-(
D Finnigan
Feb 3, 2013, 1:22:48 PM2/3/13
to
osgeld wrote:
> no clue
>
> seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
Might have meant 143K, as in standard 5.25" format.
> no clue
>
> seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
>
> the screenshot is almost too perfect as far as flatness and gloss, but
> does
> have appropriate pixel fuzz
the description.
The "pixel fuzz" is an artifact of lossy JPEG compression.
--
]DF$
Apple II Book: http://macgui.com/newa2guide/
Apple II Archive: http://macgui.com/vault/
Apple II Web & Blog hosting: http://a2hq.com/
Bill Garber
Feb 3, 2013, 2:07:36 PM2/3/13
to
"D Finnigan" <dog...@macgui.com> wrote in message
news:dog_cow-1...@macgui.com...
> osgeld wrote:
>> no clue
>>
>> seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
>
> Might have meant 143K, as in standard 5.25" format.
They are actually 140K as in; 143,360 / 1024 bytes.
>> no clue
>>
>> seller mentions 144k disk, and yea we make mistakes
>
> Might have meant 143K, as in standard 5.25" format.
Bill Garber
http://www.sepa-electronics.com
D Finnigan
Feb 3, 2013, 2:28:10 PM2/3/13
to
Bill Garber wrote:
>
> They are actually 140K as in; 143,360 / 1024 bytes.
True, but I meant 143K as a shorthand for 143,000 bytes. Just an
>
> They are actually 140K as in; 143,360 / 1024 bytes.
approximation.
If you want to split hairs, my dear fellow... :-)
0 new messages