Bill Garber of Garberstreet Electronics
http://www.garberstreet.com
Maybe it's just me, but I cannot stand the smaller 16:9 format displays. Too
short vertically. It's like all of a sudden every LCD manufacturer on earth
decided that all anybody ever wanted to do on a computer is watch DVD video.
In order to get the same height as an "old" style 4:3 19" display, you need a
24" monitor.
I am very happy to know that, thank you.
N.B., This is not true of all 16:9 monitors (some have a setting to leave
black borders on the edges rather than stretching), but you do need to check
before you buy.
--
be seeing you ... Don
Don Melton, Sr. Consultant, Vatic Technologies Limited
> I bought something similar (same aspect ratio and a similar size) a while
> back. [I wanted something short so that I could mount it with a VESA
> bracket on the backsplash of a workbench that has an integrated overhanging
> shelf with only 14" clearance beneath it.] I was, however, disappointed to
> find that it could ONLY display in 16:9 format; if you fed it a 1024x768
> signal it would "stretch" it to fill the width and distort the image. I
> ended up buying a used DELL 1024x768 display that works just fine.
>
> N.B., This is not true of all 16:9 monitors (some have a setting to leave
> black borders on the edges rather than stretching), but you do need to check
> before you buy.
I've been keeping an eagle-eye on Craig's List and am scarfing up a number of
the ever-rarer 4:3 LCD displays.
Just a couple of days ago I bought my 3rd Dell 24" LCD. Couldn't
pass up $250 for a refurb 2408WFP from a Dell employee. A variety of
connections too:
DVI (2 of them)
HDMI
DisplayPort
VGA
Component
Composite
S-Video
The 16:9 TV standard will ensure that 4:3 displays continue to become
rarer. Volume drives pricing, and pricing drives design.
-michael
NadaNet and AppleCrate II: parallel computing for Apple II computers!
Home page: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon
"The wastebasket is our most important design
tool--and it's seriously underused."
It's me too. Can't stand those ungainly 16:9 monitors. I'd have
rather had TALLER ones (or even 1:1 ratio) than wider. Like you say,
I happen to have more to do than watch movies, and when I do,
letterbox is just fine.
jS
Buy a 16:9 monitor that rotates or that you can change the mount on and
have the video signal rates 90� to match.
Personally though, I like the wider displays. It's easier for me to
spread work out that way.
Greg B.
--
Actual e-mail address is gregbuchner and I'm located at gmail.com
> Personally though, I like the wider displays. It's easier for me to
> spread work out that way.
I recently purchased a Viewsonic 24" HDMI (just under $200) and you sure
can...
I'll bet you've seen Maximum PC's recent article about a six
16:9 monitor gaming setup!
Now that would allow a _lot_ of windows to be visible at once!
Stock traders have the highest monitor count I've seen.
Of course the cards don't have to be as fast as gamers'.
Cheers,
Nick.