Russell Hafter News <see...@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote:
> I do not know about Mess Pro for RISC OS
Nor I.
> but from a quick read of the manual for the Windows version, it, like
> every non RISC OS e-mail program it seems to insist on you having an
> Inbox, an Outbox and a Sentbox.
Pluto had the equivalent of an Inbox, the default mailbox for things nit
directed elsewhere.
Pluto had an outbound message queue, which is virtually the same as MP's
Outbox, especially if (like me) you don't have MP automatically send
whatever is in the Outbox - things are sent when I decide to send them,
giving me a few minutes (or more if I forget) time to reconsider my words.
Pluto did in my opinion handle "log copies of sent messages" better than MP
does - MP mainly puts those in the Sent Mail and Sent News folders (at least
it seems to for original posts but not always for replies which can stay in
the folder they were written in). I have filters set up which take effect
when I open the Sent Mail folder, which find the 'log copies' and move them
to the folders where the incoming public copies of them will be put.
Pluto had a useful (well, I liked it) feature which would delete the log
copy of an outbound mail when the publically distributed copy arrived
(useful for maillists to see whether a sent message had got to the server).
With MP I have to manually delete the copies of what I sent. I use filters
to set the colours of outbound messages one way, and those of inbound copies
of what I wrote another way, so that both types show up differently from
msgs written by other people.
> And, if you are not careful, it insists on doing this for every e-mail
> address you have.
Does it? I have around 200 'identities' (separate outbound email addresses)
and only one each of Inbox, Outbox, Sent Mail. However that's using an
offline mailhandling mode (POP3 collection, deletion from server). It's
probably different if you use IMAP where the folder structure in MP will
match that of your mail provider's IMAP server.
Other things I miss from Pluto days:
- good handling of entire threads in an atomic manner
- versatile control of thread display, ie which threads in a MP
group sort highest in the display, and indeed what order subthreads
are shown in within a specific thread
- versatile control of box sorting orders and column selection, and
ability to change a the way a set of messages is being displayed
to one of umpteen different display types
- ability to unlink a subthread from a thread (eg when someone has
started a new thread by replying to part of an old one)
- ability to select a set of messages, or those which are results of
a search, and have them open in a new viewer as if they were the
contents of a separate virtual box. One can do that recursively
to get subsets of subsets
- two different types of 'flag' on messages (MP has one)
Things Pluto users are used to which MP doesn't do:
- having mails from multiple maillists routed to a single box - MP
routes each maillist's messages to a separate 'group' folder.
- having posts from separate newsgroups routed to a single box - MP
routes each maillist's messages to a separate 'group' folder.
- these two things take a lot of getting used to if you're used
to seeing eg all your RO related mail & news traffic in one
place. With MP you might be able to do this by intercepting
incoming mail & news and moving them from the normal maillist
and newsgroup groups into a single local folder. But then
you'd lose the attributes of the maillist & newsgroup folders
on the moved items.
I'm sure more will occur to me.
I made the transition to MP in 2006 when I had to start using a laptop and
although for a while I ran !Pluto under VRPC as well as MP, I thought it
would be better to get used to a decent Windows client which, if I ever
decide to start using linux, is also supported there. Moving from Windows
to linux would be much easier if I need to, if I already know my way around
the email & news client, and browser (I use Firefox).