> I would be interested...

>     I've not seen this USENET group this alive in a very long time.  Even
>     when the 3b1/7300 was new it was considered a dog, though there were
>     many clever people that got their moneys worth out of them.

>     I registered 3b1.org quite recently merely as a 'vanity' domain for
>     the sdf.lonestar.org folks, but after seeing the activity here I thought
>     I'd suggest using it for a UUCP hub/map for bang pathing.  I'm sure
>     most mail programs still understand login%host@domain addresses and I'd
>     be happy to setup polled UUCP via dialup or TCP (if you can manage that).

>     I used to provide USENET feeds via email (individual articles would be
>     emailed via UUCP).  We're still spooling news and if you aren't reading
>     this on a 3b1, you could very well be.

billg...@cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon) writes:
> In article <m2my5beee4....@pierre.ipanematech.us>,
>    pe...@pierre.ipanematech.us (Peter H. Schmidt) writes:
>> I would be interested...

>>     I've not seen this USENET group this alive in a very long time.
>>     Even when the 3b1/7300 was new it was considered a dog, though
>>     there were many clever people that got their moneys worth out
>>     of them.

>>     I registered 3b1.org quite recently merely as a 'vanity' domain
>>     for the sdf.lonestar.org folks, but after seeing the activity
>>     here I thought I'd suggest using it for a UUCP hub/map for bang
>>     pathing.  I'm sure most mail programs still understand
>>     login%host@domain addresses and I'd be happy to setup polled
>>     UUCP via dialup or TCP (if you can manage that).

>>     I used to provide USENET feeds via email (individual articles
>>     would be emailed via UUCP).  We're still spooling news and if
>>     you aren't reading this on a 3b1, you could very well be.

> I have tried to revive UUCP for email numerous times in the past
> bith for fun and because it offers a virtually spam-free way to do
> email.  I have never found anyone interested.

> bill