http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c Discussion about C language standards. 2009-12-16T07:50:14Z Google Groups Keith Thompson ks...@mib.org 2009-12-16T07:50:14Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/d1def2f544eb7d71/6e03910039290088?show_docid=6e03910039290088

The latest committee draft for C201X is <br> &lt;<a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1425.pdf">[link]</a>&gt;. <br> It includes a &lt;threads.h&gt; header. I'm not sure how it relates to <br> Plauger's proposal.

jacob navia ja...@nospam.org 2009-12-16T07:42:06Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/d1def2f544eb7d71/0999cf7f88c2f1af?show_docid=0999cf7f88c2f1af

Hi <br> I am writing a container library in C with the objective of giving <br> all C programmers a &quot;STL light&quot; package. <br> I need synchronization primitives for multi-threaded operation. I remember <br> that I reviewed in this group a thread proposal written by Plauger. <br> Is that proposal accepted? <br> Should I use it as a basis for the synch primitives?

SolutionPerson eso...@gmail.com 2009-12-15T14:30:05Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/0f9206e4e5f6ceb2/ef6b9849a5ca7c15?show_docid=ef6b9849a5ca7c15

Analysis- With an Introduction to Proof, 4-E-Instructors SM is <br> available at affordable prices. Email me at allsolutionmanuals11[at] <br> gmail.com if you need to buy this. All emails will be answered ASAP.

Paulo Matos pocma...@gmail.com 2009-12-14T08:32:17Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/5a66407753d5f4f7/e71db0d868ae88c0?show_docid=e71db0d868ae88c0

Thank you very much for the reference!

Flash Gordon s...@spam.causeway.com 2009-12-13T12:14:06Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/a0d5d0128a8ec45f?show_docid=a0d5d0128a8ec45f

We did not use an eval board, and we did not use Linux (or any OS <br> provided by TI), and it was definitely a TI compiler not gcc. Things <br> could have changed since then, or they could do different things for <br> different ranges of chips, or they could do Linux/gcc for the Eval <br> boards and as we did not do the eval board...

Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no 2009-12-13T11:55:51Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/b30af9686531094d?show_docid=b30af9686531094d

Last time I worked on a TI chip (DaVinci &amp; DaVinci HD) they provided two <br> compilers, one of which was GCC, and the eval board ran Linux... <br> DES

Flash Gordon s...@spam.causeway.com 2009-12-12T00:19:21Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/77f5ff145685db8f?show_docid=77f5ff145685db8f

In conforming more (with -ansi -pedantic) it does conform to the <br> standard, modulo bugs. <br> The Texas Instruments C compiler for the TMS320C2x/2xx/5x compiled with <br> one exception, it did not zero static variables which did not have an <br> initialiser, but since they provided the source for the startup code

Flash Gordon s...@spam.causeway.com 2009-12-12T00:04:00Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/5a66407753d5f4f7/97656b348764831c?show_docid=97656b348764831c

It's a pre-c89 draft, the last one that was publicly available, which I <br> obtained from an archive of Dan Pop's web site after he and it <br> disappeared. It's not perfect.

SolutionPerson eso...@gmail.com 2009-12-11T19:11:37Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/ab277409bf19357a/3621b19f845207f9?show_docid=3621b19f845207f9

C++ How to Program, 7/E Deitel &amp; Deitel instructors solution manual <br> ch 1-27 is available at affordable prices. Email at <br> allsolutionmanuals11[at]gmail. com if you need to buy this. All emails <br> will be answered ASAP.

Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no 2009-12-11T16:27:39Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/44df34dd889c8a42?show_docid=44df34dd889c8a42

Doh! <br> DES

Wojtek Lerch wojte...@yahoo.ca 2009-12-11T15:49:38Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/1f419bb28799b1f3?show_docid=1f419bb28799b1f3

I think you're talking about &quot;flexible array members&quot;, not VLAs.

Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no 2009-12-11T15:44:06Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/d8e4b10319b4f3cc?show_docid=d8e4b10319b4f3cc

In many if not most cases these days, &quot;compilers targeting embedded <br> hardware&quot; means &quot;the GNU compiler collection&quot;, which admittedly does not <br> conform to any C standard, but at least it tries. <br> In non-GCC cases, they might not even try to conform, but they usually <br> do try not to surprise the users too badly.

Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no 2009-12-11T15:40:48Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/5a8266387ff814b3?show_docid=5a8266387ff814b3

Microsoft does not implement any part of C99. This is well known to <br> anyone who has ever tried to write software that will run on both <br> Windows and *nix, or to port *nix software to Windows. The most <br> commonly encountered problem is the lack of long long and intN_t, and to <br> a smaller degree (since they're less commonly used) intmax_t and the new

Francis Glassborow francis.glassbo...@btinternet.com 2009-12-11T14:50:04Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/c1f974a737a7c5a1?show_docid=c1f974a737a7c5a1

Actually, how many compilers targeting embedded hardware conform to a C <br> Standard (any one, let alone the latest)

Marco prenom_no...@yahoo.com 2009-12-11T14:48:07Z http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_frm/thread/18f7cdbfbd2579c4/3138409350a363a9?show_docid=3138409350a363a9

How many C compilers for embedded targets implement VLAs? Not many. <br> Does Microsoft implement it yet? not sure. <br> I would say 10 years out that it is not meeting the intent of having <br> a language standard. <br> I think VLA is featuritis for C. This is a good feature for other <br> more higher order languages.