We wanted to reduce the 45 statements related to librarian behaviors to a
more manageable set and determine underlying concepts. We first ran
factor analysis on 8/10/97 and obtained 10 factors, using mean
substitution for the missing variable treatment, principal components
analysis and varimax rotation. However, using the same set of data on
1/25/98 I ran factor analysis again, using the same defaults, including
mean substitution, but this time received warning message #11302 "the
correlation matrix is ill-conditioned." Has SPSS made some program
changes between the first and second time I ran factor analysis, and
received identical results, except for the warning message? How serious
is this problem? What do you recommend I do?
Once we resolve this problem, we would like to explore the association
between the factors and the outcome variables (i.e. between user
perceptions of librarian behavior and user perceptions of success). Is
correlation (factors with outcome variables) the best SPSS procedure to
use or are there other data analysis methods we should explore?
Thank you for whatever advice you can provide.
Jo Bell Whitlatch
San Jose State University Library
San Jose CA 95192-0028
FAX: 408-924-2701
Email: jwhi...@email.sjsu.edu
Phone: 408-924-2742
David Nichols
Principal Support Statistician and
Manager of Statistical Support
SPSS Inc.
nic...@spss.com
>----------
>From: Jo Bell Whitlatch[SMTP:jwhi...@EMAIL.SJSU.EDU]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 12:18 PM
>To: SPS...@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
>Subject: Factor Analysis Using SPSS on a Mainframe Computer