Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Richard Dawkins Claims Unborn Children Are Less Human Then Pigs
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Jeanne Douglas
May 22, 2013, 9:33:00 PM5/22/13
to
In article <c8fqp8pjb292p4j72...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-tweet-.html
>
> By now, most people have heard of the world famous atheist Richard
> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> not to believe.
Where's the evil?
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-tweet-.html
>
> By now, most people have heard of the world famous atheist Richard
> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> not to believe.
Where's the evil?
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
Message has been deleted
Jeanne Douglas
May 22, 2013, 11:29:34 PM5/22/13
to
In article <3ruqp8hnbkmubu2a0...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Do you deny that declaring pigs superier to humans is evil? Do you?
No.
But, of course, he did no such thing.
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
No.
But, of course, he did no such thing.
kni...@baawa.com
May 22, 2013, 11:38:08 PM5/22/13
to
On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:50:47 -0400, Brother Love
page and watch Ray Comfort. (Youtube video)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/05/22/ray-comfort-must-think-lying-for-jesus-is-okay/
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
<BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
If anyone doubts christian preachers are bags of shit, go to this
>
>If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
page and watch Ray Comfort. (Youtube video)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/05/22/ray-comfort-must-think-lying-for-jesus-is-okay/
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
casey
May 22, 2013, 11:44:17 PM5/22/13
to
On 22 May, 14:50, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
Without commenting on Dawkin's tweet as I don't know
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
the context I would point out that you cannot assign the
view of one atheist as being the view of another atheist
as that would be dishonest and being a good Christian
you are I assume honest?
Not being able to find evidence that something exists
doesn't turn you into something evil.
calvin
May 23, 2013, 12:28:24 AM5/23/13
to
up until the moment of birth by tweeting nonsense gives
off an evil smell.
SkyEyes
May 23, 2013, 1:27:29 AM5/23/13
to
On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
for very good reason: birth hurts.
-
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
-
wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
for very good reason: birth hurts.
-
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
-
SkyEyes
May 23, 2013, 1:28:04 AM5/23/13
to
On May 22, 7:14 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >In article <c8fqp8pjb292p4j72p6ouh4tqbfl7n9...@4ax.com>,
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 18:33:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <c8fqp8pjb292p4j72p6ouh4tqbfl7n9...@4ax.com>,
> > Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> >>http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
>
> >> By now, most people have heard of the world famous atheist Richard
> >> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> >> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> >> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> >> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> >> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> >> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> >> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> >> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> >> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> >> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> >> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> >> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> >> not to believe.
>
> >Where's the evil?
>
> >> By now, most people have heard of the world famous atheist Richard
> >> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> >> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> >> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> >> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> >> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> >> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> >> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> >> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> >> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> >> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> >> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> >> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> >> not to believe.
>
> >Where's the evil?
>
> Do you deny that declaring pigs superier to humans is evil? Do you?
That's not what Dawkins says, so you can stop lying about him.
SkyEyes
May 23, 2013, 1:30:10 AM5/23/13
to
USSC has said we have abortion on demand BEFORE VIABILITY, which
occurs somewhere around weeks 24-26. After that, abortions are only
performed to save the life and health of the mother or because there's
something horribly wrong with the fetus that was undetectable before
viability.
It would be better if you got your facts straight before you spout
off.
Jason
May 23, 2013, 3:32:49 AM5/23/13
to
In article
<fcfdb9e0-d806-4923...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net> wrote:
> On May 22, 9:28=A0pm, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
Have any fetuses been murdered by an abortion doctor as they were being born?
<fcfdb9e0-d806-4923...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net> wrote:
> On May 22, 9:28=A0pm, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
Alex W.
May 23, 2013, 4:58:21 AM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 00:32:49 -0700, Jason wrote:
> Have any fetuses been murdered by an abortion doctor as they were being born?
No, by that stage the abortion doctors usually wait for a
> Have any fetuses been murdered by an abortion doctor as they were being born?
few days until they can use the babies for their Black Mass
ritual sacrifice and roast-baby dinner.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
calvin
May 23, 2013, 9:17:34 AM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 1:30 am, SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote:
> On May 22, 9:28 pm, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > On May 22, 11:44 pm, casey <jgkjca...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > On 22 May, 14:50, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> > > > latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> > > Without commenting on Dawkin's tweet as I don't know
> > > the context I would point out that you cannot assign the
> > > view of one atheist as being the view of another atheist
> > > as that would be dishonest and being a good Christian
> > > you are I assume honest?
>
> > > Not being able to find evidence that something exists
> > > doesn't turn you into something evil.
>
> > No, but trying to stop all opposition to abortion on demand
> > up until the moment of birth by tweeting nonsense gives
> > off an evil smell.
>
> We don't have abortion on demand up until the moment of birth. The
> USSC has said we have abortion on demand BEFORE VIABILITY, which
> occurs somewhere around weeks 24-26. After that, abortions are only
> performed to save the life and health of the mother or because there's
> something horribly wrong with the fetus that was undetectable before
> viability.
>
> It would be better if you got your facts straight before you spout
> off.
Gosnell, and another case that came to light
> On May 22, 9:28 pm, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
> > On May 22, 11:44 pm, casey <jgkjca...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > On 22 May, 14:50, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> > > > latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> > > Without commenting on Dawkin's tweet as I don't know
> > > the context I would point out that you cannot assign the
> > > view of one atheist as being the view of another atheist
> > > as that would be dishonest and being a good Christian
> > > you are I assume honest?
>
> > > Not being able to find evidence that something exists
> > > doesn't turn you into something evil.
>
> > No, but trying to stop all opposition to abortion on demand
> > up until the moment of birth by tweeting nonsense gives
> > off an evil smell.
>
> We don't have abortion on demand up until the moment of birth. The
> USSC has said we have abortion on demand BEFORE VIABILITY, which
> occurs somewhere around weeks 24-26. After that, abortions are only
> performed to save the life and health of the mother or because there's
> something horribly wrong with the fetus that was undetectable before
> viability.
>
> It would be better if you got your facts straight before you spout
> off.
even more recently. Get your facts straight.
In the past there was Tiller. Probably there are
hundreds of late term abortionists, and if the
Dawkins tweet is accurately reported, then he
is doing his best to enable them.
MarkA
May 23, 2013, 12:30:13 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:57:17 -0400, Brother Love wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 2:50�pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>>> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>>>
>>> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>>
>>He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
>>their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are intelligent,
>>conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are *not*. The nervous
>>system isn't hooked up and operating until birth, for very good reason:
>>birth hurts.
>>
>>
> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I! Yes! Each and every one of
> you!
That's pretty much how I feel about people who have to lie to make their
point. You call Dawkins' description of God "unflattering". Dawkins is
quoting the Bible; he didn't write it, he's only reading it. Which,
apparently, many Christians fail to do.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 2:50�pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>>> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>>>
>>> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>>
>>He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
>>their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are intelligent,
>>conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are *not*. The nervous
>>system isn't hooked up and operating until birth, for very good reason:
>>birth hurts.
>>
>>
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I! Yes! Each and every one of
> you!
That's pretty much how I feel about people who have to lie to make their
point. You call Dawkins' description of God "unflattering". Dawkins is
quoting the Bible; he didn't write it, he's only reading it. Which,
apparently, many Christians fail to do.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
MarkA
May 23, 2013, 12:35:35 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 00:32:49 -0700, Jason wrote:
MarkA
May 23, 2013, 12:42:40 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:54:06 -0400, Brother Love wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
> READ THE ARTICLE! Yes he did.
I did READ THE ARTICLE. And, no, Dawkins never says that pigs are
superior to humans. In fact, he is, as usual, EXTREMELY PRECISE in his
use of language: he specifies that he is discussing the aspects of
humanness that are "relevant to the morality of abortion".
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
I did READ THE ARTICLE. And, no, Dawkins never says that pigs are
superior to humans. In fact, he is, as usual, EXTREMELY PRECISE in his
use of language: he specifies that he is discussing the aspects of
humanness that are "relevant to the morality of abortion".
Uncle Vic
May 23, 2013, 4:40:08 PM5/23/13
to
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:0q0sp8h7bgvmljtde...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
Fuck you Brother Sperm.
--
Uncle Vic
aa# 2011
BAAWA
AA Quotemeister
Visit my You Tube Channel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/Vicman6311?feature=mhee
news:0q0sp8h7bgvmljtde...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
> READ THE ARTICLE! Yes he did.
>
Creation Studies .org?
>
Fuck you Brother Sperm.
--
Uncle Vic
aa# 2011
BAAWA
AA Quotemeister
Visit my You Tube Channel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/Vicman6311?feature=mhee
Jeanne Douglas
May 23, 2013, 5:15:29 PM5/23/13
to
In article <a01sp8lb31kip12e2...@4ax.com>,
And who FOLLOWS Dawkins?
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
> >>
> >> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
> >
> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
> >
>
> >wrote:
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
> >>
> >> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
> >
> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
> >
>
> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
Why?
And who FOLLOWS Dawkins?
Jeanne Douglas
May 23, 2013, 5:15:59 PM5/23/13
to
In article <ot0sp8d4q6btjg5u2...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> That just prooves that athiests are no good.
Not according to the Pope.
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Not according to the Pope.
Jeanne Douglas
May 23, 2013, 5:16:21 PM5/23/13
to
In article <0q0sp8h7bgvmljtde...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
He said no such thing.
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
> READ THE ARTICLE! Yes he did.
I'm not responsible for your reading comprehension problems.
He said no such thing.
Free Lunch
May 23, 2013, 7:00:27 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:58:21 +0100, "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote
in alt.atheism:
Modestly proposed.
in alt.atheism:
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Jeanne Douglas
May 24, 2013, 12:12:15 AM5/24/13
to
In article <skdtp816bu6gm1ov0...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dawkins is the athiest paintron saint.
According to whom?
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
According to whom?
Metspitzer
May 24, 2013, 12:31:37 AM5/24/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:12:15 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>In article <skdtp816bu6gm1ov0...@4ax.com>,
> Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:15:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <a01sp8lb31kip12e2...@4ax.com>,
>> > Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On May 22, 2:50�pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>> >> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>> >> >
>> >> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
>> >> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
>> >> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
>> >> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
>> >> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
>> >
>> >Why?
>> >
>> >And who FOLLOWS Dawkins?
>>
>> Dawkins is the athiest paintron saint.
>
>According to whom?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc5JXbyw1C0
>In article <skdtp816bu6gm1ov0...@4ax.com>,
> Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:15:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <a01sp8lb31kip12e2...@4ax.com>,
>> > Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On May 22, 2:50�pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>> >> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>> >> >
>> >> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
>> >> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
>> >> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
>> >> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
>> >> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
>> >
>> >Why?
>> >
>> >And who FOLLOWS Dawkins?
>>
>> Dawkins is the athiest paintron saint.
>
>According to whom?
Jeanne Douglas
May 24, 2013, 1:05:07 AM5/24/13
to
SkyEyes
May 24, 2013, 1:34:43 AM5/24/13
to
term termination choices.
And what other case are you alluding to that came to light more
recently? Either quote the case, or don't mention it.
> Get your facts straight.
> In the past there was Tiller.
threatened the woman's life, or where there was something horribly
wrong with the fetus that they couldn't diagnose earlier in
pregnancy. Tiller operated *entirely* within the bounds of the law,
and provided a service that women desperately needed.
> Probably there are
> hundreds of late term abortionists,
term abortions. It's quite an uncommon service, thanks to you
dipshits who don't realize that they are sometimes needed
desperately. No woman decides to have a late-term abortion for any
reason other than to save her own life, or because the fetus has
horrible problems that would mean it couldn't survive for a
significant period of time outside the womb. In such cases, it's far
better to terminate while the woman is still healthy - pregnancy is
very taxing on the female body - and allow the woman to try again for
a healthy pregnancy.
> and if the
> Dawkins tweet is accurately reported, then he
> is doing his best to enable them.
SkyEyes
May 24, 2013, 1:36:08 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 4:57 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
great minds of our time.
*anything* like you.
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:27:29 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> >>http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>
> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> >> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> >>http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>
> >He doesn't claim that fetuses are less "human" than pigs, he claims
> >their less *sentient* than pigs. And he's right. Pigs are
> >intelligent, conscious, sentient beings. Embryos and fetuses are
> >*not*. The nervous system isn't hooked up and operating until birth,
> >for very good reason: birth hurts.
>
> People who defend Dawkins makes me sick.
You don't know a single fucking thing about Dawkins. He's one of the
great minds of our time.
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!
If you're a christian, I don't want to be one. I don't want to be
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!
*anything* like you.
harry k
May 24, 2013, 9:54:18 AM5/24/13
to
On May 22, 2:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>
wrote:
> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>
> http://www.creationstudies.org/Education/richard-dawkins-abortion-twe...
>
> By now, most people have heard of the world famous atheist Richard
> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> not to believe.
>
> Dawkins. For someone whose area of expertise is supposed to be
> biology, Dr. Dawkins has become a very vocal proponent of atheism. He
> takes pride in his unflattering descriptions of the God of the Bible.
> He is actually gleeful when he has an opportunity to repeat his
> demeaning characterization of the God of Israel as noted in his
> interview with Ben Stein. This conversation is on display for all to
> see in the documentary “Expelled” (Miller, Stein & Ruloff, 2008). In
> addition to his anti-Jehovah diatribes, Dawkins is known for his
> caustic wit and his insulting characterizations that reflect poorly on
> all people of faith. He seems especially focused on Jews and
> Christians, being on record concerning his apparent dislike for the
> God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a supreme Deity in whom he claims
> not to believe.
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!
Sorry Zachy, but any link that begins with "creation studies" is a lie
> Yes! Each and every one of you!
on the face of it and we know that anything you write about it will be
a further lie.
Harry K
WrongWayWade
May 24, 2013, 3:43:48 PM5/24/13
to
Brother Love wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:38:08 -0700, kni...@baawa.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:50:47 -0400, Brother Love
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 20:38:08 -0700, kni...@baawa.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:50:47 -0400, Brother Love
>> <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>>> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> If anyone still doubts that athiests are evil, let them read this
>>> latest report about Dawkins, the paintron saint of athiesm.
>>>
>> If anyone doubts christian preachers are bags of shit, go to this
>> page and watch Ray Comfort. (Youtube video)
>> http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/05/22/ray-comfort-must-think-lying-for-jesus-is-okay/
>>
>>
>
>
> That just prooves that athiests are no good.
>
>
>> page and watch Ray Comfort. (Youtube video)
>> http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/05/22/ray-comfort-must-think-lying-for-jesus-is-okay/
>>
>>
>
>
> That just prooves that athiests are no good.
>
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
Just remember, Jesus loves you; everyone else thinks you're an asshole.
WrongWayWade
May 24, 2013, 3:52:16 PM5/24/13
to
Brother Love wrote:
> Dawkins is the athiest paintron saint.
Paintron saint. I'll have to remember that one. TMML
> Dawkins is the athiest paintron saint.
You'd think a religious nut would at least get his religious terminology
right.
Free Lunch
May 24, 2013, 4:05:59 PM5/24/13
to
On Fri, 24 May 2013 15:52:16 -0400, "WrongWayWade"
<rl31...@excite.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
Shouldn't it be Patr�n. En tequila es verda.
<rl31...@excite.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
0 new messages