Mike Richter spewed:
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone" to say
> anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
=====================================================
Mike Richter's Unadulterated White Lies (error rates)
=====================================================
========================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 7/22/00
I have actually measured error rates
========================
The above is an unadulterated white LIE.
There was NO way Mike Richter could have measured "error rates" (C1/C2
errors). Mike Richter did NOT even have a drive reporting C1 errors.
And Mike Richter does NOT even know what C1/C2 errors are!
----------------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone" to say
> anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
=====================================================
Mike Richter's Unadulterated White Lies (error rates)
=====================================================
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 10/20/02
I have tested non-HighSpeed erasables in my 12x HighSpeed
and 8x non-HighSpeed Plextors and find substantially higher
error rates at 4x in the HighSpeed drives.
======================
The above is an unadultered white LIE.
There was NO way Mikey could have tested "error rates". First,
there was NO error rate measuring software supporting Plextors.
Second, even if there was a software, it could not have tested
error rates -- because the above Plextors do NOT report C1 errors.
And Mikey does NOT even know what C1/C2 errors are!
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone" to say
> anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
---------------------------------------------
Mike Richter: CD-R Faq Makes a Common Mistake
---------------------------------------------
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 9/16/01
the FAQ makes a common mistake in that section,
confusing Enhanced CD with its predecessor, CD Extra
======================
The above is Mikey's strutting that he's such an authority on CD-R that
he can even point out a mistake in CD-R Faq, thus giving credibility to
these unadulterated white lies.
======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Lying Shit)
Date: 9/16/01
Subject: CD Extra and Enhanced CD
There is a specification for CD Extra which defines it as a single
session containing audio tracks followed by a data *track*.
======================
From: Mike Richter (cRoxio Shit)
Date: 10/6/01
Subject: Easy CD Creator makes CD-Extra disc with no track titles
CD Extra uses a single session with audio track(s) followed by
a data track. If there are two sessions, it is an "Enhanced CD".
=====================
----------------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Mikey spewed the above unadulterated white lies to weasel out a bug of
Easy Coaster Creator: Easy CD Mangler does not support CD-Text in SA0
(Session-At-Once).
(Note: CD-Text is stored in the subcode of the lead-in)
( and thus supported only in SAO and DAO. )
======================
From: Mike Richter (cRoxio Shit)
Date: 9/15/01
Subject: Easy CD Creator makes CD-Extra disc with no track titles
> the program did not transfer track titles or publisher
> or artist information to the disc.
If you want to do a true CD Extra, you have to comply with the rules
for CD Extra - which means TAO and no titles.
======================
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
[ Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio? ]
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter: CD-R Faq Conflicts with References
------------------------------------------------
========================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 5/14/01
Yes, the FAQ says that a Mixed Mode disc
is written in a single session.
I don't doubt it...but it conflicts with
other information I have gleaned from
references
========================
There are No -- None, Nada, Zip, Zilch -- references that define Mixed
Mode as multiple sessions.
The above Mikey's unadulterated white lie was to weasel out (at the
expense of CD-R FAQ) another Mikey's unadulterated white lie:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 5/12/01
Mixed Mode is multisession by definition.
I found it out by reading the definition.
=====================
There are No -- None, Nada, Zip, Zilch -- definitions that define Mixed
Mode as multisession.
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
---------------------------------------------
Mike Richter: CD-R FAQ has Significant Errors
---------------------------------------------
=================================
From: "ned ludd"
Date: 5/28/02
Subject: Lead in and Lead out
Mike Richter (Slimy Shit) crapped:
>
> I've posted privately to Andy on the FAQ section.
>
< It is quite dated ... and has significant errors
> based on my understanding.
>
> An essential omission for this Subject is the role
> of the leadout/runout in a reader.
>
> A CD-ROM (or audio) drive needs the runout
< to read the session at all.
Not in my experience.
An audio disc without a leadout ... will read in ANY player
up to the point where the data ends provided it was burned DAO.
Failed data discs burned DAO will behave similarly,
any complete files will be readable in any reader.
=================================
----------------------------------------------
Mikey, you are The Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------------
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
===================================================
Mike Richter - The Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB (UDF)
===================================================
Mike Richter has been for YEARS blaming the UDF -- to weasel out the
bugs of DirectCD:
-----------------------------------------
Packet writing is the same as UDF
UDF is a fragile format
UDF is an unreliable format
There is an inherent problem in UDF
the format is very fragile and unreliable
The format is bad - it loses data
-----------------------------------------
But then again:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 5/4/06
Subject: UDF Has just bit me in the bum
> > I have used UDF for many years, but yesterday I had my first
> > corruption. I am now wondering whether to bother with UDF
your problem is not with UDF
======================
'
-------------------------------
Wow! What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, Any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
===========================================================
Mike Richter's Unadulterated White Lies (error rates)(BLER)
===========================================================
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Mike Richter's Unadulterated White Lies (error rates)(7-00)
> -----------------------------------------------------
> ======================
> From: Mike Richter
> Date: 7/22/00
>
> > I have been told by a friend ... that burning above 2X
> > will not result in reliable data.
>
> Is he in the mail room? I certainly hope he has nothing to do
> with the engineering side if he's so greatly misinformed.
>
> I have actually measured error rates
>
> The best results were when writing at 4x,
> 2x was slightly poorer and 1x was worst of all.
> ======================
Then again:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 4/17/00
Subject: whats the point of 8x cd recording
if you can hardly ever write?
I have never understood the advantage of 8x writing to begin with
- unless you're in the mass-pirating business. I make enough
mistakes at 2x and 4x.
I find that the BLER is lower at 2x even on the 8x blanks I prefer.
======================
The above is an unadulterated white LIE.
First, it directly contradicts the (7/22/00) post. Second, there was NO
way Mikey could have found the BLER -- Mikey had NO time to use a BLER
tester:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 4/23/00
I have borrowed a machine which will do BLER testing
- if only I can find the time to use it.
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 12/29/00
I have a BLER tester on loan; all I need is the time
to set it up and learn to use it.
Maybe by 2003 if I'm lucky.
======================
----------------------------------------------
Mikey, you are The Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
====================================================
Mike Richter's Cockamamie Mumbo Jumbo on CD-RW Media
====================================================
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 10/19/02
Subject: 4x CDRW's in 12x Writer?
> About to trade my 4x TEAC for a Mitsumi that does CDRW's at 12x.
> Will it still write my 4x media?
Not well if at all.
======================
Mikey's 12x Plextor must be something special:
==========================
From: Camper
Date: 8/23/02
I even write files with INCD on the high speed Liteon
with low speed CDRWs (up to 4 speed).
=========================
From: mbg
Date: 10/19/02
I have a Plextor 121032S and it will
write 4X CDRW media fine at 4X.
=========================
From: Harry Avant
Date: 10/19/02
Well I just used a couple of old Memorex 4X CD-RWs
in a new Plex 40/12/40 and had no problems.
=========================
And here comes Mikey with the "error rates" crap:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 10/20/02
I have tested non-HighSpeed erasables in my 12x HighSpeed
and 8x non-HighSpeed Plextors and find substantially higher
error rates at 4x in the HighSpeed drives.
======================
The above is an unadultered white LIE.
There was NO way Mikey could have tested "error rates". First, there
was NO error rate measuring software supporting Plextors. Second, even
if there was a software, it could not have found error rates -- because
the above Plextors do NOT report C1 errors.
'
----------------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Lying Friggin SOB!
Mike Richter spewed (11/7/07):
>
> If you look around hard enough, you can always find "someone"
> to say anything.
Like this one, Mikey?
====================================================
Mike Richter's Cockamamie Mumbo Jumbo on CD-RW Media
====================================================
>
> And here comes Mikey with the "error rates" crap:
>
> ======================
> From: Mike Richter
> Date: 10/20/02
>
> I have tested non-HighSpeed erasables in my 12x HighSpeed
> and 8x non-HighSpeed Plextors and find substantially higher
> error rates at 4x in the HighSpeed drives.
> ======================
>
> The above is an unadultered white LIE.
>
> There was NO way Mikey could have "tested" error rates. First, there
> was NO error rate measuring software supporting Plextors. Second, even
> if there was a software, it could not have found error rates -- because
> the above Plextors do NOT report C1 errors.
But the above unadulterated white lie is the basis for these cockamamie
mumbo jumbos:
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 11/25/03
There are many problems with eraable media. The most common is
using a medium poorly matched to your drive. For starters,
check the logo on the drive and on the package of blanks.
If they don't match - HighSpeed, UltraSpeed or neither - then
you're asking for trouble.
======================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 12/24/03
Most likely, you are using the wrong media.
If it's UltraSpeed, it wants discs in similarly marked packages
- rated 16x and above. If it's High Speed, it wants discs in
similarly marked packages, rated 4x and above. If it has neither
marking, it needs discs without such marking on their packaging
and rated no higher than 4x.
======================
Like this one, Mikey?
> Date: 12/24/03
>
> Most likely, you are using the wrong media.
>
> If it's UltraSpeed, it wants discs in similarly marked packages
> - rated 16x and above. If it's High Speed, it wants discs in
> similarly marked packages, rated 4x and above. If it has neither
> marking, it needs discs without such marking on their packaging
> and rated no higher than 4x.
> ======================
And the above cockamamie mumbo jumbo is to weasel out this DirctCD bug:
-----------------------
DirectCD 3.05
Fixes
Some older, low-speed recorders cannot correctly write high-speed
rated CD-RW media, but DirectCD would formerly allow you to try.
DirectCD now checks the media
and will reject as appropriate. <=== FIXED ???
DirectCD 5.3.4
Fixed:
Burn to Ultra High Speed media
on non-Ultra High Speed Drives,
no longer allowed <=== FIX a FIX ???
-----------------------
--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------