> Hi,
> I am new to the group, appreciate if you could answer a couple of queries I
> have
> Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
> too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
> I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 recv buffers
> allocated for the recv packets.
> My questions:
> 1. What situation causes such syslogs to pop-up ?
> 2. Is it safe to increase the RECV_TOMANY to a larger value ?
> Thanks
> Kiran
> ------------------------------
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:42:35 GMT
> From: Unruh <unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca>
> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] too many recvbufs allocated (40)
> To: questi...@lists.ntp.org
> Message-ID: <%Cn3k.657$L03.54@edtnps92>
> kiran.shi...@gmail.com (Kiran Shirol) writes:
> >Hi,
> >I am new to the group, appreciate if you could answer a couple of queries
> I
> >have
> >Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
> >too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
> >I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 recv buffers
> >allocated for the recv packets.
> >My questions:
> >1. What situation causes such syslogs to pop-up ?
> >2. Is it safe to increase the RECV_TOMANY to a larger value ?
> How many servers do you have? What are your minpoll and maxpoll values for
> those servers? Are you actually getting through to those servers ( what is
> the output of ntpq -p).
> >Thanks
> >Kiran
> ------------------------------
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:16:06 +0000
> From: Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org>
> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] too many recvbufs allocated (40)
> To: questi...@lists.ntp.org
> Message-ID: <ywn9r6b5amzt....@ntp1.isc.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >>> In article <fd2a79190806080347t3fecd0e5kde4e0bb0aaa6...@mail.gmail.com>,
> kiran.shi...@gmail.com (Kiran Shirol) writes:
> Kiran> Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
> Kiran> too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
> Kiran> I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 recv
> Kiran> buffers allocated for the recv packets.
> I recall a bug like this being fixed a while ago.
> 4.2.0 is pretty old. The latest stable release is 4.2.4, and we are pretty
> close to releasing ntp-dev as 4.2.6.
> I recommend you upgrade your ntp software.
> --
> Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org>
> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member!
Thanks for the responses. I will update to 4.2.4.