Groups
Sign in
Groups
comp.protocols.dns.std
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Learn more
comp.protocols.dns.std
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 3388
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Alexander Bartolich
,
Big-8 Management Board
5
3/19/10
Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.protocols.dns.std
RESULT comp.protocols.dns.std will be removed The Last Call for Comments (LCC) on 2010-03-07
unread,
Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.protocols.dns.std
RESULT comp.protocols.dns.std will be removed The Last Call for Comments (LCC) on 2010-03-07
3/19/10
Scott Rose
11/14/08
[dnsext] draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal as WG item
From the DNSEXT WG agenda: 5. Proposed WG work (28 min) 16:23 Excludes further forgery resilience
unread,
[dnsext] draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal as WG item
From the DNSEXT WG agenda: 5. Proposed WG work (28 min) 16:23 Excludes further forgery resilience
11/14/08
Stephane Bortzmeyer
, …
bert hubert
3
11/13/08
[dnsext] Re: Time-line for forgery resilience phase #2
Ok, this is somewhat of a tricky post since my own draft is among the ones circulated. Additionally,
unread,
[dnsext] Re: Time-line for forgery resilience phase #2
Ok, this is somewhat of a tricky post since my own draft is among the ones circulated. Additionally,
11/13/08
Florian Weimer
,
Edward Lewis
2
11/12/08
Re: [dnsext] Zones suitable for AXFR
It's good to have a few days at home and to catch=20 up on some reading. I had missed this thread
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Zones suitable for AXFR
It's good to have a few days at home and to catch=20 up on some reading. I had missed this thread
11/12/08
Ólafur Guðmundsson
,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2
11/7/08
Re: [dnsext] draft-bellis-dnsext-dnsproxy-00 - WG Item?
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:48:33AM -0500, Ólafur Gušmundsson /DNSEXT chair <og...@ogud.com>
unread,
Re: [dnsext] draft-bellis-dnsext-dnsproxy-00 - WG Item?
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:48:33AM -0500, Ólafur Gušmundsson /DNSEXT chair <og...@ogud.com>
11/7/08
Edward Lewis
11/6/08
Re: [dnsext] Draft agenda for IETF 73
At 15:50 +0100 11/6/08, Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= wrote: >I admit, the on-list and off-list
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Draft agenda for IETF 73
At 15:50 +0100 11/6/08, Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= wrote: >I admit, the on-list and off-list
11/6/08
bert hubert
, …
Edward Lewis
4
11/4/08
Re: [dnsext] draft-bellis-dnsext-dnsproxy-00
At 9:33 +0000 11/4/08, Ray.B...@nominet.org.uk wrote: >> Yes. > >Has anyone ever looked
unread,
Re: [dnsext] draft-bellis-dnsext-dnsproxy-00
At 9:33 +0000 11/4/08, Ray.B...@nominet.org.uk wrote: >> Yes. > >Has anyone ever looked
11/4/08
Edward Lewis
2
10/30/08
Re: [dnsext] Agenda items for Minneapolis, IETF-73
At 10:17 -0400 10/30/08, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >Apart from Ed's post that he _won't_
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Agenda items for Minneapolis, IETF-73
At 10:17 -0400 10/30/08, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >Apart from Ed's post that he _won't_
10/30/08
Scott Rose
, …
Edward Lewis
49
10/27/08
Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
At 12:03 +0400 10/27/08, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >[Warning, most of the ideas here come from my
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
At 12:03 +0400 10/27/08, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >[Warning, most of the ideas here come from my
10/27/08
Dean Anderson
10/22/08
Re: [dnsext] FR: An argument against 0x20 and mitigation by standard labels
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2008,
unread,
Re: [dnsext] FR: An argument against 0x20 and mitigation by standard labels
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2008,
10/22/08
Interne...@ietf.org
10/23/08
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-06.txt
--NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft
unread,
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-06.txt
--NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft
10/23/08
Ólafur Guðmundsson
10/23/08
[dnsext] Fwd: Posting of IPR Disclosure
--=====================_144770488==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
unread,
[dnsext] Fwd: Posting of IPR Disclosure
--=====================_144770488==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
10/23/08
Samantha...@suddenlink.net
10/18/08
under Bandini elsewhere
Ollie wrote: > > Where should I govern another flat contribution? > http://celebrate.bachaan
unread,
under Bandini elsewhere
Ollie wrote: > > Where should I govern another flat contribution? > http://celebrate.bachaan
10/18/08
Roxanna.A...@msn.com
10/17/08
trying for example comp.protocols.dns.std
Margaret wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:14:45 GMT: > > Who can illustrate another roasted beer? >
unread,
trying for example comp.protocols.dns.std
Margaret wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:14:45 GMT: > > Who can illustrate another roasted beer? >
10/17/08
Ólafur Guðmundsson
10/17/08
[dnsext] Re: Time-line for forgery resilience phase #2
--=====================_617249337==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1";
unread,
[dnsext] Re: Time-line for forgery resilience phase #2
--=====================_617249337==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1";
10/17/08
Mark Andrews
, …
Olafur Gudmundsson
17
10/17/08
Re: [dnsext] Firewall support for large DNS names (>255) and packets (>512)?
--=====================_608930926==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Firewall support for large DNS names (>255) and packets (>512)?
--=====================_608930926==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
10/17/08
Dean Anderson
10/15/08
Re: [dnsext] draft-barwood-dnsext-fr-resolver-mitigations-03
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, George Barwood wrote: > I have revised my draft
unread,
Re: [dnsext] draft-barwood-dnsext-fr-resolver-mitigations-03
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, George Barwood wrote: > I have revised my draft
10/15/08
Ólafur Guðmundsson
10/15/08
[dnsext] DNS profile effort
--=====================_429330244==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
unread,
[dnsext] DNS profile effort
--=====================_429330244==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
10/15/08
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
,
Matt Larson
4
10/14/08
Re: [dnsext] One other argument for local scope...
At Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:30:25 +0100, "George Barwood" <george....@blueyonder.co.uk
unread,
Re: [dnsext] One other argument for local scope...
At Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:30:25 +0100, "George Barwood" <george....@blueyonder.co.uk
10/14/08
Stephane Bortzmeyer
, …
Dean Anderson
20
10/14/08
Re: Some notes on DNSCurve
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Some of the
unread,
Re: Some notes on DNSCurve
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Some of the
10/14/08
Dean Anderson
10/10/08
Re: [dnsext] Re: Protecting caches?
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > I don't believe
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Re: Protecting caches?
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > I don't believe
10/10/08
Florian Weimer
, …
Dean Anderson
37
10/9/08
Re: Protecting caches?
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Wouter Wijngaards wrote: > > The thing that
unread,
Re: Protecting caches?
[ Note: Post was moderated. ] On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Wouter Wijngaards wrote: > > The thing that
10/9/08
Paul Hoffman
, …
Stephane Bortzmeyer
8
10/10/08
[dnsext] No spec for DNSCurve
At 3:07 PM -0400 10/9/08, Edward Lewis wrote: >At 11:32 -0700 10/9/08, Paul Hoffman wrote: >
unread,
[dnsext] No spec for DNSCurve
At 3:07 PM -0400 10/9/08, Edward Lewis wrote: >At 11:32 -0700 10/9/08, Paul Hoffman wrote: >
10/10/08
Ólafur Guðmundsson
10/9/08
Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
Speaking as Document Shepherd: Process history: DNSEXT WG determined that the scope of this document
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
Speaking as Document Shepherd: Process history: DNSEXT WG determined that the scope of this document
10/9/08
Thierry Moreau
2
10/9/08
Re: [dnsext] Rabin-Williams signatures for DNSSEC
Eric Rescorla wrote: > At Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:31:19 -0700, > Adam Langley wrote: > >>
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Rabin-Williams signatures for DNSSEC
Eric Rescorla wrote: > At Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:31:19 -0700, > Adam Langley wrote: > >>
10/9/08
bman...@vacation.karoshi.com
, …
Matt Larson
3
10/9/08
[dnsext] Notice of Inquiry regarding DNSSEC]
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008, Paul Hoffman wrote: > A more resolvable URL is <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/
unread,
[dnsext] Notice of Inquiry regarding DNSSEC]
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008, Paul Hoffman wrote: > A more resolvable URL is <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/
10/9/08
Edward Lewis
10/8/08
[dnsext] implementations of RFC 5155 (aka NSEC3)
How many publicly released implementations of RFC 5155 (NSEC3) are available? (That is, not beta
unread,
[dnsext] implementations of RFC 5155 (aka NSEC3)
How many publicly released implementations of RFC 5155 (NSEC3) are available? (That is, not beta
10/8/08
Edward Lewis
10/6/08
Re: [dnsext] Request for new RRTYPE assignment: "ASSET"
At 20:08 -0400 9/12/08, Kevin Darcy wrote: >but as a matter of semantics, the word "asset
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Request for new RRTYPE assignment: "ASSET"
At 20:08 -0400 9/12/08, Kevin Darcy wrote: >but as a matter of semantics, the word "asset
10/6/08
Florian Weimer
, …
bman...@vacation.karoshi.com
4
10/6/08
Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:25:06PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > At 10:38 +0200 10/2/08, Florian
unread,
Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:25:06PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > At 10:38 +0200 10/2/08, Florian
10/6/08
Peter Koch
10/6/08
[dnsext] Re: REMINDER: rfc2672bis WGLC expiring!
Hello, On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:17:08PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > We posted the WGLC for
unread,
[dnsext] Re: REMINDER: rfc2672bis WGLC expiring!
Hello, On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:17:08PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > We posted the WGLC for
10/6/08