Description:
Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND). (Moderated)
|
|
|
zone A record?
|
| |
Hello, I'm new to bind and I have a question about giving a zone an A record. I have one server setup as a master and two slave servers. I have created company.com as a master zone, and I have created location1.company.com as a master zone. The company.com zone has entries for our web sites, and other services and the... more »
|
|
PTR zone /28 not working, solved
|
| |
Hi, My ISP append a dot (.) after ns1.mincex.cu and ns2.mincex.cu and mails start to be sended y arriving. The new configuration lines into the 66.6.190.in-addr.arpa zone file on my ISP is: 224/28 IN NS ns1.mincex.cu. 224/28 IN NS ns2.mincex.cu. Now I will tallk with my ISP about the transfer of 66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.... more »
|
|
PTR zone /28 not working
|
| |
Hi, I use Bind-9.4.2 running on FreeBSD-7.2. Last week my DNS was reconfigured to a new IP address pool by my ISP and by me from a /29 to /28 address range. Using "How is my DNS" I check my domain and all is good except reverse lookup. My ISP also reconfigured the PTR zone and delegate the reverse zone... more »
|
|
FWD: 9.6.1-P1 zone parser false errors
|
| |
I may have missed other responses. Anbody have any idea of what's going on below? thanks Len uname -a Linux ns1.abcxyz.net 2.4.20-31.9smp #1 SMP Tue Apr 13 17:40:10 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux old BIND: /usr/sbin/named-checkzone -v 9.2.1 /usr/sbin/named-checkzone abcxyz.com /var/named/db.abcxyz.com... more »
|
|
bind-users Digest, Vol 334, Issue 1
|
| |
... >I'm also wary of declaring the same range in multiple match lists (once >asserted, then negated everywhere else), since that means if the >numeric value of the range changes, you have multiple places to update, >and you could miss one. Here are two friends to help not miss one: e.g. subnet moves from 10.42. to 10.43... more »
|
|
Glitches when new entries appear in dlv.isc.org?
|
| |
Our main recursive nameservers are running BIND 9.6.1-P1 and are using DNSSEC validation via dlv.isc.org. We had a report this morning that names under cern.ch were failing to resolve. I suspect that these were SERVFAILs, although unfortunately the situation had corrected itself by the time I was able to look at it.... more »
|
|
ipv6 dns resolution
|
| |
Hello guys. (I hope this is the right place to ask, otherwise pls. advise me accordingly.) I have this problem on my ipv6 network and dns setup and i'll appreciate any input to help me resolve this. My question is: If i point to a subdomain (ex. ipv6.google.com), how do i resolve to its ipv6 address by default?... more »
|
|
multiple internal views not working (RESOLVED)
|
| |
All, thanks so much for your help in understanding match-clients in the view statement for zones. For historical purposes (and future searchers) this statement works: match clients { !10.x.5.0/24; 10.x.0.0/16; } doesn't serve .5, but serves everything else. Thank you Mr. Clegg (where do I send that beer? :-)... more »
|
|
|