<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom</id>
  <title type="text">comp.protocols.dicom Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.protocols.dicom/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.protocols.dicom feed"/>
  <updated>2008-09-07T07:58:16Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>LEADTOOLS</name>
  <email>supp...@leadtools.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-07T07:58:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/393e93b33180b7c5/6209ec8eff75ae48?show_docid=6209ec8eff75ae48</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/393e93b33180b7c5/6209ec8eff75ae48?show_docid=6209ec8eff75ae48"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Software to save multi-frame DICOM file</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; The DICOM standard allows multi-frame images in data sets (for example &lt;br&gt; with Cine playback). &lt;br&gt; If you want a toolkit to do this, then you can use the LEADTOOLS &lt;br&gt; Medical Imaging 15 toolkit to save a multi-frame image to a multi- &lt;br&gt; frame DICOM data set. You can also convert from and to multi-frame &lt;br&gt; image formats like TIFF and GIF.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>LEADTOOLS</name>
  <email>supp...@leadtools.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-07T07:53:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/644d8402344fa055/41059c57e490d070?show_docid=41059c57e490d070</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/644d8402344fa055/41059c57e490d070?show_docid=41059c57e490d070"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is DICOM image in mesa test conform to standard ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello Arno, &lt;br&gt; You are correct. If no character set is defined in tag (0008,0005), &lt;br&gt; then any DICOM reader (or converter in your case) will assume that &lt;br&gt; this dataset uses the basic graphic set. &lt;br&gt; However, if there was no special character used in the dataset, the &lt;br&gt; DICOM reader will (mostly) open it correctly, but you will get an
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>ljdon...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-07T01:54:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/3e8aef608a7aa2ca?show_docid=3e8aef608a7aa2ca</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/3e8aef608a7aa2ca?show_docid=3e8aef608a7aa2ca"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Frame of reference UID??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Robert Horn &lt;br&gt; So we we get a transform Matrix provided by registration and when we &lt;br&gt; apply this transform to the Target image to align itself with Source &lt;br&gt; Image, do we copy the FOR UID from source to target. &lt;br&gt; LJ.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter B Schmidt</name>
  <email>n...@pbschmidt.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-06T15:49:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/d391bdc6047cce81/99d9b9715ed368af?show_docid=99d9b9715ed368af</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/d391bdc6047cce81/99d9b9715ed368af?show_docid=99d9b9715ed368af"/>
  <title type="text">Re: dcmtk - accessing frames of images</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello dall, &lt;br&gt; please direct your Question to the dcmtk forums at &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://forum.dcmtk.org/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;, I am sure there you will find help. &lt;br&gt; In this newsgroup, only discussions regarding the DICOM Standard itself &lt;br&gt; are discussed. &lt;br&gt; HTH, &lt;br&gt; Peter
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Clunie</name>
  <email>dclu...@dclunie.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-06T10:27:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/b3d28451be7d7639/15c14e23cef31663?show_docid=15c14e23cef31663</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/b3d28451be7d7639/15c14e23cef31663?show_docid=15c14e23cef31663"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Quality Assessment for Good Images</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi Carsten &lt;br&gt; From CID 6044 Types of Image Quality assessment used in CAD Image &lt;br&gt; Quality templates there is: &lt;br&gt; DCM	111237	Usable - Meets the quality control standard &lt;br&gt; which you could use to extend CID 7010 as a Key Object Selection &lt;br&gt; Document Title. &lt;br&gt; David
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>raminder.ahluwa...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-05T13:02:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/3b9eede0ed47bc66?show_docid=3b9eede0ed47bc66</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/3b9eede0ed47bc66?show_docid=3b9eede0ed47bc66"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Data consistency - additional image after study is closed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  To have a new study_uid or not will depend upon RIS generating a new &lt;br&gt; order. Typically, a new order generation will result in a new study. &lt;br&gt; If you are taking images in the same order, they belong to the same &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;study&amp;quot;, and hence PACS will add those images to the current existing &lt;br&gt; study with the same UID. Therefore, it is more of a workflow issue. If
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Horn</name>
  <email>robert.h...@agfa.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-05T12:02:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/d81a546ca3348c85?show_docid=d81a546ca3348c85</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/d81a546ca3348c85?show_docid=d81a546ca3348c85"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Frame of reference UID??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Or, more precisely, that registration (either based on landmarks or &lt;br&gt; external information) will be needed before you know anything about &lt;br&gt; their spatial relationship. It is only when the two UIDs are the same &lt;br&gt; that you know that both use the same coordinate system.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Carsten Witte</name>
  <email>newsgro...@gmx.info</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-05T12:00:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/b3d28451be7d7639/1a37023827825fab?show_docid=1a37023827825fab</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/b3d28451be7d7639/1a37023827825fab?show_docid=1a37023827825fab"/>
  <title type="text">Quality Assessment for Good Images</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I plan to prototype a Quality Assessment Application. I plan to &lt;br&gt; support states like &amp;quot;none,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;rejected,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;best,&amp;quot; and the like, all of &lt;br&gt; which I can encode into a combination of CID 7010 and CID 7011/7012. &lt;br&gt; Except for a state &amp;quot;good.&amp;quot; First, I tough I define &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; thru the &lt;br&gt; absence of a QA-KOS, but then I reckon I run run into trouble when
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>dall</name>
  <email>mueller.mare...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-05T07:46:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/d391bdc6047cce81/08aa8257215f4153?show_docid=08aa8257215f4153</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/d391bdc6047cce81/08aa8257215f4153?show_docid=08aa8257215f4153"/>
  <title type="text">dcmtk - accessing frames of images</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  i write a program using the dcmtk toolkit. i finally succeeded in &lt;br&gt; writing some code that puts four several .dcm-files (showing four &lt;br&gt; different views of a lung/trachea) together like on this picture: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/451/bildaz7.png&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; to load the pictures i used this: &lt;br&gt; Code: &lt;br&gt; DcmFileFormat datei1;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>gunter zeilinger</name>
  <email>gunte...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T15:43:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/677cf2f5f4886d56/9a37a9040a3d307d?show_docid=9a37a9040a3d307d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/677cf2f5f4886d56/9a37a9040a3d307d?show_docid=9a37a9040a3d307d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Mammo Hanging Protocol problem in combination with Presentation States</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi David, &lt;br&gt; I agree, it&#39;s not the question if we should meet user expectations OR &lt;br&gt; keep our HP implementation strict standard compliant, but how to fix &lt;br&gt; the standard to be able to express user expectations / preferences &lt;br&gt; without having to &amp;quot;customize&amp;quot; its interpretation. &lt;br&gt; So we would like to be able to define HPs for the primary
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Clunie</name>
  <email>dclu...@dclunie.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T11:59:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/31573cb197ca3521?show_docid=31573cb197ca3521</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1a61c5c30d7e69c7/31573cb197ca3521?show_docid=31573cb197ca3521"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Frame of reference UID??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Nothing.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>luigipb</name>
  <email>luigi.pamp...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T09:30:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/3c0eeb93ed86b4b1?show_docid=3c0eeb93ed86b4b1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/3c0eeb93ed86b4b1?show_docid=3c0eeb93ed86b4b1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Data consistency - additional image after study is closed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The Study Date is a study level attribute, so it cannot change across &lt;br&gt; the study, but in fact it is the date when the study starts, even if &lt;br&gt; it lasts for more than one day (for example, when it crosses &lt;br&gt; midnight !), no matter if the study contains images acquired in &lt;br&gt; different days, just put the first date into every image (of course,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tobias</name>
  <email>tobias.kur...@meditec.zeiss.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T09:28:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1ec7b3814afbe1e0/fbdf075fec7374f9?show_docid=fbdf075fec7374f9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/1ec7b3814afbe1e0/fbdf075fec7374f9?show_docid=fbdf075fec7374f9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Encapsulated PDF and DICOM Default Transfer Syntax</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks a lot for the clarification! &lt;br&gt; Tobias
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Om</name>
  <email>omkumar...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T08:27:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/603519bc4282a7c2/83fe1490e6c74414?show_docid=83fe1490e6c74414</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/603519bc4282a7c2/83fe1490e6c74414?show_docid=83fe1490e6c74414"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Modality Worklist Patient&#39;s name matching</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You are free to add the Asterix; The patient filter you send in &lt;br&gt; Request is generic (Specific Patient as I infer by your Query Object &lt;br&gt; may be anything among the 5 Components of PN Data Type in DICOM) and &lt;br&gt; while querying i am free to look at any/ all of the 5 Components &lt;br&gt; specified by the standard (unless you specifically query for First
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>M1nd0nF1r3</name>
  <email>ta...@poczta.onet.pl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-09-04T07:10:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/eacd094b7be840ff?show_docid=eacd094b7be840ff</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_thread/thread/278189029036a28f/eacd094b7be840ff?show_docid=eacd094b7be840ff"/>
  <title type="text">Data consistency - additional image after study is closed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Dear all! &lt;br&gt; We have following scenario: &lt;br&gt; - CR Study was performed and closed &lt;br&gt; - After study was done, on next day we are making additional exposure &lt;br&gt; - so new image &lt;br&gt; Questions: &lt;br&gt; - should new image will have same STUDY INSTANCE UID? &lt;br&gt; - does PACS system should accept new image? Should it be attached to &lt;br&gt; old study, DESPITE that new image(study) date will be DIFFERENT?
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
