More political philosophy about: Is the world getting better or worse?

[amin...@gmail.com]

Hello,



More political philosophy about: Is the world getting better or worse?

I have just looked at the following video that i posted previously:

Is the world getting better or worse? A look at the numbers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCm9Ng0bbEQ


But i think that the man on the video is "too" optimistic, because
if you have noticed, i defined morality by the following abstraction: "Perfection at best", read my proof below about it, and since i am a more serious computer programmer, i think morality is like the software, since the software needs to be stable and needs to be perfection, so we, more serious software programmers, are not satisfied in computer programming if it is not following high standards,
so i think morality is the same , because we are like in a Safety-critical system that needs high standards of perfectioning, so we have
in our system to be those high standards of perfectioning in action.


Read the rest of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy:


More political philosophy about the intellectual and the material..


As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:

"First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:

"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""


But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material.

Read the rest of my previous thoughts of my political philoso;phy
to understand more:


More political philosophy about money..

As you are noticing in my following political philosophy about "Achieving Your Potential", i have just not talked about the engine
of money, but here is what i said below in my political philosophy about money:

"When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit."


More political philosophy about "Achieving Your Potential"..


I have just looked at the following video of
Garry Kasparov:

Garry Kasparov on "Achieving Your Potential"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPT0vg_Jl8Q


And i think that , in this video, Garry Kasparov is not so efficient
in his thinking, because like in psychology or philosophy
he must like shows the essence, i mean he must show the primitives
that permits to "achieve your potential", so i will explain:

First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:

"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."


But be smart and notice that the result of my Rule that is this satisfaction is also a balance of the individual satisfaction and the satisfaction of the society and the world, so it constrains your image to be in accordance with morality that takes care correctly of the society and the world, so i think that it becomes more clear that those two engines are really powerful too and they permit to achieve your potential.

Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to
understand more:

More political philosophy about political correctness..

Now in political philosophy can we ask the question of:

Do we have to be political correctness or not ?

I think to be smart you have to define political correctness..

So then can we in political philosophy ask what is political correctness ?

I think that you have to know about morality to be able to answer this question, and you will notice in my logical proof below that i think a correct abstraction of what is morality is: "perfection at best", so why i am choosing such abstraction ? because we have to be perfection in action by also being an effort of being more perfection, so then you are noticing that morality must be pushed forward towards absolute perfection, but perfection at best is also that we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, so then now you are noticing that morality is also this effort of helping others and it is also perfection in action towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, so then you are noticing that independently of democracy we can now notice that morality is also this act of balancing between perfection of helping others and perfection of moving forward towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, and now you are noticing that when you look at today world you are feeling that our today world is converging fast towards this essence of morality of human beings, and now you are finally noticing that you are able to see that this essence of morality
also dictates to us a kind of political correctness. So read the rest of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
more:



More about compassion in political philosophy..

And what about compassion in political philosophy ?

"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:

"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."

So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also
helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect
helping others and to know how to help others.

So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others"

But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:

Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.


More political philosophy of: What is morality ?

Am i crazy by saying that you have to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" ?

No, i am not crazy , since i am like a wise man type of person, so
i will explain more:

When i say that you have to follow the Rule of:

""More perfection brings satisfaction"


You have to understand that i have abstracted the definition of morality to: "Perfection at best" (read my proof below of it), and the "at best"
must be defined more, and you will notice in my below writing that
i have defined more what is the "at best" of "perfection at best" so
that you understand that morality is the act of perfectioning at best that is constrained by some constraints, so to not be extremism or radicalism of perfection, such as neo-nazism, that is problematic, you have to read about those constraints in my below writing, so then you are understanding that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" is also constrained by the same constraints of morality of today such as under democracy etc., so read all my following writing so that you
understand my political philosophy..


More political philosophy about life..


I think that there is many engines that push us forward,
but i don't think that we have to return to racial white nationalism,
because it can bring with it many problems such as hate between different races, so i think that the best engine is to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction..", this is i think the smartest way to follow, so read about it in my following writing to understand more:

More political philosophy about morality..


More about the efficient spirit..


When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.

Read my previous thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about the efficient spirit..

I am like a wise man type of person, and now i will speak more
about what is a beautiful spirit..

When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. And please
read my below thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:


And now more political philosophy..


I think it is a beautiful day, what do i mean by beautiful day?,
i am like a wise man type of person and i am able to notice it,
notice that Diversity has brought perfection, but you have to notice more, so look at my following poem of Love to notice:


==========================

You're In My Heart

Like the long way from the start

That brings the beautiful "insight"

You're In My Heart

Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"

That makes us see in the dark

You're In My Heart

Because it is far from the evil fight

Because it is like the words of the almight

You're In My Heart

Because we are beautiful from the inside

Because our Love is right !

So I want to take you in my arms

Like peace and love that disarm

I want to take you in my arms

Since i am here to make it fine

I want to take you in my arms

Since love is also like a beautiful cup of wine

I want to take you in my arms

Since the light of my heart is making our love shines

I want to take you in my arms

Since our destiny is a beautiful Day of Valentine !

=======================



Notice in my above poem of Love that i am saying the following:

"I want to take you in my arms
Since our destiny is a beautiful Day of Valentine !"

When i say: "Our destiny is the beautiful Day Of Valentine"

That doesn't mean that our destiny is only one Day Of Valentine,
Because that also symbolically means that our destiny is the "celebration" of the Day of Valentine, that means our destiny will be Love and Romance.

And notice in my above poem of Love that i am saying:

"You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark"

So as you are noticing the day and night means also symbolically
the night of humanity, that means the bad of our humanity, and both
the day and night of humanity have allowed us also to see in the dark,
so you have to understand my poem of Love, this is the basis
of the principle of: the right Diversity gives perfection,
but you have to be more smart, today we are able to adapt
quickly to the bad of our humanity and be much more wisdom
because we are much more aware and much conscious and much more
educated because of the sophistication of education and the sophistication of internet and such, this is why i think that
arab countries will adapt quickly, so i think that we have to be more
optimistic about arabs and about our world.


Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:


More political philosophy about beautifulness..

I am like a wise man type of person, so i am a special person like
a wise man, and i am a gentleman type of person, so i am beautiful
from the inside, since you have also noticed that i wrote many
poems in front of you.. but today i will continu to speak
about an important subject and it is the one of beautifulness,
so i will begin it by ask the question of:


Is my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction"
beautiful or not ?


So here you will notice that you have to be a wise man to notice
that this rule is so important but it also brings much more beautifulness !

Since you can feel it by also noticing the following principle of: the right Diversity brings perfection, and you can notice it in the following video of a beautiful indian song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnCIjfkPooo

Look at how they are being beautiful like beautiful westerners,
since this diversity is becoming perfection ! and this is what is bringing exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns, you can feel more this important principle by my following writing:


Now i think there is something really important about the essence of humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality is perfection at best (read below my proof of it), and the goal to attain is the goal of life that is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity" has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality" has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below to notice it).

More political philosophy about tolerance..

I am like a "wise" man type of person, and i am a gentleman type of person..

Today i will do more political philosophy about tolerance,
i will start it by asking the following smart question:

What is this Statue of Liberty in USA and what is Liberty ?


You can be inferiority, and think that Liberty is just like being free from constraints ! but a great philosopher knows Liberty comes with the right constraints
so that to be the right Liberty that is the right morality , so here
again we notice that Liberty too is constrained by morality, because
morality is like the King, and now you are noticing more and more that
a great philosopher says that political philosophy must be a transcendence with a sophisticated thinking ! and since i am like
a wise man, notice with me that the main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight", from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more "hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more savage instincts in the right direction, so here again you notice that Buddha was right about this, but since i am
like a wise man, i will be more precise about the how to attain a
state of Serenity, so i will start it by giving an example of mathematical logic:

(a -> b) AND (b -> c) gives (a -> c)

Note: the -> symbol is what we know as: logical implication.


This is a little "theorem", so from this theorem you will notice that
there is important requirements to be able to obtain the logical result of (a -> c), and those "requirements" are from knowledge and smartness and
consciousness that help us to understand what is the logical implication of: (a -> b), i will not get into more details, but notice that to be
able to understand how do we get to the result, we have to understand
what is (a -> b), so now you are understanding the principle of a great philosopher that is that you have to think with sophistication so that
to understand what's Liberty or what is this or that, and now i will say that from my important rule that i talked about previously that is: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", is i think the rule to attain serenity, because since you are maximizing at best satisfaction by effort of being more perfection, so i think this brings more "serenity", and i will say that this important rule of:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" looks by
logical analogy at the following principle that i talked about previously that is the following:

In science there is very important principle that is:

There are appearances and there are realities, and there is the false and there is the truth, so you have to know that in science we are "not" confident with the appearances , that means what you see may not be what you get or what is truth , so now you are understanding the first principle of science.

This is the same in political philosophy, political philosophy is also like science, because in political philosophy we have not to be confident with the appearances or with what we see, this is why you have seen me in my previous post asking a question in political philosophy such as: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency ? and why am i answering this question, it is because in political philosophy we are not confident with the appearances or with what we see ! because we have to get inside and understand the truth correctly so that also to know if
we are "safe" from something, it is also about safety !. So now you are noticing that in political philosophy, we have to be this first principle of science that i just talked about above, and we have to be "efficiency" and we have to know if compassion and love are inherent to efficiency, i think this is my "abstraction" of what is political philosophy.

And read the rest of my following thoughts of my political philosophy
to understand more:


More about: what is it to be a great philosopher ?

I said before the following:

======

What is it to be a great philosopher ?

I will try to answer this question:

I am like a wise man and i will make you feel more what is it
to be a great philosopher, so i will start it by asking a question:

Is human life not beautiful ?

If you are like thinking with your human instincts or with inferiority, you will have the tendency to say that human life is not beautiful, but if you are a great philosopher, you will say that it is by logical analogy as answering the question of: what is decent morality? ,
so now you are feeling that a great philosopher is like
also the one that tries, like in mathematics, to find a generalization
or a logical proof that generalize ! so now you are feeling more
and more that a great philosopher is a sophisticated thinking !
this is why you have to look at how i am answering the question
below of: what is decent morality? and of: is human life beautiful?
so read my below political philosophy to understand more
about what is it to be a great philosopher:
======




You have to understand more what is a great philosopher,
now you will feel more and more that to answer this
question you have to be more smart ! so i will continu to
answer this question:

You have to understand that the main part of being a great philosopher
is that life is "not" perfect, so political philosophy knows that,
and a great philosopher knows that since life is all those imperfections
and weaknesses , so a great philosopher knows that
in this context of those weaknesses and imperfections, life can
become nihilism or life can become too much violence , so
a great philosopher will know that in this context he must be
a sophisticated thinking that transcend, this is why
you are feeling that to be able to answer the question of:
Is human life beautiful ? you have to be smartness, since
a great philosopher will say that if you answer this question
by simply saying that human life is not beautiful or that
this life is shit ! so this is like nihilism that is constrained
by morality , this is why i am answering below both questions of
is human life beautiful? and what is decent morality ? so
read my below political philosophy to understand better:

I am like a wise man and it is genetical in me..

You have to understand my political philosophy, i will explain it more:

When you see mathematics, mathematics is not about the feeling,
so mathematics can be less compassion if it decides to be too
much perfection, and this is also the main part of my philosophy,
how can we avoid extremism of perfection , this is why you
will feel in my writing that i am like a wise man type of person
that is a gentleman type of person when i am writing my political
philosophy, read it carefully again to notice it:

As you have noticed i am a white arab that is a gentleman
type of person, and i am also like a wise man type of person
and i am also a more serious software developer and
i am also an inventor who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and you have also
noticed that i write poetry , and you have noticed that
i wrote many poems in front of you here and i posted
them here..

Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy..

Can we ask the question of: What must be an efficient Pedagogy today?,
i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress
and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy,
because today we have to be more efficient at learning,
because i think that the level of sophistication of today
is much more than the past and i think that this has
as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than
the past to be able to be efficient learning, i think that this is
the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that
we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for
learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right tool must be made more "easier", now you are noticing
that the parts of efficient learning are becoming more clear,
this is why i said before in my political philosophy
the following that permits you to understand more what i am saying:

What is happening in my brain ?

I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since
it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable
of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that
to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able
to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction,
first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better,
first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because
to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example
at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know, because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient.


Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to learn more:


More political philosophy about life..


You will say that this life is not beautiful, but i don't agree
because this beautifulness is constrained by morality, so it is the same
as to how to measure decent morality (read below my political
philosophy about it) ! i am a more rational and more analytic
man, this is genetical in me, and this gives me a more technical
mind, this is why i say that morality also has to have a methodology,
but with more abstraction we have to notice that to be successful
you have to "prioritize" by giving weights of importance to this
or that ! and as you are noticing this process of prioritizing changes
our "perception" and/or "conception" ! so we have to ask in political philosophy the question of: what is so important for humans !
and now you are feeling that it is a process of prioritizing,
but you will say that the so important is money ! but this is not the
right conception ! because we can ask the question in political
philosophy of: Is money capable of guiding humanity in the right path or way ? so now you are noticing that money has its weakness , so now we
are capable of seeing the advantage of my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", and since it's the effort
of being perfection, so "smartness" takes a great weight of importance ,
so then beautifulness is constrained by morality that says that
smartness is so important, so now you are feeling that it is, by
logical analogy, like answering the question of what is a "decent" morality (read below to see my answer), so now you are
understanding that human life becomes constrained since
smartness is so important, so this becomes that we can
say that life is this decent morality(read below of how to measure decent morality) that is not that life it is not beautiful, so now i think that there is no logical contradiction, and read my political philosophy below to understand more:


Political philosophy about how to "measure" civilization..

I think from my thoughts below you are noticing that
statistically we can measure civilization by asking
a question of: "Do we have to be Peace of silence of death
or do you have to continu to live and go forward towards
more and more perfection..?", so now you are becoming more smart
by measuring it this way, this is why a right philosophy
is the one that wants to maximize at best satisfaction
so that to continu to live and go forward with more and more perfection, this is the main engine that is the rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" that maximize at best
satisfaction so that to be better than Peace of silence of death,
so i think that we have not to be pessimistic because
the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns are
enhancing and maximizing very very quickly our satisfaction, so then we have to be more smart in our lives by knowing more
about the political philosophy, so read my following
thoughts to know more about my political philosophy:

More political philosophy about philosophy..


You have to understand more my philosophy, do you remember what i was saying yesterday about "perfection", i said in my philosophy that my
following rule is very important: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", but how can we say that more and more perfection is "satisfaction" ? so i think from my own experience that more and more perfection makes you a better person and it is understandable that it is satisfaction, so now you have to notice that this satisfaction can not be brought by the "Peace" of silence of death, it is as the satisfaction that is brought by a beautiful Moroccan couscous that you eat that can not be brought by Peace of silence of death, and notice that a beautiful Morrocan couscous that you eat is also brought by the rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", so a beautiful Moroccan couscous that you eat also brings satisfaction that permits us to go forward with more and more perfection, so now you are understanding more my political philosophy below, this is why i said yesterday in my political philosophy (read below) that this rule is one of the best engine that we have that permits to push forward our civilization towards more and more perfection towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness that is the goal of philosophy, so now i think that the requirements of the right philosophy are seen more clearly, but how to avoid extremism of "perfection"? i think you have to understand what is morality, because since the goal
of philosophy is perfectioning at best to be able to attain absolute happiness, so we have to be careful about morality that has the same goal as philosophy as i explained it in my political philosophy previously, so how can we be careful? i think you have to read my political philosophy below to understand better morality:


Today i will talk about capitalism and socialism..

So i have to do more political philosophy to understand better..


So when we talk capitalism we have to transcend and view "capitalism" as
a tool of "meritocracy" and "meritocracy" as a tool of "quality" and quality as a tool of "perfection". so as you are understanding we have
to have the right quality so we have to have meritocracy and meritocracy
needs capitalism. So the question is not do we have to have meritocracy,
the question is what kind of meritocracy do we have to have, so read
my below writing to understand the kind of meritocracy that we need.

So now you are understanding more morality as i have defined it below,
that it is perfection at best (read my below proof of what is morality
to understand better), and now you are understanding that morality is
about "perfectioning" to attain the goal of absolute perfection or
absolute happiness, so morality is pushed forward towards absolute perfection, but perfection at best is also constrained by democracy
to give "compassion" and "love" (read my below writing to understand more), and we have to ask a question of: Is perfectionS of white supremacism or neo-nazism the right perfections ? , i don't think
so because we have to understand the constraints to understand more,
so for example we have to know about what is smartness ? and here is
my answer:

And what is the essence of human smartness ?

This is a good subject of political philosophy..

So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..

Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..

But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.

But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?

It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things.


And what do i mean by morality is perfection at best ?

I said before the following:

"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"


So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at best, so i think my definition is logical.


So now that you are understanding my definition of morality, please
read my following thoughts to understand better:


About white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the
"defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality",
and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized:

Now what is it to be civilized ?

This is a smart question..

You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to
be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the
fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't
contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there
we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that
we have to be the right "stability" to be able to
call a society a society or a country a country, so this is
why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we
are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am
not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism,
because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't
understand the requirements of our today "civilization",
so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because
they are too much violence.


Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


Yet about meritocracy and elitism..


I wrote previously the following:

"More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy..
The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because
we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy.
But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what
kind of meritocracy do we have to have ?
Because as you are noticing that i said below:
"You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism""


And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem:


===

Look at the more "individual" perfection

It can become an imperfection

Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection

Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections

And since we are many of us made also of imperfections

So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection

And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention"

So this is why morality is calling for "actions"

This is why laws are our security and a right prevention

And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension

So you have to see it better in many more dimensions !

Since it is like running away from the pain of detention !

So as you see there is no pretension

So hope that there is no incomprehension !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

====


Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better:


More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy..

The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because
we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy.

But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what
kind of meritocracy do we have to have ?

Because as you are noticing that i said below:

"You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"

So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be.

So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have.

And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism
needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have
to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example
at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again:

More political philosophy about order..


I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more
that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that
talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people,
and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also
seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy:


About love and order..

As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political
philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality
by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with
Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency.


But you will ask the following question:

Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ?


You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is
primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is
a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding
that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is
why you are noticing that i am saying below the following:

===

Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ?

This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how
can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this:

Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we
are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence,
so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the
people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder
and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more)

==



About democracy and corruption..


Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means.

Read the definition of corruption here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption


So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency.

So when i say below that:


===

How must we think democracy in political philosophy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.

===


Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency.

Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more:


More political philosophy about democracy..

Is democracy the best thing to do ?

Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below:

=======================================================

How must we think democracy in political philosophy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.

And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ?

This is a really good subject of political philosophy,
and answering it permits us to understand better our
actual democracies, this is why i will continu
to answer this question:

I said before the following:

Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and
this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society.

So technocracy is not correct thinking, because
what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance.

But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice
on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also
the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a "civilization"
that avoids savagery, this is why the utilitarianism of technocracy is not correct thinking, and i think we can also "view" this right dose of humanism as the way that USA system is run by the separation of powers to not "fall" into extremism and savagery ! so as you are noticing that democracy needs a competent governance and i think that democracy and a competent governance is the way to go.

=======================================================================


So is democracy the best thing to do ?

I think you have to understand that democracy "depends" on morality,
it is like guided also by morality, and since as i said in my political philosophy below that morality is efficiency and the right compassion
and love, so democracy also needs those requirements and is guided
by those requirements, so democracy of course needs a "competent" governance since people needs efficiency, and democracy fights more efficiently corruption, and democracy needs to know how to avoid extremism that causes problems inside the system etc.


Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better:


About morality and political philosophy..

As you will notice i will do more political philosophy so that you understand better:

If you remember my last thoughts of political philosophy about morality,
it is the following:

===========================================================================

I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following:

"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

I have to be more precise:

When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good

What is it that we call "good" in morality ?

A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from the following definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: FLAWLESSNESS

Also i said above that:

"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

Now can we ask the following question:

How can we measure decent morality ?

We can first ask the following question:

How do we measure the truth ?

The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by rationalism and by empiricism !

So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth
is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example:
when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government
enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize
wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" !
so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest"
priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of measure is choosen among many and is prioritized !

I will explain more by giving an example:

To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that
is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to
things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest importance for us.

Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder.

====



I think that you understand more the essence of morality, but
there is still something to say, i said that morality is
perfection at best, so now we have to ask the following question:
how to avoid "extremism" of perfection that can be dangerous ? i mean that perfection at best can for example give too much
importance to "efficiency" and this can become dangerous ! so
is my definition of morality that is perfection at best correct
or not ? i think that there is no logical contradiction in
my definition and it is correct because you have to understand
the essence of democracy that is related to morality to understand
better ! because we have to look at our "essence" to understand better
morality ! because since a great part of the people of the society are more human and they do understand that getting into savagery is "bad" ! so this great part of people of the society does constrain democracy ! since for example the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be "moderation" to avoid extremism that hurt the system
or that causes violence or/and desorder and/or that causes civil war inside the system ! so this makes us understand that morality that is perfection at best is constrained by democracy so that the "at best" becomes more human or more moderation that is in accordance of our today kind of civilization that, as you have noticed, is balancing perfection with our kind of civilization so that to avoid savagery or desorder. So i hope you have understood my explanation and definition of what is the essence of morality, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about morality.

And here is what i wrote about democracy:

I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the
way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers,
What is the separation of powers?

The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or courts, interprets the law.

But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not "sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful !
look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war
inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" !

========================================================================




So you are now understanding that morality is also: Perfection at best.

But is it in contradiction with my previous post about political philosophy ?

No it isn't because "Perfection at best" is "Perfection"
that is "Efficiency" in my previous abstraction of my previous post, and
it is also the "at best" that is the correct compassion and love in my previous abstraction of my previous post, since in political philosophy
we have to be "efficient" and since there is also human and animal suffering etc. so we have to be correct compassion and love that
contains also the correct tolerance and patience, but as you are noticing there is two of my abstractions of morality that are:

"Perfection at best" or "Efficiency and the correct compassion and love"

Now there is something to add is the following:

Now what is it to be civilized ?

This is a smart question..

You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to
be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the
fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't
contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there
we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that
we have to be the right "stability" to be able to
call a society a society or a country a country, so this is
why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we
are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am
not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism,
because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't
understand the requirements of our today "civilization",
so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because
they are too much violence.


And read the rest of my previous thoughts of my previous post:


About my thoughts..


I am using the word "confident" in my following thoughts (read below when i am speaking of the first principle of science)
and it means: certain.

Read the definition of "confident" here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/confident


So read my following thoughts:


About from where comes morality ?

I said previously that political philosophy is about (this is my abstraction):

1- The first principle of science that i talked about (read below)

2- How to be efficient

3- To answer the question: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency? (read below)


But there is still something to know about political philosophy..

But from where comes morality ?

This is a very important question:

I think morality comes from the people that needs to be "efficient"
so that to survive better and from the people that needs a decent
compassion and love that is considered decent by morality(so you have
to know where is the reference of measure) so that there is
no desorder that causes violence, so in politics we have
to be "efficient" so that to "satisfy" and we have to be the correct compassion and love.


Read the rest of my previous post to understand better:


About what is political philosophy..

First you have to distinguish between the inferior and the superior..

Answering correctly such a question as:

What is political philosophy ?

Is something that demand a level of smartness, because you have to be equipped with smartness to be able to feel it and to know it correctly.

So i will start to answer it by "abstracting" the answer much more correctly:

In science there is very important principle that is:

There are appearances and there are realities, and there is the false and there is the truth, so you have to know that in science we are "not" confident with the appearances , that means what you see may not be what you get or what is truth , so now you are understanding the first principle of science.

This is the same in political philosophy, political philosophy is also like science, because in political philosophy we have not to be confident with the appearances or with what we see, this is why you have seen me in my previous post asking a question in political philosophy such as: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency ? and why am i answering this question, it is because in political philosophy we are not confident with the appearances or with what we see ! because we have to get inside and understand the truth correctly so that also to know if
we are "safe" from something, it is also about safety !. So now you are noticing that in political philosophy, we have to be this first principle of science that i just talked about above, and from my previous post, we have to be "efficiency" and we have to know if compassion and love are inherent to efficiency, i think this is my "abstraction" of what is political philosophy.


Read the rest of my previous post to understand more my thoughts:


About philosophy of expressiveness..

You have to understand more my philosophy, so i have to be more
smart to "abstract" it correctly:

If i say:

"I Love you".


You are noticing that if i had only those 3 words to express,
so i will not be able to express the following:

"I love you very much".

So you are feeling more correctly the constraints over expressiveness.

This is the most important thing in political philosophy.

Because when you add more words to be able to express: "I love you very much", you are immediately noticing that it also permits not only to express precisely a feeling, but it allows to express it more "efficiently", so it is expressiveness of efficiency.


And this is the basis of political philosophy, because in political philosophy we have to be able to express it "efficiently" , and what
is efficiency ?

Efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input, that is our universe or universes, that is performant, it is performance.


So as you are noticing it is expressiveness of "efficiency", and now
you are noticing that the first question in political philosophy is: how
to be efficient ? and to be able to be really efficient, so you have to be high efficiency of technology and science !, and second question: Is love and compassion inherent to efficiency ?

This is why i wrote previously the following:

More political philosophy now..


I think you know me more now..

Today i will discuss a very "important" subject of political philosophy..

It is also about "expressiveness", you have to know that we can be constrained and this can make expressiveness "less" expressiveness,
so you have to be smart to know how to "avoid" those constraints to
be able to be more expressiveness of your liberty or your intelligence or your performance etc. i give you an example so that you understand:

Let us take the history of black slavery..

Black men can say that white people have constrained black people with slavery and colonialism , so that black people have much less expressed
there liberty and there intelligence and there performance etc. but notice that like in "mathematics" we can take off this constraint by saying that slavery and colonialism have permitted the white people
to express much more "efficiently" there liberty and there intelligence and there performance etc. by becoming much more rich because of slavery and colonialism, but notice that after white people have become much more rich, because of that, they have started "help" much more black africans and black people etc. so as you are noticing this makes us see more clearly the what about expressiveness..

Other than that:

We are still hating white people because of past black slavery, but i think that this is not "wisdom", because black africans in the past time
of black slavery were considered to be much more "animals", because in the past time of black slavery, black africans were looking like animal monkeys to white people and black africans were considered by white people much less smart than humans that were defined as being white people, so white people, in the past time of black slavery, were "not" able to judge correctly because of lack of "science" and lack of quality, this is why they have practiced slavery on black africans, so we have today, and by understanding it, to be able to transcend this problem and by not being hate towards white people because of past slavery.

Now we have to be more smart and try to feel more and know more with political philosophy:


Look at my following poem of Love:

============================================

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful wind

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful stars

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like wanting to fly with you high

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like the beautiful that is not wanting to die

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like not wanting to be the bad guy

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like the beautiful Gold of Versailles

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like don't cry my baby, don't cry !

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like never saying to love a Goodbye !

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is like being far from war and the cry !

Feeling like i am feeling the beautiful sky

It is also like my great love that want to mystify

So let me fly with you baby, let me fly !

=========================================



You have to notice that what i am trying to do in my poem above
is to make it much more precise with more precise calculations and with more measure and with more rationality and notice that i am "not"
neglecting compassion and love, so this way you are noticing that it looks like political philosophy, because what are we doing in political
philosophy? we can say that in political philosophy of today and of the future we are asking a question such as:

Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ?

This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how
can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this:

Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we
are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence,
so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the
people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder
and its violence ! and now there is an important question that we have
to ask, and it is:

And what about compassion and love globally above this earth ?

I think that there is something to notice, is that since China and
western countries and others are arming themselves with powerful arms
such as nuclear arms etc. so this has its advantages, because this also forces neo-nazism and white supremacism to take this fact into account and avoid to repeat an horror like the horror of Hitler that have tried to exterminate jews and others..

This is why i said the following:

How do you think i am doing it ? you have to notice that i am
also capable of high standards of safety-critical systems programming, so i am not thinking as neo-nazism or white supremacism, because i am
taking into account the "safety" criterion, this is
the weakness of neo-nazism and white supremacism, because
neo-nazism is inherently "archaism" of nazism, and this is
not acceptable in high standards of safety-critical systems
programming, because it is inferiority, because the first
important thing to notice is that our today time is not
the past history time of Hitler and nazism, because our today world is
equipped with extremely dangerous nuclear arms, China has them
Russia has them and USA has them etc. so more violent ideologies
like neo-nazism and white supremacism are not taking correctly into account this criterion of safety, because since neo-nazism is more
violent towards other races and white supremacism is more violent
towards other races, so with more violent ideologies such as
neo-nazism and white supremacism we can get "easily" into a very big destructive nuclear war, so this is why i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism are inherently "archaism" because they have not adapted correctly to the requirements of our today world, this is why you have to be able to think correctly and to notice that the game of today world is also to be able to correctly think the requirement of safety, and this also requires from us to know how to be "smartness" of "Diplomacy" so that to avoid the mess of violence. This is why you are seeing me talking about the criterion of safety, please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better.

And about the logical consistency of my writing about abstraction and efficiency:

I wrote previously the following:

"You can feel it by seeing that mathematically a+a=2*a, it is also
about abstraction, it is like commutative, a+a abstract 2*a
and 2*a abstract a+a"


Is it logically consistent to say so ?

Yes, because you have to read what follows, here is what follows:

"And you can also run the abstraction of 2*a or a+a in your brain and if your brain contains the consciousness of the understanding of the abstractions, then the understanding of the abstractions will come to you quickly, so then, is the understanding of the abstractions is part
of the process that we call abstraction ? i think it is
a more appropriate philosophy, so i think we can answer with
a "yes"."


So as you are noticing i am "including" in my philosophy, that i think
is more appropriate, the understanding of the abstractions in the process that we call abstraction. So there is no logical inconsistency.


So read again my previous post:


About abstraction and efficiency..


When you abstract and say or write mathematically:

a+a= 2*a

I think this is the most important part of the philosophy
of computing or parallel computing, i think you have to be a wise type of person like me to see it clearly..

Philosophy about computing is something really important,
what are we doing in computing or parallel computing ? i mean how to abstract the answer to feel it much more correctly ?

You can feel it by seeing that mathematically a+a=2*a, it is also
about abstraction, it is like commutative, a+a abstract 2*a
and 2*a abstract a+a, and you can also run the abstraction
of 2*a or a+a in your brain and if your brain contains the
consciousness of the understanding of the abstractions ,
then the understanding of the abstractions will come to you quickly,
so then, is the understanding of the abstractions is part
of the process that we call abstraction ? i think it is
a more appropriate philosophy, so i think we can answer with
a "yes".

So now by analogy you are feeling more how to abstract much more
correctly the philosophy of computing, it becomes more clearly
that in computing or parallel computing we are abstracting more and more
towards higher level of abstractions, and we are organizing those
abstractions like a "language" to be executed in computers, and the understanding of the abstractions must be part of the process of abstracting in computing or parallel computing, and the abstractions must be "efficient" and then we are also running those higher level abstractions in our computers.

This is why you have previously seen me posting the following, read it carefully:

Analogy with parallel computing..

My personality is more complex, you have to understand me more,
when i say i am also a gay like Chevy Chase because i am more humoristic, you have to understand this "abstraction" of saying
humoristic, i am humoristic like Chevy Chase because i am more
positive and i want the others to be more posititive, so i can
be humoristic to make you positive, but my humoristic way
of doing is more "smart", because i can use a sophisticated humoristic manner to learn you more about morality and about life and i am
more intellectual in doing so.

And speaking about "abstractions", i think it is a good subject
of philosophy, because i think you have to be capable
of philosophy about computing, i think one of the main part
of computing is also about abstracting, but it is not only
about abstracting but you have to abstract and be sophisticated
in it by making your abstractions "efficient". I give you an example:

As you know i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, and
one of my last invention is a Fast Mutex that is adaptative,
so i have extracted the abstractions from my Fast Mutex,
and those abstractions are like a language or like an automaton
that is also like a protocol that is constituted of a language,
so when i execute the abstraction that is the Enter() method, it will enter the Fast Mutex, and when i execute the abstraction that is
the Leave() method, it will leave the Fast Mutex, but you have
to be more smart, because it is "not" enough to abstract, you
have to be more efficient, i mean that i am thinking like a researcher
when i have invented my last Fast Mutex by taking into account
the following characteristics, so i have made my new Fast Mutex powerful by making it as the following:


1- Starvation-free
2- Good fairness
3- It keeps efficiently and very low the cache coherence traffic
4- Very good fast path performance (it has the same performance as the
scalable MCS lock when there is contention.)
5- And it has a good preemption tolerance.


I think that you will not find anywhere this new invention of mine.


More political philosophy about wisdom..

I think i am like a wise man type of person, but i have to show you more
what is a wise man, a wise man is a composition of both cultural superiority and genetical superiority that forms a wise man, and you will notice that a wise man is capable of good judgment , but i will first make you feel something important, look at the following song of UB40 - (I Can't Help) Falling In Love With You here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUdloUqZa7w

As you are noticing the song is saying the following:

"Wise man said, only fools rush in !"

Do you understand it correctly ?

You have to be aware of one of the most important principle
of wisdom !

So i will easy the job for you and make you understand:

There is an important principle in Psychology and in Psychiatry that you have to know correctly to be able to understand, and here it is:

It is that you have to be able to transcend your natural instincts(from genetics) that are emotional and behavioral disorders to be able to be
reason and of a better quality !

Do you understand it correctly ?

And from this, we can logically infer more by asking the following question:

And what is those in the rest of the phenomenal world that look like those natural instincts that causes to be not able to be reason ?

Look for example at nationalism, a nationalist can for example be more virility that render him to be not able to be reason, and that's called "toxic" virility, and those are natural instincts that causes him to be not able to be reason, but he can be also lack of awareness or lack of quality that render him to be not able to be "wisdom", and this looks, and by "analogy", like natural instincts that causes to be not able to be reason, this is why we have to be careful about nationalism because i think that nationalists are in general more virile and there virility can become toxic virility that can render them to be not able to be wisdom, but notice with me that i have to define more what is "wisdom", here it is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom


Other political parties can be more "tolerance"(and this can be caused
by lack of virility) that render them be not able to be wisdom, because this more tolerance in them can prevent them to be the right safety or
the right quality.

So now you are understanding that to be able to be wisdom
we have to be this right quality that permits us to be wisdom !

So now you are more understanding my above thoughts, so i will give an
example so that you understand more:

We are still hating white people because of past black slavery, but i think that this is not "wisdom", because black africans in the past time
of black slavery were considered to be much more "animals", because in the past time of black slavery, black africans were looking like animal monkeys to white people and black africans were considered by white people much less smart than humans that were defined as being white people, so white people, in the past time of black slavery, were "not" able to judge correctly because of lack of "science" and lack of quality, this is why they have practiced slavery on black africans, so we have today, and by understanding it, to be able to transcend this problem and by not being hate towards white people because of past slavery.


Now what is it to be civilized ?

This is a smart question..

You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to
be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the
fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't
contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there
we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that
we have to be the right "stability" to be able to
call a society a society or a country a country, so this is
why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we
are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am
not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism,
because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't
understand the requirements of our today "civilization",
so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because
they are too much violence.


More political philosophy about perfectionism..

I think to be more smart, you have to feel what is it to be perfectionism, and to be able to feel how a perfectionist
is feeling its perfectionism you have to apply my rule of:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction",
that i talked about previously, this is the essence of perfectionism,
it is this "satisfaction" that you get from perfection, but you have to
be more smart and know how to navigate, because to be successful
you have to know how to "prioritize" by giving weights of importance
to this or that thing, and this has as a prerequisite the
right capability of giving weights of importance to this or that
thing, so this right capability has as prerequisite of being
correctly guided to be this right capability, so as you are
noticing my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" is very important in politics.

Read my following thoughts to know more:

You have to know me more:

I said previously that Beautifulness is also an engine that gives also "hope". This is also why i am writing to you my poems of Love. But you have to understand that i am a gentleman kind of person, and i think
that i am like a wise man type of person, so you are noticing
that since i am a gentleman type of person, so when i am writing
my poetry i am writing it with my brain of a gentleman, and
you have to know that a brain of a gentleman is known by its honesty and its sincerity and and by its beautifulness of the inside , since i am
more beautiful from the inside, but you have to understand also that
i am a guy that is more "technical", and you have noticed it
since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations
and i am a more serious software developer, so this is
why you are noticing that i talked as i talked by not neglecting
the criterion of efficiency by saying for example that:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction",
because it is really an important rule that makes us go beautifully
forwards towards more and more perfection. But here is my
previous thoughts that you can read to understand more about me:


I was just looking at the following video from USA of Dean Martin & Jerry Lewis That's Amore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TWhFmCRdoU


I think that it is "inherent" to the performance of this video that we have to know that the effort of being more perfection gives satisfaction, so this is the secret, the rule number one is that you have to know that: The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction. This is a very good engine that makes you go beautifully forward towards more and more perfection towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness that is the goal of philosophy. You have also the engine of "money", but the engine of money can gives "corruption", so i think that the effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction is one of the best engines. and as i said previously that Beautifulness is also an engine that gives also "hope".

Read my previous thoughts below to understand more my kind of philosophy:


More explanation of my poem..

You will say that my poem contains a "bug", and you will quickly
say that since silence of death is Peace, and since we are not yet Peace in this life, why do we not be silence of death? but i am saying in my poem that the "beautiful" perfection is calling us in front of the audience ! and this beautiful perfection says that we can be a beautiful of a satisfaction by being a level of perfection in this life, and also the beautiful perfection is also a beautiful kabbab or a beautiful couscous from Morocco that you are eating or it can be the beautiful eating, or it can be the beautiful of internet that brings a satisfaction or the level of perfection of internet that brings a satisfaction etc. so you are noticing that this also makes us patience and makes us the effort to attain more and more perfection ! so this is my kind of philosophy, so reread my previous thoughts:


I explain my poem below, you will notice that it is also
my philosophy, because when i say in my poem below that:

"Time and space do not end on our infinite love
Because even silence of death is a beautiful Dove"

Since silence of death is also not being consciousness,
so it is a state that doesn't suffer, so it is thus
a state of Peace, so this is why my philosophy is also about
this Peace of death, since this Peace of death will make
you free from suffering , this is why i am also saying in my poem
that:

"Because even silence of death is a beautiful Dove"

Since the beautiful Doves are symbolic of Peace.

But you will notice that my philosophy is not just about
this Peace of silence of death, because i am saying the
following in my poem:

"Time and space do not end on our infinite love
This is why silence of death is also our patience !"

So why am i saying that silence of death is our patience ?
Because the beautiful "perfection" is calling us
so that we make an effort to attain it to be able not only
to attain Peace but to attain absolute happiness by attaining
absolute perfection that is the goal of philosophy , this is also my philosophy ! this is why my poem is about a philosophy
that is smart !

This is why i am saying in the end of my poem the following:

"Time and space do not end on our infinite love
Because the beautiful "perfection" is calling us in front of the audience !"


And notice that in my poem i am saying also the following:

"Time and space do not end on our infinite love
Because Peace of the Stars is our beautiful Song"


I mean that the Stars that are also above in the a night sky are like silence of death, they are not consciousness and they are not feeling suffering etc. so they are also this "Peace" of silence of death.

Reread my poem and you will understand more this time:

I was just looking at this video of a beautiful song from India:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bph4qI_z4Ms&list=RDR5mhNH-syXU&index=2


So i have just decided to write fast a poem, you have to understand its philosophy, and i will explain it more in my next post, so here it is:


Time and space do not end on our infinite love

Because our love is like way above the power of God

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

Since our love is Peace of a white Dove

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

Because Peace of the Stars is our beautiful Song

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

This is why we will soon be beautifully as one

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

This is how is our love and beautiful joy

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

Because even silence of death is a beautiful Dove

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

This is why silence of death is also our patience !

Time and space do not end on our infinite love

Because the beautiful "perfection" is calling us in front of the audience !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.