Hello,
I want to be more clearer about my Parallel archiver, i have designed
my Parallel archiver engine so that you can script or you can automate
the archiving with easy, and as you have noticed i have supported the
best parallel compression algorithms, but what is more interesting
about my Parallel archiver is that you can use it like a database
system with an access of O(1) time complexity , because i have also
designed it like a hashtable that you have to use from the hardisk or
from memory, this is where my Parallel archiver shines ! The Zip and
7Zip tools do not support that , and i have just tested for example 7Zip
GUI tool and i have noticed that on a somewhat bigger archive with for
example 20000 of files, it will take too much time to add or to delete a
file, because those accesses are sequential on 7Zip and Zip, but this
weakness do not exist in my Parallel archiver , because my parallel
archiver is like a database system that access the files in O(1) time
complexity, so my Parallel archiver is excellent in that regards, other
than that i have done a benchmark and i have noticed that my Parallel
archiver can load an index of 80000 of files in about 9.5 seconds in an
SSD drive, that's really fast... so i will advice you to take into
consideration my Parallel archiver because it's an excellent tool.
You can download my new Parallel archiver 3.2 from:
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-archiver
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.