How to transcend the divide between the shiites and the sunnites in Irak?

[Ramine]

Hello......

How to transcend the divide between the shiites and the sunnites in Irak?

By optimization !

You have to know how to optimize economy too to be more powerful and
more organized, and the prerequisites is transcendence of this kind
of inferiority that lack optimization.

Morality is the same , it permit us to transcend , because
it gets us more organized and more efficient to better survive, and
because science is part of morality, because is laws part of morality ?
yes, because science also rules us with rules of optimization that has
as a goal to give more quality and more happiness to the people,
so this is part of good, so we have to enlarge our conception of what is
morality, thus including science as a part of morality is part of the
game today, this is part of the high standards of today, this view is
also enforced with the fact also that thinking bigger like thinking how
to be more scalable or as to be more organized world wide or as to be
world order and security is an essential part of requirements of today,
but it's necessary to know also that taking science alone as morality is
corruption , because science with more maximization and more
optimization can neglect the weakers among us , so science can be a kind
of horror like the horror of nazism, so
please be wiser and reread my following full text to
understand better my views:

About Stability and world order..

How to get stability and world order ?

You have to stabilize and secure the country also, and this has to be
done by searching for the rules to execute that avoid extremism and
violence, this is mandatory for our democracies, so i have told you to
notice that neglecting compassion and/or love and/or respect cause
violence and extremism and desorder, so you have not to neglect
them , and you have to know how to higher consumer confidence index
to better optimize economy world wide, so for that you have to know how
to avoid hate towards other people that causes problems to economy ,
because it hurts consumer confidence index, and you have to know to not
get into communism and to avoid extremism of communism because communism
is too extreme and its extremism causes violence, so you have to know
how to tune those variables of compassion and respect and love and how
to optimize the system, and how to do it ? by being for example more
social like being social democracy and or being social Liberalism, hope
you have understood my proof.. and this is not finished because you have
to think about immigration, and here is what i have said about immigration:

In parallel computer programming we have to optimize, like by
reducing the size of the serial part, and by reducing the cache
coherence traffic etc. and this to render your software or algorithm
scalable, so we are concerned by the scalability criterion..

Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:

If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..

About America and the world..

Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.

And how can we be more civilized ?

I have done philosophy..

We have to measure it easily to know about it..

Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is
corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates
to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the weakers among us,
so then this is corruption of morality that permit us to measure
corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure
civilization.

This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.

So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.

The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..

If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principales of communism or being principales of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence
responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the
principales of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.