Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More political philosophy
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Sky89
Sep 2, 2018, 12:05:13 AM9/2/18
to
Hello..
Read this:
More political philosophy
You have seen posting my new poems of love..
But now i will continu to do political philosophy in front of your eyes,
this time about economy..
We have to be smart, and i think i have become more smart by doing
political philosophy, and doing political philosophy permits me to like
understand more and more and understand like the essence of things !
Now follow with me please:
What is the essence of economy ?
This is a good question in political philosophy, and i will answer it
smartly like this:
You have first to understand morality:
As i have explained morality is perfection at best or reliability at
best, because the essence of reliability is solving problems, so think
about it like this: when you solve problems it is like
you are becoming more and more perfection, and when you solve
all problems you will say that it is absolute reliability or
absolute perfection or absolute happiness, this why morality is
pushed towards absolute happiness that is the goal to attain,
but you have to notice with me that when i say morality is
perfection at best or reliability at best, it must at least be decent
morality so that to not cause a big problem, because if it is not decent
morality it is like a failure of morality that causes desorder and
violence in the system, so now we return to the above question of:
What is the essence of economy ?
We have to do more political philosophy to understand it better:
Economy is part of morality, morality must govern and morality says that
economy is part of the "set" of solving problems that is the essence of
reliability, it is the same as the laws that are part of morality, laws
also solve problems so that to be morality that is perfection at best
or reliability at best, so economy is like laws because it is part of
morality, so economy can "not" escape morality because it is part of
morality and it makes morality perfection at best or reliability at
best, and since economy is part of morality, It is the same of when i
say: If you see a light, is it a light ! It needs correct interpretation
! So i think the correct interpretation by political philosophy is that
it is inherent to capitalism that economy needs to be "responsability",
and responsability of capitalism is that economy is integrated with the
all set that is morality and it is part of morality and it must interact
with morality by being compatible with morality, also capitalism is
capitalism of today and capitalism of the future so it has to know how
to wisely protect the envirenment and to protect our planet from too
much exploitation and from too much pollution ! and capitalism has to be
pragmatism and realism.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
Here is again my previous wisdom:
You have to be able to recognize the light and you have to be the light
to be able to be successful. But how can you interpret that it is a
light ? You have to be "professionalism" and you have to be
technology and science to be able to do it.
So as you have noticed my wisdom above is like poetry and it is like
philosophy and it is the base of morality, so can we ask
ourselves a question:
Is morality like mathematics ?
I mean is morality a maximization of reliability or perfection.
I think this is the main problem of nazism and neo-nazism, because
nazism and neo-nazism want to maximize perfection or wants to maximize
reliability and this is the defect of neo-nazism because neo-nazism is
not realism or pragmatism ! because morality is also knowing how to be
tolerance to avoid violence and to avoid desorder inside the system !
and morality is also how to be the right imperfections to be able to be
the correct perfection or the correct reliability ! this is the main
point ! this is why when i say a sentence such as: if you see a light ,
is it a light ? this is the base of political philosophy ! and this is
the base of morality ! because you have to be able of correct
interpretation of what is a light ! so now you are more apt to
understand that the ideologies such as neo-nazism are defective because
they are not correct pragmatism and not correct realism.
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better my thoughts:
I have to do more political philosophy in front of you so that
you be able to understand me better, so i will do more political
philosophy now, and now about the essence of morality, so i will
start it by asking the following question:
What is the essence of morality ?
You have to understand deeply my thoughts to understand better
what is the essence of morality, first you have to be able to define
better what is morality, so notice with me that morality can not be
called morality if it is not a "decent" morality ! this is the constrain
over morality, because if laws(that is morality) are not "decent" laws,
so it is "failure" of morality, so the essence of morality is
a social contract that sets morality as being a decent morality,
because morality is a "set" that contains: the political system and the
laws etc. but you have to know how to be not extremist at defining what
is a "decent" morality, here again there can be extremism that is too
violent, so as you are noticing that the base of the internal political
system of USA and China and all the other countries is that it has to be
compatible with a decent morality, so as you are noticing the social
contract is clear , and now comes the question of: is political
correctness a fascism ? here again you have to notice that to be able to
be a decent morality you have to know how to be political correctness
and symbolism of political correctness, and now you are feeling more the
fact that political correctness is part of morality and it is a
"necessary" requirement.
Read again the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
About the essence of political philosophy..
I am a white arab, but i am not a muslim
As you have noticed i am not wasting my time with Islam,
because Islam is very inefficient as a system and as an economic
system, and as you have noticed i am doing more political philosophy
here, and why am i doing more political philosophy ? because
political philosophy permits us to transcend our living conditions
and permits us to be awareness that is more "efficient", so here
again you are noticing that i am giving much more importance to
efficiency, i give you an example:
If i ask you a question of what is the best way to succeed in life ?
If you understand the essence of this question, you will understand
better the "essence" of political philosophy, because political
philosophy is morality that is reliability as i have explained, so since
morality is constrained by reliability, thus it must be a decent
morality so that to be able to call it morality or reliability, so as
you have noticed political correctness and symbolism of political
correctness is part of morality, because being political "correctness"
is being correctness that is "measured" by morality that has to be
maximization at best of reliability and it must be "decent" morality to
be able to call it morality so that to not cause desorder and violence
inside the system, so as you are noticing political philosophy permits
us to be more successful as a system, by doing political philosophy i am
discovering the architectural ideas and the steps that permit us to
construct a more successful political system, so as you have noticed i
have spoken in my political philosophy about:
1- Hierarchy
2- Richness
3- Efficiency
4- And about economy
5- And about morality
etc.
Read my following thoughts to understand better(And i will post to you
my other thoughts of my political philosophy):
More political philosophy..
You have seen me talking about USA and about communism..
How do you think people around the world are judging communism and are
judging USA ?
Philosophically we know that we have the strong and the weak, but
if the weak just want to be equal to the strong , is it
acceptable by logic ? i don't think so because the weak is also
"inefficiency" and he has the "tendency" to be more "corrupt" or more
"desorder" ! and from philosophy we can say that "hierarchy" by the
the fact that nature and culture wants the strong to be strong and want
him to guide people and to give quality and want him to give efficiency
! so from this we can say that this "hierarchy" is allowed by logic !
but political philosophy gives a "great" priority to the fact that we
have to know how to "nuance" to be able to judge ! so we have for
example to know that USA has its "advantages".
This is why i said that:
About the essence of USA...
USA is meritocracy that has choosen to be "efficiency", and it has
allowed the rich to be rich to attract more economic investment and to
attract more smart people so that to become rich and to be at the
forefront of technology and science. But can we ask ourselves an
important question? what will be the world without USA ? this is the
important question to ask ! and now you are starting to be "pragmatic"
by asking this question ! and now you are starting to see the nuances
and be capable of nuancing ! because one of the advantages of USA is
that USA is in the forefront of technology and science and it is helping
the world to advance in technology and science ! and since USA has
become powerful so USA has wanted and wants to play a role of a
policeman of the world to bring more order to the world ! so as you have
noticed we have to be capable to see the advantages of USA ! this is how
we will be capable of nuancing in politics !
And yet more about political philosophy..
And you saw me writing above about "hierarchy", so what about
"richness" ?
Read all my following thoughts to understand more:
Yet more political philosophy about morality..
I said that morality is reliability.
And look at the dictionary here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability
It says that:
Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.
So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is
the "state" of being reliable.
But there is still a question that remains:
Why not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability ?
Because if morality can not be viewed as morality because of failure of
the system , so this can not be called reliability or morality,
so this is why i am approximating with the word reliability, because
if we call a system a decent morality that means that it can be
called reliability, thus we can not say that morality is maximization at
best of reliability because if maximization at best of reliability is
not "sufficient" to give "decent" morality, so that's not reliability
and that's not morality.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
I will yet get into more political philosophy..
This time about political correctness and symbolism that is part of
political correctness..
You will notice that communism has used also symbolism that is part of
political correctness to govern and for example national socialism of
Algeria today uses political correctness and "symbolism" of political
correctness to govern the people, so what do we have to
think about political correctness and about this kind of symbolism that
is part of political correctness that is used by such governance? i
think that when we say political correctness, as you have noticed this
contains the word "correctness", so i think that political correctness
is also the way because correctness of political correctness is defined
by measuring it by morality that is "reliability", because as
i said that the essence of reliability is solving problems and
reliability(thus morality) is pushed towards solving all our problems
that is absolute reliability or absolute happiness, so correctness of
political correctness has to be measured by reliability , this is why
when we say that we have to be political correctness this is "logical"
and this is a "truth", so from now you are able to understand that being
political correctness is part of morality.
Read the rest of my thought to understand better:
I have to be more smart..
I said that morality is reliability.
But look at the dictionary here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability
It says that:
Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.
So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is
the "state" of being reliable, but here again you have to understand
the essence of reliability, reliability is a balance of tolerance
and efficiency and performance etc. that gives a "maximization" that
we can call reliability, so here again you are feeling the essence of
morality that is reliability, and i am choosing to say that
morality is reliability to show a more correct "abstraction" that
permit us to show that the essence of reliability is "solving"
problems, so when we are the right tolerance in the system , we are also
this "tolerance" to be able to avoid violence inside the system that
causes problems to the system, so this solves problems, and this is the
essence of reliability.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
More political philosophy about economy..
I have to be smart, i explained before that performance and efficiency
are "inherent" to reliability, this shows us on what have we to base
our society and what have to be the conception of our society, because
by my explanations you are "feeling" the essence of "reliability" and
how it is related to morality, by "analogy" with economy and richness,
security is also inherent to economy and to richness because they are
related to reliability, because morality is reliability(as i have proved
it to you in my previous posts), so when i say being rich is compatible
with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be
rich, you have to understand that economy too is economy of today and
economy of the future, and richness is richness of today and richness of
the future, so "responsability"(that is security) is inherent to
richness and to economy. So as you are noticing there is no
"contradiction" in my affirmation, and you are noticing that this
must includes the requirements that we have to know how to wisely
"protect" the "environment" and how to wisely protect our planet from
exploitation and from pollution too.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
About populism of today..
I think there is a "duality", USA is a "meritocracy" type of system,
but "populism" that has voted for Donald Trump is "less" educated and
"less" awareness and was not capable to adapt efficiently to
"globalisation", so they were fearing "globalisation", so i think that
they have to become more skilled and more educated to be more aware of
globalisation and to be capable to understand more correctly
globalisation and to be more capable to adapt to globalisation, thus the
way is to be efficient thinking and more efficiency to be able to adapt.
I will continu to do more political philosophy..
I think the most important thing today is that we have to construct
a new "spirit", i think the new spirit must also be that we have to go
from economy and see economy as an important tool to attain
a civilization and to construct a new man that is more civilized,
because notice with that when you are a rich country it is much "easier"
for the people to become civilized(thus to become order etc.), so
we have to give a great importance to economy today, for example
China has a weakness that it is more centralized government that
is lacking efficiency(read bellow to notice it), so they have to
decentralize and to specialize more the parts of the government so that
to be more "professionalism" that knows how to invest "efficiently"
abroad, and i think we have to be more efficient thinking and more
efficiency by investing more in technology and science to be able
to enhance much more our living conditions.
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
About the essence of communism
Communism has tried to construct a new "man", but how can you construct
a new man that is civilized or how can you construct a civilization if
you remain more poor and your economy is not a good economy ? this is
what we call pragmatism ! because as i said before being rich is
compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you
have to be rich, if your country is not rich so it will be less "order"
and more "insecurity" and more "corruption" ! this is why in my
following writing i am speaking about efficiency and about reliability
and about economy.
Read all my following thoughts to understand better:
What is the exceptionalism of USA ?
You have to do more political philosophy to understand better USA..
If you are immature in politics you will say that USA is porno, so
USA is bad, but this is childish thinking.. because we have to transcend
with political philosophy to understand better USA..
As you have noticed i said that "reliability" is important and
"efficiency" is important, and i have explained that efficiency is
like performance, and since the essence of reliability is solving
problems, and when we solve all problems we say that we are absolute
reliability or absolute happiness that is the goal that guides morality
towards its goal that is solving all our problems, so reliability pushes
morality towards absolute reliability or absolute happiness, and since
being performance is a problem to solve , so efficiency and performance
are inherent to reliability, now there is something important that
remains, you have to be able to feel the essence of civilization to
be able to understand USA, USA wanted and want to be "rich" to be able
to be a leader and to be able to be a leader in technology and science
and to be able to be a policeman of the world that brings order, and so
that to benefit the world with its high quality products and high
quality services, not only that but you will notice that in philosophy
the fact that USA has become rich has caused that USA has become less
"corrupt", so this richness of USA makes USA be less corrupt than third
world countries or less corrupt than China or than Russia etc. so this is
the advantage of being rich, because being rich is compatible with
"civilization", because you have to be rich to be able to be a
civilization, and i think that this is also what we call the
exceptionalism of USA. So USA has not to fail, and USA has
to eliminate its "deficit" and to reduce its debt so that to
be more capable as a country.
More philosophy about efficiency..
We have to be more smart , you have seen me talking about efficiency,
and i said that you have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed and
to be able to be responsability and success you have to give much more
importance to "efficiency", but there is a problem that remains, it is
how will you "interpret" "efficiency" ? USA will interpret efficiency as
being more decentralization of the government that specializes the
decentralized parts of the governement to be able to be "efficiency",
but China will interpret efficiency to be more "centralized" government,
but this more centralized government of China is causing problems to
efficiency and we are noticing it by the fact that many of the huge
investments abroad of China is inefficiency that causes more debt and
problems to China(please read bellow to notice it), and i think that the
cause of this inefficiency of China is the fact that efficiency is
interpreted as being more "centralization" of government of China and
this centralization has caused a lack of "professionalism" that has
caused problems to China.
How to be responsability ?
First step you have to prioritize to be able to succeed !
And to wich would you give much more importance ?
You have to give much more importance to "efficiency" !
You have to think efficiently and be more efficient and this
has some requirements !
For example easy thinking will ask for love and compassion..
But what do you think is also compassion and love ?
Look at USA , why some of you in USA are not happy and become more violent ?
It is because of efficiency !
Because survival and quality need efficiency !
And because love and compassion need efficiency !
But you have not to be like fools because USA is capable
to adapt quickly to efficiency and to efficient thinking !
So you have to be more patience with USA and to give a chance to USA !
Because USA knows about efficiency and USA can adapt quickly !
So we have not to be pessimistic about USA !
Read the rest:
What is to be primitive ?
I am a white arab and you know me more that i am not primitive as ISIS
or Al Qaida, i am a more sophisticated white arab, and what is it to be
primitive ? i am not primitive because i am saying to myself that
"efficiency" is of a great importance ! so i am trying to be more and
more efficient ! ISIS and Al Qaida are inferior thinking that is not
efficient and also because it is causing a mess to muslims ! the best
way to fight ISIS and Al Qaida is to be efficient thinking and to be
efficiency ! i don't like to be like primitive ! because it is risky and
dangerous and it is not dignity ! so this is why i am talking "rules"
and "laws" to be more efficiency and to be more efficient thinking ,
because order is "primordial", without laws and rules there is no order
! so there is no country and no society and no civilization ! so it is
primitiveness that i don't want at all ! you have to understand my way
of thinking ! i am for example saying to myself that i want my society
to be efficient economy to be able to survive better , so to fulfill
this requirement i need to respect efficient laws and rules ! this is a
requirement for me that must be fullfilled because survival is dependent
on it ! so i am not kinding with laws and rules ! and primitiveness is
not dignity for me ! so i have to be more efficiency and more efficient
thinking ! i am constantly focussing on efficiency and efficient
thinking to be more dignity for me ! this also why i am a more serious
computer programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there
implementations, because i am always seeking to be more "dignity" by
being more efficiency and more efficient thinking !
this is my way of doing and this is my spirit !
USA is a country of rules and laws
I said before that USA is a country of laws , and i love it !
Look for example at this:
Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code
Read more here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/computer-programmers-get-new-tech-ethics-code/
This article comes from Scientific American here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/tech/
So as you are noticing Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code in
USA, so as you are noticing USA is a country of "rules" and "laws", this
is why i love it, and you are noticing that USA is adapting quickly to
efficiency and to efficient thinking.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
I am a white arab, and you know me better now..
About our beloved USA..
As you have noticed that i love USA because i am a more
serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, and i think i will sell some of my algorithms
to USA companies such as Google or Microsoft or Embarcadero.., also
i love USA because it is in forefront of science and technology
defending "civilization", this is of a great importance for me !
this is why i love USA, and i think that USA is a country of "laws"
and this is very important for me, because enforcing laws is very
important for "order" and for foreign "investment" and for efficient
immigration and for economy, so i am not kinding , i am the one
that does love USA because it is a country of laws ! also i love
USA because USA does adapt quickly to "efficiency", i am noticing it
everyday, that USA wants to be efficient "efficiently" ! this is
why i love USA, i am not pessimistic as you are noticing ! because
i think that USA can quickly adapt because it is serious about
efficiency because USA knows about the "mess" of communism and the
mess of other inefficient ideologies ! so we have to keep focused on
efficient thinking and on efficiency ! and what do you think is USA ?
USA knows about pragmatism ! because USA is not neglecting efficiency
and it is quick at adapting ! i think that USA is on the right path,
because it is capable of listening and applying and understanding the
language of efficiency ! you will say that porno is about sex ,
but you have to understand that today politics must be about efficiency
and efficient thinking ! and today people have to be more responsable
and more aware and more educated to be more efficient ! so you
have to prioritize to be able to succeed ! so the language of sex
and sex is inferior thinking and inferiority , because it is primitive !
and you have to prefer to it the language of efficiency and efficiency !
So read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
What must be politics of today ?
There is a very important thing that you have to understand,
past history was also a history of "inefficiency", for example
communism was not efficient thinking, because efficient thinking is also
correct pragmatism, look at communism of China today, you will notice
that many of there huge investments abroad are inefficient(read bellow
to notice it), so it is causing problems to China, because i think China
is a communist dictatorship that is not "efficient" thinking of
"economy", it is like the old days of inefficiency, and look for example
at USA , USA also was "inefficiency" that has caused the crisis of year
2000(read bellow to notice it), Russia also is inefficiency and
inefficient thinking that is causing problems to its economy, read for
example this:
About Russia's economy...
Read this:
Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
1. Rule of law
2. Optimization of the Government size
3. Regulatory efficiency
4. Open markets
Read more here:
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong
economy, read the following to notice it:
"Russia’s transition from a centrally planned economy to a more
market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly
statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the
imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private
sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints
caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace.
Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate
the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak
protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term
economic development."
https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia
So i think that today politics must be efficiency and efficient thinking.
Read the rest to understand better:
I am a white arab and you know me better now..
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" that is "dangerous" for China, and by
analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is
dangerous look like the following when i said:
==
I said:
"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "
Here is the proof, read the following:
In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.
Read more here:
Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis
https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/
==
Here is the proof about China , look at this interesting video:
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
Still about economy and quality..
Why Doesn’t DUBAI care about OIL?
Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its
economy and become rich:
- Lower taxes
- Special economic zones
- High degree of immigration freedom
- It has attracted more investment
Look at this video to know more about DUBAI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM
Still about quality
As you have noticed growth in France will lower
the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption
is also a way in economics to lower unemployment
more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to
build quality products and services like in Germany to be more
competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other
countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education
sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality,
because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in
being more effective in economics and education France will attract more
and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and
growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its
challenges and I think it is able to meet them.
Still on France ..
I understand better the United States, and I also know how
to adopt the best of the United States, you in France you
have a tendency to insist too much on the fact that arabs of the Maghreb
do not integrate better and that they should integrate better, but I do
not agree with the method, because I am a different mentality, and I
think it is necessary to bring "indirectly those arabs to integrate
better, and this "indirectly" it is this entrepreneurial spirit that
wants to bring the president Macron, because since the private sector of
France is of 75%, and that the private sector is important, then it is
necessary to educate better and correctly those arabs of France to be
able for them to be more efficient and more entrepreneurial and to be
able for them to create companies too, and also France has to be more
positive like Macron and show those arabs of France that France is more
positive, from there "indirectly" the arabs of France will want to
build France and to integrate better in France. I think Macron is smart
and he understands my ideas better.
I said below that:
"the french political party that is called FN is also more idealism that
contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism"
I mean that this racial idealism of the FN, as the fact of
wanting to become 100% racially European white is also more idealism
that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism.
On the entrepreneurial spirit ..
I think that in France you have to understand well the president Macron,
Macron wants to bring and develop an entrepreneurial spirit of
people of France, especially that in France the private sector is at 75%
of workforce and the public sector is only 25%, in Algeria the public
sector is at 35% of workforce, so we should not go through a thousand
ways, president Macron knows that the pessimism of the far right party
of the FN is bad, so Macron is more positive and I think we need to be
more positive, because Macron knows that France is able to solve its
problems in an intelligent way, I give you an example: the FN
says that it's tired of arabs of France, and that people who voted FN do
not want anymore arabs, but Macron understands the finesse of politics
and he knows he has to be smart because immigration is good
for economic growth etc. that's why Macron is more
"realistic", because for him the FN is also more idealism that
contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism, that's why
I find Macron intelligent.
I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because
look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators:
First look at the growth of France here:
"Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the
period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes
Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East -
Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees
in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to
decline, at a very measured pace . "
and look also at this about France:
According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on
Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report
recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This
indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the
inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to
remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to
train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the
world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet
produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy.
Read more here to notice it:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html
So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the
budget and i think that France is capable of doing it.
Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do:
I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can
we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of
unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size
of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes,
because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth
by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
I have to be more precise about USA:
I said before on my previous post that:
"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "
Here is the proof, read the following:
In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.
Read more here:
Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis
https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/
So reread my following thoughts:
About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..
I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:
Questions:
What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?
Answer:
At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000.
Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:
Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.
The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
For proof, read the following document:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
And about immigration now:
Look at this following video about:
Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?
You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".
But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
===
Hello...
Read this:
About my genealogy and my history..
I am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada...
I talked before about my "genealogy", i am a white arab descendent of
prophet Mohamed from my grand-father of my father and from my
grand-mother of my father and from my grand-mother of my mother, they
are all descendent from arabs descendent of prophet Mohamed, but my
grand-father from my mother is berber, so i am much "more" arab and i am
descendent of prophet Mohamed this is why my name is: Amine Moulay
Ramdane, the "Moulay" of my name means that i am descendent of arabs
descendent of prophet Mohamed, and i think that my arab ancestors has
brought "civilization" to the berbers.
I am a "white" arab, and as a proof look at this song and
how the arab singers from Saudia Arabia in this video are "whites", i am
also a white arab that looks like them and i am more civilized., so look
at this song in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abyHF_zG3ng
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Read this:
More political philosophy
You have seen posting my new poems of love..
But now i will continu to do political philosophy in front of your eyes,
this time about economy..
We have to be smart, and i think i have become more smart by doing
political philosophy, and doing political philosophy permits me to like
understand more and more and understand like the essence of things !
Now follow with me please:
What is the essence of economy ?
This is a good question in political philosophy, and i will answer it
smartly like this:
You have first to understand morality:
As i have explained morality is perfection at best or reliability at
best, because the essence of reliability is solving problems, so think
about it like this: when you solve problems it is like
you are becoming more and more perfection, and when you solve
all problems you will say that it is absolute reliability or
absolute perfection or absolute happiness, this why morality is
pushed towards absolute happiness that is the goal to attain,
but you have to notice with me that when i say morality is
perfection at best or reliability at best, it must at least be decent
morality so that to not cause a big problem, because if it is not decent
morality it is like a failure of morality that causes desorder and
violence in the system, so now we return to the above question of:
What is the essence of economy ?
We have to do more political philosophy to understand it better:
Economy is part of morality, morality must govern and morality says that
economy is part of the "set" of solving problems that is the essence of
reliability, it is the same as the laws that are part of morality, laws
also solve problems so that to be morality that is perfection at best
or reliability at best, so economy is like laws because it is part of
morality, so economy can "not" escape morality because it is part of
morality and it makes morality perfection at best or reliability at
best, and since economy is part of morality, It is the same of when i
say: If you see a light, is it a light ! It needs correct interpretation
! So i think the correct interpretation by political philosophy is that
it is inherent to capitalism that economy needs to be "responsability",
and responsability of capitalism is that economy is integrated with the
all set that is morality and it is part of morality and it must interact
with morality by being compatible with morality, also capitalism is
capitalism of today and capitalism of the future so it has to know how
to wisely protect the envirenment and to protect our planet from too
much exploitation and from too much pollution ! and capitalism has to be
pragmatism and realism.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
Here is again my previous wisdom:
You have to be able to recognize the light and you have to be the light
to be able to be successful. But how can you interpret that it is a
light ? You have to be "professionalism" and you have to be
technology and science to be able to do it.
So as you have noticed my wisdom above is like poetry and it is like
philosophy and it is the base of morality, so can we ask
ourselves a question:
Is morality like mathematics ?
I mean is morality a maximization of reliability or perfection.
I think this is the main problem of nazism and neo-nazism, because
nazism and neo-nazism want to maximize perfection or wants to maximize
reliability and this is the defect of neo-nazism because neo-nazism is
not realism or pragmatism ! because morality is also knowing how to be
tolerance to avoid violence and to avoid desorder inside the system !
and morality is also how to be the right imperfections to be able to be
the correct perfection or the correct reliability ! this is the main
point ! this is why when i say a sentence such as: if you see a light ,
is it a light ? this is the base of political philosophy ! and this is
the base of morality ! because you have to be able of correct
interpretation of what is a light ! so now you are more apt to
understand that the ideologies such as neo-nazism are defective because
they are not correct pragmatism and not correct realism.
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better my thoughts:
I have to do more political philosophy in front of you so that
you be able to understand me better, so i will do more political
philosophy now, and now about the essence of morality, so i will
start it by asking the following question:
What is the essence of morality ?
You have to understand deeply my thoughts to understand better
what is the essence of morality, first you have to be able to define
better what is morality, so notice with me that morality can not be
called morality if it is not a "decent" morality ! this is the constrain
over morality, because if laws(that is morality) are not "decent" laws,
so it is "failure" of morality, so the essence of morality is
a social contract that sets morality as being a decent morality,
because morality is a "set" that contains: the political system and the
laws etc. but you have to know how to be not extremist at defining what
is a "decent" morality, here again there can be extremism that is too
violent, so as you are noticing that the base of the internal political
system of USA and China and all the other countries is that it has to be
compatible with a decent morality, so as you are noticing the social
contract is clear , and now comes the question of: is political
correctness a fascism ? here again you have to notice that to be able to
be a decent morality you have to know how to be political correctness
and symbolism of political correctness, and now you are feeling more the
fact that political correctness is part of morality and it is a
"necessary" requirement.
Read again the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
About the essence of political philosophy..
I am a white arab, but i am not a muslim
As you have noticed i am not wasting my time with Islam,
because Islam is very inefficient as a system and as an economic
system, and as you have noticed i am doing more political philosophy
here, and why am i doing more political philosophy ? because
political philosophy permits us to transcend our living conditions
and permits us to be awareness that is more "efficient", so here
again you are noticing that i am giving much more importance to
efficiency, i give you an example:
If i ask you a question of what is the best way to succeed in life ?
If you understand the essence of this question, you will understand
better the "essence" of political philosophy, because political
philosophy is morality that is reliability as i have explained, so since
morality is constrained by reliability, thus it must be a decent
morality so that to be able to call it morality or reliability, so as
you have noticed political correctness and symbolism of political
correctness is part of morality, because being political "correctness"
is being correctness that is "measured" by morality that has to be
maximization at best of reliability and it must be "decent" morality to
be able to call it morality so that to not cause desorder and violence
inside the system, so as you are noticing political philosophy permits
us to be more successful as a system, by doing political philosophy i am
discovering the architectural ideas and the steps that permit us to
construct a more successful political system, so as you have noticed i
have spoken in my political philosophy about:
1- Hierarchy
2- Richness
3- Efficiency
4- And about economy
5- And about morality
etc.
Read my following thoughts to understand better(And i will post to you
my other thoughts of my political philosophy):
More political philosophy..
You have seen me talking about USA and about communism..
How do you think people around the world are judging communism and are
judging USA ?
Philosophically we know that we have the strong and the weak, but
if the weak just want to be equal to the strong , is it
acceptable by logic ? i don't think so because the weak is also
"inefficiency" and he has the "tendency" to be more "corrupt" or more
"desorder" ! and from philosophy we can say that "hierarchy" by the
the fact that nature and culture wants the strong to be strong and want
him to guide people and to give quality and want him to give efficiency
! so from this we can say that this "hierarchy" is allowed by logic !
but political philosophy gives a "great" priority to the fact that we
have to know how to "nuance" to be able to judge ! so we have for
example to know that USA has its "advantages".
This is why i said that:
About the essence of USA...
USA is meritocracy that has choosen to be "efficiency", and it has
allowed the rich to be rich to attract more economic investment and to
attract more smart people so that to become rich and to be at the
forefront of technology and science. But can we ask ourselves an
important question? what will be the world without USA ? this is the
important question to ask ! and now you are starting to be "pragmatic"
by asking this question ! and now you are starting to see the nuances
and be capable of nuancing ! because one of the advantages of USA is
that USA is in the forefront of technology and science and it is helping
the world to advance in technology and science ! and since USA has
become powerful so USA has wanted and wants to play a role of a
policeman of the world to bring more order to the world ! so as you have
noticed we have to be capable to see the advantages of USA ! this is how
we will be capable of nuancing in politics !
And yet more about political philosophy..
And you saw me writing above about "hierarchy", so what about
"richness" ?
Read all my following thoughts to understand more:
Yet more political philosophy about morality..
I said that morality is reliability.
And look at the dictionary here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability
It says that:
Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.
So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is
the "state" of being reliable.
But there is still a question that remains:
Why not say that morality is maximization at best of reliability ?
Because if morality can not be viewed as morality because of failure of
the system , so this can not be called reliability or morality,
so this is why i am approximating with the word reliability, because
if we call a system a decent morality that means that it can be
called reliability, thus we can not say that morality is maximization at
best of reliability because if maximization at best of reliability is
not "sufficient" to give "decent" morality, so that's not reliability
and that's not morality.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
I will yet get into more political philosophy..
This time about political correctness and symbolism that is part of
political correctness..
You will notice that communism has used also symbolism that is part of
political correctness to govern and for example national socialism of
Algeria today uses political correctness and "symbolism" of political
correctness to govern the people, so what do we have to
think about political correctness and about this kind of symbolism that
is part of political correctness that is used by such governance? i
think that when we say political correctness, as you have noticed this
contains the word "correctness", so i think that political correctness
is also the way because correctness of political correctness is defined
by measuring it by morality that is "reliability", because as
i said that the essence of reliability is solving problems and
reliability(thus morality) is pushed towards solving all our problems
that is absolute reliability or absolute happiness, so correctness of
political correctness has to be measured by reliability , this is why
when we say that we have to be political correctness this is "logical"
and this is a "truth", so from now you are able to understand that being
political correctness is part of morality.
Read the rest of my thought to understand better:
I have to be more smart..
I said that morality is reliability.
But look at the dictionary here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reliability
It says that:
Reliability is: The quality or state of being reliable.
So when i say that morality is reliability, i mean that it is
the "state" of being reliable, but here again you have to understand
the essence of reliability, reliability is a balance of tolerance
and efficiency and performance etc. that gives a "maximization" that
we can call reliability, so here again you are feeling the essence of
morality that is reliability, and i am choosing to say that
morality is reliability to show a more correct "abstraction" that
permit us to show that the essence of reliability is "solving"
problems, so when we are the right tolerance in the system , we are also
this "tolerance" to be able to avoid violence inside the system that
causes problems to the system, so this solves problems, and this is the
essence of reliability.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
More political philosophy about economy..
I have to be smart, i explained before that performance and efficiency
are "inherent" to reliability, this shows us on what have we to base
our society and what have to be the conception of our society, because
by my explanations you are "feeling" the essence of "reliability" and
how it is related to morality, by "analogy" with economy and richness,
security is also inherent to economy and to richness because they are
related to reliability, because morality is reliability(as i have proved
it to you in my previous posts), so when i say being rich is compatible
with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you have to be
rich, you have to understand that economy too is economy of today and
economy of the future, and richness is richness of today and richness of
the future, so "responsability"(that is security) is inherent to
richness and to economy. So as you are noticing there is no
"contradiction" in my affirmation, and you are noticing that this
must includes the requirements that we have to know how to wisely
"protect" the "environment" and how to wisely protect our planet from
exploitation and from pollution too.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
About populism of today..
I think there is a "duality", USA is a "meritocracy" type of system,
but "populism" that has voted for Donald Trump is "less" educated and
"less" awareness and was not capable to adapt efficiently to
"globalisation", so they were fearing "globalisation", so i think that
they have to become more skilled and more educated to be more aware of
globalisation and to be capable to understand more correctly
globalisation and to be more capable to adapt to globalisation, thus the
way is to be efficient thinking and more efficiency to be able to adapt.
I will continu to do more political philosophy..
I think the most important thing today is that we have to construct
a new "spirit", i think the new spirit must also be that we have to go
from economy and see economy as an important tool to attain
a civilization and to construct a new man that is more civilized,
because notice with that when you are a rich country it is much "easier"
for the people to become civilized(thus to become order etc.), so
we have to give a great importance to economy today, for example
China has a weakness that it is more centralized government that
is lacking efficiency(read bellow to notice it), so they have to
decentralize and to specialize more the parts of the government so that
to be more "professionalism" that knows how to invest "efficiently"
abroad, and i think we have to be more efficient thinking and more
efficiency by investing more in technology and science to be able
to enhance much more our living conditions.
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
About the essence of communism
Communism has tried to construct a new "man", but how can you construct
a new man that is civilized or how can you construct a civilization if
you remain more poor and your economy is not a good economy ? this is
what we call pragmatism ! because as i said before being rich is
compatible with civilization and to be able to be a civilization you
have to be rich, if your country is not rich so it will be less "order"
and more "insecurity" and more "corruption" ! this is why in my
following writing i am speaking about efficiency and about reliability
and about economy.
Read all my following thoughts to understand better:
What is the exceptionalism of USA ?
You have to do more political philosophy to understand better USA..
If you are immature in politics you will say that USA is porno, so
USA is bad, but this is childish thinking.. because we have to transcend
with political philosophy to understand better USA..
As you have noticed i said that "reliability" is important and
"efficiency" is important, and i have explained that efficiency is
like performance, and since the essence of reliability is solving
problems, and when we solve all problems we say that we are absolute
reliability or absolute happiness that is the goal that guides morality
towards its goal that is solving all our problems, so reliability pushes
morality towards absolute reliability or absolute happiness, and since
being performance is a problem to solve , so efficiency and performance
are inherent to reliability, now there is something important that
remains, you have to be able to feel the essence of civilization to
be able to understand USA, USA wanted and want to be "rich" to be able
to be a leader and to be able to be a leader in technology and science
and to be able to be a policeman of the world that brings order, and so
that to benefit the world with its high quality products and high
quality services, not only that but you will notice that in philosophy
the fact that USA has become rich has caused that USA has become less
"corrupt", so this richness of USA makes USA be less corrupt than third
world countries or less corrupt than China or than Russia etc. so this is
the advantage of being rich, because being rich is compatible with
"civilization", because you have to be rich to be able to be a
civilization, and i think that this is also what we call the
exceptionalism of USA. So USA has not to fail, and USA has
to eliminate its "deficit" and to reduce its debt so that to
be more capable as a country.
More philosophy about efficiency..
We have to be more smart , you have seen me talking about efficiency,
and i said that you have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed and
to be able to be responsability and success you have to give much more
importance to "efficiency", but there is a problem that remains, it is
how will you "interpret" "efficiency" ? USA will interpret efficiency as
being more decentralization of the government that specializes the
decentralized parts of the governement to be able to be "efficiency",
but China will interpret efficiency to be more "centralized" government,
but this more centralized government of China is causing problems to
efficiency and we are noticing it by the fact that many of the huge
investments abroad of China is inefficiency that causes more debt and
problems to China(please read bellow to notice it), and i think that the
cause of this inefficiency of China is the fact that efficiency is
interpreted as being more "centralization" of government of China and
this centralization has caused a lack of "professionalism" that has
caused problems to China.
How to be responsability ?
First step you have to prioritize to be able to succeed !
And to wich would you give much more importance ?
You have to give much more importance to "efficiency" !
You have to think efficiently and be more efficient and this
has some requirements !
For example easy thinking will ask for love and compassion..
But what do you think is also compassion and love ?
Look at USA , why some of you in USA are not happy and become more violent ?
It is because of efficiency !
Because survival and quality need efficiency !
And because love and compassion need efficiency !
But you have not to be like fools because USA is capable
to adapt quickly to efficiency and to efficient thinking !
So you have to be more patience with USA and to give a chance to USA !
Because USA knows about efficiency and USA can adapt quickly !
So we have not to be pessimistic about USA !
Read the rest:
What is to be primitive ?
I am a white arab and you know me more that i am not primitive as ISIS
or Al Qaida, i am a more sophisticated white arab, and what is it to be
primitive ? i am not primitive because i am saying to myself that
"efficiency" is of a great importance ! so i am trying to be more and
more efficient ! ISIS and Al Qaida are inferior thinking that is not
efficient and also because it is causing a mess to muslims ! the best
way to fight ISIS and Al Qaida is to be efficient thinking and to be
efficiency ! i don't like to be like primitive ! because it is risky and
dangerous and it is not dignity ! so this is why i am talking "rules"
and "laws" to be more efficiency and to be more efficient thinking ,
because order is "primordial", without laws and rules there is no order
! so there is no country and no society and no civilization ! so it is
primitiveness that i don't want at all ! you have to understand my way
of thinking ! i am for example saying to myself that i want my society
to be efficient economy to be able to survive better , so to fulfill
this requirement i need to respect efficient laws and rules ! this is a
requirement for me that must be fullfilled because survival is dependent
on it ! so i am not kinding with laws and rules ! and primitiveness is
not dignity for me ! so i have to be more efficiency and more efficient
thinking ! i am constantly focussing on efficiency and efficient
thinking to be more dignity for me ! this also why i am a more serious
computer programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there
implementations, because i am always seeking to be more "dignity" by
being more efficiency and more efficient thinking !
this is my way of doing and this is my spirit !
USA is a country of rules and laws
I said before that USA is a country of laws , and i love it !
Look for example at this:
Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code
Read more here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/computer-programmers-get-new-tech-ethics-code/
This article comes from Scientific American here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/tech/
So as you are noticing Computer Programmers Get New Tech Ethics Code in
USA, so as you are noticing USA is a country of "rules" and "laws", this
is why i love it, and you are noticing that USA is adapting quickly to
efficiency and to efficient thinking.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
I am a white arab, and you know me better now..
About our beloved USA..
As you have noticed that i love USA because i am a more
serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, and i think i will sell some of my algorithms
to USA companies such as Google or Microsoft or Embarcadero.., also
i love USA because it is in forefront of science and technology
defending "civilization", this is of a great importance for me !
this is why i love USA, and i think that USA is a country of "laws"
and this is very important for me, because enforcing laws is very
important for "order" and for foreign "investment" and for efficient
immigration and for economy, so i am not kinding , i am the one
that does love USA because it is a country of laws ! also i love
USA because USA does adapt quickly to "efficiency", i am noticing it
everyday, that USA wants to be efficient "efficiently" ! this is
why i love USA, i am not pessimistic as you are noticing ! because
i think that USA can quickly adapt because it is serious about
efficiency because USA knows about the "mess" of communism and the
mess of other inefficient ideologies ! so we have to keep focused on
efficient thinking and on efficiency ! and what do you think is USA ?
USA knows about pragmatism ! because USA is not neglecting efficiency
and it is quick at adapting ! i think that USA is on the right path,
because it is capable of listening and applying and understanding the
language of efficiency ! you will say that porno is about sex ,
but you have to understand that today politics must be about efficiency
and efficient thinking ! and today people have to be more responsable
and more aware and more educated to be more efficient ! so you
have to prioritize to be able to succeed ! so the language of sex
and sex is inferior thinking and inferiority , because it is primitive !
and you have to prefer to it the language of efficiency and efficiency !
So read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
What must be politics of today ?
There is a very important thing that you have to understand,
past history was also a history of "inefficiency", for example
communism was not efficient thinking, because efficient thinking is also
correct pragmatism, look at communism of China today, you will notice
that many of there huge investments abroad are inefficient(read bellow
to notice it), so it is causing problems to China, because i think China
is a communist dictatorship that is not "efficient" thinking of
"economy", it is like the old days of inefficiency, and look for example
at USA , USA also was "inefficiency" that has caused the crisis of year
2000(read bellow to notice it), Russia also is inefficiency and
inefficient thinking that is causing problems to its economy, read for
example this:
About Russia's economy...
Read this:
Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
1. Rule of law
2. Optimization of the Government size
3. Regulatory efficiency
4. Open markets
Read more here:
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong
economy, read the following to notice it:
"Russia’s transition from a centrally planned economy to a more
market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly
statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the
imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private
sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints
caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace.
Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate
the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak
protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term
economic development."
https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia
So i think that today politics must be efficiency and efficient thinking.
Read the rest to understand better:
I am a white arab and you know me better now..
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" that is "dangerous" for China, and by
analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that is
dangerous look like the following when i said:
==
I said:
"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "
Here is the proof, read the following:
In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.
Read more here:
Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis
https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/
==
Here is the proof about China , look at this interesting video:
Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
Still about economy and quality..
Why Doesn’t DUBAI care about OIL?
Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its
economy and become rich:
- Lower taxes
- Special economic zones
- High degree of immigration freedom
- It has attracted more investment
Look at this video to know more about DUBAI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM
Still about quality
As you have noticed growth in France will lower
the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption
is also a way in economics to lower unemployment
more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to
build quality products and services like in Germany to be more
competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other
countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education
sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality,
because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in
being more effective in economics and education France will attract more
and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and
growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its
challenges and I think it is able to meet them.
Still on France ..
I understand better the United States, and I also know how
to adopt the best of the United States, you in France you
have a tendency to insist too much on the fact that arabs of the Maghreb
do not integrate better and that they should integrate better, but I do
not agree with the method, because I am a different mentality, and I
think it is necessary to bring "indirectly those arabs to integrate
better, and this "indirectly" it is this entrepreneurial spirit that
wants to bring the president Macron, because since the private sector of
France is of 75%, and that the private sector is important, then it is
necessary to educate better and correctly those arabs of France to be
able for them to be more efficient and more entrepreneurial and to be
able for them to create companies too, and also France has to be more
positive like Macron and show those arabs of France that France is more
positive, from there "indirectly" the arabs of France will want to
build France and to integrate better in France. I think Macron is smart
and he understands my ideas better.
I said below that:
"the french political party that is called FN is also more idealism that
contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism"
I mean that this racial idealism of the FN, as the fact of
wanting to become 100% racially European white is also more idealism
that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism.
On the entrepreneurial spirit ..
I think that in France you have to understand well the president Macron,
Macron wants to bring and develop an entrepreneurial spirit of
people of France, especially that in France the private sector is at 75%
of workforce and the public sector is only 25%, in Algeria the public
sector is at 35% of workforce, so we should not go through a thousand
ways, president Macron knows that the pessimism of the far right party
of the FN is bad, so Macron is more positive and I think we need to be
more positive, because Macron knows that France is able to solve its
problems in an intelligent way, I give you an example: the FN
says that it's tired of arabs of France, and that people who voted FN do
not want anymore arabs, but Macron understands the finesse of politics
and he knows he has to be smart because immigration is good
for economic growth etc. that's why Macron is more
"realistic", because for him the FN is also more idealism that
contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism, that's why
I find Macron intelligent.
I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because
look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators:
First look at the growth of France here:
"Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the
period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes
Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East -
Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees
in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to
decline, at a very measured pace . "
and look also at this about France:
According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on
Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report
recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This
indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the
inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to
remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to
train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the
world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet
produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy.
Read more here to notice it:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html
So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the
budget and i think that France is capable of doing it.
Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do:
I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can
we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of
unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size
of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes,
because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth
by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.
I have to be more precise about USA:
I said before on my previous post that:
"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "
Here is the proof, read the following:
In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.
Read more here:
Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis
https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/
So reread my following thoughts:
About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..
I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:
Questions:
What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?
Answer:
At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000.
Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:
Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.
The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
For proof, read the following document:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
And about immigration now:
Look at this following video about:
Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?
You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".
But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
===
Hello...
Read this:
About my genealogy and my history..
I am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada...
I talked before about my "genealogy", i am a white arab descendent of
prophet Mohamed from my grand-father of my father and from my
grand-mother of my father and from my grand-mother of my mother, they
are all descendent from arabs descendent of prophet Mohamed, but my
grand-father from my mother is berber, so i am much "more" arab and i am
descendent of prophet Mohamed this is why my name is: Amine Moulay
Ramdane, the "Moulay" of my name means that i am descendent of arabs
descendent of prophet Mohamed, and i think that my arab ancestors has
brought "civilization" to the berbers.
I am a "white" arab, and as a proof look at this song and
how the arab singers from Saudia Arabia in this video are "whites", i am
also a white arab that looks like them and i am more civilized., so look
at this song in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abyHF_zG3ng
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages