Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I correct, please reread my proof by contradiction..
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
Apr 17, 2016, 9:16:14 PM4/17/16
to
Hello.....
I correct, please reread my proof by contradiction..
I think that we have also to prove by contradiction...
If the serial part of the Amdahl's law is 1/16 the overall
parallel program, so when you will test with USL with
fewer cores and fewer threads, let say 8, you can
escape contention on the serial part, and this will
make the nonlinear regression of USL to fail to predict
in this particular case, so since it fails on this
particular case , so this makes the USL methodology
to fail, it is like a proof by contradiction in
mathematics.
So from this, how can we believe this USL methodology ?
i think that Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology
must explain to us what is this magical thing that makes
his USL methodology succeed.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
I correct, please reread my proof by contradiction..
I think that we have also to prove by contradiction...
If the serial part of the Amdahl's law is 1/16 the overall
parallel program, so when you will test with USL with
fewer cores and fewer threads, let say 8, you can
escape contention on the serial part, and this will
make the nonlinear regression of USL to fail to predict
in this particular case, so since it fails on this
particular case , so this makes the USL methodology
to fail, it is like a proof by contradiction in
mathematics.
So from this, how can we believe this USL methodology ?
i think that Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology
must explain to us what is this magical thing that makes
his USL methodology succeed.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages