More political philosophy about civilization..

[amin...@gmail.com]

Hello..


More political philosophy about civilization..

So now i will do more political philosophy about capitalism and governance, i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, now you will hear that Marxism is scientific or communism is scientific, but i don't think they are scientific, since as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that to logically prove, so first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization.

So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


But now you will notice that there is something happening, it is
that we have to know how to "tune" diversity and to tune morality so that to not degenerate into a too violent system, and you will notice it by my following thoughts:

More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard:

We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/

So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article:

"Today it teaches the doctrine of liberalism with its pacifism, its love for the inferior and misbegotten, its internationalism which makes a virtue out of treason, its hatred of all who possess strong national feelings, its toothless desire for racial equality, and its tolerance of everything and everyone, particularly the alien and the unfit."

So as you are noticing that the above article is making a logical inconsistency, since take for example "beauty", we can say by
the same logic as the above article that since beauty is much
less important than technical efficiency, so we have to pay
beauty much less money than technical efficiency, but if
you say so you are questioning the very basic fondations of what
we call a civilization, since our kind of civilization comes with a kind
of tolerance that permits it , this is part of the backbone of our civilization, it is also this kind of tolerance that permits us
to be the right tolerance and compassion towards the unfit
and towards the alien, and if you change this, i think this will make
our societies much more and too violent societies, so you have to understand it so that to understand the backbone of our civilization. Second logical inconsistency of the above article, it is that those
white supremacists are giving too much importance to genetics, neglecting at same time the power of culture and learning and awareness that permit or can permit other ethnic groups such as arabs and south americans and indians to become much better humans.

More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..

I will be more rigorous, so read again:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:

Why Capitalism Fails

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/

And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:

"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).

And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

And the above article is saying the following:

"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."

I think it is not true, because read the following:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/

And read the following:

Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:

Following are some of the advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.

Following are some of the disadvantages of automation:

1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a
machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work
from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for
skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill
levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and
unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this
sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work.

2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting
unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of
automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing
workers.

3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers
and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the
wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will
become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase.
Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach
epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression.

And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk


And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38


More political philosophy about Meritocracy..

Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic:

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/

So as you notice it says:

“The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears,”

So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality,
so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune
it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important.

Read my following previous thoughts of my political philosophy:

More political philosophy about responsability..

I have just read the following article about Putin:

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-says-communism-comes-bible-compares-lenin-saint-781328

And notice that it says the following:

"But Putin argues that like Christianity, communism preaches "freedom, brotherhood, equality." He called the Moral Code of the Builder of Communism, a pamphlet of guiding principles for all party members, a "primitive excerpt from the Bible.""


I agree that the communism was about "freedom, brotherhood, equality.",
but we have to be pragmatic, so we have to be smart and play it smartly since we have to also know how to address the problem of hate, so there must be "responsability", since if we simply call people to freedom and brotherhood and equality, it is not pragmatic, since we have to call them first to responsability that permits to bring such as those qualities, and we have also to be pragmatic since we can not be strict equality(since it is also not Meritocracy, so it is not efficient), but we can be solidarity and collaboration, so now you are understanding why i am talking as i am talking about nationalism and about hate in my thoughts of my political philosophy(read more about hate in my thoughts below), so here is my thoughts of my political philosophy about nationalism:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.