Horizon68
unread,Dec 19, 2018, 6:02:28 PM12/19/18You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Hello..
About white supremacism and neo-nazism..
White supremacists and neo-nazis and such violent people and idielogies,
are not correct "security" and are not a correct order because they are
too violent, and because they have to know how to play
it "safer" and this takes more smartness and more knowledge
and more wisdom, this is why i think that the dangerosity for world
order of white supremacists and neo-nazis is too risky that we must not
follow them and we must not give them governance.
Please read the rest to understand my thoughts:
About order and rationality..
As you have noticed i am a white arab, and i am a more
serious computer programmer who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i think
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or Intel
or Embarcadero companies.
Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..
I think you know me more now..
Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?
Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:
About quality and about security..
I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:
I have come to an interesting subject..
So i was asking myself the following question:
From where comes a scientific mind ?
I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:
When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.
Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..
Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology
on "order" first !
So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !
You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !
So from wich causes we get more order ?
I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:
1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.
2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security
3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.
4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.
And this is related to my following thoughts:
You have to understand Buddha
I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.
This is why i said before:
If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?
I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..
Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.
But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.
There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:
How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?
and it is:
Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?
I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.