Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue
102 views
Skip to first unread message
Alexander Krizhanovsky
Jan 15, 2014, 11:35:40 AM1/15/14
to
I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX Disruptor. The last time is in discussion at Hacker News. In LinkedIn discussions I also was asked about boost::lockfree::queue (it appeared in Boost recently). So I'm writing the post to share the answers.
http://natsys-lab.blogspot.ru/2014/01/natsys-lock-free-queue-in-comparison.html
http://natsys-lab.blogspot.ru/2014/01/natsys-lock-free-queue-in-comparison.html
Chris M. Thomasson
Jan 15, 2014, 5:19:50 PM1/15/14
to
> "Alexander Krizhanovsky" wrote in message
> news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a...@googlegroups.com...
> I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX
> Disruptor.
FWIW, check this out:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion
AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict
bi-directional FIFO Queue.
> news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a...@googlegroups.com...
> I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX
> Disruptor.
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion
AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict
bi-directional FIFO Queue.
0 new messages