Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Read again my final corrected post..
1 view
Skip to first unread message
amin...@gmail.com
Aug 9, 2019, 5:34:17 PM8/9/19
to
Hello,
Read again my final corrected post..
About parallel programming and concurrency..
Look at the following concurrency abstractions of microsoft:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task.waitany?view=netframework-4.8
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task.waitall?view=netframework-4.8
I will soon implement waitany() and waitall() concurrency abstractions for Delphi and Freepascal, with the timeout in microseconds of course, and they will work with my efficient implementation of a Future, so you will be able to wait for one or many futures with waitany() and waitall().
And about task cancellation like in microsoft TPL, i think it is
not a good abstraction, because how do you know when you have to efficiently cancel a task or tasks ? so you are understanding that task cancellation is not a so efficient abstraction , so i will not implement it, because i think the waitany() and waitall() with the "timeout" in microseconds are good concurrency abstractions.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Read again my final corrected post..
About parallel programming and concurrency..
Look at the following concurrency abstractions of microsoft:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task.waitany?view=netframework-4.8
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task.waitall?view=netframework-4.8
I will soon implement waitany() and waitall() concurrency abstractions for Delphi and Freepascal, with the timeout in microseconds of course, and they will work with my efficient implementation of a Future, so you will be able to wait for one or many futures with waitany() and waitall().
And about task cancellation like in microsoft TPL, i think it is
not a good abstraction, because how do you know when you have to efficiently cancel a task or tasks ? so you are understanding that task cancellation is not a so efficient abstraction , so i will not implement it, because i think the waitany() and waitall() with the "timeout" in microseconds are good concurrency abstractions.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages