Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
To be more precise...
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
Mar 21, 2015, 6:07:17 PM3/21/15
to
Hello,
I want to be more precise:
I wrote:
>The notion of time doesn't exist, but the "probability" that
>the time is inside the long interval of time of the probability
>of 1/1000000000 is maintained, so it is like we are saying that my
>affirmation: "because the event can appear at ANY MOMENT" is also
> very improbable.
I mean when you start playing each time the probability of
1/1000000000, you can not say if you are playing for a long time or a
short time, it is like if the variable of "time" doesn't exist, this
is what i mean, but the "probability" that the time is inside the long
interval of time of the probability of 1/1000000000 is maintained, so it
is like we are saying that my affirmation: "because the event can
appear at ANY MOMENT" is also very improbable.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
I want to be more precise:
I wrote:
>The notion of time doesn't exist, but the "probability" that
>the time is inside the long interval of time of the probability
>of 1/1000000000 is maintained, so it is like we are saying that my
>affirmation: "because the event can appear at ANY MOMENT" is also
> very improbable.
I mean when you start playing each time the probability of
1/1000000000, you can not say if you are playing for a long time or a
short time, it is like if the variable of "time" doesn't exist, this
is what i mean, but the "probability" that the time is inside the long
interval of time of the probability of 1/1000000000 is maintained, so it
is like we are saying that my affirmation: "because the event can
appear at ANY MOMENT" is also very improbable.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages