Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Read again, i correct a typo
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Sky89
Jul 13, 2018, 2:32:01 AM7/13/18
to
Hello...
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo
Why are you so rich ?
When you are more pessimistic, you will ask: why Bill Gates and such
others are so rich and why others are poor ?
But you don't understand my way of thinking..
I repeat my wisdom:
I know what is the "constrains" of empirical moral, that USA
is conservatism of its capitalism because it fears the mess
of socialism and it fears the mess of communism and it fears the mess of
other political ideologies, and i think that some people inside the USA
are stupid because they think that USA is bad and they start to be
violent ! i am not like them , because i am bringing my thoughts to the
table and bringing my political philosophy to the table and i am trying
by that to "convince" the others, so my way is constructive and less
violent because i am aware of violence and the mess and the blindness of
the past and i don't want to be quick at hating and i don't want to be
quick at being violent, this is why i am giving a chance to world order.
About the new generation and more..
I am a 50 years old white arab that has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i am more "experienced" and i
know both about the old and the new generation, the new generation of
younger want to be "quick", they want to be quick into sex and quick
into thinking and quick at hating, but this is not wisdom, you have to
be more sophistication and be more disciplined and be more wisdom, and
more wisdom is also being wisdom and "patiance" of science , because
science is not quick , because science is smartness that apply itself
at being rigorosity that takes time, the new generation of younger have
to learn to be more rigor of technology and science to make itself more
sophisticated, this is why i am a more serious computer programmer that
knows how to be more rigor of more serious computer programming, this is
why you are feeling the rigor of my thoughts in my actual post, and you
are feeling that i am capable of thinking more correctly , so read the
rest to notice it:
Being in accordance with reality..
When you become sophistication of politics , you will know the following
about politics today:
You have to be able to get out of "idealism" without being "pessimism",
this is smartness, because you have to give a chance to world order.
If you are more idealistic like north Korea, you will not be in
accordance with reality, we will say that you are not pragmatic,
you have to be able to understand what is pragmatism in politics
that takes into account many constrains, but this pragmatism has
to know how to drive by avoiding at best pessimism and violence inside
the system and outside the system, because morality is not only
a priori pure moral but it is also empirical moral inferred from
experience that must know how to "balance" correctly and how
to guide our world into the right direction bringing world
order at the same time, read the rest of my thoughts because
this actual post is all my thoughts of today that i have
thought fast and write fast:
Reality is reality..
I am also more political correctness, why political correctness ?
because life is still a "difficult" job and is still imperfect
and in this context violent or bad "words" can bring violence
to our world and to our society , so we have to be careful !
this is why i am political correctness and you are noticing it
in my last post.. But you have to be more sophistication like
me to be capable of seeing more "correctly" and to be capable
of seeing correctly the constrains of empirical moral inferred from
experience, some of you that are more idealistic will see morality as
being more idealistic without taking into account consumerism or other
constrains, for example Donald Trump is someone that tells it as it is
even if he is somewhat harsh ! but a more idealistic person will
interpret Donald Trump as being racist and bad and this is not correct
morality, because you have to know how to be tolerance too ! because i
think that Donald Trump is not a bad person as i have explained it to
you,and i am a more experience person that has more wisdom and more
maturity that sees more correctly, so read the rest of my thoughts of
today to understand better my thoughts:
How to love USA ?
If you are immaturity, you will be quick to hate USA..
But i am a white arab that is more wisdom and that is more maturity that
knows how to love USA..
Why ?
You have to be capable of philosophy and political philosophy to
understand better USA, you will say for example why USA is allowing the
rich to be so much rich and you will be quick to hate USA, but this is
not wisdom ! because USA is conservatism of its capitalism because
it is fearing the mess of communism or the mess of socialism ! so you
have to avoid violence with USA and you have to know how to "convince"
USA to make it more "confident" ! and when you are maturity like me
you will know that USA also can adapt "quickly", this is why you have
to be more confident with USA and because also USA wants to be convinced !
this is why i love USA because USA is also "rationality" that adapts
quickly and that wants to be convinced !
Read the rest to know more about my thoughts of today:
About maturity..
Maturity is not too much virility that is more blind because more violent..
You have to follow me here, because i am bringing my wisdom..
What that is trying to do Donald Trump ?
Is Donald Trump a bad person ?
I am more mature and i understand more politics, Donald Trump
is a man that tells it as it is, so when he speaks about shithole
countries he is not bad, he just get angry about the living
conditions of those shithole countries, because he just want to
say by being a little angry that those countries must be more
responsability, so you have not to see Donald Trump as racist
or bad, because our "beloved" Donald Trump is also a good guy that is
trying to find a right "balance" and is trying to bring world
order, he doesn't want to start a "big" trade war, he is just
wanting to bring more "fairness" and he is not wanting to start a
big trade war, other than that why do you think that Donald Trump
is wanting to be nice with president Vladimir Putin or the like, because
Donald Trump is not stupid, because he knows that we have tried
the hard way that was not effective, and now he wants to
try the soft way with those kind of presidents that look
like dictators, because the soft way can work and we have
to try it and this is what Donald Trump is doing.
More about philosophy...
You know me that i am a white arab and i am also an "inventor"
of many scalable algorithms and there implementations etc.
We have to be smarter to do political philosophy, because in philosophy
like in political philosophy we have to know like the essence of things,
like knowing the main parts of morality or the main parts of
a society.. this is the job of political philosophy also, and
this is what i was doing here , because i have posted my
political philosophy here, there is also smartness that knows
what is the weaknesses of "today", today we are quick into "violence"
of words and violence of acts and this is "inferiority", because
one of the main part of political philosophy is the requirement
of being "sophistication" that knows how to manage our world
and that knows how to think and how to see and how to solve..
i think that our world must not get into "stupidity", our world
must know how to find the right "balance" and how to find "peace",
and peace has also as a requirement world "order", and world order
depends on economical factors and on our ability of teaching wisdom
and teaching a better politics and a better philosophy, don't be mess of
the past because the past was inferiority of technology and science and
was blindness , so be wisdom and be capable of thinking correctly.
Also i said before that:
More about political philosophy..
I am a white arab, and we have to be more smart, and like in philosophy
we have to speak about the "essence" of things..
What is the essence of a society ?
We can not call a society a society if it is not "order" , order is
fondamental to a society, but there is not only order but also the sens
of "sacrifice", and there is hard sacrifice and soft sacrifice,
if we want today to be a civilization, we have not to generalize "hard"
sacrifice, like being violence of warrior type of people, to the general
population and tell them to be this hard sacrifice, because this
violence of warriors like the military and the police, has to be kept in
control inside the sphere of the military and the police so that to not
cause violence in the rest of the society, this is the same for the hard
sacrifice of other part of the population like scientists and engineers,
because they are doing a "hard" work and we can call it "hard"
sacrifice, so to be able to call a civilization by the name of a
civilization , we have not to generalize this "hard" sacrifice to the
rest of the population and tell all the population to be hard sacrifice,
because it is too much violence, and the rest of the population that is
not hard sacrifice has to understand that there is also what we call
"soft" sacrifice that is much less violence such as being tolerance and
being compassion and helping the others to a certain level that is not
violence.
Hope you have understood the essence of political philosophy.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo
Why are you so rich ?
When you are more pessimistic, you will ask: why Bill Gates and such
others are so rich and why others are poor ?
But you don't understand my way of thinking..
I repeat my wisdom:
I know what is the "constrains" of empirical moral, that USA
is conservatism of its capitalism because it fears the mess
of socialism and it fears the mess of communism and it fears the mess of
other political ideologies, and i think that some people inside the USA
are stupid because they think that USA is bad and they start to be
violent ! i am not like them , because i am bringing my thoughts to the
table and bringing my political philosophy to the table and i am trying
by that to "convince" the others, so my way is constructive and less
violent because i am aware of violence and the mess and the blindness of
the past and i don't want to be quick at hating and i don't want to be
quick at being violent, this is why i am giving a chance to world order.
About the new generation and more..
I am a 50 years old white arab that has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and i am more "experienced" and i
know both about the old and the new generation, the new generation of
younger want to be "quick", they want to be quick into sex and quick
into thinking and quick at hating, but this is not wisdom, you have to
be more sophistication and be more disciplined and be more wisdom, and
more wisdom is also being wisdom and "patiance" of science , because
science is not quick , because science is smartness that apply itself
at being rigorosity that takes time, the new generation of younger have
to learn to be more rigor of technology and science to make itself more
sophisticated, this is why i am a more serious computer programmer that
knows how to be more rigor of more serious computer programming, this is
why you are feeling the rigor of my thoughts in my actual post, and you
are feeling that i am capable of thinking more correctly , so read the
rest to notice it:
Being in accordance with reality..
When you become sophistication of politics , you will know the following
about politics today:
You have to be able to get out of "idealism" without being "pessimism",
this is smartness, because you have to give a chance to world order.
If you are more idealistic like north Korea, you will not be in
accordance with reality, we will say that you are not pragmatic,
you have to be able to understand what is pragmatism in politics
that takes into account many constrains, but this pragmatism has
to know how to drive by avoiding at best pessimism and violence inside
the system and outside the system, because morality is not only
a priori pure moral but it is also empirical moral inferred from
experience that must know how to "balance" correctly and how
to guide our world into the right direction bringing world
order at the same time, read the rest of my thoughts because
this actual post is all my thoughts of today that i have
thought fast and write fast:
Reality is reality..
I am also more political correctness, why political correctness ?
because life is still a "difficult" job and is still imperfect
and in this context violent or bad "words" can bring violence
to our world and to our society , so we have to be careful !
this is why i am political correctness and you are noticing it
in my last post.. But you have to be more sophistication like
me to be capable of seeing more "correctly" and to be capable
of seeing correctly the constrains of empirical moral inferred from
experience, some of you that are more idealistic will see morality as
being more idealistic without taking into account consumerism or other
constrains, for example Donald Trump is someone that tells it as it is
even if he is somewhat harsh ! but a more idealistic person will
interpret Donald Trump as being racist and bad and this is not correct
morality, because you have to know how to be tolerance too ! because i
think that Donald Trump is not a bad person as i have explained it to
you,and i am a more experience person that has more wisdom and more
maturity that sees more correctly, so read the rest of my thoughts of
today to understand better my thoughts:
How to love USA ?
If you are immaturity, you will be quick to hate USA..
But i am a white arab that is more wisdom and that is more maturity that
knows how to love USA..
Why ?
You have to be capable of philosophy and political philosophy to
understand better USA, you will say for example why USA is allowing the
rich to be so much rich and you will be quick to hate USA, but this is
not wisdom ! because USA is conservatism of its capitalism because
it is fearing the mess of communism or the mess of socialism ! so you
have to avoid violence with USA and you have to know how to "convince"
USA to make it more "confident" ! and when you are maturity like me
you will know that USA also can adapt "quickly", this is why you have
to be more confident with USA and because also USA wants to be convinced !
this is why i love USA because USA is also "rationality" that adapts
quickly and that wants to be convinced !
Read the rest to know more about my thoughts of today:
About maturity..
Maturity is not too much virility that is more blind because more violent..
You have to follow me here, because i am bringing my wisdom..
What that is trying to do Donald Trump ?
Is Donald Trump a bad person ?
I am more mature and i understand more politics, Donald Trump
is a man that tells it as it is, so when he speaks about shithole
countries he is not bad, he just get angry about the living
conditions of those shithole countries, because he just want to
say by being a little angry that those countries must be more
responsability, so you have not to see Donald Trump as racist
or bad, because our "beloved" Donald Trump is also a good guy that is
trying to find a right "balance" and is trying to bring world
order, he doesn't want to start a "big" trade war, he is just
wanting to bring more "fairness" and he is not wanting to start a
big trade war, other than that why do you think that Donald Trump
is wanting to be nice with president Vladimir Putin or the like, because
Donald Trump is not stupid, because he knows that we have tried
the hard way that was not effective, and now he wants to
try the soft way with those kind of presidents that look
like dictators, because the soft way can work and we have
to try it and this is what Donald Trump is doing.
More about philosophy...
You know me that i am a white arab and i am also an "inventor"
of many scalable algorithms and there implementations etc.
We have to be smarter to do political philosophy, because in philosophy
like in political philosophy we have to know like the essence of things,
like knowing the main parts of morality or the main parts of
a society.. this is the job of political philosophy also, and
this is what i was doing here , because i have posted my
political philosophy here, there is also smartness that knows
what is the weaknesses of "today", today we are quick into "violence"
of words and violence of acts and this is "inferiority", because
one of the main part of political philosophy is the requirement
of being "sophistication" that knows how to manage our world
and that knows how to think and how to see and how to solve..
i think that our world must not get into "stupidity", our world
must know how to find the right "balance" and how to find "peace",
and peace has also as a requirement world "order", and world order
depends on economical factors and on our ability of teaching wisdom
and teaching a better politics and a better philosophy, don't be mess of
the past because the past was inferiority of technology and science and
was blindness , so be wisdom and be capable of thinking correctly.
Also i said before that:
More about political philosophy..
I am a white arab, and we have to be more smart, and like in philosophy
we have to speak about the "essence" of things..
What is the essence of a society ?
We can not call a society a society if it is not "order" , order is
fondamental to a society, but there is not only order but also the sens
of "sacrifice", and there is hard sacrifice and soft sacrifice,
if we want today to be a civilization, we have not to generalize "hard"
sacrifice, like being violence of warrior type of people, to the general
population and tell them to be this hard sacrifice, because this
violence of warriors like the military and the police, has to be kept in
control inside the sphere of the military and the police so that to not
cause violence in the rest of the society, this is the same for the hard
sacrifice of other part of the population like scientists and engineers,
because they are doing a "hard" work and we can call it "hard"
sacrifice, so to be able to call a civilization by the name of a
civilization , we have not to generalize this "hard" sacrifice to the
rest of the population and tell all the population to be hard sacrifice,
because it is too much violence, and the rest of the population that is
not hard sacrifice has to understand that there is also what we call
"soft" sacrifice that is much less violence such as being tolerance and
being compassion and helping the others to a certain level that is not
violence.
Hope you have understood the essence of political philosophy.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89
Jul 14, 2018, 10:05:35 PM7/14/18
to
Hello..
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo:
More about humanity
This neo-nazism and the like are like archaism..
Take for example the fact that the USA companies that are in China
are giving or we call it transfering some of there "technologies" to
Chinese because Chinese has dictated it(read more about the realities),
neo-nazism will quickly get angry and violent about that,
but this is a childish view, because USA knows about the constrains
and it is pragmatic, and it says that if it doesn't do it that's
not beneficial, other than that USA is playing like a game of chess, and
it says that since USA is big market and there is other
markets around the world that buys american, so giving some of its
technologies to Chinese is less damaging, this realities then
are "amortizing" a lot the "damage" and they render the process
of giving some of the USA technologies to Chinese acceptable, this is
the way it is with "China" also, China also by the same process can give
some its technologies to Africa or to arab countries, so as you have
noticed the reality of today has changed, and the game of today is
different than the past, please read the rest my thoughts that i have
corrected better to understand better:
About inferior thinking..
As you have noticed i am a white arab that lives in Quebec Canada
since 1989, and i am 50 years old now, i am a more serious computer
programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there
implementations and i want to sell some of my scalable algorithms
to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero, now there is still
an important subjet that i will get into now, it is about
"inferior" thinking, because i think neo-nazism and the the political
far right and nationalism are "inferior" thinking, because
optimization of today is more "pragmatic", it means it is realistic,
but nationalism is considered an "extremism" today that doesn't
take into account correctly the "constrains", so it is not "pragmatic"
so it is inferior thinking, take for example a more open market
today, as you have noticed third world countries have a
high economical "growth", and they are opening there market to economic
investment, so USA and Europe and Chinese and Japanese and
such are economically investing in third world countries such
as arab countries and african countries etc. because also of this
high economic growth of third world countries, so this is a "win-win"
game , this is what we call optimization of today that is pragmatism,
even Israel knows about this pragmatism, and Israel also is now
economically investing in many arab countries, this is why i told you
more theorically that we have to give "priorities" to processes and
things, and it is not a game of: i want it all ! "theorically" i have
also explained that we are giving a "high" priority to "economy" and a
much lesser priority to the priority of neo-nazism or nationalism that
says that arabs are less beautiful and we have to discriminate them
because they are less beautiful, this beautifulness is much "lesser"
priority for optimization of today, so we have to know about this
optimization of today and we have to be smart to "benefit" from it as
i am explaining to you, this is why Israel must work with arab
countries to construct better relations and a better world, other
than that we have to know about the "future", an inferior thinking will
say that progress of science and technology today is like "linear",
but that's not the case because progress of science and technology is
"exponential" and there is also the law of accelerating returns that
plays an important role, this is why in about 15 years science and
technology will be "really" powerful and i think in about 15 year or 20
years we will also be able to enhance our "genetics", like becoming more
beautiful and more smart, this is also why we have not to waste our time
with inferior thinking of neo-nazism, read the rest of my following
thoughts to understand better:
What is the essence of reliability ?
What is reliability ?
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
What is corruption of morality ?
How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?
First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.
And here is what i said before:
More about morality..
Philosophy is also like finding the essence of things..
This is why i am finding the essence of morality..
Morality can be modeled also by "reliability", because reliability
do "engender" perfection, here is how:
We have to be more "reliable" to be able to survive and to be able to
succeed, this is a "priority" that must be fullfilled, and we have to
prioritize to be able to succeed, and being reliable is being "capable"
of contineous perfection towards perfection that is able to solve
problems, this is why reliability can model morality and this is why
reliability is morality, so as you have noticed morality can be defined
by: morality is a priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is
empirical moral inferred from experience, but this definition is too
much abstraction that do not permit us to feel and see and understand
better what is morality this is why i am doing more philosophy to find
the essence of morality, and this is why i said in my previous
definition that morality is:
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
And from where comes compassion and tolerance ?
Compassion and tolerance comes from morality, because morality
knows that "extremism" that is too violent inside the "set" of morality(
because extremism is constrained by morality) is bad, and this rule is
also inherent to our essence, and now read another time my definition of
the essence of morality and you will finally understand:
Here is the essence of morality:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,
so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
About life now..
Life is full of "imperfections", it is not perfection, and morality
has to know how to deal with those imperfections, like the imperfection
of the fact that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans, but
don't forget that even inside the "set" of white europeans there is also
full of imperfections, so to be more wisdom is knowing how to deal with
those imperfections with wisdom, this is why i have made you understand
why beautifulness is a lesser priority for optimization of today that
wants to bring more capable immigrants to be able to optimize
economy and the system. So you have to be more pragmatic
by prioritizing to be able to succeed, and to able to succeed
is knowing also the constrains of today, being too much idealism
is also neglecting to be more realistic about the constrains,
this is why i said the following:
About nationalism
Nationalism is too much idealism, it is as he want it all,
but to be pragmatic today you have to know that you have
to give "priorities" to processes and things, and you have to
know that optimization of today is also knowing that you can
not have it all, that means that you have to give for example
a high priority to economy neglecting at the same time the priority of
neo-nazism that wants to discriminate arabs because they are less
beautiful than white europeans, this beautifulness is a less priority
for optimization of today and it is a high priority for stupid white
european nationalism like neo-nazism that is not in accordance with
optimization of today.
I give you an example to understand me better:
I have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations,
so now i want to sell my scalable algorithms to Google or to Microsoft
or to Embarcadero, but i am not as beautiful as white europeans, and
this less beautiful than white europeans is like more "dirt" for white
european nationalism, do you think Google or Microsoft or Embarcadero
have to discriminate me because i am less beautiful because i am a white
arab, i don't think so , this is why white european nationalism is like
childish ! this is why i have said the following:
More about white european nationalism
We have to be more smart to know more about white european nationalism
White european nationalism is too "idealistic", because it is not
pragmatic, because optimization of today must be more pragmatic,
white european nationalism discriminate arabs because arabs for them
are like more "dirt" than the dirt of white europeans, but this is a
"childish" view, because optimization of today has to know how to accept
some level of "dirt" to be able to be more rich and more wealth, this is
why this too much idealism of the nationalism of white european race is
not understanding about optimization of today, this is why neo-nazism is
"childish" too because it is not understanding "optimization" of today.
This is why i said before:
The essence of nationalism
I think nationalism is not a correct ideology, because like neo-nazism
that gives more priority to the white european race, it is too
"idealistic", it believes too much in the values of nationalism,
it is like too much idealism, but i think nationalism is a failure
because it is archaism because it is not pragmatism, communism also is
too idealistic and it is archaism and it is
a failure. Today we have to transcend this archaism towards
a better political philosophy that takes into account the realities such
as optimization of the economy and the system and this is what we call
pragmatism, this is why i said the following:
What you see is what you get ?
This is the main problem of today, we are quick to judge by the
appearances, we are quick to say that Israel is all bad , and arabs
are all bad, but this is just our senses, it is like in philosophy,
we have to be more precise and see the benefits of this and that,
optimization of today is constrained by some constrains, and immigration
that respects the laws is also an immigration that wants to optimize,
this is why we are also bringing more "capable" immigrants that can even
take the jobs of white europeans, neonazis want to prioritize by
giving more priority to white european people, but this is archaism
that "optimization" rejects, you have to know more about what is
doing your government to know more about optimization and to know about
immigration , optimization of today doesn't prioritize like neonazis by
the the fact that you have to be of white european race, optimization
of today brings more capable arab immigrants because they are useful
for the economy and the system, you have to see the big picture
of this optimization to avoid being discrimination towards arabs,
because more capable arabs are brought because they are useful,
so we have to cease to be immaturity that is not responsability.
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo:
More about humanity
This neo-nazism and the like are like archaism..
Take for example the fact that the USA companies that are in China
are giving or we call it transfering some of there "technologies" to
Chinese because Chinese has dictated it(read more about the realities),
neo-nazism will quickly get angry and violent about that,
but this is a childish view, because USA knows about the constrains
and it is pragmatic, and it says that if it doesn't do it that's
not beneficial, other than that USA is playing like a game of chess, and
it says that since USA is big market and there is other
markets around the world that buys american, so giving some of its
technologies to Chinese is less damaging, this realities then
are "amortizing" a lot the "damage" and they render the process
of giving some of the USA technologies to Chinese acceptable, this is
the way it is with "China" also, China also by the same process can give
some its technologies to Africa or to arab countries, so as you have
noticed the reality of today has changed, and the game of today is
different than the past, please read the rest my thoughts that i have
corrected better to understand better:
About inferior thinking..
As you have noticed i am a white arab that lives in Quebec Canada
since 1989, and i am 50 years old now, i am a more serious computer
programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there
implementations and i want to sell some of my scalable algorithms
to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero, now there is still
an important subjet that i will get into now, it is about
"inferior" thinking, because i think neo-nazism and the the political
far right and nationalism are "inferior" thinking, because
optimization of today is more "pragmatic", it means it is realistic,
but nationalism is considered an "extremism" today that doesn't
take into account correctly the "constrains", so it is not "pragmatic"
so it is inferior thinking, take for example a more open market
today, as you have noticed third world countries have a
high economical "growth", and they are opening there market to economic
investment, so USA and Europe and Chinese and Japanese and
such are economically investing in third world countries such
as arab countries and african countries etc. because also of this
high economic growth of third world countries, so this is a "win-win"
game , this is what we call optimization of today that is pragmatism,
even Israel knows about this pragmatism, and Israel also is now
economically investing in many arab countries, this is why i told you
more theorically that we have to give "priorities" to processes and
things, and it is not a game of: i want it all ! "theorically" i have
also explained that we are giving a "high" priority to "economy" and a
much lesser priority to the priority of neo-nazism or nationalism that
says that arabs are less beautiful and we have to discriminate them
because they are less beautiful, this beautifulness is much "lesser"
priority for optimization of today, so we have to know about this
optimization of today and we have to be smart to "benefit" from it as
i am explaining to you, this is why Israel must work with arab
countries to construct better relations and a better world, other
than that we have to know about the "future", an inferior thinking will
say that progress of science and technology today is like "linear",
but that's not the case because progress of science and technology is
"exponential" and there is also the law of accelerating returns that
plays an important role, this is why in about 15 years science and
technology will be "really" powerful and i think in about 15 year or 20
years we will also be able to enhance our "genetics", like becoming more
beautiful and more smart, this is also why we have not to waste our time
with inferior thinking of neo-nazism, read the rest of my following
thoughts to understand better:
What is the essence of reliability ?
What is reliability ?
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
What is corruption of morality ?
How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?
First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.
And here is what i said before:
More about morality..
Philosophy is also like finding the essence of things..
This is why i am finding the essence of morality..
Morality can be modeled also by "reliability", because reliability
do "engender" perfection, here is how:
We have to be more "reliable" to be able to survive and to be able to
succeed, this is a "priority" that must be fullfilled, and we have to
prioritize to be able to succeed, and being reliable is being "capable"
of contineous perfection towards perfection that is able to solve
problems, this is why reliability can model morality and this is why
reliability is morality, so as you have noticed morality can be defined
by: morality is a priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is
empirical moral inferred from experience, but this definition is too
much abstraction that do not permit us to feel and see and understand
better what is morality this is why i am doing more philosophy to find
the essence of morality, and this is why i said in my previous
definition that morality is:
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
And from where comes compassion and tolerance ?
Compassion and tolerance comes from morality, because morality
knows that "extremism" that is too violent inside the "set" of morality(
because extremism is constrained by morality) is bad, and this rule is
also inherent to our essence, and now read another time my definition of
the essence of morality and you will finally understand:
Here is the essence of morality:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,
so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
Life is full of "imperfections", it is not perfection, and morality
has to know how to deal with those imperfections, like the imperfection
of the fact that arabs are less beautiful than white europeans, but
don't forget that even inside the "set" of white europeans there is also
full of imperfections, so to be more wisdom is knowing how to deal with
those imperfections with wisdom, this is why i have made you understand
why beautifulness is a lesser priority for optimization of today that
wants to bring more capable immigrants to be able to optimize
economy and the system. So you have to be more pragmatic
by prioritizing to be able to succeed, and to able to succeed
is knowing also the constrains of today, being too much idealism
is also neglecting to be more realistic about the constrains,
this is why i said the following:
About nationalism
Nationalism is too much idealism, it is as he want it all,
but to be pragmatic today you have to know that you have
to give "priorities" to processes and things, and you have to
know that optimization of today is also knowing that you can
not have it all, that means that you have to give for example
a high priority to economy neglecting at the same time the priority of
neo-nazism that wants to discriminate arabs because they are less
beautiful than white europeans, this beautifulness is a less priority
for optimization of today and it is a high priority for stupid white
european nationalism like neo-nazism that is not in accordance with
optimization of today.
I give you an example to understand me better:
I have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations,
so now i want to sell my scalable algorithms to Google or to Microsoft
or to Embarcadero, but i am not as beautiful as white europeans, and
this less beautiful than white europeans is like more "dirt" for white
european nationalism, do you think Google or Microsoft or Embarcadero
have to discriminate me because i am less beautiful because i am a white
arab, i don't think so , this is why white european nationalism is like
childish ! this is why i have said the following:
More about white european nationalism
We have to be more smart to know more about white european nationalism
White european nationalism is too "idealistic", because it is not
pragmatic, because optimization of today must be more pragmatic,
white european nationalism discriminate arabs because arabs for them
are like more "dirt" than the dirt of white europeans, but this is a
"childish" view, because optimization of today has to know how to accept
some level of "dirt" to be able to be more rich and more wealth, this is
why this too much idealism of the nationalism of white european race is
not understanding about optimization of today, this is why neo-nazism is
"childish" too because it is not understanding "optimization" of today.
This is why i said before:
The essence of nationalism
I think nationalism is not a correct ideology, because like neo-nazism
that gives more priority to the white european race, it is too
"idealistic", it believes too much in the values of nationalism,
it is like too much idealism, but i think nationalism is a failure
because it is archaism because it is not pragmatism, communism also is
too idealistic and it is archaism and it is
a failure. Today we have to transcend this archaism towards
a better political philosophy that takes into account the realities such
as optimization of the economy and the system and this is what we call
pragmatism, this is why i said the following:
What you see is what you get ?
This is the main problem of today, we are quick to judge by the
appearances, we are quick to say that Israel is all bad , and arabs
are all bad, but this is just our senses, it is like in philosophy,
we have to be more precise and see the benefits of this and that,
optimization of today is constrained by some constrains, and immigration
that respects the laws is also an immigration that wants to optimize,
this is why we are also bringing more "capable" immigrants that can even
take the jobs of white europeans, neonazis want to prioritize by
giving more priority to white european people, but this is archaism
that "optimization" rejects, you have to know more about what is
doing your government to know more about optimization and to know about
immigration , optimization of today doesn't prioritize like neonazis by
the the fact that you have to be of white european race, optimization
of today brings more capable arab immigrants because they are useful
for the economy and the system, you have to see the big picture
of this optimization to avoid being discrimination towards arabs,
because more capable arabs are brought because they are useful,
so we have to cease to be immaturity that is not responsability.
Sky89
Jul 16, 2018, 3:06:46 PM7/16/18
to
Hello...
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo
What has to be politics ?
I said about morality that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
Read for example this:
"Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025,
technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
US alone."
https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours
So what about this problem ?
Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
"reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of
accelerating returns, so i think that in about 15 years or
20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
powerful that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or
nationalism.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really
powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
our world problems.
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
Is morality tolerance and compassion ?
You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..
As i said morality that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an
exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
and science will be really really powerful and we will
be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..
This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
That's a really an interesting an important question:
I said that morality is:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:
I am strong like patience
I am passionate like romance
I am right as the nuance!
I am compassionate as hope
It's like flowers and bees bringing honey
As our life is made of light and Rainbow
I am like love, joy and smiles
Who are also like diamond and sapphire
Who are also like Satin and Velvet
Since it's like the Elixir of love
Since our love is divine
As dawn is beautiful and comes back
With its sky and its stars and its divine silence
Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden
Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes
We are sun and heat like lovers
Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes
Where love and hope are intertwined
Like flowers and bees
Like the taste of honey
You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back
And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny
Of our love which is divine
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--
And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism
Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
About the essence of perfection..
What is the essence of perfection ?
Because i explained and defined morality as:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more
correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
absolute perfection.
To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.
Read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9
This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not
realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
Read the rest:
What is the essence of Liberty ?
If i ask you a question:
Is idealism a morality ?
If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
have defined reliability as being:
What is the essence of reliability ?
What is reliability ?
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
What is corruption of morality ?
How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?
First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.
So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
About morality...
I have explained that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.
And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
more life:
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
"Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."
I want to comment on it more:
I said before that:
"Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and
efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of
efficiency and optimization like in UK."
So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
"its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism
belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong
to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection"
that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous
doing , because it is more rigor of logic.
Read this:
Read again, i correct a typo
I said about morality that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
"Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025,
technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
US alone."
https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours
So what about this problem ?
Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
"reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of
accelerating returns, so i think that in about 15 years or
20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
powerful that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or
nationalism.
Read the rest of my thoughts:
Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really
powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
our world problems.
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
Is morality tolerance and compassion ?
You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..
As i said morality that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an
exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
and science will be really really powerful and we will
be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..
This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
to understand better my thoughts:
Is morality beautiful ?
That's a really an interesting an important question:
I said that morality is:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:
I am strong like patience
I am passionate like romance
I am right as the nuance!
I am compassionate as hope
It's like flowers and bees bringing honey
As our life is made of light and Rainbow
I am like love, joy and smiles
Who are also like diamond and sapphire
Who are also like Satin and Velvet
Since it's like the Elixir of love
Since our love is divine
As dawn is beautiful and comes back
With its sky and its stars and its divine silence
Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden
Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes
We are sun and heat like lovers
Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes
Where love and hope are intertwined
Like flowers and bees
Like the taste of honey
You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back
And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny
Of our love which is divine
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism
Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
About the essence of perfection..
What is the essence of perfection ?
Because i explained and defined morality as:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more
correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
absolute perfection.
To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.
Read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9
This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not
realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is
possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.
possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
Read the rest:
What is the essence of Liberty ?
If i ask you a question:
Is idealism a morality ?
If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
have defined reliability as being:
What is the essence of reliability ?
What is reliability ?
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
What is corruption of morality ?
How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?
First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.
socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that
is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent.
So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent.
also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
Read the rest:
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
About morality...
I have explained that:
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.
And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
more life:
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
"Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."
I want to comment on it more:
I said before that:
"Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and
efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of
efficiency and optimization like in UK."
So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
"its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism
belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong
to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection"
that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids
doing , because it is more rigor of logic.
0 new messages