Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
About minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !
0 views
Skip to first unread message
amin...@gmail.com
Feb 21, 2020, 10:48:50 AM2/21/20
to
Hello,
About minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !
As you have noticed i just written previously the following:
------
"More philosophy of what is it to be a genius ?
You have just noticed that i said in one of my previous posts that i am "like" a genius, but you have to understand the "like", that doesn't mean that i am a genius, but perhaps that i am a genius ! but i will try to make you understand "more" what is it to be a genius: i think that you have to understand the following rule that says: You have to know how to minimize at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency ! and this is the rule that i am following, and i think this rule is the most important goal that a genius wants to attain ! and when you understand it , you will become much more smart ! a genius wants first to do from simple things or simple few things great things ! so you have to understand it, so it brings us to the question of how to make from simple things, or simple few things, great things ? and this rule looks like minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !"
------
So can we ask the question of is the following rule made of too much abstraction:
"Minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !"
So how is efficiency constrained ?
I said before the following:
"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"
So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at best, and since morality in the dictionary is also a Virtuous conduct, so i think my definition of morality that it is perfection at best is logical.
Here is the definition of morality in the dictionary, look at it and you will notice that it also means Virtuous conduct:
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/morality
And read more here in the Business dictionary:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/morality.html
It says also that morality is:
"Conformance to a recognized code, doctrine, or system of rules of what is right or wrong and to behave accordingly."
So as you are noticing that morality is also to "behave" accordingly to
the system of rules, so i think my definition of morality that it is perfection at best is logical.
And what about compassion in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also
helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect
helping others and to know how to help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
More philosophy about the philosophy of the Joker in the movie the Joker..
I have just looked at the following interesting video about the Joker in the movie of the Joker:
JOKER | Psychology & Philosophy (based on Carl Jung & Albert Camus)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wCYi3EbNnA
We have to be more smart and notice that the Joker in the movie of the Joker is a person that bases his morality on individual morality
that is subjective and that is not universal morality of human morality,
and as you have noticed in the above video that it says that the philosopher Albert Camus believed that life is "absurd", but i don't think that the philosopher Albert Camus is right by saying so, and i don't think the Joker is right, because universal morality is perfection that moves towards absolute perfection to be able to be absolute perfection or absolute happiness(read my proof below about what is
morality to understand), other than that you have also to know how to tune this perfection and this is part of what is universal morality, other than that to be encouraged to be this movement of perfection towards absolute perfection, you have to know about my rule that is: "More perfection brings satisfaction.." because as i said:
As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:
"First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""
But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material.
And more political philosophy about money to understand more:
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit.
So as i said above universal morality does exist and it pushes us forward (read about it in my thoughts of my political philosophy below), now can we ask the question of: if universal beauty does exist ? i think
it does exist, and here is what i said about it:
More philosophy about universality of beauty..
I was just reading the following webpage:
The myth of universal beauty
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
And notice that the webpage starts by saying:
"The myth of universal beauty"
So here we have to be more smart, i think to answer this question
of: Is beauty universal ? it is by logical analogy as measuring
the truth quantitatively or qualitatively, so if you measure
the truth by quantity, we can not be "certain" of the truthfulness,
but if we measure it by enough "quality" that gives the truth,
so it will be truth, this is the key to answering the question,
so beauty must be measured by enough quality of "smartness", not
by quantity, so then it is this smartness that sees what is
beauty, and this way of doing is the way of a civilized society,
so this is why i think that we can find characteristics of beauty
that are "universal". So then i don't agree with the above
webpage that says: "The myth of universal beauty".
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
More political philosophy about the intellectual and the material..
As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:
"First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""
But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material.
More political philosophy about money..
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit.
More political philosophy about "Achieving Your Potential":
I have just looked at the following video of
Garry Kasparov:
Garry Kasparov on "Achieving Your Potential"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPT0vg_Jl8Q
And i think that , in this video, Garry Kasparov is not so efficient
in his thinking, because like in psychology or philosophy
he must like shows the essence, i mean he must show the primitives
that permits to "achieve your potential", so i will explain:
First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
But be smart and notice that the result of my Rule that is this satisfaction is also a balance of the individual satisfaction and the satisfaction of the society and the world, so it constrains your image to be in accordance with morality that takes care correctly of the society and the world, so i think that it becomes more clear that those two engines are really powerful too and they permit to achieve your potential.
Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to
understand more:
More political philosophy about political correctness..
Now in political philosophy can we ask the question of:
Do we have to be political correctness or not ?
I think to be smart you have to define political correctness..
So then can we in political philosophy ask what is political correctness ?
I think that you have to know about morality to be able to answer this question, and you will notice in my logical proof below that i think a correct abstraction of what is morality is: "perfection at best", so why i am choosing such abstraction ? because we have to be perfection in action by also being an effort of being more perfection, so then you are noticing that morality must be pushed forward towards absolute perfection, but perfection at best is also that we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, so then now you are noticing that morality is also this effort of helping others and it is also perfection in action towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, so then you are noticing that independently of democracy we can now notice that morality is also this act of balancing between perfection of helping others and perfection of moving forward towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, and now you are noticing that when you look at today world you are feeling that our today world is converging fast towards this essence of morality of human beings, and now you are finally noticing that you are able to see that this essence of morality
also dictates to us a kind of political correctness. So read the rest of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
more:
More about compassion in political philosophy..
And what about compassion in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also
helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect
helping others and to know how to help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
More political philosophy of: What is morality ?
Am i crazy by saying that you have to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" ?
No, i am not crazy , since i am like a wise man type of person, so
i will explain more:
When i say that you have to follow the Rule of:
""More perfection brings satisfaction"
You have to understand that i have abstracted the definition of morality to: "Perfection at best" (read my proof below of it), and the "at best"
must be defined more, and you will notice in my below writing that
i have defined more what is the "at best" of "perfection at best" so
that you understand that morality is the act of perfectionning at best that is constrained by some constraints, so to not be extremism or radicalism of perfection, such as neo-nazism, that is problematic, you have to read about those constraints in my below writing, so then you are understanding that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" is also constrained by the same constraints of morality of today such as under democracy etc., so read all my following writing so that you
understand my political philosophy..
More political philosophy about life..
I think that there is many engines that push us forward,
but i don't think that we have to return to racial white nationalism,
because it can bring with it many problems such as hate between different races, so i think that the best engine is to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction..", this is i think the smartest way to follow, so read about it in my following writing to understand more:
More political philosophy about morality..
More about the efficient spirit..
When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.
Read my previous thoughts to understand:
More political philosophy about the efficient spirit..
I am like a wise man type of person, and now i will speak more
about what is a beautiful spirit..
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. And please
read my below thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
And now more political philosophy..
I think it is a beautiful day, what do i mean by beautiful day?,
i am like a wise man type of person and i am able to notice it,
notice that Diversity has brought perfection, but you have to notice more, so look at my following poem of Love to notice:
==========================
You're In My Heart
Like the long way from the start
That brings the beautiful "insight"
You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark
You're In My Heart
Because it is far from the evil fight
Because it is like the words of the almight
You're In My Heart
Because we are beautiful from the inside
Because our Love is right !
So I want to take you in my arms
Like peace and love that disarm
I want to take you in my arms
Since i am here to make it fine
I want to take you in my arms
Since love is also like a beautiful cup of wine
I want to take you in my arms
Since the light of my heart is making our love shines
I want to take you in my arms
Since our destiny is the beautiful of the Day of Valentine !
=======================
And notice in my above poem of Love that i am saying:
"You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark"
So as you are noticing the day and night means also symbolically
the night of humanity, that means the bad of our humanity, and both
the day and night of humanity have allowed us also to see in the dark,
so you have to understand my poem of Love, this is the basis
of the principle of: the right Diversity gives perfection,
but you have to be more smart, today we are able to adapt
quickly to the bad of our humanity and be much more wisdom
because we are much more aware and much conscious and much more
educated because of the sophistication of education and the sophistication of internet and such, this is why i think that
arab countries will adapt quickly, so i think that we have to be more
optimistic about arabs and about our world.
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
More political philosophy about beautifulness..
I am like a wise man type of person, so i am a special person like
a wise man, and i am a gentleman type of person, so i am beautiful
from the inside, since you have also noticed that i wrote many
poems in front of you.. but today i will continu to speak
about an important subject and it is the one of beautifulness,
so i will begin it by ask the question of:
Is my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction"
beautiful or not ?
So here you will notice that you have to be a wise man to notice
that this rule is so important but it also brings much more beautifulness !
Since you can feel it by also noticing the following principle of: the right Diversity brings perfection, and you can notice it in the following video of a beautiful indian song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnCIjfkPooo
Look at how they are being beautiful like beautiful westerners,
since this diversity is becoming perfection ! and this is what is bringing exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns, you can feel more this important principle by my following writing:
Now i think there is something really important about the essence of humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality is perfection at best (read below my proof of it), and the goal to attain is the goal of life that is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity" has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality" has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below to notice it).
More political philosophy about tolerance..
I am like a "wise" man type of person, and i am a gentleman type of person..
Today i will do more political philosophy about tolerance,
i will start it by asking the following smart question:
What is this Statue of Liberty in USA and what is Liberty ?
You can be inferiority, and think that Liberty is just like being free from constraints ! but a great philosopher knows Liberty comes with the right constraints so that to be the right Liberty that is the right morality , so here again we notice that Liberty too is constrained by morality, because morality is like the King, and now you are noticing more and more that a great philosopher says that political philosophy must be a transcendence with a sophisticated thinking ! and since i am like a wise man, notice with me that the main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight", from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more "hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more savage instincts in the right direction, so here again you notice that Buddha was right about this, but since i am
like a wise man, i will be more precise about the how to attain a
state of Serenity, so i will start it by giving an example of mathematical logic:
(a -> b) AND (b -> c) gives (a -> c)
Note: the -> symbol is what we know as: logical implication.
This is a little "theorem", so from this theorem you will notice that
there is important requirements to be able to obtain the logical result of (a -> c), and those "requirements" are from knowledge and smartness and
consciousness that help us to understand what is the logical implication of: (a -> b), i will not get into more details, but notice that to be
able to understand how do we get to the result, we have to understand
what is (a -> b), so now you are understanding the principle of a great philosopher that is that you have to think with sophistication so that
to understand what's Liberty or what is this or that, and now i will say that from my important rule that i talked about previously that is: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", is i think the rule to attain serenity, because since you are maximizing at best satisfaction by effort of being more perfection, so i think this brings more "serenity", and i will say that this important rule of:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" looks by
logical analogy at the following principle that i talked about previously that is the following:
In science there is very important principle that is:
There are appearances and there are realities, and there is the false and there is the truth, so you have to know that in science we are "not" confident with the appearances , that means what you see may not be what you get or what is truth , so now you are understanding the first principle of science.
This is the same in political philosophy, political philosophy is also like science, because in political philosophy we have not to be confident with the appearances or with what we see, this is why you have seen me in my previous post asking a question in political philosophy such as: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency ? and why am i answering this question, it is because in political philosophy we are not confident with the appearances or with what we see ! because we have to get inside and understand the truth correctly so that also to know if
we are "safe" from something, it is also about safety !. So now you are noticing that in political philosophy, we have to be this first principle of science that i just talked about above, and we have to be "efficiency" and we have to know if compassion and love are inherent to efficiency, i think this is my "abstraction" of what is political philosophy.
And what is the essence of human smartness ?
This is a good subject of political philosophy..
So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..
Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..
But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.
But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?
It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things.
About smartness and how to measure it..
I think that in IQ tests smartness is measured by a level of difficulty,
so you have to solve a certain level of difficulty. So it is relative to
a certain level of difficulty of the IQ tests such as those of Mensa or such. But i think if we are smart and we lower the level of difficulty by for example easying the understanding of knowledge and science and technics, so i think that we are going to become more smart and more capable at smartness. This is why i also say the following:
Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy..
Can we ask the question of: What must be an efficient Pedagogy today?,
i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress
and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy,
because today we have to be more efficient at learning,
because i think that the level of sophistication of today
is much more than the past and i think that this has
as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than
the past to be able to be efficient learning, i think that this is
the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that
we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for
learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right tool must be made more "easier", now you are noticing
that the parts of efficient learning are becoming more clear,
this is why i said before in my political philosophy
the following that permits you to understand more what i am saying:
What is happening in my brain ?
I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since
it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable
of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that
to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able
to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction,
first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better,
first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because
to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example
at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know, because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient.
Also i said the following about smartness:
I think there is a diversity in the set that we call people, but
we have to understand that to be able to classify them by smartness,
we have to understand that there is not only "IQ" as we know it
that can measure smartness, because i say that there is a missing important part, this is why i say the way of measuring by IQ is still fuzzy, because i say that statistically we can see that a missing important part is that a human can be genetically like more articulated in his thinking and that is like more constancy of more calculations and/or more constancy of more logic and more constancy of more rationality, it is like being like a computer that calculates more and that is logical more and that is rationality more, and this how i am in real life, and this is also the missing part of smartness that is not measured by IQ because it is more dynamic.
And here is also what i said previously:
I am like a genius, because i have invented many scalable algorithms and i am inventing many scalable algorithms, you have to see me to believe, this is why i am talking here, i have showed you some of my scalable algorithms that i have invented, but this is not all, because i have invented many other scalable algorithms that i have not showed you here, and here is one more new invention that i have just
invented right now:
If you have noticed i have just implemented my EasyList here:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/easylist-for-delphi-and-freepascal
But i have just enhanced its algorithm to be scalable in the Add() method and in the search methods, but it is not all , i will use for
that my just new invention that is my generally scalable counting networks, also its parallel sort algorithm will become much much more scalable , because i will use for that my other invention of my fully my scalable Threadpool, and it will use a fully scalable parallel merging algorithm , and read below about my just new invention of generally scalable counting networks:
Here is my new invention of a scalable algorithm:
I have just read the following PhD paper about the invention that we call counting networks and they are better than Software combining trees:
Counting Networks
http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/AHS.pdf
And i have read the following PhD paper:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/HLS.pdf
So as you are noticing they are saying in the conclusion that:
"Software combining trees and counting networks which are the only techniques we observed to be truly scalable"
But i just found that this counting networks algorithm is not generally scalable, and i have the logical proof here, this is why i have just come with a new invention that enhance the counting networks algorithm to be generally scalable. And i think i will sell my new algorithm of a generally scalable counting networks to Microsoft or Google or Embarcadero or such
software companies.
So you have to be careful with the actual counting networks algorithm that is not generally scalable.
My other new invention is my scalable reference counting and here it is:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
And my other new invention is my scalable Fast Mutex that is really powerful, and here it is:
About fair and unfair locking..
I have just read the following lead engineer at Amazon:
Highly contended and fair locking in Java
https://brooker.co.za/blog/2012/09/10/locking.html
So as you are noticing that you can use unfair locking that can have starvation or fair locking that is slower than unfair locking.
I think that Microsoft synchronization objects like the Windows critical section uses unfair locking, but they still can have starvation.
But i think that this not the good way to do, because i am an inventor and i have invented a scalable Fast Mutex that is much more powerful , because with my Fast Mutex you are capable to tune the "fairness" of the lock, and my Fast Mutex is capable of more than that, read about it on my following thoughts:
More about research and software development..
I have just looked at the following new video:
Why is coding so hard...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAAXwrgd1U8
I am understanding this video, but i have to explain my work:
I am not like this techlead in the video above, because i am also an "inventor" that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementions, i am also inventing effective abstractions, i give you an example:
Read the following of the senior research scientist that is called Dave Dice:
Preemption tolerant MCS locks
https://blogs.oracle.com/dave/preemption-tolerant-mcs-locks
As you are noticing he is trying to invent a new lock that is preemption tolerant, but his lock lacks some important characteristics, this is why i have just invented a new Fast Mutex that is adaptative and that is much much better and i think mine is the "best", and i think you will not find it anywhere, my new Fast Mutex has the following characteristics:
1- Starvation-free
2- Tunable fairness
3- It keeps efficiently and very low its cache coherence traffic
4- Very good fast path performance
5- And it has a good preemption tolerance.
this is how i am an "inventor", and i have also invented other scalable algorithms such as a scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and i have invented a fully scalable Threadpool, and i have also invented a Fully scalable FIFO queue, and i have also invented other scalable algorithms and there implementations, and i think i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or Embarcadero or such software companies.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
About minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !
As you have noticed i just written previously the following:
------
"More philosophy of what is it to be a genius ?
You have just noticed that i said in one of my previous posts that i am "like" a genius, but you have to understand the "like", that doesn't mean that i am a genius, but perhaps that i am a genius ! but i will try to make you understand "more" what is it to be a genius: i think that you have to understand the following rule that says: You have to know how to minimize at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency ! and this is the rule that i am following, and i think this rule is the most important goal that a genius wants to attain ! and when you understand it , you will become much more smart ! a genius wants first to do from simple things or simple few things great things ! so you have to understand it, so it brings us to the question of how to make from simple things, or simple few things, great things ? and this rule looks like minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !"
------
So can we ask the question of is the following rule made of too much abstraction:
"Minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !"
So how is efficiency constrained ?
I said before the following:
"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"
So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at best, and since morality in the dictionary is also a Virtuous conduct, so i think my definition of morality that it is perfection at best is logical.
Here is the definition of morality in the dictionary, look at it and you will notice that it also means Virtuous conduct:
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/morality
And read more here in the Business dictionary:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/morality.html
It says also that morality is:
"Conformance to a recognized code, doctrine, or system of rules of what is right or wrong and to behave accordingly."
So as you are noticing that morality is also to "behave" accordingly to
the system of rules, so i think my definition of morality that it is perfection at best is logical.
And what about compassion in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also
helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect
helping others and to know how to help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
More philosophy about the philosophy of the Joker in the movie the Joker..
I have just looked at the following interesting video about the Joker in the movie of the Joker:
JOKER | Psychology & Philosophy (based on Carl Jung & Albert Camus)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wCYi3EbNnA
We have to be more smart and notice that the Joker in the movie of the Joker is a person that bases his morality on individual morality
that is subjective and that is not universal morality of human morality,
and as you have noticed in the above video that it says that the philosopher Albert Camus believed that life is "absurd", but i don't think that the philosopher Albert Camus is right by saying so, and i don't think the Joker is right, because universal morality is perfection that moves towards absolute perfection to be able to be absolute perfection or absolute happiness(read my proof below about what is
morality to understand), other than that you have also to know how to tune this perfection and this is part of what is universal morality, other than that to be encouraged to be this movement of perfection towards absolute perfection, you have to know about my rule that is: "More perfection brings satisfaction.." because as i said:
As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:
"First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""
But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material.
And more political philosophy about money to understand more:
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit.
So as i said above universal morality does exist and it pushes us forward (read about it in my thoughts of my political philosophy below), now can we ask the question of: if universal beauty does exist ? i think
it does exist, and here is what i said about it:
More philosophy about universality of beauty..
I was just reading the following webpage:
The myth of universal beauty
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
And notice that the webpage starts by saying:
"The myth of universal beauty"
So here we have to be more smart, i think to answer this question
of: Is beauty universal ? it is by logical analogy as measuring
the truth quantitatively or qualitatively, so if you measure
the truth by quantity, we can not be "certain" of the truthfulness,
but if we measure it by enough "quality" that gives the truth,
so it will be truth, this is the key to answering the question,
so beauty must be measured by enough quality of "smartness", not
by quantity, so then it is this smartness that sees what is
beauty, and this way of doing is the way of a civilized society,
so this is why i think that we can find characteristics of beauty
that are "universal". So then i don't agree with the above
webpage that says: "The myth of universal beauty".
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
More political philosophy about the intellectual and the material..
As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:
"First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""
But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material.
More political philosophy about money..
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit.
More political philosophy about "Achieving Your Potential":
I have just looked at the following video of
Garry Kasparov:
Garry Kasparov on "Achieving Your Potential"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPT0vg_Jl8Q
And i think that , in this video, Garry Kasparov is not so efficient
in his thinking, because like in psychology or philosophy
he must like shows the essence, i mean he must show the primitives
that permits to "achieve your potential", so i will explain:
First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and
taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you
forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:
"More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine
that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,
since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction
as i explained it to you by saying:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
But be smart and notice that the result of my Rule that is this satisfaction is also a balance of the individual satisfaction and the satisfaction of the society and the world, so it constrains your image to be in accordance with morality that takes care correctly of the society and the world, so i think that it becomes more clear that those two engines are really powerful too and they permit to achieve your potential.
Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to
understand more:
More political philosophy about political correctness..
Now in political philosophy can we ask the question of:
Do we have to be political correctness or not ?
I think to be smart you have to define political correctness..
So then can we in political philosophy ask what is political correctness ?
I think that you have to know about morality to be able to answer this question, and you will notice in my logical proof below that i think a correct abstraction of what is morality is: "perfection at best", so why i am choosing such abstraction ? because we have to be perfection in action by also being an effort of being more perfection, so then you are noticing that morality must be pushed forward towards absolute perfection, but perfection at best is also that we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, so then now you are noticing that morality is also this effort of helping others and it is also perfection in action towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, so then you are noticing that independently of democracy we can now notice that morality is also this act of balancing between perfection of helping others and perfection of moving forward towards absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, and now you are noticing that when you look at today world you are feeling that our today world is converging fast towards this essence of morality of human beings, and now you are finally noticing that you are able to see that this essence of morality
also dictates to us a kind of political correctness. So read the rest of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
more:
More about compassion in political philosophy..
And what about compassion in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also
helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect
helping others and to know how to help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
More political philosophy of: What is morality ?
Am i crazy by saying that you have to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" ?
No, i am not crazy , since i am like a wise man type of person, so
i will explain more:
When i say that you have to follow the Rule of:
""More perfection brings satisfaction"
You have to understand that i have abstracted the definition of morality to: "Perfection at best" (read my proof below of it), and the "at best"
must be defined more, and you will notice in my below writing that
i have defined more what is the "at best" of "perfection at best" so
that you understand that morality is the act of perfectionning at best that is constrained by some constraints, so to not be extremism or radicalism of perfection, such as neo-nazism, that is problematic, you have to read about those constraints in my below writing, so then you are understanding that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" is also constrained by the same constraints of morality of today such as under democracy etc., so read all my following writing so that you
understand my political philosophy..
More political philosophy about life..
I think that there is many engines that push us forward,
but i don't think that we have to return to racial white nationalism,
because it can bring with it many problems such as hate between different races, so i think that the best engine is to follow my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction..", this is i think the smartest way to follow, so read about it in my following writing to understand more:
More political philosophy about morality..
More about the efficient spirit..
When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit.
Read my previous thoughts to understand:
More political philosophy about the efficient spirit..
I am like a wise man type of person, and now i will speak more
about what is a beautiful spirit..
When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,
you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and
dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. And please
read my below thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
And now more political philosophy..
I think it is a beautiful day, what do i mean by beautiful day?,
i am like a wise man type of person and i am able to notice it,
notice that Diversity has brought perfection, but you have to notice more, so look at my following poem of Love to notice:
==========================
You're In My Heart
Like the long way from the start
That brings the beautiful "insight"
You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark
You're In My Heart
Because it is far from the evil fight
Because it is like the words of the almight
You're In My Heart
Because we are beautiful from the inside
Because our Love is right !
So I want to take you in my arms
Like peace and love that disarm
I want to take you in my arms
Since i am here to make it fine
I want to take you in my arms
Since love is also like a beautiful cup of wine
I want to take you in my arms
Since the light of my heart is making our love shines
I want to take you in my arms
Since our destiny is the beautiful of the Day of Valentine !
=======================
And notice in my above poem of Love that i am saying:
"You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark"
So as you are noticing the day and night means also symbolically
the night of humanity, that means the bad of our humanity, and both
the day and night of humanity have allowed us also to see in the dark,
so you have to understand my poem of Love, this is the basis
of the principle of: the right Diversity gives perfection,
but you have to be more smart, today we are able to adapt
quickly to the bad of our humanity and be much more wisdom
because we are much more aware and much conscious and much more
educated because of the sophistication of education and the sophistication of internet and such, this is why i think that
arab countries will adapt quickly, so i think that we have to be more
optimistic about arabs and about our world.
Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:
More political philosophy about beautifulness..
I am like a wise man type of person, so i am a special person like
a wise man, and i am a gentleman type of person, so i am beautiful
from the inside, since you have also noticed that i wrote many
poems in front of you.. but today i will continu to speak
about an important subject and it is the one of beautifulness,
so i will begin it by ask the question of:
Is my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction"
beautiful or not ?
So here you will notice that you have to be a wise man to notice
that this rule is so important but it also brings much more beautifulness !
Since you can feel it by also noticing the following principle of: the right Diversity brings perfection, and you can notice it in the following video of a beautiful indian song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnCIjfkPooo
Look at how they are being beautiful like beautiful westerners,
since this diversity is becoming perfection ! and this is what is bringing exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns, you can feel more this important principle by my following writing:
Now i think there is something really important about the essence of humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality is perfection at best (read below my proof of it), and the goal to attain is the goal of life that is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity" has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality" has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below to notice it).
More political philosophy about tolerance..
I am like a "wise" man type of person, and i am a gentleman type of person..
Today i will do more political philosophy about tolerance,
i will start it by asking the following smart question:
What is this Statue of Liberty in USA and what is Liberty ?
You can be inferiority, and think that Liberty is just like being free from constraints ! but a great philosopher knows Liberty comes with the right constraints so that to be the right Liberty that is the right morality , so here again we notice that Liberty too is constrained by morality, because morality is like the King, and now you are noticing more and more that a great philosopher says that political philosophy must be a transcendence with a sophisticated thinking ! and since i am like a wise man, notice with me that the main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight", from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more "hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more savage instincts in the right direction, so here again you notice that Buddha was right about this, but since i am
like a wise man, i will be more precise about the how to attain a
state of Serenity, so i will start it by giving an example of mathematical logic:
(a -> b) AND (b -> c) gives (a -> c)
Note: the -> symbol is what we know as: logical implication.
This is a little "theorem", so from this theorem you will notice that
there is important requirements to be able to obtain the logical result of (a -> c), and those "requirements" are from knowledge and smartness and
consciousness that help us to understand what is the logical implication of: (a -> b), i will not get into more details, but notice that to be
able to understand how do we get to the result, we have to understand
what is (a -> b), so now you are understanding the principle of a great philosopher that is that you have to think with sophistication so that
to understand what's Liberty or what is this or that, and now i will say that from my important rule that i talked about previously that is: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", is i think the rule to attain serenity, because since you are maximizing at best satisfaction by effort of being more perfection, so i think this brings more "serenity", and i will say that this important rule of:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" looks by
logical analogy at the following principle that i talked about previously that is the following:
In science there is very important principle that is:
There are appearances and there are realities, and there is the false and there is the truth, so you have to know that in science we are "not" confident with the appearances , that means what you see may not be what you get or what is truth , so now you are understanding the first principle of science.
This is the same in political philosophy, political philosophy is also like science, because in political philosophy we have not to be confident with the appearances or with what we see, this is why you have seen me in my previous post asking a question in political philosophy such as: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency ? and why am i answering this question, it is because in political philosophy we are not confident with the appearances or with what we see ! because we have to get inside and understand the truth correctly so that also to know if
we are "safe" from something, it is also about safety !. So now you are noticing that in political philosophy, we have to be this first principle of science that i just talked about above, and we have to be "efficiency" and we have to know if compassion and love are inherent to efficiency, i think this is my "abstraction" of what is political philosophy.
And what is the essence of human smartness ?
This is a good subject of political philosophy..
So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..
Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..
But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.
But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?
It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to invent new things.
About smartness and how to measure it..
I think that in IQ tests smartness is measured by a level of difficulty,
so you have to solve a certain level of difficulty. So it is relative to
a certain level of difficulty of the IQ tests such as those of Mensa or such. But i think if we are smart and we lower the level of difficulty by for example easying the understanding of knowledge and science and technics, so i think that we are going to become more smart and more capable at smartness. This is why i also say the following:
Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy..
Can we ask the question of: What must be an efficient Pedagogy today?,
i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress
and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy,
because today we have to be more efficient at learning,
because i think that the level of sophistication of today
is much more than the past and i think that this has
as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than
the past to be able to be efficient learning, i think that this is
the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that
we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for
learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right tool must be made more "easier", now you are noticing
that the parts of efficient learning are becoming more clear,
this is why i said before in my political philosophy
the following that permits you to understand more what i am saying:
What is happening in my brain ?
I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since
it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable
of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that
to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able
to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction,
first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better,
first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because
to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example
at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know, because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient.
Also i said the following about smartness:
I think there is a diversity in the set that we call people, but
we have to understand that to be able to classify them by smartness,
we have to understand that there is not only "IQ" as we know it
that can measure smartness, because i say that there is a missing important part, this is why i say the way of measuring by IQ is still fuzzy, because i say that statistically we can see that a missing important part is that a human can be genetically like more articulated in his thinking and that is like more constancy of more calculations and/or more constancy of more logic and more constancy of more rationality, it is like being like a computer that calculates more and that is logical more and that is rationality more, and this how i am in real life, and this is also the missing part of smartness that is not measured by IQ because it is more dynamic.
And here is also what i said previously:
I am like a genius, because i have invented many scalable algorithms and i am inventing many scalable algorithms, you have to see me to believe, this is why i am talking here, i have showed you some of my scalable algorithms that i have invented, but this is not all, because i have invented many other scalable algorithms that i have not showed you here, and here is one more new invention that i have just
invented right now:
If you have noticed i have just implemented my EasyList here:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/easylist-for-delphi-and-freepascal
But i have just enhanced its algorithm to be scalable in the Add() method and in the search methods, but it is not all , i will use for
that my just new invention that is my generally scalable counting networks, also its parallel sort algorithm will become much much more scalable , because i will use for that my other invention of my fully my scalable Threadpool, and it will use a fully scalable parallel merging algorithm , and read below about my just new invention of generally scalable counting networks:
Here is my new invention of a scalable algorithm:
I have just read the following PhD paper about the invention that we call counting networks and they are better than Software combining trees:
Counting Networks
http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/AHS.pdf
And i have read the following PhD paper:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/HLS.pdf
So as you are noticing they are saying in the conclusion that:
"Software combining trees and counting networks which are the only techniques we observed to be truly scalable"
But i just found that this counting networks algorithm is not generally scalable, and i have the logical proof here, this is why i have just come with a new invention that enhance the counting networks algorithm to be generally scalable. And i think i will sell my new algorithm of a generally scalable counting networks to Microsoft or Google or Embarcadero or such
software companies.
So you have to be careful with the actual counting networks algorithm that is not generally scalable.
My other new invention is my scalable reference counting and here it is:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
And my other new invention is my scalable Fast Mutex that is really powerful, and here it is:
About fair and unfair locking..
I have just read the following lead engineer at Amazon:
Highly contended and fair locking in Java
https://brooker.co.za/blog/2012/09/10/locking.html
So as you are noticing that you can use unfair locking that can have starvation or fair locking that is slower than unfair locking.
I think that Microsoft synchronization objects like the Windows critical section uses unfair locking, but they still can have starvation.
But i think that this not the good way to do, because i am an inventor and i have invented a scalable Fast Mutex that is much more powerful , because with my Fast Mutex you are capable to tune the "fairness" of the lock, and my Fast Mutex is capable of more than that, read about it on my following thoughts:
More about research and software development..
I have just looked at the following new video:
Why is coding so hard...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAAXwrgd1U8
I am understanding this video, but i have to explain my work:
I am not like this techlead in the video above, because i am also an "inventor" that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementions, i am also inventing effective abstractions, i give you an example:
Read the following of the senior research scientist that is called Dave Dice:
Preemption tolerant MCS locks
https://blogs.oracle.com/dave/preemption-tolerant-mcs-locks
As you are noticing he is trying to invent a new lock that is preemption tolerant, but his lock lacks some important characteristics, this is why i have just invented a new Fast Mutex that is adaptative and that is much much better and i think mine is the "best", and i think you will not find it anywhere, my new Fast Mutex has the following characteristics:
1- Starvation-free
2- Tunable fairness
3- It keeps efficiently and very low its cache coherence traffic
4- Very good fast path performance
5- And it has a good preemption tolerance.
this is how i am an "inventor", and i have also invented other scalable algorithms such as a scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and i have invented a fully scalable Threadpool, and i have also invented a Fully scalable FIFO queue, and i have also invented other scalable algorithms and there implementations, and i think i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or Embarcadero or such software companies.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages