Intelli2
unread,Dec 6, 2017, 5:04:39 PM12/6/17You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Hello..
Read this:
==
Visual Studio is not really comparable to C++ Builder.
Yes they are both C++ compilers but:
1- Visual Studio is only RAD when using .NET languages
2- MFC is 'semi-rad' but does not come close to ease of use of VCL
3- Visual Studio compiler is better at producing optimized code, but C++
Builder uses Clang which is pretty good
4- Visual Studio and C++Builder are both standards compliant (CB using
Clang-based compilers)
5- C++ Builder comes with Boost
6- C++ Builder XE is much better than previous versions (not including
Builder C++ 6.0)
7- You can't beat the RAD tools in C++ Builder for C++ development,
nothing comes close
The biggest recommendation I can make is DO NOT MOVE TO MFC, that's
where the pain starts.
With all that said, when I was given a choice for a client between
moving to VS2008/2010 or Builder C++ for a new product, I picked
Builder, just for the RAD IDE.
==
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.