Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Visual Studio is not really comparable to C++ Builder

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Intelli2

unread,
Dec 6, 2017, 5:04:39 PM12/6/17
to
Hello..

Read this:

==

Visual Studio is not really comparable to C++ Builder.

Yes they are both C++ compilers but:

1- Visual Studio is only RAD when using .NET languages
2- MFC is 'semi-rad' but does not come close to ease of use of VCL
3- Visual Studio compiler is better at producing optimized code, but C++
Builder uses Clang which is pretty good
4- Visual Studio and C++Builder are both standards compliant (CB using
Clang-based compilers)
5- C++ Builder comes with Boost
6- C++ Builder XE is much better than previous versions (not including
Builder C++ 6.0)
7- You can't beat the RAD tools in C++ Builder for C++ development,
nothing comes close

The biggest recommendation I can make is DO NOT MOVE TO MFC, that's
where the pain starts.


With all that said, when I was given a choice for a client between
moving to VS2008/2010 or Builder C++ for a new product, I picked
Builder, just for the RAD IDE.

==


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages