We have to be more smart about communism of China..

[Horizon68]

Hello,,

Read this:



We have to be more smart about communism of China..

As you have noticed i said that democracy is more efficient in fighting
corruption, so i will give you an example, i said the following:


==
I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:

Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY
==


So here we are again at what we call "corruption", since how
can you be "confidence" with communism ? i mean that communism
of China says that it has also to "help" other third world countries and
such because it is communism that wants much more "equality", and this
can bring problems and inefficiencies, because communism can help others
by economically investing in other third world countries even if the
economic investments is inefficient because communism want to be much
more equality, and i think that this is what happened to communism
of China(look at the video above to notice it), and this can
be called corruption.


Read all the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


About socialism..

I think that there is a real "impact" of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.

Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.

This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:

It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.

Now about communism..

Is communism acceptable ?

I will try to answer this question:

First you have to read my thoughts of my political philosophy
below to understand more my thoughts and to understand that
an acceptable abstraction is also that i am defining
morality as perfection at best and i am defining more the "at best"
of perfection at best , please read my thoughts
of my political philosophy below to understand better.

Now comes the very important question:

Is communism acceptable ?

Is for example communism of China acceptable ?

So since as i have defined morality below that it is
perfection at best, so you have to notice that communism of China
has to "survive" to be able to be acceptable, so i think
the main advantage of communism of China is the capacity of China
that is its big population and also its quality
of smartness and its level of perfection, and i think that this is the
main advantage that makes communism of China be able to survive,
now since communism of China is more "apt" to survive, so the next
smart question is what is the nest very important thing
to notice about communism of China ? i think
communism of China is judging that its people has
to be more "controlled" by morality so that
to make successful morality, and since as i have
defined it , morality is perfection at best,
so we understand that morality is about perfectionning
and about perfection, this is the goal of morality, it is
to "perfect" and to perfect people, and this is why i think that even
though that the act of communism of China that is to control more
the people than the West to make them more perfect can be viewed as
extremism by the West, i think that morality
that is perfection at best can consider and define this act of communism
of China of controlling more the people to make them more "perfect"
as an act that is more "acceptable" by morality that is perfection at
best,but i think communism of China has a weakness that it is not as
efficient
as democracies of the West at fighting "corruption".

So now comes the next question:

Is democracy also an acceptable morality? i think that
we can consider democracy as acceptable because
it is a more efficient way to fight corruption and
its manner of controlling the people is a more soften way
than communism of China and this act of the western democracies is
considered like more humanist or more tolerance, but it is acceptable.

And to be more precision and more rationality, we have to ask why i am
saying that democracy is acceptable?

A "nihilistic" type of philosophy can say that our world is still
injustice , so our world is not acceptable , and since our world
that is a "set" is not acceptable , hence democracy that is part of our
world is not acceptable, and it can start to be more violent.

But we have to be careful because a nihilistic way of thinking
is an inferior thinking , but why is it an inferior thinking?
because we have to set correctly morality by saying to nihilistic
type of ideologies that our humanity is "advancing" because it wants to
give a chance by "effort" to being able to attain a more advanced
"perfection" that permits us to solve many of our problems and that
permits us to be happiness or absolute happiness, so this is the main
point that makes nihilistic type of philosophies not
acceptable, also read below what i am saying about Capitalism and
egoism and you will notice that we have not to be pessimistic. But there
is still an important thing to talk about , and that is the fact that we
have to "analyze" and "evaluate" correctly the "realities" of our
democracies more correctly , and we have to be careful with that because
we have not to "fall" into violence "easily", because
we have to be a correct sophistication that permits us to
set morality correctly, and i think that we have
not to be pessimistic about Donald Trump , because Donald Trump
has for example started a trade war with China because China
is not allowing full access to its Market, but America before
Donald Trump was allowing full access of its Market, so
Donald Trump is wanting to bring more "fairness", this is
why he has started a trade war with China, so we have not
to be "pessimistic" , because i think that this trade war
between USA and China will end with more fairness, also
i don't think that Donald Trump is a neo-nazi or a white supremacist,
and what about "populism" of the actual democracies? read below my
thoughts of my political philosophy to understand better.

And i think there is another problem of socialism and socialism of
China, and that is the following:

I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on
economic growth, productivity and innovation.

Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist
party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France.
He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes.
As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the
French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp,
the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign
investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the
effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is
indeed egalitarianism.

This is why i said on my thoughts of my political philosophy(read it
below) that:

It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the
effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.

Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand
better:

My political philosophy..

As promised, and so that you understand my previous poem,
here is many of my thoughts of my political philosophy, read them all to
understand my thoughts:

About my thoughts..

As you are noticing in my following thoughts of my political philosophy
that i am also talking economy and talking about economies of some
countries such as Russia and France and Dubai etc. i am choosing
"carefully" those countries to be able to talk about some important
things that we have to know about macroeconomics and that we have to
apply to be more efficient, please reread all my following thoughts of
my political philosophy to understand more:

In the Protestant work ethic, the first to justify, theologically and
morally, the idea of work for the job, The ardor at work being defined
as the confirmation of personal salvation. By rendering obsolete the
previous social and theological schemes in which the pursuit of profit
was contrary to the ideals of salvation and charity, the Protestant
ethic favored the great deployment of utilitarian and instrumental
logics. In short, the idea that capitalism is "natural" would be, above
all, a sociohistoric construction.

And notice that Utilitarianism is an ethical and philosophical theory
that states that the best action is the one that maximizes utility,
which is usually defined as that which produces the greatest well-being
of the greatest number of people

So as you are noticing that the Protestant work ethic was not so
realistic, because i think it was based too much on Utilitarianism, so i
think it was a kind of extremism, so as you are noticing that the
capitalism philosophy does build also a lot over race for profit and
over Utilitarianism too, so this can lead to problems if it gets too
extremistic , that means it gets on too much Utilitarianism and too
much race of profit that can cause problems to society and to humanity,
such as the "envirenmental" problems that we face today, so we have to
be careful and be responsable, but we have not to be pessimistic about
capitalism, because we are more aware today and we are today perfecting
ourselves more efficiently to be more capable of transending this kind
of problems.

Read the rest of my thoughts:

I have come to a very interesting subject of political philosophy..

Take for example the capitalism philosophy, generally, the definitions
of capitalism admit three common denominators: the private ownership of
the means of production, the free market and the competition between
economic actors. For classical economists, it is indeed these three
elements that, when they interact, allow the most efficient allocation
of resources, innovation, the maximization of production and therefore,
at the end of the day, the progress of societies. It appears, however,
that these dynamics can not be set in motion without a central element,
being to capitalism what essence is to the motor: the race for profit.

But we have to be more smart , there is not only race for profit in
capitalism but also "egoism" that interact to give for example
capitalism that is more nationalistic, for example neo-nazism is racial
nationalism that is built on "egoism", but in the eyes of communism this
egoism was a problem for communism , because national egoism in the past
has brought many problems to our humanity, so do we have to be
pessimistic about this sort of egoism ? i don't think so because
egoism is constrained by the consumer confidence index that we have
to higher globally and is constrained by the fact that we have
to give the necessary wages to others locally and around the world so
that to be able for others to "buy" our products, like has done it
Fordism, and notice also that today we are economically investing in
many third world countries because of there higher economical growth ,
so this is getting better and better, so we have not to be pessimistic,
and notice that the other criticism I make on the far right political
parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just
bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following:

Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.

When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).

For proof, read the following document:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm


And about U.S. multinationals..


I said yesterday the following:

==

About our world..

I have studied operational research, and you have to understand
a very important thing, you have to understand that science
and technology and economy have to follow some rules
of logistics in operational research, this is the deficiency
of neo-nazism and such violent ideologies, they are not
understanding the game of today that needs logistics
to be more successful, so the world has changed and neo-nazism
is not understanding this changing, changes such as you are seeing USA
companies coming to Morocco my country such as the following(this is
also following rules of logistics):

I am a white arab from Morocco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco:

http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx


I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is:

Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250


Read about DXC Technology here:

http://www.dxc.technology/


So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know
how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working
and investing in other countries such as Morocco !

So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA..

===


Read the following to understand more about U.S. multinationals:


• The worldwide operations of U.S. multinationals are highly
concentrated in America in their U.S. parents, not abroad in their
foreign affiliates. The idea that U.S. multinationals have somehow
“abandoned” the United States is not supported by the facts. They
maintain a large presence in America, both relative to the
overall U.S. economy and relative to the size of their foreign affiliates.

• International engagement drives the overall strength of U.S.
multinational companies. Although the United States is still the world’s
largest single-country market, in the past generation it has been a
slow-growth market compared with much of the world. Even with today’s
worldwide recession, this means that the overall strength of U.S.
multinationals is increasingly tied to their success in both America and
abroad. It also means that viewing the domestic and foreign operations
of U.S. multinationals as unrelated is increasingly incorrect. U.S.
multinationals must make strategic investment and employment decisions
from a truly global perspective, with links across all locations and
with dynamic variation in successful strategies both across
companies at a point in time and within companies over time.

• Foreign-affiliate activity tends to complement, not substitute for,
key parent activities in the United States such as employment, worker
compensation, and capital investment. Being globally engaged requires
U.S. multinationals to establish operations abroad and also to expand
and integrate these foreign activities with their U.S. parents. The idea
that global expansion tends to “hollow out” U.S. operations is
incorrect. Rather, the scale and scope of U.S. parent activities
increasingly depends on successful engagement abroad. Expansion by
U.S. parents and their affiliates contributes to the productivity and
average standard of living of all Americans.

Read more here:

https://www.uscib.org/docs/foundation_multinationals.pdf


And read all my following thoughts about economy..

About Russia's economy...

Read this:

Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?

The important characteristics of Switzerland are:

1. Rule of law

2. Optimization of the Government size

3. Regulatory efficiency

4. Open markets


Read more here:

https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/

So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong
economy, read the following to notice it:

"Russia’s transition from a centrally planned economy to a more
market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly
statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the
imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private
sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints
caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace.
Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate
the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak
protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term
economic development."

Read more here:

https://www.heritage.org/index/country/russia


I think China is having a problem, it is not the trade war, it is
the fact that it has done huge investments abroad, and many of those
investments abroad are "inefficient" investments , they are bad
investment, so it is causing to China more and more debt, and with this
China is taking too much "risk" can become "dangerous" for China,
here is the proof of that, look at this interesting video:

Is Xi Jinping HOLDING BACK Chinese EXPANSION?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raooYdCh7vY

And by analogy, because it is a risk that is dangerous, this risk that
is dangerous look like the following risk when i said:

==

I said:

"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "

Here is the proof, read the following:

In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.

Read more here:

Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis

https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/

==



Still about economy and quality..

Why Doesn’t DUBAI care about OIL?

Dubai has done the following to diversify and make successful its
economy and become rich:

- Lower taxes

- Special economic zones

- High degree of immigration freedom

- It has attracted more investment


Look at this video to know more about DUBAI:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEs1uOzt3KM


Still about quality

As you have noticed growth in France will lower
the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption
is also a way in economics to lower unemployment
more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to
build quality products and services like in Germany to be more
competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other
countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education
sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality,
because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in
being more effective in economy and education France will attract more
and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and
growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its
challenges and I think it is able to meet them.

Also I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because
look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators:

First look at the growth of France here:

"Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the
period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes
Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East -
Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees
in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to
decline, at a very measured pace . "

and look also at this about France:

According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on
Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report
recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This
indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the
inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to
remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to
train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the
world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet
produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy.

Read more here to notice it:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html

So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the
budget.

Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do:

I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can
we also do in France to unlock economic growth and reduce the rate of
unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size
of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes,
because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth
by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an
increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption
and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and
employment, so it reduces unemployment.

I have to be more precise about USA:

I said before on my previous post that:

"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "

Here is the proof, read the following:

In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.

Read more here:

Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis

https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/

So reread my following thoughts:

About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..

I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:

Questions:

What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?

Answer:

At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000.

Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:

Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.

The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:

Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.

When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).

For proof, read the following document:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm


And about immigration now:

Look at this following video about:

Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?

You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".

But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o



And now about a very important point about morality..

As you are noticing morality is not an "exact" science , but it has
to use rationality and use measure and use science so that to maximize
correctly "perfection" that is the "goal" of morality, so this is why i
am talking about the way of how to maximize correctly perfection by
showing why this or that "diversity" is necessary and this or that
"quantity" is necessary or this or that "quality" is necessary, this is
why you are noticing that i am for example speaking about "smartness" in
terms of or taking into account "quantity" and "diversity" and "quality"
so that you are able to set more correctly morality. Please reread all
my thoughts carefully to notice it:

I think that i am more positive about morality..

Because i am able to do much better political philosophy, so i am
able to feel more what is morality and what is today morality,
I think that morality of today democracies is a beautiful thing, and you
have to understand my way of doing to be able to make morality
successful, you have to think more efficiently by asking
for example the following questions:

- How to be "security" locally and globally , because
security is important.

- How to be the right "diversity" that gives the right perfection

- And how to be the right "quantity" that gives the right perfection.

- And how to be the right perfection.


Those are the important questions to ask , and you have to be
more efficient to answer them, because that's the most important
parts of morality, so this is why i am looking carefully at how
must we be this "diversity" that gives the right perfection,
and this "quantity" that gives the right perfection etc.
and you will notice that i am "prioritizing" like this
to be more successful in my political philosophy,
please read all my following thoughts to notice it:

About neo-nazis and white supremacists..

As you have noticed i am a white arab that is more sophisticated like a
thinker, so i am seeing neo-nazis or white supremacists as being
inferior thinking, why ? because they have the tendency to be
too violent and they have the tendency to see morality as if it
has to be like a pure morality, i mean that they are too much "purism"
of morality, so they want to purify the society from "imperfections" too
much ! so they are not understanding the requirements of today morality
! because the very basis of today morality is that it has to know how to
be the right "diversity" and the right "imperfections" and the right
"quantity" that bring the right perfection that is needed by morality !
but neo-nazis are not understanding the game of today morality because
they lack sophistication of political philosophy, so neo-nazis and white
supremacists wants "naively" to "purify" too much from imperfections,
because they are like purists of morality ! but there act is not in
accordance with science and with political philosophy. So i think that
they have to "reform" there political ideologies, and they have to read
my following thoughts to understand better:


About political philosophy..

As you are noticing i am a white arab that is more sophisticated type of
person, that is a more serious computer programmer and a more rational
type of person and a gentleman type of person, this is why i don't
believe in God, because God is not love and that's the important thing
to know.

Other than that you have seen me writing in front of you many poems of
love, and you have seen me posting about my software projects
and you have seen me speaking to you about my political philosophy,
but we have to be aware of the requirements, for example when we
say "righteousness" , what is it to be righteousness ? that's the
most important part of morality ! and to be more capable of morality
you have to know how to be the right diversity and the right perfection
and you have to be able to see what is bringing democracy to morality,
that's why i have posted more about my political philosophy, here
is again some of my thoughts and my architectural ideas of my political
philosophy, read them again to be able to understand my thoughts:


Now i have come to an interesting subject about philosophy..

I think you know me more now..

Now you have also to understand my way of doing, i am
trying to find a way that permits me to "model" more efficiently
"humanity", this is why you are seeing me answering some
questions such as: From where comes a scientific mind ?
and from where comes order ?

Now you have to understand my way, let's for example look at me,
as you have noticed i am a more "rational" type of person that
is more technical and that is mathematics and i am
also a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of person,
now let us return to the basis of being more "rational" type of person,
as you are noticing since i am more rational type of person,
this more rational, in me, permits me to be more "precise" and more
"measure" and more "logic" and more "rational", and this causes that it
makes me see less rational type of persons as "inferior" thinking, so
this more rational in me permits me to be higher level of quality of
thinking, and i am not a narcissist, but a narcissist has the same
effect as he want to be superior thinking, but a narcissist has an
abnormal behavior that leads him to problems in society, look
for example at Donald Trump, he is a narcissist type of person,
but he is having problems with his behavior that we can
judge as abnormal behavior that causes problems, so
as you have noticed i am not a narcissist, because i am
a gentleman type of person, but the very basis is that
i am being a higher level of quality of thinking because
i am a more rational type of person, so this permits
us to model more correctly humanity, this is why
you have seen me writing the following:

About quality and about security..

I am more "smart", and you have to understand my work,
being more rational is not sufficient, you have
to know how to play it "safer", and i am also showing you how to be able
to "model" our humanity, and i am showing you how to be "quality" and
how to be "security", first here is what i said about being more rational:

I have come to an interesting subject..

So i was asking myself the following question:

From where comes a scientific mind ?

I think i was able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:

When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.

Second, but being more rational that brings quality is not sufficient,
you have also to be security, and here is what i said about security:

How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?

This is an interesting subject of political philosophy..

Because even a violent ideology like nazism bases its ideology
on "order" first !

So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order !

You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied !

So from wich causes we get more order ?

I think that order comes from the fact that we are security
for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we
are security for oneself and others ? we are security
for oneself and others for different causes, here they
are:

1- We are good morality that takes
care of security.

2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security

3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system
as a critical system that needs the right requirements
for the right security both locally and globally.

4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself
or others.


And this is related to my following thoughts:

You have to understand Buddha

I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us
to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us
to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline
his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that
are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be
more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security
is also like love and compassion.

This is why i said before:

If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ?

I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this..

Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of
more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others
and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but
if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for
oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like
emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more
disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs
"security", so you have to be more capable, so
more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for
security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality
and more perfection.

But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of
today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit
us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more
"hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step,
psychology wants
also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and
"discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of
empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding
our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this
is like the main point of Buddha.

The main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight",
from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more
"hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you to guide your more
savage instincts in the right direction.

There is a smart question inherent to my previous question of:

How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ?

and it is:

Do we need to fear capitalism of today or fear "more" free market
internationally of today because it is not "order" ?

I think we have to understand the "spirit" of capitalism of today
to understand more what is happening, i think capitalism of today
is more "soften", and it ressembles a "sportive" competition,
but it can not be called a violent fight, because the actual capitalism
lives in a more appropriate "context" that constrain it to be more
respect ! because capitalism has to not ignore "Fordism", and has to not
ignore consumer confidence index that it must higher globally and
locally and this causes more respect, and high economic growth of many
countries like african countries and arab countries is more
attractive for economic investment etc. etc. and i think that this more
interconnected economies bring more peace and more stability and Fordism
has noticed it.

Philosophy about philosophy..

You will notice that i am more smart, because you have to understand
my way of doing political philosophy, so i will ask the following
question that will permit us ti understand more my way of doing
political philosophy:

Why are we doing political philosophy?

This type of question gives rise to something similar to human
Metathought, it is philosophy about philosophy, but how can
we address this problem of why are we doing political philosophy,
i think that by reading my political philosophy you will notice
that i am more smart because political philosophy is part of morality
that is perfection at best as i have proved it(read about it below), and
you will notice that this abstraction of my definition of morality is
also correct, but you have to define more the "at best" of perfection at
best that is morality, and now you will notice that it is the basis of
political philosophy, it is also about how to make "safer" morality, it
is also about "security", and this permits us to know more about
political philosophy, because as you will notice that "democracy" and
what we call the separation of powers in the USA system and other
systems all are today part of morality, this is a very important part of
morality ! and this democracy and separation of powers forces us more to
be more moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system and this is
also one of the most important parts of morality that permits morality
to be more safer today, this is why i will invite you to read all my
following thoughts to understand more my political philosophy:

Philosophy about science...

I have come to an interesting subject..

So i was asking myself the following question:

From where comes a scientific mind ?

I have been able to extract the architectural idea that answer this
question:

When you are a more rational type of person(i mean it is genetical in
you), you will for example use more logic and more measure and more
rationality, and this high level of quality of more rationality that you
have does permit you to be more "selective" of your type of culture,
because since you are more rationality, you will for example be able to
"recognize" the great importance of science and technology, so you will
start to give weights and priorities this technological and/or
scientific type of cultures, so you will start to give
a "much" higher priority to logic and to math and to philosophy or
political philosophy and to science, so since this culture is of great
importance you will choose more this type of culture, this is why this
will be reflected in your type of culture that you have. This is the
kind of person that genetically i am , i am a more rational type of
person, and i am a more wise type of person and i am a gentleman type of
person.

And please read my following thoughts, i have corrected a last typo in them:

About nihilism and such ideologies..

I am a white arab, and i am a more "wise" type of person, and i am a
gentleman kind of person, so i am more capable at thinking political
philosophy, and now i am coming to a very interesting subject..

As you are noticing today that people can become more violent
when they don't understand what is morality and when they don't
understand political philosophy, i will give you more of my wisdom
to understand me more:


What do you think is also morality ?

I have proved that morality is perfection at best, i think that
this definition is also correct because it shows that morality
has also to be perfectioning and to be correct efficiency so that to be
able to be successful ! but you have to be able to see more correctly
morality ! morality is not absolute perfection yet ! because
morality of today is constructing perfection by also needing
"imperfections" to be able to be the right perfection ! this is
how you have to be mature in political philosophy ! because
if you say that imperfections that are needed by morality so that
to be more efficient are not morality and you start to hate our world
and be violent with our world because of those imperfections that are
needed by morality to be more efficient , so it is like
a kind of "nihilism" ! and i think this is "immaturity" of morality !
look for example at neo-nazism , it is not accepting imperfections
of others that are needed by morality of today so that to be the right
perfection ! so they are not understanding the "game" of morality of
today ! i am not being pessimistic ! because morality of today is
accepting a certain level of imperfections so that to be the right
perfection and so that to be more efficient ! and this is what we call
maturity of morality that is perfection at best ! also we have not to be
pessimistic about morality that is perfection at best , because i have
defined more what is the "at best" of perfection at best so that you
understand more correctly what is morality of today and what is
morality. So read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

About political philosophy..

As you have noticed i am a white arab, i am not like religious man,
i want to do political philosophy to explain my ideas and my
architectural ideas, this is why you have seen me writing here
about political philosophy, now i have come to an interesting subject
of today, here it is:

We have to understand the requirements to be able to do political
philosophy..

I think political philosophy must use a "methodology" to be more
successful !

For example in political philosophy you will start by thinking about
sufficiency and reliability and efficiency and robustness and
flexibility and Security.

I give you an example to understand me more:

You can somewhat higher "flexibility" and this can somewhat lower
"reliability", and this can be "acceptable" if we start by giving
weights or priorities to processes or things.. i give you another
example to understand more: let say arabs like me(i am not religious ,
and i am speaking about arabs that are not religious), we can say that
eventhough arabs are overall less beautiful than white europeans, we are
bringing arab immigrants because it is good for productivity or/and
economy or/and the social system or/and the system, so we are giving
much higher priority to this facts than the fact of being as beautiful
as white europeans, so this is like somewhat highering flexibility and
this is somewhat lowering reliability and this causes that we are being
more efficient.

So now you are understanding more political philosophy, that you have
to be capable to "prioritize" to be able to be successful, and
you have to understand that political philosophy is also understanding
what is morality that is perfection at best and you have to be able
to define the "at best" of perfection at best to be successful,
and from here you will understand that you have to be the right
"diversity" that brings the right perfection, also in political
philosophy you have to be able to extract the architectural ideas that
are important and necessary for our political philosophy, and here again
read my following thoughts to understand better how i am doing it:

About wisdom and love..

Political philosophy is something really important,
but why am i doing political philosophy ? i am
doing it to be able to "extract" the "architectural" ideas that
are the way to follow and that permit us to walk in the right direction,
you have to be more "serious" about political philosophy, but how am i
extracting those architectural ideas? it is like wisdom
and more smartness in action ! and here again there is something really
important to notice, and it is: you will notice that my writing is
like wisdom , because wisdom is more important to be able to govern,
because with wisdom you are being a higher quality that is more
appropriate to be able to govern ! and why i am making this
"distinction" between wisdom and love ? first because wisdom of
today is like balancing the good and the bad to be able to be the right
perfection, so this makes wisdom superior to love or compassion, and
second, it is because it is related to morality that is perfection at
best as i have proved it, because when you are more naive you will think
that since morality is like perfection so morality is like "mathematics"
or like "efficiency" or it is like a "maximization" of perfection, so it
is like a "corruption" of morality since this can become dangerous, but
i think that this thinking is "inferiority" that doesn't understand
correctly morality of today, and to be able to understand morality you
have to be superiority of wisdom , because morality is perfection at
best , and you have to understand more what is the "at best" of
perfection at best to be able to be more optimistic about morality of
today, this is why
you have to read my following thoughts:


I am a white arab that is more wise, so you have to understand my way of
doing..

What about USA ?

You have to be smart, i don't think Donald Trump is a white supremacist
or a neo-nazi, because you have to understand more Donald Trump, Donald
Trump wants also "fairness", you will say that when Donald Trump
says that he wants USA to be great again that's not like fairness, but
i think that you are wrong because Donald Trump wants USA to be great
again and at the same time USA is allowing China (and others) to be
more competitive and to become great ! so thinking of Donald Trump is
like fairness thinking towards China and others ! this is why he has got
into trade war with China, because China was not more "fairness" because
it has not allowed full access to its Market etc. so China was too much
"protectionism", this is why Donald Trump is getting into a trade war
with China to force China to be more fairness, now you know me more that
i am not hating USA because it is an easy process that is not correct
thinking, because also hating our world is an easy process that is not
correct thinking ! because it is immaturity ! so we have to know how to
manage ourselves by first becoming more efficient locally inside a
country and globally around the world ! because you have to understand
me more, i am more "realism" and more "pragmatism" because i am seeing
that USA is also more fairness and efficiency by coming and investing
in Morocco my arab country, and you will ask what are USA investing in
Morocco ? read this and my writing follows:

I am a white arab from Moroco, here is US Companies Operating in Morocco:

http://heymorocco.com/american-companies-in-morocco.aspx


I think DXC Technology was not on the list, here it is:

Look at the following video about DXC Technology in Morocco:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ_MyKQ-250


Read about DXC Technology here:

http://www.dxc.technology/


So as you are noticing USA is also understanding that we have to know
how to work together to be more efficient ! this is why it is working
and investing in other countries such as Morocco !

So i think we have to be more optimistic about USA..


And about wisdom...


You have to understand my writing..

By what are you able to judge wisdom ?

By wisdom in itself !

So you have to be capable of choosing the right wisdom to be able
to govern, so you have to be able to be "high" quality that is the
right security that is able to choose the right wisdom.


But what is wisdom ?

I said below that wisdom of today is like being moderation, because
wisdom of today has to balance the bad and the good so that to be able
to be the right perfection of perfection at best that is morality,
so is wisdom corruption of morality ? if you are naive you will
say that since it is not good to balance the bad and good, so it
is not morality, but this is "immaturity", because you have to
understand what is morality and what is it to be "decent" morality today
to be able to decide, so read my writing below to understand more about
what is decent morality today and what is morality:

Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


About diversity...

I said in my previous poem the following:

"Our silence cry patience
And our hearts cries love and justice
Like the blue sky
Like the heartbeat of pretty birds
Since we hear the pretty song of the nightingales
And the oasis of the desert tells us about wisdom
Its wisdom that defies the tourmants of the desert
So we walk towards the light
Like a Rainbow
Because my story is multicolored
So I go back to my multicolored land
Because diversity is also wisdom"

So notice with me that i want to show that "diversity" is important by
saying also the following:

"Because diversity is also wisdom"


And as you have noticed that there is wisdom and there is love..

So is wisdom love or not ? or is wisdom "corruption" of morality ?

We have to be capable of political philosophy to understand "wisdom",
wisdom of today is also like a "moderation" that permits the society and
the world to avoid desorder and destruction(read my writing below about
morality to understand better) ! wisdom is something really important,
because when you say "love", it is "inherent" to love that
it is not capable to be a way of governing ! so we have to choose
a more appropriate way of governing ! and i think that wisdom is
also the way, but you have to be capable of political philosophy to
notice that wisdom can not be in contradiction with morality that
is perfection at best, but do we have to be pessismistic about
morality? i think that we have to be more optimistic because
i have explained more what must be the "at best" of perfection at
best that is morality, please read what's following to understand
more what is morality !

I will do more political philosophy, please read all my following
thoughts to understand better my thoughts:

I think "Flexibility" is also something really important in politics and
management, because nationalism and communism come with some
deficiencies because they lack flexibility, for example communism
still uses Class Struggle that is too violent and that can bring
war and destruction to our humanity, and neo-nazism also uses
Racial Struggle that is too violent that can bring war and destruction
to humanity, and nationalism also use National Struggle against the
others , but the problem of nationalism is that nationalism of today
lacks flexibility too because it is too much nationalism that is not in
accordance with a correct pragmatism or correct realism, nationalism of
today is by analogy as if you are too individualistic, i mean that
nationalism of today is not correct "efficiency", because also
nationalism of today, like the one that resulted from populism, comes
from "fear" of Globalization without
being correct pragmatism and correct efficiency, and i think that's also
lacking of flexibility, because we have to know
more about Globalization, i mean that you have to know how to transcend
your living conditions by being more educated and more skilled and more
efficient and more aware ! this is why i am here to bring my own
thoughts, and this is why i am speaking about how we have today to
get more efficient by working with others globally , not just locally
inside a country, and this is why i said that neo-nazism and white
supremacism lack flexibility too that is needed by efficiency(read below
my writing about neo-nazism and immigration to notice it), now what
about Globalization? read what's follow about Globalization and you will
understand more:

About globalization..

About populism..

I think that populism of USA that has also elected Donald Trump,
and other populism around the world, are like Class "Struggle"
of communism, because this populism is fearing insecurity
of globalization , insecurity that has been created because
this populism of USA have not been able to adapt correctly to
globalization because this populism has to be more skilled and
more educated to be more "competitive" so that to be "successful", also
here is the the solution to populism of USA:

First, USA has to adapt and improve quickly in education and health
care, read the following to understand more:

The United States ranks 27th in the world for its investments in
education and health care as measurements of its commitment to economic
growth, according to the first-ever scientific study ranking countries
for their levels of human capital.

The nation placed just behind Australia (ranked 26th) and just ahead of
Czech Republic (ranked 28th). In contrast, China's ranking of 44th in
2016 represents an increase from its 1990 ranking of 69th.

"The decline of human capital in the United States was one of the
biggest surprises in our study," said Dr. Christopher Murray, director
of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the
University of Washington. "Our findings show the association between
investments in education and health and improved human capital and GDP
-- which policymakers here in the US ignore at their own peril. As the
world economy grows increasingly dependent on digital technology, from
agriculture to manufacturing to the service industry, human capital
grows increasingly important for stimulating local and national economies."

The World Bank President, Dr. Jim Yong Kim, defines human capital as
"the sum total of a population's health, skills, knowledge, experience,
and habits." It is a concept that recognizes that not all labor is
equal, and the quality of workers can be improved by investing in them.

The US's ranking of 27th in 2016 represents a significant decrease from
its 1990 ranking of 6th. It comes from having 23 years of expected human
capital, measured as the number of years a person can be expected to
work in the years of peak productivity, taking into account life
expectancy, functional health, years of schooling, and learning.

Researchers found that nations with greater improvements in human
capital also tend to have faster growth in per capita GDP. Countries in
the highest quartile of improvements in human capital between 1990 and
2016 had a 1.1% higher median yearly GDP growth rate than countries in
the bottom quartile of human capital improvements. For example, between
2015 and 2016, a 1.1% increase in the human capital growth rate in China
equated to an additional $163 per capita; in Turkey, $268 per capita;
and in Brazil, $177 per capita.

Read more here:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180924190303.htm

Second, populism of USA has to be more aware about the advantages of
globalization, so read the following:

And about globalization..

1- Globalization has created new opportunities for firms to develop
business models and offerings that have a higher intensity of R&D,
innovation and capital. Many of the goods and services that have entered
the market over the past decades have exactly those features, and
without globalization, firms would have been forced to continue with
business models that work with a smaller volume of sales. Firms have
been able to specialize more than before and, as a consequence, human
capital and the share of skilled jobs in the economy have grown
remarkably. Today, advanced economies have a greater share of
better-paid and better-skilled jobs than ever before.

2- Globalization has increased real wages for people in Western
economies by making products cheaper or reducing the pace of price
increases. If the typical goods that every household purchases had
followed domestic rather than international price developments,
consumers would have been poorer and saddled with products of lower quality.

3- Globalization has made significant contributions to productivity
growth and, as a consequence, further raised living standards.
Globalization has been particularly important for enabling new
technology to spread fast across markets. In the long term, it is the
speed of technological improvement that sets the pace for how richer
societies get.how societies get richer

However, trade and investment are not growing fast anymore, and there is
much suggesting that the decline in trade and investment growth is one
explanation to the failing dynamism of Western economies. While some
appreciate the decline in the growth of globalization, those who care
about the prosperity of a society should deplore it and make efforts for
the world economy to return to high levels of trade growth.

Read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/

Read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/


And read my following thoughts about morality and democracy and God:

More about God..

You have to be able to do political philosophy to understand God of the
monotheistic religions, God is capable of making it "perfect", and
making it perfect is for example being absolute happiness that is the
goal of morality that is perfection at best, so why God has not created
us of this perfection ? then why are we suffering ? this suffering of
our body and spirit is also "imperfections" that are in contradiction
with the essence of God. So i think we have not to believe in God.


So now are we lost without God ?

I am more mature and i believe that we have to be more optimistic,
because i was looking at morality and i have noticed that it is getting
much more efficient, because we are getting more aware and more
efficient today , thus we have not to make the mistake and get into
hating and hating our world ! because it is easy to hate this or that !
this is why we have to be more mature and be more responsability. and
notice that we are getting much more efficient today with technology and
science ! and we are getting more organized and more sophisticated ! so
you have to be able to love this beautifulness of this much more
efficiency of today ! giving it a high priority and a big importance is
i think the key to success ! so today we have to be more smart and
understand that we also have to work together globally and we have to be
more organized and more order globally ! thus since as i said that
morality is perfection at best , this shows that it is also about
efficiency ! so we have to be more efficient thinking and more efficient
actions ! and you have to understand more correctly what is the at best
of perfection at best that is morality, so read what's follow to be able
to understand:

And here is again my previous writing about democracy and morality:

I will now do more political philosophy about democracy and about morality..

As you have noticed i have talked about the essence of morality,
and i have proved that morality is Perfection at best by saying the
following:

===

I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following:

"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

I have to be more precise:

When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at
best the good

What is it that we call "good" in morality ?

A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and
being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so
that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out
of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize
at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we
have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness ,
and this is called perfection at best since from the following
definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call:
FLAWLESSNESS

Also i said above that:

"But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"

Now can we ask the following question:

How can we measure decent morality ?

We can first ask the following question:

How do we measure the truth ?

The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by
rationalism and by empiricism !

So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth
is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references
of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to
"prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example:
when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the
reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government
enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize
wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" !
so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute
happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest"
priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be
measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in
itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again
you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of
measure is choosen among many and is prioritized !

I will explain more by giving an example:

To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that
is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent
morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to
things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest
importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can
say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even
if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally
order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process
is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest
importance for us.

Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is
Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of
"civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder.

====



I think that you understand more the essence of morality, but
there is still something to say, i said that morality is
perfection at best, so now we have to ask the following question:
how to avoid "extremism" of perfection that can be dangerous ? i mean
that perfection at best can for example give too much
importance to "efficiency" and this can become dangerous ! so
is my definition of morality that is perfection at best correct
or not ? i think that there is no logical contradiction in
my definition and it is correct because you have to understand
the essence of democracy that is related to morality to understand
better ! because we have to look at our "essence" to understand better
morality ! because since a great part of the people of the society are
more human and they do understand that getting into savagery is "bad" !
so this great part of people of the society does constrain democracy !
since for example the legislative branch or power of the government has
to know how to be "moderation" to avoid extremism that hurt the system
or that causes violence or/and desorder and/or that causes civil war
inside the system ! so this makes us understand that morality that is
perfection at best is constrained by democracy so that the "at best"
becomes more human or more moderation that is in accordance of our today
kind of civilization that, as you have noticed, is balancing perfection
with our kind of civilization so that to avoid savagery or desorder. So
i hope you have understood my explanation and definition of what is the
essence of morality, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about
morality.

And here is what i wrote about democracy:

I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the
way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers,
What is the separation of powers?

The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of
government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the
executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or
courts, interprets the law.

But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not
"sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative
branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful !
look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both
conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to
understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has
to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war
inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative
branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war
inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" !

About Israel..

You have to do more political philosophy to understand more..

I think our world by becoming more technology and more science and
by becoming internet is rendering Israel more aware of
the "priorities", and i think that Israel is not
just thinking "Israel" alone, but it is thinking also the world, because
we are today more interconnected economies and a more interconnected
world, so we have to be efficient, so i think we have to forget about
old Israel and we have to be more "positive" by looking at today Israel,
and as you know there is "inferiority" of thinking , like being a
"purist" like being racial purism is inferiority today , so Israel is
understanding that it has to "diversify" because morality is also
diversity that brings the "right" perfection, and the right perfection
is constrained by today necessities, and i have tried in my political
philosophy to learn more neo-nazism the right way of thinking more
correctly , so they have to listen because there way of thinking
by wanting to have racial purity is an archaism
that is not in accordance with morality that is perfection at best,
and you can easily notice it by being in contact with the realities
of today and the necessities of immigration, so o we have to be more
realism, and we have to be correct realism and correct pragmatism with
racism , because we can not simply think of others this or that,
we have to give a chance to realism and to pragmatism to be able
to be in accordance with morality and this takes experience and
awareness and more professionalism.


And what is the essence of human smartness ?

This is a good subject of political philosophy..

So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..

Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..

But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.

But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?

It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the
problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes
us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem
or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more
"hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and
this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and
less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us
understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent
on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our
world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs
south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to
invent new things.

I have proved that morality is perfection at best.

But this perfection at best must know the following:

What is the essence of a human society ?

We can not call a human society a society if it is not "order" , order
is fondamental to a society, but there is not only order but also the
sens of "sacrifice", and there is hard sacrifice and soft sacrifice,
if we want today to be a "civilization", we have not to generalize
"hard" sacrifice, like being a warrior type of people, like soldiers of
an army, to the general population and tell them to be this hard
sacrifice, because this violence of warriors like the military and the
police has to be kept in control inside the sphere of the military and
the police so that to not cause violence in the rest of the society,
this is the same for the hard sacrifice of other part of the population
like scientists and engineers, because they are doing a "hard" work and
we can call it "hard" sacrifice, so to be able to call a civilization by
the name of a civilization , we have not to generalize this "hard"
sacrifice to the rest of the population and tell all the population to
be hard sacrifice, because it is too much violence, and the rest of the
population that is not hard sacrifice has to understand that there is
also what we call "soft" sacrifice that is much less violence such as
being tolerance and being compassion and helping the others without
being a hard sacrifice.

Now i think there is something really important about the essence of
humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality
is perfection at best, and the goal to attain is the goal of life that
is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that
is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute
happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the
essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has
needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more
quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you
can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a
greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on
them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey
become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity"
has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and
immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below
about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality"
has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity
so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is
needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be
perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also
having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below
to notice it).

More political philosophy now..

I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy:

As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of
nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to
ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have
behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in
that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i
think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is
perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we
have to be pessimistic of our morality ? i don't think so, because there
is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent
morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence
inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge
that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation
of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune
perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism
of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this
is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus
morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing
at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures
you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how
to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct"
perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european
countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants
are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is
interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab
immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system
etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful,
this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not
correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't
agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.