Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
No competition from Lisp
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Joe Seigh
Oct 1, 2007, 8:00:49 PM10/1/07
to
http://jsnell.iki.fi/blog/archive/2007-10-01-faster-sbcl-hash-tables.html
Think it'd work with a concurrent collector? :)
--
Joe Seigh
When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.
Chris Thomasson
Oct 7, 2007, 7:17:17 PM10/7/07
to
"Joe Seigh" <jsei...@xemaps.com> wrote in message
news:RSfMi.4840$Jk2.2819@trndny03...
> http://jsnell.iki.fi/blog/archive/2007-10-01-faster-sbcl-hash-tables.html
>
>
> Think it'd work with a concurrent collector? :)
news:RSfMi.4840$Jk2.2819@trndny03...
> http://jsnell.iki.fi/blog/archive/2007-10-01-faster-sbcl-hash-tables.html
>
>
> Think it'd work with a concurrent collector? :)
GC seems like a pain in the neck to deal with! I know it can run with a
concurrent "proxy" collector. As for concurrent "traditional" GC that
attempts to "track everything in sight", well, the performance might get
worse. GC can sometimes stab the scalability of your applications right in
the back... Humm...
Joe Seigh
Oct 7, 2007, 9:35:09 PM10/7/07
to
In this case, they depend on "stop the world" GC to get exclusive
access.
0 new messages